Skip to main content
Log in

Interagency collaboration and the management of counter-insurgency campaigns against Boko Haram in Nigeria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines interagency collaboration (IAC) among key security agencies and how this has impacted the counter-insurgency campaign against Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria. Interagency collaboration is often perceived as a panacea for dealing with many complex social problems. But there still exists fogginess about the nature, triggers, and what determines results of interagency collaboration. This study focuses on these issues. We employed the complexity theory to argue that organizations are like complex adaptive systems (CAS) that can naturally be drawn to interdependence and connectivity in reaction to a shared problem. Weiss theory helps to explain the determinants as depending on available resources and the capacity of collaborating institutions. We conclude that despite the tendency towards conflict among the Nigerian security agencies, the initial failure of traditional approach of police and military brutality in quelling the insurrection led to a perception of a shared problem by the government and law enforcement agencies. However, resource and weak institutional capacity to mount collaboration largely explained why the counter-insurgency collaboration has not yielded the expected results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source Lughadha (2016, p. 8)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Tables 1, 2, and 3 showcase these agencies in the order of national, regional, and international levels, and the key roles they played in the counter-insurgency.

  2. KII with a Nigerian Customs official attached to the north east command, 16 August 2019.

  3. Key informant in the Office of the National Security Adviser, 5/4/2019.

  4. Key informant in the Office of the National Security Adviser, 5/4/2019.

  5. Key informant in the Office of the National Security Adviser, 5/4/2019.

References

  • Abdullahi, D.I. 2011. Nigerian customs service: Performance scorecard: August 2009–August 2011. https://web2.customs.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Scorecard_03.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2019.

  • Adeniyi, O. 2012. Terrorism and inter-Agency coordination in Nigeria. Sahara Reportershttps://saharareporters.com/2012/11/29/terrorism-and-inter-agency-coordination-nigeria-olusegun-adeniyi. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

  • Adeolu, Y. 2018. General Buratai warns soldiers to steer clear of politics. TodayNG. www.today.ng/news/nigeria/2019-general-buratai-warns-soldiers-steer-clear-politics114162. Accessed 14 Jun 2019.

  • Agranoff, R. 2006. Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review 66 (10): 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alemika, E.E.O. 2018. The constraints of rights-based policing in Africa. In Policing reform in Africa: Moving towards a rights-based approach in a climate of terrorism, insurgency and serious violent crime, ed. Alemika, E.E.O., Ruteere, M. and Howell, S., 14–43. Cape Town, ZA: African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF).

  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. 1994. Can network theory illuminate interagency collaboration? Paper prepared for the workshop on network analysis and innovations in public programs, Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 1994, LaFollette Institute of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/409f/53430f98dae83b526a92b03d515fea83432d.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.

  • Chan, S. 2001. Complex adaptive systems. Research Seminar in Engineering Systems, ESD.83.

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, GIZ. 2018. Supporting police reform processes in Nigeria.https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/41986.html. Accessed 22 May 2019.

  • Eme, O.I. 2018. Inter security agency rivalry as an impediment to national counter terrorism strategy (NACTEST). African Heritage Research working paper series 2018-003

  • Eppel, E.A. 2009. The contribution of complexity theory to understanding and explaining policy processes: A study of tertiary education policy processes in New Zealand. A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington.

  • Falode, J.A. 2016. The nature of Nigeria’s Boko Haram war, 2010–2015: A strategic analysis. Journal of Terrorism Research Initiative. 10 (1): https://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/488/html. Accessed 7 Jul 2019.

  • Felter, C., T. Johnson, and A.S. Mohammed. 2018. Nigeria’s battle with Boko Haram. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/nigerias-battle-boko-haram. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.

  • Foster-Fishman, P., D.A. Salem, N.A. Allen, and K. Fahrbach. 2001. Facilitating inter-organizational collaboration: The contributions of inter-organizational alliances. American Journal of Community Psychology 29 (6): 875–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A., and K. Biekart. 2017. Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable development goals: The importance of interlocutors. Public Administration and Development. 37: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, R.M. 2014. A canon for cooperation: A review of the interagency cooperation literature. Journal of Public Administration and Governance 4 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazley, B. 2017. The current state of inter-organizational collaboration: Lessons for human service research and management. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 41 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1095582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobman, G.M. 2005. Complexity theory: A new way to look at organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly 29 (3): 350–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, J., F. Buick, and J. O’Flynn. 2011. Experiments with joined-up, horizontal and whole-of-government in Anglophone countries. In 74–99. Massey. International handbook on civil service systems, ed. A. Massey, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, H. 2018. Can peace-builders end the war with Boko Haram? New Internationalist. https://newint.org/features/2018/09/01/boko-haram-peace-nigeria. Accessed 8 Apr 2019

  • Ibrahim, J. and S. Bala. 2018. Special report: Civilian-led governance and security in Nigeria after Boko Haram. Washington: United States Institute of Peace.https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/201812/sr_437_civilian_led_governance_and_security_in_nigeria_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019

  • Institute for Economics and Peace. 2016. Global Terrorism Index 2016: Measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism. New York: Institute for economics and Peace. http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Global-Terrorism-Index-2016.2.pdf.

  • Institute for Economics and Peace. 2017. Global Terrorism Index 2017: Measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism. New York: Institute for Economics and Peace. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-terrorism-index-2017.

  • Institute for Economics and Peace. 2018. Global Terrorism Index 2018: Measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism. New York: Institute for Economics and Peace. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-terrorism-index-2018.

  • Institute for Economics and Peace. 2019. Global Terrorism Index 2019: Measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism. New York: Institute for economics and Peace. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/GTI-2019web.pdf.

  • Jones, H. 2011. Taking responsibility for complexity: How implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems. Overseas Development Institute Working paper 330. London: ODI

  • Jurasek, J.W. 2012. Inter-agency cooperation: The new security paradigm in the 21st century. Manuscript submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Strategic Studies Degree, United States Army War College

  • Kaiser, F.M. 2011. Interagency collaborative arrangements and activities: Types, rationales, considerations. Congressional Research Service, R41803. https://www.crs.gov. Accessed 5 Apr 2019.

  • Kayode, I. 2014. Civilian JTF beheads 41 Boko Haram. Punch. Accessed 31 Oct 2014.

  • Kożuch, B., and S.K. Jurek. 2016a. Inter-organisational coordination for sustainable local governance: Public safety management in Poland. Sustainability 8 (123): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kożuch, B., and S.K. Jurek. 2016b. Factors of effective inter-organizational collaboration: A framework for public management. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 47: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, A.J.N. 2013. Avoiding Sisyphus: Cansofcom and interagency collaboration in the Canadian national security sector. JCSP 39 Master of Defence Studies. Canadian Forces College. https://www.cfc.forces.gc.ca/259/290/299/286/luft.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2019.

  • Lughadha, C.N. 2016. Challenges of interagency. Working Paper read at national workshop for prevention partnership and family support. https://www.cypsc.ie. Accessed 3 May 2019.

  • Mahmoud, O. 2018. Local, global, or in between? Boko Haram’s messaging, strategy, membership, and support networks. In Boko Haram beyond the headlines: Analysis of Africa’s enduring insurgency, ed. Jacob Zenn, 87–114. Combating terrorism Center: West Point.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitleton-Kelly, E. 2003. Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organisations: The application of complexity theory to organisations: Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. https://web.archive.org/web/20091229060410/http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk:80/complexity/Papers/Ch2final.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2019.

  • Mwangi, O.G. 2017. Neo-elitism and counterterrorism operations in Kenya. Africa Security Review 26: 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigerian Immigration Service. 2015. Safe landing: An overview of the Nigerian immigration Act. Advocaat, law and practice. https://www.advocaatlaw.com/resources/publications/safe-landing-an-overview-of-the-nigerian-immigrationact-2015. Accessed 29 Apr 2019.

  • Odoma, S. 2014. Superiority struggles and inter-agency feud in Nigeria. Global Journal of Human-Social Science 14 (5): 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbeide, U. 2011. Inter-agency cooperation in combating terrorism in Nigeria: Enhancing existing instruments and frameworks in the security services. African Research Review 56 (23): 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okeoghene, E.P. 2017. International migration and the study of socio-economic development in Nigeria: The role of Nigerian immigration service. A dissertation submitted to the Department of Political Science and International Relations, School of Post Graduate Studies, College of Leadership Development Studies, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun state, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of a master’s degree in international relations.https://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/9738/1/EBRI%20PROMISE%20OKEOGHENE.pdf. Accessed Jun 7 2019.

  • Olsen, J. 2007. The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization. Paper prepared for Annual Review of Political Science, 11, ed. Margaret Levi. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. https://annualreviews.org.

  • Olugbuo, B.C. and O.S. Ojewale. 2018. Multiple counterinsurgency groups in north-eastern Nigeria. In Policing reform in Africa: Moving towards a rights-based approach in a climate of terrorism, insurgency and serious violent crime, eds. Alemika, E.E.O., M. Ruteere, and S. Howell. Cape Town, ZA: African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF)

  • Omenma, J.T., and C.M. Hendricks. 2018. Counterterrorism in Africa: An analysis of the civilian joint task force and military partnership in Nigeria. Security Journal 31 (3): 764–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuoha, F. 2013. Porous borders and Boko Haram’s arms smuggling operations in Nigeria: Report. Aljazeera Centre for Studies. https://studies.aljazeera.net/mritems/Documents/2013/9/8/20139810737330580Porous%20Borders_bokoharam.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2019.

  • Parradang, D.S. 2015. Building on legacies: Nigerian Immigration Service. University of Jos, Plateau state retrieved from https://irepos.unijos.edu.ng/jspui/bitstream/123456789/738/1/BUILDING%20ON%20LEGACIES.pdf.

  • Park, J. 2017. An introduction to complexity theory: What it is, what it replaces, and why it’s important. https://medium.com/@junp01/an-introduction-to-complexity-theory3c20695725f8.

  • Perouse de Montclos, M. 2014. Nigeria’s interminable insurgency. Addressing the Boko Haram crisis Research Paper Africa Programme. Chatham House: The Royal Institute of African Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri., 2004. Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (1): 103–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premium Times. 2014. 207 Boko Haram militants killed in Maiduguri attacks, says Civilian JTF. https://www.saharareporters.com/2014/03/14/207-boko-haram-militants-killed-in-maiduguri-attacks-say-civilian-jtf-premiumtimes.

  • Scherer, R., and K. Zumbush. 2011. Limits for successful cross-border governance of environmental (and spatial) development: The Lake Constance Region. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 14: 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shauib, Y.A. 2017. General Monguno: Tackling inter-agency rivalry. https://opinion.premiumtimesng.com/2017/06/05/general-monguno-tackling-inter-agency-rivalry-by-yushau-a-shuaib/. Accessed Jul 4 2019.

  • Stacey, R.D. 2003. Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity, 4th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • (United States) Government Accountability Office, GAO. 2003. Results-oriented government: Practices that can help enhance and sustain collaboration among federal agencies, GAO-06-15. Washington, DC: GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmington, P., H. Daniels, A. Edwards, S. Brown, J. Leadbetter, D. Martin, and D. Middleton. 2004. Interagency collaboration: A review of the literature. United Kingdom: The Learning in and for Interagency Working Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J.A. 1987. Pathways to cooperation among public agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7 (1): 94–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. 2015. The changing face of immigration compliance in Nigeria: Improved process and enhanced scrutiny. Deloitte: Inside Tax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenn, J. 2014. Boko Haram's emerging caliphate in Nigeria: Will Maiduguri fall? Terrorism Monitor 12 (18): 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., C. Lindberg, and P. Plsek. 2001. A Complexity science primer. Edgeware: Insights from complexity science for health care leaders. Irving, Tex.: VHA Inc. 3–20.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Okechukwu M. Ikeanyibe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikeanyibe, O.M., Olise, C.N., Abdulrouf, I. et al. Interagency collaboration and the management of counter-insurgency campaigns against Boko Haram in Nigeria. Secur J 33, 455–475 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-020-00237-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-020-00237-3

Keywords

Navigation