Abstract
Despite the applicability of assemblage theory to extreme events, the relational ontology that assemblage thinkers employ makes it hard to ground the potential of artefacts to undergo substantial change. To better understand how artefacts can be unexpectedly destroyed, and thereby catch managers by surprise, this article draws on Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology. This approach is used to explain how artefacts, as concrete objects, have the capacity both to cause and to exacerbate calamities. By contrast, assemblage theory is shown to provide insight into post-disaster organizing dilemmas. An analysis of artefact-based surprise at a disaster-prone New Zealand port illustrates the complementarity of the two approaches. Minimizing surprise was a major impetus behind attempts by port managers to make sizeable artefacts more disaster resilient. Yet there are limits to this process that stem from a gap revealed by the philosophical distinction between an artefact’s design plan and its maximum plan. Object-based surprise at the port also sparked tension between the competing imperatives of centralization and decentralization in post-disaster recovery. How this problem played out at the grassroots level is best explained, however, in assemblage-theoretic terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amore, A., C.M. Hall, and J. Jenkins. 2017. They never said “come here and let’s talk about it”: Exclusion and non-decision-making in the rebuild of Christchurch, New Zealand. Local Economy 32 (7): 617–639.
Annarelli, A., and F. Nonino. 2016. Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega 62: 1–18.
Ashley, B.M. 2006. The way toward wisdom: an interdisciplinary and intercultural introduction to metaphysics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Bennett, J. 2005. The agency of assemblages and the north American blackout. Public Culture 17 (3): 445–465.
Berthod, O., G. Müller-Seitz, and J. Sydow. 2014. Out of nowhere? Interorganizational assemblage as the answer to a food-borne disease outbreak. Schmalenbach Business Review 66 (4): 385–414.
Borrero, J.C., and D.G. Goring. 2015. South American tsunamis in Lyttelton Harbor, New Zealand. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 172 (3–4): 757–772.
Buchanan, I. 2015. Assemblage theory and its discontents. Deleuze Studies 9: 382–392.
Chalmers, G., McLennan, N., and Barsanti, L. 2013. Lyttelton port of Christchurch seismic resilience from an owner’s perspective. Ports 2013: Success Through Diversification, (American Society of Civil Engineers): 1405-1414.
Clarke, W.N. 2008. Explorations in metaphysics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Cnossen, B., and N. Bencherki. 2019. The role of space in the emergence and endurance of organizing: How independent workers and material assemblages constitute organizations. Human Relations 72 (6): 1057–1080.
Craig, W.L. 2016. God over all: Divine aseity and the challenge of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cretney, R.M. 2016. Local responses to disaster: The value of community led post disaster response action in a resilience framework. Disaster Prevention and Management 25 (1): 27–40.
Daskalaki, M., D. Hjorth, and J. Mair. 2015. Are entrepreneurship, communities, and social transformation related? Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (4): 419–423.
DeLanda, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York: Continuum.
DeLanda, M., and H. Harman. 2017. The rise of realism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. (trans. P. Patton). Columbia, NY: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1986. Kafka: Toward a minor literature. (Trans. D. Polan). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2011. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dodds, M.J. 2010. The philosophy of nature. Oakland: Western Dominican Province.
Duff, C., and S. Sumartojo. 2017. Assemblages of creativity: Material practices in the creative economy. Organization 24 (3): 418–432.
Environment Canterbury. 2015. Development of the Draft Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan. Retrieved from https://ceraarchive.dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Documents/development-of-the-lyttelton-port-recovery-plan-and-attachments1-7.pdf
Farias, I. 2018. Master plans as cosmograms: Articulating oceanic forces and urban forms after the 2010 earthquake and tsunami in Chile. In Relational planning: Tracing artefacts, agency and practices, ed. M. Kurath, M. Marskamp, J. Paulos, and J. Ruegg, 179–202. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Feser, E. 2019. Aristotle’s revenge: The metaphysical foundations of physical and biological science. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticae.
Gasparin, M., and D. Neyland. 2018. We have always been modern(ist): Temporality and the management of “timeless” iconic chairs. Organization 25 (3): 354–373.
Gherardi, S. 2016. To start practice theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization 23 (5): 680–698.
Giovannoni, E., and P. Quatrrone. 2018. The materiality of absence: Organizing and the case of the incomplete cathedral. Organization Studies 39 (7): 849–871.
González, S. 2009. (Dis)connecting Milan(ese): Deterritorialised urbanism and disempowering politics in globalising cities. Environment and Planning A 41: 31–47.
Grisez, G., and R. Shaw. 1988. Beyond the new morality: The responsibilities of freedom. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Grove, K., and J. Pugh (2015) Assemblage thinking and participatory development: potentiality, ethics, biopolitics. Geography Compass 9 (1): 1–13
Harman, G. 2002. Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago: Open Court.
Harman, G. 2005. Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Chicago: Open Court.
Harman, G. 2010. Towards speculative realism: Essays and lectures. Winchester: Zero Books.
Harman, G. 2011. The quadruple object. Alresford: Zero Books.
Harman, G. 2012. The third table / Der dritte tisch. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
Harman, G. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harman, G. 2018a. Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. London: Pelican Books.
Harman, G. 2018b. Speculative realism: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and time. (Trans. J. Macquarie and E. Robinson). New York, NY: HarperPerennial.
Humphreys, C., and A.C.T. Smith. 2014. Talking objects: Towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization 21 (4): 477–494.
Johansson, N., and J. Metzger. 2016. Experimentalizing the organization of objects: Re-enacting mines and landfills. Organization 23 (6): 840–863.
Johnston, D., R. Pettersson, G. Downes, D. Paton, G. Leonard, K. Pishief, and R. Bell. 2008. Developing an effective tsunami warning system: Lessons from the 1960 Chile earthquake tsunami for New Zealand coastal communities. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 3 (2): 105–120.
Kantur, D., and A. Işeri-Say. 2012. Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework. Journal of Management and Organization. 18 (6): 762–773.
Kreeft, P. 2014. Socratic logic: A logic text using Socratic method, platonic questions, and Aristotelian principles. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.
Leonardi, P.M. 2014. The emergence of materiality within formal organizations. In How matter matters, ed. P.R. Carlisle, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, and H. Tsoukas, 142–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linnenluecke, M.K. 2017. Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (1): 4–30.
Lundborg, T., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2011. Resilience, critical infrastructure, and molecular security: The excess of ‘life’ in biopolitics. International Political Sociology 5 (4): 367–383.
Lyttelton Port Company. 2014. Lyttelton Port recovery plan information package. Retrieved from http://www.lpc.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Summary-document-LPC-information-package.pdf
Lyttelton/Mount Herbert Community Board (2011). Lyttelton community recovery plan, volume 1. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/158326523-Lyttelton-community-recovery-plan.html
Lyttelton/Mount Herbert Community Board 2015. Submission on draft Lyttelton port recovery plan. Community Board Chairperson to Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority, 31 August 2015. Retrieved from www.ccc.govt.nz
McCormack, D. 2017. Elemental infrastructures for atmospheric media: On stratospheric variations, value and the commons. Environment and Planning D, Society and Space 35 (3): 418–437.
Moreland, J. 2001. Universals. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Müller, M. 2015. Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass 9 (1): 27–41.
Müller-Seitz, G. 2014. Practising uncertainty in the face of large-scale disease outbreaks. Journal of Management Inquiry 23 (3): 276–293.
Narr, L., and S. Clegg. 2018. Models as strategic actants in innovative architecture. Journal of Management Inquiry 27 (1): 26–39.
New Zealand Government. 2010. National infrastructure plan. Retrieved from https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2017-12/nip-mar10.pdf
New Zealand Government. 2015. The thirty year New Zealand infrastructure plan – 2015. Retrieved from http://purl.oclc.org/nzt/i-1785
Orlikowski, W.J. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448.
Paring, G., S. Pezé, and I. Huault. 2017. “Welcome to the whiteboard, the new member of the team”: Identity regulation as a sociomaterial process. Organization 24 (6): 844–865.
Parker, M. 2015. Vertical capitalism: Skyscrapers and organization. Culture and Organization 21 (3): 217–234.
Parker, M. 2017. Tower cranes and organization studies. Organization Studies 38 (7): 989–1004.
Parr, A. 2005. Deterritorialisation/Reterritorialisation. In The Deleuze dictionary, ed. A. Parr, 66–69. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Perrow, C. 2011. The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pierides, D., and D. Woodman. 2012. Object-oriented sociology and organizing in the face of emergency: Bruno Latour, Graham Harman and the material turn. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 662–679.
Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant and proper function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potter, S.H., J.S. Becker, D.M. Johnston, and K. Rossiter. 2015. An overview of the impacts of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14: 6–14.
Taleb, N.N. 2014. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House.
Thornley, L., Ball, J., Signal, L., et al. (2013). Building community resilience: Learning from the Christchurch Earthquakes: Final report to Health Research Council and Canterbury Medical Research Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/11932244/building20community20resilience20report20-20march202013
Van Inwagen, P. 2015. Metaphysics. Boulder: Westview Press.
Van Wezemael, J. 2008. The contribution of assemblage theory and minor politics for democratic network governance. Planning Theory 7 (2): 165–185.
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the research assistance provided by Malcolm Tull during the first phase of the fieldwork.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reveley, J. Artefacts, Surprise and Managing During Disaster: Object-Oriented Ontological and Assemblage-Theoretic Insights. Philosophy of Management 19, 427–445 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00138-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00138-w