Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 31, 2019

Stativity in the Causative Alternation? New Questions and a New Variant

  • Maria Eugenia Mangialavori Rasia EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

This paper discusses whether capacity to license an internal argument and eventivity are default properties of so-called change-of-state verbs.

I draw attention to the claim that, in certain languages, the causative-inchoative alternation extends to a third, external-argument-only variant with stative behavior. Productivity and systematicity raise a host of problems for current generalizations on the Causative Alternation and change-of-state verbs for various reasons, starting from the long-held claim that unique arguments of change-of-state verbs are by default internal. Insofar as the causative component is independently realized in a noneventive, nonepisodic frame, this variant challenges (a) a widely agreed rule of event composition, whereby cause, if present, causally implicates process; (b) the claim that cause(r) interpretation of the external argument is a byproduct of transitivization. The present discussion: (a) brings out a crosslanguage contrast bearing on default (cause/undergoer) interpretation of unique arguments in equipollent alternations; (b) provides new empirical data supporting the stativity of the (causative) outer v head; (c) substantiates important predictions in the literature (e.g. that verbs of causation should have stative readings; that external-argument-only variants of Object-Experiencer verbs should be found); (d) captures further verb classes allowing the alternation; and (e) shows crucial contrasts with other transitive-(in/a)transitive alternations involving null/arb objects. Aspect and determination of different (a)atransitivity alternations are central throughout.

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Florian Schäfer. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretation, 187-211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197723.4.187Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Florian Schäfer. 20015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arad, Maya. 1998. VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Authier, J. Marc. 1987 Arbitrary Null Objects and Unselective Binding. In Jaeggli, Oscar, Kenneth Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, 45-67. Dordrecht: Kluwer10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_2Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, John, Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2011. Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 331–69.10.1162/LING_a_00093Search in Google Scholar

Berro, Ane. 2012. Three Levels of Root Insertion in Basque Intransitive Verbs. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 11(1), 7-22.Search in Google Scholar

Berro, Ane. 2015. Breaking verbs: From event structure to syntactic categories in Basque. PhD dissertation, UPV-EHU and Université de Bordeaux-Montaigne.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh, Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Implicit Arguments. In Everaert, Martin, Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume II, 558-588. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch34Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Denis. 1987. Null Objects and the Theory of Empty Categories, Ms., University of Texas, Austin.Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar

Cattaneo, Andrea. 2008. Italian Null Objects and Resultative/Depictive Predication. In Emily Elfner, Martin Wakov (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 37. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. A Semantics for Unaccusatives and its Syntactic Consequences. Ms., Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Search in Google Scholar

Condoravdi, Cleo. 1990.Symmetric Predicates, Verbal Classes and Diathesis Alterations. Unpublished Ms., University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Copley, Bridget. 2018. Dispositional causation. To appear in Glossa.10.5334/gjgl.507Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William A. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anna M., 1990. Modularity and the mapping from the lexicon to the syntax. Probus 2: 257-290.10.1515/prbs.1990.2.3.257Search in Google Scholar

Doron, Edit. 2003. Agency and Voice: the semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11: 1-67.10.1023/A:1023021423453Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Search in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley. 2003. On obligatory obligation: The composition of Italian causatives. In Castro, Ana, Marcelo Ferreira, Valentine Hacquard, Andrés Pablo Salanova (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 47: Collected Papers on Romance Syntax, 87-113. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley. 2005. Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian & English. In Slabakova, Roumyana, Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), Aspectual Inquiries, 95-120. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5Search in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley. 2007. Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197-238.Search in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley, Simin Karimi. 2005. Determinants of Event Type in Persian Complex Predicates. Lingua 115(10): 1365-140110.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1982. ‘On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexive Clitics’, In Bresnan, Joan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 87-148, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken, Samuel J. Keyser. 1988. Explaining and constraining the English middle. In Tenny, Carol (ed.), Studies in generative approaches to aspect, 41-58. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken, Samuel J. Keyser. 1992. Lexical Categories and the Projection of Argument structure. In Lakarra, Joseba, Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), Syntactic Theory and Basque Syntax, 147-173. Donostia: Supplements of the ASJU.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken, Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, Ken, Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53-109. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken, Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken, Samuel J. Keyser. 2005. Aspect and the Syntax of Argument Structure of verb roots in English. In Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Tova Rapoport (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect, 42-63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. PhD thesis, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2008. On the Causative Construction. In ed. by Miyagawa, Shigeru, Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 20-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Rather, Monika, Anastasia Giannankidou (eds.), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization, 320-342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2012. Lexical Decomposition in Modern Syntactic Theory. In Hinzen, Wolfram, Edouard Machery, Markus Werning (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, 328-350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0015Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In D’Alessandro, Roberta, Irene Franco, Angel J. Gallego (eds.), The Verbal Domain, 3-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations. In Comrie, Bernard, Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity, 87-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009 Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 77-138.10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1970. Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth, Malka Rappaport. 2010. Lexicalized Scales and Verbs of Scalar Change. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the CLS, April 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth, Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth, Malka Rappaport. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. Verb Classes in English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 2009a. Aspectual Approaches to Lexical Semantic Representation. LSA Course. https://web.stanford.edu/~bclevin/lsa09aspapp.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 2009b. Lexical Semantics of Verbs I: Introduction and Role-Centered Approaches to Lexical Semantic Representation. LSA Course. https://web.stanford.edu/~bclevin/lsa09intro-sr.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. On Davidsonian and Kimian States. In Comorovski, Ileana, Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Syntax and Semantics, 107-130. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_4Search in Google Scholar

Mangialavori Rasia, Ma. Eugenia. 2018. On the limits of the causative alternation (or on the hidden potential of COS verbs). Paper presented at the 44th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Rome, March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Marín, Rafael, Louise McNally. 2011. Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 267-502.Search in Google Scholar

Massam, Diane. 1989. Null Objects and Non-Thematic Subjects in Middles and Tough Constructions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 11.2: 53-60.Search in Google Scholar

Massam, Diane. 1992. Null objects and non-thematic subjects. Journal of Linguistics 28: 115-137.10.1017/S0022226700015012Search in Google Scholar

Mateu, Jaume, Mar Massanell. 2015. A constructional approach to auxiliary selection. In Kailuweit, Rolf, Malte Rosemeyer (eds.), Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness. Berlin: de Gruyter, 183-212.Search in Google Scholar

Mateu, Jaume. 2017 Two types of locative alternation. In Álvarez González, Albert, Ia Navarro (eds.), Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives, 52-77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.120.03matSearch in Google Scholar

McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. Event Paths, Conflation, Argument Structure and VP Shells. Linguistics 42: 523-571.Search in Google Scholar

McIntyre, Andrew. 2005. The Semantic and Syntactic Decomposition of get. Journal of Semantics, 22-4(1), 401-438.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian, Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the Functional Hierarchy Language Sciences, 46: 152-17410.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: a first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486319Search in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1986. On the Null Object in European Portuguese. In Jaeggli, Oscar, C. Silva-Corvalane (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics, 373-390. Foris: Dordrecht.10.1515/9783110878516-024Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport, Malka, Beth Levin 2010. Lexicalized Scales and Verbs of Scalar Change’. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, April 8-10, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport, Malka, Beth Levin. 2012. Lexicon Uniformity and the Causative Alternation. In Everaert, Martin, Marijana Marelj, Tal Siloni (eds.), The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, 1-19. Oxford: Oxford University.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The Theta System. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229-290.10.1515/thli.28.3.229Search in Google Scholar

Rivero, Maria Luisa. 2004. Datives and the Non-Active Voice/Reflexive Clitics in Balkan languages. In Olga Tomić (ed.), Balkan Syntax and Semantics, 237-267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.67.13rivSearch in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501-557.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2003. Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203461785Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 1987. The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110877304Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, Susan. 1996. Events and Verb Classification. Linguistics, 34: 191-223.Search in Google Scholar

Rothmayr, Antonia. 2009. The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.143Search in Google Scholar

Rothstein, Susan. 2012. Another Look at Accomplishments and Incrementality. In Demonte, Violeta, Louis McNally (eds.), Telicity, Change, State: A cross-categorical view of event structure, 60-102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Russi, Cinzia. 2008. Italian Clitics. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110206975Search in Google Scholar

Soto, Guillermo. 2008. Sobre el llamado futuro de probabilidad [On the so-called future of probability]. Boletín de Filología XLII: 193-206Search in Google Scholar

Varchetta, Nicola. 2012. Rethinking Italian psychological verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, Università. Ca’ Foscari Venezia.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument Structure and Morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81-114.10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1986. The Italian Null Objects. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter. 2003. Optimal case patterns: German and Icelandic compared. In Brandner, Ellen, Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New Perspectives on Case Theory, 331-367. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa, Eunjeong Oh. 2007. On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-06-18
Accepted: 2019-05-24
Published Online: 2019-12-31

© 2019 Maria Eugenia Mangialavori Rasia, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2019-0014/html
Scroll to top button