Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:04:55.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reclaiming and Preserving Traditional Music: Aesthetics, ethics and technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2020

Mirko Ettore D’Agostino
Mirko Ettore D’Agostino*
Affiliation:
Istanbul Technical University, Turkey
*
Email: mirkodagostino@yahoo.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Music history is full of examples of composers drawing upon traditional repertoires for their works. Starting from the late nineteenth century in particular, many of them have looked at this specific sound material for several reasons: overcoming the limitations of tonal system, discovering different compositional strategies, finding new inspiration and aesthetics, evoking exoticism. Electronic music is no exception. Since the emergence of sound recording, sonic artists and electronic music composers have experimented with new technologies trying to integrate traditional elements in their works with different results and various purposes. In the present time, the preservation of these traditional elements could represent one of the most crucial goals. In a world characterised by a widespread globalisation, traditional music might be at risk of being neglected or even forgotten, as for local identities and cultures in general. As electronic music composers and sonic artists we should ask ourselves if it is possible to create a link between tradition and innovation, connecting these two apparently opposite realities. Can we safeguard at-risk traditions and at the same time re-present them through contemporary artistic practices and technologies? Is there a way to develop a form of expression that could reach a wide and diverse range of listeners, taking into account recent trends and studies in electronic music while preserving the main distinctive features of the traditional repertoires? The article attempts to answer the above-mentioned questions with the support of a case study: the personal research conducted into the use of traditional music from the southern Italian region of Campania in the scope of electronic music composition.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Computation in the Sonic Arts , April 2020 , pp. 106 - 115
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andean, J. 2014. Towards an Ethics of Creative Sound. Organised Sound 19(2): 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2011. Importing the Sonic Souvenir: Issues of Cross-Cultural Composition. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Conference (EMS11), New York. www.ems-network.org/spip.php?article319 (accessed 16 July 2018).Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2014. Instruments INDIA: A Sound Archive for Educational and Compositional Use. Organised Sound 19(2): 146–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burri, M. 2010. Digital Technologies and Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Positive Look at a Difficult Relationship. International Journal of Cultural Property 17(1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cifariello Ciardi, F. 2008. Local and Global Connotations in Sonic Composition. Organised Sound 13(2): 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, A. and Latini, G. 2008. Global/Local Issues in Electroacoustic Music for the Cinema of the Real: A Case Study. Organised Sound 13(2): 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Agostino, M. E. 2011. Identità Locale e Linguaggio Globale. Quando la musica elettroacustica incontra l’universo folklorico. Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis, Conservatorio di Musica Licinio Refice, Frosinone, Italy.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, M. E. 2017. Personal interview with Gianluca Zammarelli.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, M. E. 2018. Personal interview with Francesco Pellegrino.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The Relation of Language to Materials. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. London: Macmillan, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, R. 2005. Free Sound within Culturally Specific Practice. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Barcelona, September.Google Scholar
Gluck, R. 2008. Between, within and across Cultures. Organised Sound 13(2): 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M. 1960. Bi-musicality. Ethnomusicology 4: 55–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, S. 2014. Appropriation, Culture, and Meaning in Electroacoustic Music: A Composer’s Perspective. Organised Sound 19(2): 110–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuenfeldt, K. 1998. Good Vibrations? The ‘Curious’ Cases of the Didjeridu in Spectacle and Therapy in Australia. The World of Music (Old Instruments in New Contexts: Case Studies of Innovation and Appropriation) 40(2): 29–51.Google Scholar
Rennie, T. 2014. Socio-Sonic: An Ethnographic Methodology for Electroacoustic Composition. Organised Sound 19(2): 117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon House.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1977. The Tuning of the World. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-Shapes. Organised Sound 2(2): 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 2002. Genres and Techniques of Soundscape Composition as Developed at Simon Fraser University. Organised Sound 7(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 2008. Soundscape Composition as Global Music: Electroacoustic Music as Soundscape. Organised Sound 13(2): 103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F. 1990. Composer and Material in Musique Concréte. www.rosewhitemusic.com/concrete.html (accessed 17 July 2018).Google Scholar
WIPO. 1985. Model Provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions. UNESCO/WIPO. www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/unesco/unesco001en.pdf (accessed 18 August 2018).Google Scholar
WIPO. 2004. Consolidated Analysis of the Legal Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions/Expressions of Folklore. WIPO. www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/tk/785/wipo_pub_785.pdf (accessed 17 August 2018).Google Scholar