Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:13:38.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ficino on Force, Magic, and Prayers: Neoplatonic and Hermetic Influences in Ficino’s Three Books on Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Denis J.-J. Robichaud
Denis J.-J. Robichaud*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes new evidence from the marginalia to Ficino’s Plotinus manuscripts and offers a novel reading of Ficino’s “De Vita” 3. It settles scholarly disagreements concerning Paul O. Kristeller’s manuscript research and Frances Yates’s Hermetic thesis about “De Vita” 3, and reconsiders accepted conclusions regarding the centrality of Hermetic magic in Ficino’s philosophy. It demonstrates the origins and sources for “De Vita” 3 in Ficino’s reading of Plotinus’s explanations of prayer, and also reveals Iamblichus’s overlooked influence on Ficino: on the performative nature of philosophy in “De Vita” 3, and even on Ficino’s acknowledgment of the pseudonymity of the Hermetica.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , Spring 2017 , pp. 44 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

MS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 30.29. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 30.29.Google Scholar
MSS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 82.10–11. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 82.10–11.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 87.03. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 87.03.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 89, sup.38. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 89, sup. 38.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, II.iii.214. Cited as MS Florence, BNCF II.iii.214.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. Conventi soppr. E.1.2562. Cited as MS Florence, BNCF, Conventi soppr. E.1.2562.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Riccardiana, 24. Cited as MS Florence, RICC, 24.Google Scholar
MS Paris, Bibliothéque nationale de France, Gr. 1816. Cited as MS Paris, BnF, Gr. 1816.Google Scholar
MS Rome, Biblioteca Vallicelliana, F 20. Cited as MS Rome, VALL, F 20.Google Scholar
Albertini, Tamara. Marsilio Ficino: Das Problem der Vermittlung von Denken und Welt in einer Metaphysik der Einfachheit. Munich: W. Fink Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
Al-Kindi, . De radiis. Ed. D’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse and Hudry, Françoise. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 61 (1974): 139–260.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino and Plato’s Pythagorean Eye.” Modern Language Notes 97 (1982): 171–82.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino, Hermes Trismegistus and the Corpus Hermeticum .” In New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought: Essays in the History of Science, Education and Philosophy. In Memory of Charles B. Schmitt. ed. Henry, John and Hutton, Sarah, 38–47. London: Duckworth, 1990.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. Nuptial Arithmetic: Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on the Fatal Number in Book VIII of Plato’s Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino: Daemonic Mathematics and the Hypotenuse of the Spirit.” In Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines in Renaissance Europe. ed. Grafton, Anthony and Siraisi, Nancy, 121–37. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “To Gaze upon the Face of God Again: Philosophic Statuary, Pygmalion and Marsilio Ficino.” Rinascimento, 2nd series, 48 (2008): 123–36.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Pythagoras in the Early Renaissance.” In A History of Pythagoreanism. ed. Huffman, Carl, 435–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Arthur. “Was Plotinus a Magician?” Phronesis 1.1 (1955): 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, A. Immanuel, ed. Platonis dialogi graece et latine. 5 parts in 10 vols. Berlin: Reimer, 1816–18.Google Scholar
Bidez, Joseph. Vie de Porphyre, le philosophe néo-platonicien: Avec les fragments des traités Περὶ ἀγαλμάτων et De regressu animae. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964.Google Scholar
Bidez, Joseph, Cumont, Franz, Delatte, Armand, et al., eds. Catalogue des manuscrits alchimiques grecs. 6 vols. Brussels: M. Lamertin, 1928.Google Scholar
Parme, Blaise de. Questiones super Perspectiva Communi. Ed. Vescovini, Graziella Federici and Biard, Joël. Paris: Vrin, 2009.Google Scholar
Blum, Paul R. “Qualitates occultae: Zur philosophischen Vorgeschichte eines Schlüsselbegriffs zwichen Okkultismus und Wissenschaft.” In Die okkulten Wissenschaften in der Renaissance. ed. August Buck, 45–64. Wiesbaden: In Kommission bei Otto Harrassowitz, 1992.Google Scholar
Boas, George, trans. The Hieroglyphics of Horapollo. New York: Pantheon Books, 1950.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc. “Plotin et la Magie.” In Prophyre, La Vie de Plotin. ed. Brisson, Luc, Cherlonneix, Jean-Louis, Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile, et al., 2:465–75. Paris: Vrin, 1992.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Al-Kindi in the Renaissance.” In Sapientiam amemus: Humanismus und Aristotelismus in der Renaissance. Festschrift für Eckhard Kessler zum 60. Geburtstag. ed. Blum, Paul, Blackwell, Constance, and Lohr, Charles, 13–30. Munich: Fink, 1999.Google Scholar
Campanelli, Maurizio, ed. Mercurii Trismegisti: Pimander sive de potestate et sapientia dei. Trans. Ficino, Marsilio. Turin: Aragno, 2011.Google Scholar
Carmody, Francis. The Astronomical Works of Thabit B. Qurra. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. “Pythagoras in the Renaissance: The Case of Marsilio Ficino.” Renaissance Quarterly 52.3 (1999): 667–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. Piety and Pythagoras in Renaissance Florence: The Symbolum Nesianum. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. “Late Antiquity and Florentine Platonism: The ‘Post-Plotinian’ Ficino.” Marsilio Ficino: His Theology (2002), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. The Lost Italian Renaissance: Humanists, Historians, and Latin’s Legacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Clark, John. “The Manuscript Tradition of Marsilio Ficino’s De vita libri tres .” Manuscripta 27 (1983): 158–64.Google Scholar
Clark, John. “Roger Bacon and the Composition of Marsilio Ficino’s De vita longa (De vita, Book II).” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 49 (1986): 230–33.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Scholastic Philosophy and Renaissance Magic in the De vita of Marsilio Ficino.” Renaissance Quarterly 37.4 (1984): 523–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Renaissance Magic and Neoplatonic Philosophy: ‘Ennead’ 4.3–5 in Ficino’s ‘De vita coelitus comparanda.’” In Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone (1986), 2:351–69.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Iamblichus, Synesius and the Chaldaean Oracles in Marsilio Ficino’s De Vita Libri Tres: Hermetic Magic or Neoplatonic Magic?” In Supplementum Festivum: Studies in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller. ed. Hankins, James, Monfasani, John, and Purnell, Frederick Jr., 441–55. Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1987.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Hermes Trismegistus, Proclus, and the Question of a Philosophy of Magic in the Renaissance.” In Hermeticism and the Renaissance: Intellectual History and the Occult in Early Modern Europe. ed. Ingrid Merkel and Allen Debus, 79–110. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1988.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Natural Magic, Hermeticism, and Occultism in Early Modern Science.” In Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. ed. Lindberg, David and Westman, Robert, 261–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian, trans. Hermetica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Hermes Theologus: The Sienese Mercury and Ficino’s Hermetic Demons.” In Humanity and Divinity in Renaissance and Reformation: Essays in Honor of Charles Trinkaus. ed. O’Malley, John, Izbicki, Thomas, and Christianson, Gerald, 149–82. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar
Corpus hermeticum. Ed. and trans. Nock, Arthur D. and Festugière, André-Jean. 4 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1945–54.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London, 1678.Google Scholar
Delatte, Armand. Essai sur la politique pythagoricienne. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1999.Google Scholar
Delcorno Branca, Daniela. “Un discepolo del Poliziano: Michele Acciari.” Lettere Italiane 38 (1976): 64–81.Google Scholar
Dodds, Eric. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eusebius. De evangelica praeparatione. Trans. George of Trebizond. Treviso, 1480.Google Scholar
Eusebius, . Praeparatio evangelica. Ed. Karl Mras. Vols. 43.1 and 43.2 of Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrunderte. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1954–56.Google Scholar
Festugière, André-Jean. La Révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste. 4 vols. Paris: Lecoffre, 1950–54.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Opera Omnia. Basel, 1576.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Platonic Theology. Trans. Allen, Michael J. B.. Ed. Hankins, James with Bowen, William. 6 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001–06.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Three Books on Life. Ed. and trans. Kaske, Carol and Clark, John. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2002.Google Scholar
Forshaw, Peter J. “Marsilio Ficino and the Chemical Art.” In Laus Platonici Philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and His Influence. ed. Clucas, Stephen, Forshaw, Peter, and Rees, Valery, 249–71. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Förstel, Christian. “Marsilio Ficino e il Parigino Greco 1816 di Plotino.” In Marsilio Ficino, Fonti, Testi, Fortuna (2006), 65–88.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. “Le ‘elezioni’ e il problema dell’astrologia.” In Umanesimo e esoterismo. ed. Castelli, Enrico, 17–37. Padua: CEDAM, 1960.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. Lo zodiaco della vita. Rome: Laterza, 1976a.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. “Postille sull’ermetismo del Rinascimento.” Rinascimento, 2nd series, 27 (1976b): 245–49.Google Scholar
Gentile, Sebastiano. “Sulle prime traduzioni dal greco di Marsilio Ficino.” Rinascimento 40 (1990): 57–104.Google Scholar
Gentile, Sebastiano, and Gilly, Carlos. Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di ermete trismegisto. Florence: Centro Di, 1999.Google Scholar
Gentile, Sebastiano, Niccoli, Sandra, and Viti, Paolo. Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone. Mostra di manoscritti stampe e documenti 17 maggio–giugno 1984. Florence: Le Lettere, 1984.Google Scholar
Giglioni, Guido. “Theurgy and Philosophy in Marsilio Ficino’s Paraphrase of Iamblichus’s De Mysteriis Aegyptiorum.” Rinascimento, 2nd series, 52 (2012): 3–36.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450-1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Henry, Paul. Études Plotiniennes II: Les Manuscrits de Ennéades. Paris: L’Édition Universelle, Desclée de Brouwer et Cie, A. et J. Picard, 1948.Google Scholar
Holstenius, Lucas. Dissertatio De Vita et Scriptis Porphyrii Philosophi. In Johann Albert Fabricius, Biblioteca graeca, Libri iv, pars altera quae praeter scriptores de numerorum doctrina et alios nonnullos philosophos, recensentur rhetores ac sophistae, lexicorumque veterum graecorum notitia traditur. 207–81. Hamburg: C. Liebezeit, 1711.Google Scholar
Huffman, Carl. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . De mysteriis. Venice, 1497.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . De Vita Pythagorica Liber. Ed. Ludovicus Deubner, with Udalricus Klein. Leipzig: Teubner, 1975.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . De mysteriis. 1497. Facsimile reprint. Enghien-les-Bains: Les Éditions du Miraval, 2006.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . Réponse à Porphyre (De Mysteriis). Ed. and trans. Henri Dominique Saffrey and Alain-Philippe Segonds. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2013.Google Scholar
Kaske, Carol. “Ficino’s Shifting Attitude Towards Astrology in the ‘De vita coelitus comparanda,’ the Letter to Poliziano, and the ‘Apologia’ to the Cardinals.” In Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone (1986), 2:371–81.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Peter. “Poimandres: The Etymology of the Name and the Origins of the Hermetica.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 56 (1993): 1–24.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Peter. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Klibansky, Raymond, Panofsky, Erwin, and Saxl, Fritz. Saturn and Melancholy: Studies in the History of Natural Philosophy, Religion, and Art. New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. “Ficino in the Firing Line: A Renaissance Neoplatonist and His Critics.” In Marsilio Ficino: His Theology (2002), 377–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. Supplementum Ficinianum. 2 vols. Florence: Olschki, 1937–45.Google Scholar
Kroll, William, ed. De Oraculis Chaldaicis. Breslau: Koebner, 1894.Google Scholar
Lewy, Hans. Chaldaen Oracles and Theurgy. Ed. Tardieu, M.. 3rd ed. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2011.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lucentini, Paolo, and Vittoria Perrone Compagni. I testi e i codici di Ermete nel Medioevo. Florence: Polistampa, 2001.Google Scholar
Luck, Georg. “Theurgy and Forms of Worship in Neoplatonism.” In Religion, Science and Magic in Concert and Conflict. ed. Neusner, Jacob, Frerichs, Ernest, and Flesher, Paul V. McCracken, 185–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone. Ed. Garfagnini, Gian Carlo. 2 vols. Florence: Olschki, 1986.Google Scholar
Marsilio Ficino, Fonti, Testi, Fortuna. Ed. Gentile, Sebastiano and Toussaint, Stéphane. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2006.Google Scholar
Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy. Ed. Allen, Michael J. B., Rees, Valery, and Davies, Martin. Leiden: Brill, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matton, Sylvain. “Marsile Ficin et l’alchimie. Sa position, son influence.” In Alchimie et philosophie à la Renaissance: Actes du colloque international de Tours (4–7 décembre 1991). ed. Margolin, Jean-Claude and Matton, Sylvain, 123–92. Paris: Vrin, 1993.Google Scholar
Monfasani, John. “Marsilio Ficino and Eusebius of Caesarea’s Praeparatio Evangelica .” Rinascimento 49 (2009): 2–13.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. “Ancora alcune considerazioni su Marsilio Ficino e l’ermetismo.” In Marsilio Ficino, Fonti, Testi, Fortuna (2006), 89–120.Google Scholar
Ockenström, Lauri. “Refined Resemblances: Three Categories of Astromagical Images in Marsilio Ficino’s De vita 3.18 and Their Indebtedness to ‘Abominable’ Books.” Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft 9.1 (2014): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Stephan. “Geometrie und Optik in der Philosophie des Marsilio Ficino.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 98 (1991): 290–313.Google Scholar
Perrone Compagni, Vittoria. “La magia cerimoniale del ‘Picatrix’ nel Rinascimento.” Atti dell’accademia di scienze morali e politiche di Napoli 88 (1977): 279–330.Google Scholar
Pingree, David. “Learned Magic in the Time of Frederick II.” Micrologus: Le scienze alla corte di Federico II 2 (1994): 39–56.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Opera Omnia. Trans. and commentary Ficino, Marsilio. Basel, 1580.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Enneads. Ed. Henry, Paul and Schwyzer, Hans-Rudolf. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964–83.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Enneads. Trans. Armstrong, Arthur. 7 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Traité 9. Trans. Hadot, Pierre. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1994.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Opera Omnia. Trans. and commentary Ficino, Marsilio. 1580. Facsimile reprint. Enghien-les-Bains: Les Éditions du Miraval, 2008.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . De philosophia ex oraculis haurienda. Ed. Wolff, Gustav. Berlin, 1856.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . De L’Abstience. Ed. and trans. Bouffartigue, Jean and Patillon, Michel. 2 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1979.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . Sentences. Ed. and trans. the Unité propre de recherche no. 76 du Centre national de la recherche scientifique under the direction of Luc Brisson. Trans. Dillon, John. 2 vols. Paris: Vrin, 2005.Google Scholar
Quinlan-McGrath, Mary. Influences: Art, Optics, and Astrology in the Italian Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, John. Plotinus: The Road to Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ritter, Hellmut. “Picatrix, ein arabisches Handbuch hellenistischer Magie.” Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg 1921–1922 (1923): 94–124.Google Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Marsilio Ficino’s ‘Si Deus Fiat Homo’ and Augustine’s ‘Non Ibi Legi’: The Incarnation, and Plato’s Persona in the Scholia to the Laws .” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 77 (2014): 87–114.Google Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Fragments of Marsilio Ficino’s Translations and Use of Proclus’ Elements of Theology and Elements of Physics: Evidence and Study.” Vivarium 54.1 (2015): 46–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Marsilio Ficino and Plato’s Divided Line: Iamblichus and Pythagorean Pseudepigrapha in the Renaissance.” In Pythagorean Knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: Askesis-Religion-Science. ed. Renger, Almut-Barbara and Stavru, Alessandro, 427–42. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2016.Google Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Working with Plotinus: A Study of Marsilio Ficino’s Textual and Divinatory Philology.” In Teachers, Students, and Schools of Greek in the Renaissance. ed. Ciccolella, Federica and Silvano, Luigi, 120–54. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique, and Segonds, Alain-Philippe. “Ficin sur le De mysteriis de Jamblique.” Humanistica 1 (2006): 117–24.Google Scholar
Saxl, Fritz. “Rinascimento dell’Antichità. Studien zu den Arbeiten A. Warburgs.” Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 43 (1922): 220–71.Google Scholar
Sicherl, Martin. Die Handschriften, Ausgaben und Übersetzungen von Iamblichos De mysteriis: eine kritische-historische Studie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. “Traditional Medieval Tracts Concerning Engraved Astrological Images.” In Mélanges Auguste Pelzer: Études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale de la scholastique médiévale offertes à Auguste Pelzer à l’occasion de son soixante-dixième anniversaire, 217–74. Louvain, 1947.Google Scholar
Toussaint, Stéphane. “Ficino’s Orphic Magic or Jewish Astrology and Oriental Philosophy.” Accademia, Revue de la Société Marsile Ficin 2 (2000): 19–31.Google Scholar
van Bladel, Kevin. The Arabic Hermes: From Pagan Sage to Prophet of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliu, Anca. “Toucher par la vue: Plotin en dialogue avec Aristote sur la sensorialité de l’incorporel.” Les Études Philosophiques 4 (2015): 555–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vescovini, Graziella Federici. Astrologia e scienza, la crisi dell’aristotelismo sul cadere del trecento e Biagio Pelacani da Parma. Florence: Nuovedizioni E. Vallecchi, 1979.Google Scholar
Vescovini, Graziella Federici. Le teorie della luce e della visione ottica dal IX al XV secolo. Perugia: Morlacchi, 2003.Google Scholar
Vescovini, Graziella Federici. Medioevo magico. Turin: UTET, 2008.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel P. Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella. London: Warburg Institute, 1958.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel P. “Ficino and Astrology.” In Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone (1986), 2:341–49.Google Scholar
Weill-Parot, Nicolas. Les “images astrologiques” au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2002a.Google Scholar
Weill-Parot, Nicolas. “Pénombre ficinienne: Le renouveau de la théorie de la magie talismanique et ses ambiguités.” In Marsile Ficin ou Les Mystères platoniciens. ed. Toussaint, Stéphane, 71–90. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2002b.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Zambelli, Paola. L’ambigua natura della magia. Milan: Il Saggiatore, 1991.Google Scholar
Zanier, Giancarlo. La Medicina astrologica e la sua teoria: Marsilio Ficino e i suoi critici contemporanei. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo and Bizzarri, 1977.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 30.29. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 30.29.Google Scholar
MSS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 82.10–11. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 82.10–11.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 87.03. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 87.03.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 89, sup.38. Cited as MS Florence, LAUR, Plut. 89, sup. 38.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, II.iii.214. Cited as MS Florence, BNCF II.iii.214.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. Conventi soppr. E.1.2562. Cited as MS Florence, BNCF, Conventi soppr. E.1.2562.Google Scholar
MS Florence, Biblioteca Riccardiana, 24. Cited as MS Florence, RICC, 24.Google Scholar
MS Paris, Bibliothéque nationale de France, Gr. 1816. Cited as MS Paris, BnF, Gr. 1816.Google Scholar
MS Rome, Biblioteca Vallicelliana, F 20. Cited as MS Rome, VALL, F 20.Google Scholar
Albertini, Tamara. Marsilio Ficino: Das Problem der Vermittlung von Denken und Welt in einer Metaphysik der Einfachheit. Munich: W. Fink Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
Al-Kindi, . De radiis. Ed. D’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse and Hudry, Françoise. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 61 (1974): 139–260.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino and Plato’s Pythagorean Eye.” Modern Language Notes 97 (1982): 171–82.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino, Hermes Trismegistus and the Corpus Hermeticum .” In New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought: Essays in the History of Science, Education and Philosophy. In Memory of Charles B. Schmitt. ed. Henry, John and Hutton, Sarah, 38–47. London: Duckworth, 1990.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. Nuptial Arithmetic: Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on the Fatal Number in Book VIII of Plato’s Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino: Daemonic Mathematics and the Hypotenuse of the Spirit.” In Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines in Renaissance Europe. ed. Grafton, Anthony and Siraisi, Nancy, 121–37. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “To Gaze upon the Face of God Again: Philosophic Statuary, Pygmalion and Marsilio Ficino.” Rinascimento, 2nd series, 48 (2008): 123–36.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Pythagoras in the Early Renaissance.” In A History of Pythagoreanism. ed. Huffman, Carl, 435–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Arthur. “Was Plotinus a Magician?” Phronesis 1.1 (1955): 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, A. Immanuel, ed. Platonis dialogi graece et latine. 5 parts in 10 vols. Berlin: Reimer, 1816–18.Google Scholar
Bidez, Joseph. Vie de Porphyre, le philosophe néo-platonicien: Avec les fragments des traités Περὶ ἀγαλμάτων et De regressu animae. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964.Google Scholar
Bidez, Joseph, Cumont, Franz, Delatte, Armand, et al., eds. Catalogue des manuscrits alchimiques grecs. 6 vols. Brussels: M. Lamertin, 1928.Google Scholar
Parme, Blaise de. Questiones super Perspectiva Communi. Ed. Vescovini, Graziella Federici and Biard, Joël. Paris: Vrin, 2009.Google Scholar
Blum, Paul R. “Qualitates occultae: Zur philosophischen Vorgeschichte eines Schlüsselbegriffs zwichen Okkultismus und Wissenschaft.” In Die okkulten Wissenschaften in der Renaissance. ed. August Buck, 45–64. Wiesbaden: In Kommission bei Otto Harrassowitz, 1992.Google Scholar
Boas, George, trans. The Hieroglyphics of Horapollo. New York: Pantheon Books, 1950.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc. “Plotin et la Magie.” In Prophyre, La Vie de Plotin. ed. Brisson, Luc, Cherlonneix, Jean-Louis, Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile, et al., 2:465–75. Paris: Vrin, 1992.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles. “Al-Kindi in the Renaissance.” In Sapientiam amemus: Humanismus und Aristotelismus in der Renaissance. Festschrift für Eckhard Kessler zum 60. Geburtstag. ed. Blum, Paul, Blackwell, Constance, and Lohr, Charles, 13–30. Munich: Fink, 1999.Google Scholar
Campanelli, Maurizio, ed. Mercurii Trismegisti: Pimander sive de potestate et sapientia dei. Trans. Ficino, Marsilio. Turin: Aragno, 2011.Google Scholar
Carmody, Francis. The Astronomical Works of Thabit B. Qurra. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. “Pythagoras in the Renaissance: The Case of Marsilio Ficino.” Renaissance Quarterly 52.3 (1999): 667–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. Piety and Pythagoras in Renaissance Florence: The Symbolum Nesianum. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. “Late Antiquity and Florentine Platonism: The ‘Post-Plotinian’ Ficino.” Marsilio Ficino: His Theology (2002), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, Christopher. The Lost Italian Renaissance: Humanists, Historians, and Latin’s Legacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Clark, John. “The Manuscript Tradition of Marsilio Ficino’s De vita libri tres .” Manuscripta 27 (1983): 158–64.Google Scholar
Clark, John. “Roger Bacon and the Composition of Marsilio Ficino’s De vita longa (De vita, Book II).” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 49 (1986): 230–33.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Scholastic Philosophy and Renaissance Magic in the De vita of Marsilio Ficino.” Renaissance Quarterly 37.4 (1984): 523–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Renaissance Magic and Neoplatonic Philosophy: ‘Ennead’ 4.3–5 in Ficino’s ‘De vita coelitus comparanda.’” In Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone (1986), 2:351–69.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Iamblichus, Synesius and the Chaldaean Oracles in Marsilio Ficino’s De Vita Libri Tres: Hermetic Magic or Neoplatonic Magic?” In Supplementum Festivum: Studies in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller. ed. Hankins, James, Monfasani, John, and Purnell, Frederick Jr., 441–55. Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1987.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Hermes Trismegistus, Proclus, and the Question of a Philosophy of Magic in the Renaissance.” In Hermeticism and the Renaissance: Intellectual History and the Occult in Early Modern Europe. ed. Ingrid Merkel and Allen Debus, 79–110. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1988.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Natural Magic, Hermeticism, and Occultism in Early Modern Science.” In Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. ed. Lindberg, David and Westman, Robert, 261–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian, trans. Hermetica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian. “Hermes Theologus: The Sienese Mercury and Ficino’s Hermetic Demons.” In Humanity and Divinity in Renaissance and Reformation: Essays in Honor of Charles Trinkaus. ed. O’Malley, John, Izbicki, Thomas, and Christianson, Gerald, 149–82. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar
Corpus hermeticum. Ed. and trans. Nock, Arthur D. and Festugière, André-Jean. 4 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1945–54.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London, 1678.Google Scholar
Delatte, Armand. Essai sur la politique pythagoricienne. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1999.Google Scholar
Delcorno Branca, Daniela. “Un discepolo del Poliziano: Michele Acciari.” Lettere Italiane 38 (1976): 64–81.Google Scholar
Dodds, Eric. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eusebius. De evangelica praeparatione. Trans. George of Trebizond. Treviso, 1480.Google Scholar
Eusebius, . Praeparatio evangelica. Ed. Karl Mras. Vols. 43.1 and 43.2 of Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrunderte. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1954–56.Google Scholar
Festugière, André-Jean. La Révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste. 4 vols. Paris: Lecoffre, 1950–54.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Opera Omnia. Basel, 1576.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Platonic Theology. Trans. Allen, Michael J. B.. Ed. Hankins, James with Bowen, William. 6 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001–06.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Three Books on Life. Ed. and trans. Kaske, Carol and Clark, John. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2002.Google Scholar
Forshaw, Peter J. “Marsilio Ficino and the Chemical Art.” In Laus Platonici Philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and His Influence. ed. Clucas, Stephen, Forshaw, Peter, and Rees, Valery, 249–71. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Förstel, Christian. “Marsilio Ficino e il Parigino Greco 1816 di Plotino.” In Marsilio Ficino, Fonti, Testi, Fortuna (2006), 65–88.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. “Le ‘elezioni’ e il problema dell’astrologia.” In Umanesimo e esoterismo. ed. Castelli, Enrico, 17–37. Padua: CEDAM, 1960.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. Lo zodiaco della vita. Rome: Laterza, 1976a.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. “Postille sull’ermetismo del Rinascimento.” Rinascimento, 2nd series, 27 (1976b): 245–49.Google Scholar
Gentile, Sebastiano. “Sulle prime traduzioni dal greco di Marsilio Ficino.” Rinascimento 40 (1990): 57–104.Google Scholar
Gentile, Sebastiano, and Gilly, Carlos. Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di ermete trismegisto. Florence: Centro Di, 1999.Google Scholar
Gentile, Sebastiano, Niccoli, Sandra, and Viti, Paolo. Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone. Mostra di manoscritti stampe e documenti 17 maggio–giugno 1984. Florence: Le Lettere, 1984.Google Scholar
Giglioni, Guido. “Theurgy and Philosophy in Marsilio Ficino’s Paraphrase of Iamblichus’s De Mysteriis Aegyptiorum.” Rinascimento, 2nd series, 52 (2012): 3–36.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450-1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Henry, Paul. Études Plotiniennes II: Les Manuscrits de Ennéades. Paris: L’Édition Universelle, Desclée de Brouwer et Cie, A. et J. Picard, 1948.Google Scholar
Holstenius, Lucas. Dissertatio De Vita et Scriptis Porphyrii Philosophi. In Johann Albert Fabricius, Biblioteca graeca, Libri iv, pars altera quae praeter scriptores de numerorum doctrina et alios nonnullos philosophos, recensentur rhetores ac sophistae, lexicorumque veterum graecorum notitia traditur. 207–81. Hamburg: C. Liebezeit, 1711.Google Scholar
Huffman, Carl. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . De mysteriis. Venice, 1497.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . De Vita Pythagorica Liber. Ed. Ludovicus Deubner, with Udalricus Klein. Leipzig: Teubner, 1975.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . De mysteriis. 1497. Facsimile reprint. Enghien-les-Bains: Les Éditions du Miraval, 2006.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . Réponse à Porphyre (De Mysteriis). Ed. and trans. Henri Dominique Saffrey and Alain-Philippe Segonds. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2013.Google Scholar
Kaske, Carol. “Ficino’s Shifting Attitude Towards Astrology in the ‘De vita coelitus comparanda,’ the Letter to Poliziano, and the ‘Apologia’ to the Cardinals.” In Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone (1986), 2:371–81.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Peter. “Poimandres: The Etymology of the Name and the Origins of the Hermetica.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 56 (1993): 1–24.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Peter. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Klibansky, Raymond, Panofsky, Erwin, and Saxl, Fritz. Saturn and Melancholy: Studies in the History of Natural Philosophy, Religion, and Art. New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. “Ficino in the Firing Line: A Renaissance Neoplatonist and His Critics.” In Marsilio Ficino: His Theology (2002), 377–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. Supplementum Ficinianum. 2 vols. Florence: Olschki, 1937–45.Google Scholar
Kroll, William, ed. De Oraculis Chaldaicis. Breslau: Koebner, 1894.Google Scholar
Lewy, Hans. Chaldaen Oracles and Theurgy. Ed. Tardieu, M.. 3rd ed. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2011.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David. Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lucentini, Paolo, and Vittoria Perrone Compagni. I testi e i codici di Ermete nel Medioevo. Florence: Polistampa, 2001.Google Scholar
Luck, Georg. “Theurgy and Forms of Worship in Neoplatonism.” In Religion, Science and Magic in Concert and Conflict. ed. Neusner, Jacob, Frerichs, Ernest, and Flesher, Paul V. McCracken, 185–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone. Ed. Garfagnini, Gian Carlo. 2 vols. Florence: Olschki, 1986.Google Scholar
Marsilio Ficino, Fonti, Testi, Fortuna. Ed. Gentile, Sebastiano and Toussaint, Stéphane. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2006.Google Scholar
Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy. Ed. Allen, Michael J. B., Rees, Valery, and Davies, Martin. Leiden: Brill, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matton, Sylvain. “Marsile Ficin et l’alchimie. Sa position, son influence.” In Alchimie et philosophie à la Renaissance: Actes du colloque international de Tours (4–7 décembre 1991). ed. Margolin, Jean-Claude and Matton, Sylvain, 123–92. Paris: Vrin, 1993.Google Scholar
Monfasani, John. “Marsilio Ficino and Eusebius of Caesarea’s Praeparatio Evangelica .” Rinascimento 49 (2009): 2–13.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. “Ancora alcune considerazioni su Marsilio Ficino e l’ermetismo.” In Marsilio Ficino, Fonti, Testi, Fortuna (2006), 89–120.Google Scholar
Ockenström, Lauri. “Refined Resemblances: Three Categories of Astromagical Images in Marsilio Ficino’s De vita 3.18 and Their Indebtedness to ‘Abominable’ Books.” Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft 9.1 (2014): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Stephan. “Geometrie und Optik in der Philosophie des Marsilio Ficino.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 98 (1991): 290–313.Google Scholar
Perrone Compagni, Vittoria. “La magia cerimoniale del ‘Picatrix’ nel Rinascimento.” Atti dell’accademia di scienze morali e politiche di Napoli 88 (1977): 279–330.Google Scholar
Pingree, David. “Learned Magic in the Time of Frederick II.” Micrologus: Le scienze alla corte di Federico II 2 (1994): 39–56.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Opera Omnia. Trans. and commentary Ficino, Marsilio. Basel, 1580.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Enneads. Ed. Henry, Paul and Schwyzer, Hans-Rudolf. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964–83.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Enneads. Trans. Armstrong, Arthur. 7 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Traité 9. Trans. Hadot, Pierre. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1994.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Opera Omnia. Trans. and commentary Ficino, Marsilio. 1580. Facsimile reprint. Enghien-les-Bains: Les Éditions du Miraval, 2008.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . De philosophia ex oraculis haurienda. Ed. Wolff, Gustav. Berlin, 1856.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . De L’Abstience. Ed. and trans. Bouffartigue, Jean and Patillon, Michel. 2 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1979.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . Sentences. Ed. and trans. the Unité propre de recherche no. 76 du Centre national de la recherche scientifique under the direction of Luc Brisson. Trans. Dillon, John. 2 vols. Paris: Vrin, 2005.Google Scholar
Quinlan-McGrath, Mary. Influences: Art, Optics, and Astrology in the Italian Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, John. Plotinus: The Road to Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ritter, Hellmut. “Picatrix, ein arabisches Handbuch hellenistischer Magie.” Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg 1921–1922 (1923): 94–124.Google Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Marsilio Ficino’s ‘Si Deus Fiat Homo’ and Augustine’s ‘Non Ibi Legi’: The Incarnation, and Plato’s Persona in the Scholia to the Laws .” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 77 (2014): 87–114.Google Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Fragments of Marsilio Ficino’s Translations and Use of Proclus’ Elements of Theology and Elements of Physics: Evidence and Study.” Vivarium 54.1 (2015): 46–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Marsilio Ficino and Plato’s Divided Line: Iamblichus and Pythagorean Pseudepigrapha in the Renaissance.” In Pythagorean Knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: Askesis-Religion-Science. ed. Renger, Almut-Barbara and Stavru, Alessandro, 427–42. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2016.Google Scholar
Robichaud, Denis. “Working with Plotinus: A Study of Marsilio Ficino’s Textual and Divinatory Philology.” In Teachers, Students, and Schools of Greek in the Renaissance. ed. Ciccolella, Federica and Silvano, Luigi, 120–54. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique, and Segonds, Alain-Philippe. “Ficin sur le De mysteriis de Jamblique.” Humanistica 1 (2006): 117–24.Google Scholar
Saxl, Fritz. “Rinascimento dell’Antichità. Studien zu den Arbeiten A. Warburgs.” Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 43 (1922): 220–71.Google Scholar
Sicherl, Martin. Die Handschriften, Ausgaben und Übersetzungen von Iamblichos De mysteriis: eine kritische-historische Studie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. “Traditional Medieval Tracts Concerning Engraved Astrological Images.” In Mélanges Auguste Pelzer: Études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale de la scholastique médiévale offertes à Auguste Pelzer à l’occasion de son soixante-dixième anniversaire, 217–74. Louvain, 1947.Google Scholar
Toussaint, Stéphane. “Ficino’s Orphic Magic or Jewish Astrology and Oriental Philosophy.” Accademia, Revue de la Société Marsile Ficin 2 (2000): 19–31.Google Scholar
van Bladel, Kevin. The Arabic Hermes: From Pagan Sage to Prophet of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliu, Anca. “Toucher par la vue: Plotin en dialogue avec Aristote sur la sensorialité de l’incorporel.” Les Études Philosophiques 4 (2015): 555–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vescovini, Graziella Federici. Astrologia e scienza, la crisi dell’aristotelismo sul cadere del trecento e Biagio Pelacani da Parma. Florence: Nuovedizioni E. Vallecchi, 1979.Google Scholar
Vescovini, Graziella Federici. Le teorie della luce e della visione ottica dal IX al XV secolo. Perugia: Morlacchi, 2003.Google Scholar
Vescovini, Graziella Federici. Medioevo magico. Turin: UTET, 2008.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel P. Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella. London: Warburg Institute, 1958.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel P. “Ficino and Astrology.” In Marsilio Ficino e il Ritorno di Platone (1986), 2:341–49.Google Scholar
Weill-Parot, Nicolas. Les “images astrologiques” au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2002a.Google Scholar
Weill-Parot, Nicolas. “Pénombre ficinienne: Le renouveau de la théorie de la magie talismanique et ses ambiguités.” In Marsile Ficin ou Les Mystères platoniciens. ed. Toussaint, Stéphane, 71–90. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2002b.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Zambelli, Paola. L’ambigua natura della magia. Milan: Il Saggiatore, 1991.Google Scholar
Zanier, Giancarlo. La Medicina astrologica e la sua teoria: Marsilio Ficino e i suoi critici contemporanei. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo and Bizzarri, 1977.Google Scholar