Abstract
The present study investigates the collocation-induced semiosis of the linguistic sign AFRICA as being used in the academic section of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (known as COCA) (Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): one billion words, 1990-present. Available online at https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/). Drawing on a hybrid theoretical framework, the study utilizes Charles Peirce’s (1931–58) semiotic model of the sign and Roman Jakobson’s theory of “markedness” (Jakobson, Roman. 1972. Verbal communication. Scientific American (Special Issue, September 1). 73–80) as well as Stuart Hall’s treatment of “code” (Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/decoding. In Stuart Hall, Doothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, & Paul Willis (eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–79, 117–127. New York: Routledge) and John Swales’ notion of “discourse community” (Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). The study empirically tests the hypothesis that, in a given discourse domain, the relevant interpretant can decode a linguistic sign (representamen) in the co-text of its marked collocates in a way that is collocationally used via the two modes of iconic and indexical signification. The concordance-based analysis conducted in the present study offers two findings, theoretical and practical. First, the study proposes the theoretical concept of collocational semiosis as one way of methodologically integrating the study of collocation into a structural-linguistic analytic framework that richly intersects with the genre-based notion of “discourse community.” Second, in the academic discourse community of the COCA, to the expert interpretant, the representamen AFRICA has been decoded due to its marked collocates which have been technically used in two modes of signification, viz. iconic and indexical.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of Semiotica for their meticulous and incisive comments and remarks on an early draft of the current paper; further, I do appreciate the great efforts exerted by the editorial team of Semiotica.
References
Atkins, G. Douglas. 1983. Reading deconstruction, deconstruction reading. Kentucky: Kentucky University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Language and science. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19(2). 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719059919010X.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1985. The fashion system (M. Ward & R. Howard, Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape. (Original work published 1967).Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. (2009). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans., Revised ed.). London: Vintage Classics. (Original work published 1957).Search in Google Scholar
Bartsch, Sabine. 2004. Structural and functional properties of collocations in English: A corpus study of lexical and pragmatic constraints on lexical co-occurrence. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Bellou, Thea. 2013. Derrida’s deconstruction of the subject: Writing, self and other. New York: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0639-8Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.23Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Jean-Claude Passeron, and Monique de Saint Martin. 1994. Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professional power (R. Teese, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1965).Search in Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. 1957. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review 64(2). 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805.Search in Google Scholar
Burks, Arthur W. 1949. Icon, index, and symbol. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9. 673–689. https://doi.org/10.2307/2103298.Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar
Cobley, Paul. (Ed.) (2001). The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan D. 1976. Saussure. London: Fontana.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Available online at https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967. De la grammatologie. Paris: Les éditions de minute.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1997. Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans., Corrected ed.). Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967).book-chapter.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2007. Psyche: Inventions of the other, vol. I (Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1987).Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2008. Psyche: Inventions of the other, vol. II (Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1987).Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Rita Simpson-Vlach, & Maynard Carson. 2008. Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42(3). 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x.Search in Google Scholar
Figueras, Carolina. 2017. Teaching multiword sequences in the native language. In Sergi Torner, & Elisenda Bernal (eds.), Collocations and other lexical combinations in Spanish: Theoretical, lexicographical and applied perspectives, 287–302. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in linguistics (1934-1951). London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1968. Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59 (edited by F. R. Palmer). London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2000. Truth and power. In Paul Rabinow (ed.), Essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, vol. 3, 111–133. New York: The New Press.10.1515/9781474470476-010Search in Google Scholar
Gledhill, C. (1996). Collocation and the rhetoric of scientific ideas. Corpus Linguistics as a methodology for genre analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228424660_Collocation_and_the_Rhetoric_of_Scientific_Ideas_Corpus_linguistics_as_a_Methodology_for_Genre_Analysis (accessed January 25, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Gledhill, Cristopher. 2000. Collocations in science writing. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1996. The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In John J. Gumperz (Ed.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/decoding. In Stuart Hall, Doothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, & Paul Willis (eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–79, 117–127. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203381182-18Search in Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. The work of representation. In Stuart Hall (ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, 13–74). London: Sage.10.4324/9780429355363-15Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1966. Lexis as a linguistic level. In Charles Bazell, John Catford, Michael Halliday, & Robert Robins (Eds.), In Memory of J. R. Firth, 148–162. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence. 1977. Structuralism & semiotics. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.10.4324/9780203443934Search in Google Scholar
Herzberg, Bruce. 1986. The politics of discourse communities. Paper presented at the CCC Convention, New Orleans, La, March, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 1991. Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hong, Ang L., Tim K. Hua, & He Mengyu. 2017. A corpus-based collocational analysis of noun premodification types in academic writing. The Journal of Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 23(1). 115–131. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2017-2301-09.Search in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2002. Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524773Search in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, & Gill Francis 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2009. Corpus informed discourse analysis: The case of academic engagement. In Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari, & Susan Hunston (Eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse, 110–128. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2012. Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1968. Language in relation to other communication systems. In R. Jakobson (ed.), Jakobson’s selected writings, vol. 2, word and language (1971), 697–708. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.697Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1972. Verbal communication. Scientific American (Special Issue, September 1). 73–80.10.1515/9783110855463.81Search in Google Scholar
Jones, A. (1971). Computers and poetry. Poetry Australia 39. 58–63.Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, Winthrop D. 2000. First impressions. In Les Back, & John Solomos (Eds.), Theories of race and racism: A reader, 33–50. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme D. 1990. Collocations: Where grammar and vocabulary teaching meet. In Sarinee Anivan (ed.), Language teaching methodology for the nineties (= RELC Anthony Series), 215–229. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.Search in Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Goran. 1987. Aspects of English collocations. In Willem Meijs (Ed.), Corpus linguistics and beyond. Proceedings of the seventh international conference of English language research and computerized corpora, 133–140. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004483989_013Search in Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Écrits: The first complete edition in English (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Land, Stephen K. 1974. From signs to propositions: The concept of form in eighteenth-century semantic theory. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1995. Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1971. The elementary structures of kinship (J. H. Bell & J. R. von Sturmer, Trans., Rev. ed.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1967).Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813313Search in Google Scholar
Lidov, David. 1999. Elements of semiotics. London: MacMillan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690/1999. An essay concerning human understanding. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020Search in Google Scholar
Louw, Bill. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis, & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 157–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.64.11louSearch in Google Scholar
Lüdemann, Susanne. 2014. Politics of deconstruction: A new introduction to Jacques Derrida (E. Butler, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 2011).10.1515/9780804793025Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810213Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Master, Peter. 1991. Active verbs with inanimate subjects in scientific prose. English for Specific Purposes 10. 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(91)90013-M.Search in Google Scholar
Menon, Sujatha, & Jayakaran Mukundan. 2012. Collocations of high frequency noun keywords in prescribed science textbooks. International Education Studies 5(6). 149–160. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p149.Search in Google Scholar
Merrell, Floyd. 1997. Peirce, signs, and meaning. Toronto: Toronto University Press.10.3138/9781442678330Search in Google Scholar
Merrell, Floyd. 2001. Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 28–39). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund. 1998. Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2005. Collocations in a learner corpus. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.14Search in Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher. 2004. Deconstruction: Theory and practice, 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar
Ordem, Eser, & Erdogan Bada. 2016. Lexical collocations (verb + noun) across written academic genres in English. European Journal of Education Studies 1(3). 20–37. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51567.Search in Google Scholar
Peacock, Matthew. 2012. High-frequency collocations of nouns in research articles across eight disciplines. Iberica 23: 29–46.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. Collected papers, vol. 8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Porter, James E. 1988. The problem of defining discourse communities. Paper presented at the CCC Convention, St. Louis, March, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Salama, Amir H. Y. (2011). Ideological collocation and the recontextualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam post-9/11: A synergy of corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 22(3). 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395445.Search in Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, eds.). Lausanne & Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 2011. Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1916).Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. 1994. Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 1966. Beginning the study of lexis. In Charles Bazell, J. Catford, M. Halliday, & R. Robins (Eds.), In Memory of J. R. Firth (p. 410-430). London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 2003. Reading concordances. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 2004a. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair,John M. (ed.) (2004b). How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.12Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 2007. Preface. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(2). 155–157.10.1075/ijcl.12.2.03sinSearch in Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1995. Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language 1(2). 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu.Search in Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 2004. Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827Search in Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. 1997. Re-reading Saussure: The dynamics of signs in social life. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Threadgold, Terry. 1986. Semiotics-ideology-language. In Terry Threadgold, Elizabeth A Grosz, Gunther Kress, & Michael A. K. Halliday (Eds.), Semiotics-ideology-language, 15–60. Sydney: Pathfinder Press.10.2307/1773065Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Wolfgang, & Nicky Hayes. 2005. Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-07263-4Search in Google Scholar
Wongkhan, Prueksa, & Atikhom Thienthong. 2020. EFL Learners’ acquisition of academic collocation and synonymy: Does their academic experience matter?. RELC Journal, advance online publication: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219895046.Search in Google Scholar
Will, Leo. 2018. Authenticity in English language teaching: An analysis of academic discourse. Germany: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Geoffrey. 2002. In search of representativity in specialised corpora: Categorisation through collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(1): 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.1.03wil.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
