Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 31, 2019

Verb placement and accentuation: Does prosody constrain the Estonian V2?

  • Heete Sahkai EMAIL logo and Anne Tamm
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

The paper contributes to the understanding of the variation in finite verb placement in Estonian, a verb-second language, by establishing two descriptive facts. First, it identifies a previously undescribed finite verb position in Estonian declarative main clauses, which will be referred to as ‘clause-medial’. The clause-medial position is located between clause-medial sentence adverbials on the one hand, and VP adverbials and the complements of the verb on the other hand. Secondly, the paper reports two empirical studies providing evidence in support of the hypothesis that the occurrence of a finite verb in the proposed clause-medial position, as opposed to its occurrence in the second position, correlates with its accentuation. While clause-medial verbs tend to bear a nuclear pitch accent, second-position verbs don’t. Finally, the paper briefly discusses some broader implications of the existence of the clause-medial finite verb position and of the interaction between verb placement and prosody.

References

Aavik, Johannes. 1936. Eesti õigekeelsuse õpik ja grammatika (Standard Estonian textbook and grammar). Tartu: Noor-Eesti Kirjastus.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1993. Wackernagel’s Revenge: Clitics, Morphology, and the Syntax of Second Position. Language 69 (1). 68-98.Search in Google Scholar

Asu, Eva Liina. 2004. The phonetics and phonology of Estonian intonation. PhD thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Asu, Eva Liina, Francis Nolan. 2007. The Analysis of Low Accentuation in Estonian. Language and speech 50 (4). 567-588.10.1177/00238309070500040401Search in Google Scholar

Bende-Farkas, Ágnes. 2001. Verb-object Dependencies in Hungarian and English: a DRT-based Account. PhD thesis. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul, David Weenink. 2016. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.10, retrieved 13 January 2016 from http://www.praat.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo. 2011. The prosodic phrasing of sentential objects. Lingua 121 (13). 1934-1964.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2011. German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases. Lingua 121 (13). 1906-1922.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Kiss, Tibor, Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – theory and analysis: An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter. 342-382.Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808814Search in Google Scholar

Lindström, Liina. 2002. Veel kord subjekti ja predikaadi vastastikusest asendist laiendi järel (On the respective placement of the subject and the predicate following a complement or an adjunct). Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 47. 87-106.Search in Google Scholar

Lindström, Liina. 2017. Lause infostruktuur ja sõnajärg (Sentential information structure and word order). In Erelt, Mati, Helle Metslang (eds.), Eesti keele süntaks (Estonian syntax). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus. 547-565.Search in Google Scholar

Neetar, Helmi. 1966. eks-laused (eks-sentences). Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 12. 119-124.Search in Google Scholar

Remmel, Nikolai. 1963. Sõnajärjestus eesti lauses (Word order in Estonian sentences). Keele ja kirjanduse instituudi uurimused VIII. Eesti keele süntaksi küsimusi. Tallinn: Eesti Riiklik Kirjastus. 216-389.Search in Google Scholar

Sahkai, Heete, Anne Tamm. 2018. The syntax of contrastive topics in Estonian. In Amon, Marri, Marie-Ange Julia (eds.), Oralité, information, typologie / Orality, Information, Typology. Hommage à M.M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest. Paris: L’Harmattan (Langue et Parole). 399-420.Search in Google Scholar

Sahkai, Heete, Ann Veismann. 2015. Predicate-argument structure and verb accentuation in Estonian. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 6 (3). 123-143.10.12697/jeful.2015.6.3.05Search in Google Scholar

Tamm, Anne, Natalia Vaiss. 2019. Setting the boundaries: “partitive verbs” in Estonian verb classifications. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics 15. 159-181.10.5128/ERYa15.09Search in Google Scholar

Tael, Kaja. 1988. Sõnajärjemallid eesti keeles (võrrelduna soome keelega) (Estonian word order patterns in comparison with Finnish). Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Search in Google Scholar

Tael, Kaja. 1990. An approach to word order problems in Estonian. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Search in Google Scholar

Vihman, Virve, George Walkden. 2017. Exceptions to V2 in Estonian (and Kiezdeutsch). Presentation at SLE 2017, Zurich, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar

Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892. Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1. 333-436.10.1515/9783110242430.333Search in Google Scholar

Wiedemann F. J. 1875. Grammatik der Ehstnischen Sprache, zunächst wie sie in Mittelehstland gesprochen wird, mit Berücksichtigung der anderen Dialekte (The grammar of Estonian as spoken in Central Estonia, with considerations on other dialects). St.-Pétersbourg: l’Académie Impériale des sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-11-14
Accepted: 2019-10-27
Published Online: 2019-12-31

© 2019 Heete Sahkai et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2019-0040/html
Scroll to top button