Abstract
Corporate diplomacy research suggests US executives display little interest in supporting government diplomacy and promoting national culture; rather, corporate strategy focuses on profit. The corporate diplomacy phenomenon, however, needs additional examination in the more collectivistic East Asia context. This study investigates a public–private partnership in which a corporation sponsors a cultural exchange project in Japan, specifically how Japanese business leaders perceive and integrate promoting national interests and country image into corporate strategy. This research analyzes the New Tohoku program that brings foreign students, businesspersons, and social media influencers to Tohoku, a region undergoing reconstruction since the 2011 tsunami, to learn about Japan’s economy, history, climate, and culture. Interviews with executives and managers and documentary information from corporate webpages, news releases, and promotional brochures reveal motivations for engaging to (1) promote Japan’s culture, (2) stimulate economic growth, and (3) generate awareness about Pasona through publicity. While unrelated to Pasona’s business model, New Tohoku reflects the “Japanese mindset” of helping Japan; the founder, employees, and shareholders ensure this remains a strategic objective regardless of profits. This research has implications for multinational corporations’ role in cultural diplomacy as a component of public diplomacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auer, C. 2016. Conceptualizing political crisis and the role of public diplomacy in crisis communication research. In The handbook of international crisis communication research, ed. A. Schwartz, M.W. Seeger, and C. Auer, 119–132. Chichester: Wiley.
Bolewski, W. 2019. Diplomatic engagement with transnational corporations: A path to sustainable governance. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy 5 (1): 42–52.
Bovaird, T. 2004. Public-private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences 70 (2): 199–215.
Brinkerhoff, D.W., and J.M. Brinkerhoff. 2011. Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development 31 (1): 2–14.
Brown, D.L., A. Vetterlein, and A. Roemer-Mahler. 2010. Theorizing transnational corporations as social actors: An analysis of corporate motivations. Business and Politics 12 (1): 1–37.
Crowell, W.G. 2008. Official soft power in practice: US public diplomacy in Japan. In Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States, ed. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell, 207–224. New York: East Gate Books.
Fitzpatrick, K.R., C.L. White, and L.M. Bier. 2019. C-suite perspectives on corporate diplomacy as a component of public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 16 (1): 25–35.
Fort, T., and K. Rehbein. 2015. Enhancing the concept of corporate diplomacy: Encompassing political corporate social responsibility, international relations, and peace through commerce. Academy of Management Perspectives 29 (4): 387–404.
Frynas, J.G., and S. Stephens. 2015. Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews 17 (4): 483–509.
Gregory, B. 2015. Mapping boundaries in diplomacy’s public dimension. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 11 (1): 1–25.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across cultures. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hurn, B.J. 2016. The role of cultural diplomacy in nation branding. Industrial and Commercial Training 48 (2): 80–85.
Hurn, B.J., and B. Tomalin. 2013. Cross-cultural communication: Theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ingenhoff, D., and S. Marschlich. 2019. Corporate diplomacy and political CSR: Similarities, differences and theoretical implications. Public Relations Review 45 (2): 348–371.
Isar, Y.R. 2015. Culture in EU external relations: An idea whose time has come? The International Journal of Cultural Policy 21 (4): 494–508.
Kallio, H., A.M. Pietilä, M. Johnson, and M. Kangasniemi. 2016. Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing 72 (12): 2954–2965.
Kamphof, R., and J. Melissen. 2018. SCGs, foreign ministries and the art of partnering with the private sector. Global Policy 9 (3): 327–335.
Kvale, S. 1996. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lee, D. 2004. The growing influence of business in UK diplomacy. International Studies Perspectives 5 (1): 50–54.
Lee, G., and K. Ayhan. 2015. Why do we need non-state actors in public diplomacy? Theoretical discussion of relational, networked and collaborative public diplomacy. Journal of International and Area Studies 22 (1): 57–77.
Mark, S. 2009. A greater role for cultural diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’: Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 1–51.
McConnell, D.L. 2008. Japan’s image problem and the soft power solution: the JET program as cultural diplomacy. In Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States, ed. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell, 18–35. New York: East Gate Books.
McCracken, G. 1988. The long interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Melissen, J. 2011. Beyond the new public diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ 3: 1–34.
Melissen, J. 2015. Conclusions and key points about public diplomacy in East Asia. In Understanding public diplomacy in East Asia: Middle powers through a troubled region, ed. J. Melissen and Y. Sohn, 239–252. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Merriam, S.B. 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Naoyuki, A. 2008. Japan does soft power: strategy and effectiveness of its public diplomacy in the United States. In Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States, ed. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell, 224–243. New York: East Gate Books.
Nye, J.S., Jr. 2017. Q&A with CPD: Joseph S. Nye, Jr. [blog post]. Accessed https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/story/qa-cpd-joseph-s-nye-jr
O’Reilly, M., and N. Parker. 2012. ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 13 (2): 190–197.
Otmazgin, N.K. 2018. The chrysanthemum and the cool: cultural diplomacy and soft power in Japan’s foreign policy. In Routledge handbook of Japanese foreign policy, ed. M.M. McCarthy, 55–70. New York: Routledge.
Paschalidis, G. 2009. Exporting national culture: Histories of cultural institutes abroad. International Journal of Cultural Politics 15 (3): 275–289.
Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Reinhard, K. 2009. American business and its role in public diplomacy. In Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, ed. N. Snow and P.M. Taylor, 195–200. New York: Routledge.
Saner, R., and L. Yiu. 2003. International economic diplomacy: Mutations in post-modern times. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’: Discussion Papers in Diplomacy 84: 1–31.
Scherer, A.G., and G. Palazzo. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies 48 (4): 899–931.
Schneider, C.P. 2005. Culture communicates: US diplomacy that works. In The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations, ed. J. Melissen, 147–168. Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.
Schwartz, A., M.W. Seeger, and C. Auer. 2016. Significance and structure of international risk and crisis communication research. In The handbook of international crisis communication research, ed. A. Schwartz, M.W. Seeger, and C. Auer, 1–10. Chichester: Wiley.
Seiichi, K. 2008. Wielding soft power: The key stages of transmission and reception. In Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States, ed. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell, 191–217. New York: East Gate Books.
Signitzer, B. 2008. Public relations and public diplomacy: some conceptual explorations. In Public relations research: European and international perspectives and innovations, ed. A. Zerfaß, B. van Ruler, and K. Sriramesh, 205–218. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Soeya, Y. 2015. The evolution of Japan’s public diplomacy: haunted by its past history. In Understanding public diplomacy in East Asia: Middle powers through a troubled region, ed. J. Melissen and Y. Sohn, 79–106. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Szondi, G. 2008. Public diplomacy and nation branding: Conceptual similarities and differences. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’: Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 1–52.
Tamaki, T. 2019. Repackaging national identity: Cool Japan and the resilience of Japanese identity narratives. Asian Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 108–126.
Topić, M., and C. Sciortino. 2012. Cultural diplomacy and cultural imperialism: a framework for the analysis. In Cultural diplomacy and cultural imperialism, European perspective, ed. M. Topić and S. Rodin, 9–25. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Tsutomu, S. 2008. Japan’s creative industries: culture as a source of soft power in the industrial sector. In Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States, ed. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell, 128–154. New York: East Gate Books.
Wang, J. 2006a. Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review 32 (2): 91–96.
Wang, J. 2006b. Public diplomacy and global business. Journal of Business Strategy 27 (3): 41–49.
Watanabe, Y., and D.L. McConnell. 2008. Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States. New York: East Gate Books.
Westermann-Behaylo, M.K., K. Rehbein, and T. Fort. 2015. Enhancing the concept of corporate diplomacy: Encompassing political corporate social responsibility, international relations, and peace through commerce. Academy of Management Perspectives 29 (4), 387–404.
Wettenhall, R. 2003. The rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Organization Review 3 (1): 77–107.
White, C.L. 2015. Exploring the role of private-sector corporations in public diplomacy. Public Relations Inquiry 4 (3): 305–321.
White, C., and K. Alkandari. 2019. The influence of culture and infrastructure on CSR and country image: The case of Kuwait. Public Relations Review 45 (3): 1–10.
Wilkins, T. 2015. Reinventing Japan in the Asian century: towards a new grand strategy? In Foreign policies and diplomacies in Asia: Changes in practice, concepts, and thinking in a rising region, ed. M. Maass, 141–160. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Winkler, S.C. 2019. “Soft power is such a benign animal”: Narrative power and the reification of concepts in Japan. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (4): 483–501.
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zamorano, M.M. 2016. Reframing cultural diplomacy: The instrumentalization of culture under the soft power theory. Culture Unbound 8: 166–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bier, L.M., White, C.L. Cultural diplomacy as corporate strategy: an analysis of Pasona Group’s “New Tohoku” program in Japan. Place Brand Public Dipl 17, 180–192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00165-4
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00165-4