Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 5, 2019

Sonority Sequencing Principle in Sabzevari Persian: A Constraint-Based Approach

  • Mufleh Salem M. Alqahtani EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

This study sheds light on the relationship between the Sonority Sequencing Principle (SSP) and syllable structure in Sabzevari, a Persian vernacular spoken in the Sabzevar area of Northeast Iran. Optimality Theory (OT), as a constraint-based approach, is utilized to scrutinize sonority violation and its repair strategies. The results suggest that obedience to the SSP is mandatory in Sabzevari, as shown through the treatment of word-final clusters in Standard Persian words which violate the SSP. These consonant clusters are avoided in Sabzevari by two phonological processes: vowel epenthesis and metathesis. Vowel epenthesis is motivated by final consonant clusters of the forms /fricative+coronal nasal/, /plosive+bilabial nasal/, /fricative+bilabial nasal/, /plosive+rhotic/, /fricative+rhotic/, and /plosive+lateral/. Metathesis, as another repair strategy for sonority sequencing violations, occurs when dealing with final consonant clusters of the forms /plosive+fricative/and / fricative+lateral/.

References

Ahmadkhani, Mohammad Reza. 2010 Phonological metathesis in Persian: Synchronic, diachronic, and the optimality theory. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji Journal 56. 5-24. http://www.linguisticsnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/Khareji-2009-Phonological-metathesis-in-Persian-Synchronic-diachronic-and-the-optimality-theory2.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Aldaghi, Anita, Tavakoli, Nastaran. 2011 Major phonetic processes in Sabzevari Dialect. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1(3). 292-301.10.4304/tpls.1.3.292-301Search in Google Scholar

Allen, W. Sidney. 1956. Structure and system in the Abaza verbal complex. Transactions of the Philological Society 55(1). 127-176. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1956.tb00566.x10.1111/j.1467-968X.1956.tb00566.xSearch in Google Scholar

Barker, Muhammad Abd-al-Rahman. 1963. Klamath dictionary. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bat-El, Outi. 1996. Selecting the best of the worst: the grammar of Hebrew blends. Phonology 13(3). 283-328. http://www.outibatel.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Bat-El-1996-selecting-the-best-of-the-worst-the-grammar-of-Hebrew-blends.pdf10.1017/S0952675700002657Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Alan, Saka, Mohamed M. 1982. Reversed sonority in Pashto initial clusters. Journal of Phonetics 11(3). 259-275. https://asa.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1121/1.201968010.1016/S0095-4470(19)30826-5Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, Travis G. 2007. Constraints on the metathesis of sonorant consonants in Judeo-Spanish. Probus 19 (2). 171-207.10.1515/PROBUS.2007.006Search in Google Scholar

Carr, Philip. 1993. Phonology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-22849-2Search in Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 1990 The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Papers in laboratory phonology 1. 283-333.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017Search in Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B. 1944. Kota texts. Oakland: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15(2). 325-340. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1959.1165970210.1080/00437956.1959.11659702Search in Google Scholar

Hannahs, Stephen J. 2013. The phonology of Welsh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601233.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Huffman, Franklin E. 1972. The boundary between the monosyllable and the disyllable in Cambodian. Lingua 29. 54-66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002438417290006X10.1016/0024-3841(72)90006-XSearch in Google Scholar

Jeremiás, Éva M. 1984. Diglossia in persian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 34(3/4). 271-287. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35147483.pdf#page=281Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik [Textbook of Phonetics]. Leipzig: BG Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812408Search in Google Scholar

Karim, Khaled. 2010. Vowel epenthesis in Bangla: An Optimality Theory analysis. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle 20(1). 26-36. web.uvic.ca/index.php/wplc/article/download/5670/2196Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jin-hyung. 2002. Lexicon optimization reconsidered. Language Research 38.31–50. http://sspace.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/86197/1/2.%202225609.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Klein, Marc. 1993. La syllabe comme interface de la production et de la r´eception phoniques [The syllable as an Interface of Sound Production and Reception]. In B. Laks & M Plénat (eds.), De natura sonorum: Essais de phonologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes. 101-141.Search in Google Scholar

Koshal, Sanyukta. 1979. Ladakhi grammar. Delhi, Varanasi and Patna: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Laks, Bernard, Plénat, Marc. (eds.) 1993. De natura sonorum: Essais de phonologie [From Natura Sonorum: Essays of Phonology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Search in Google Scholar

Mace, John. 2015. Persian Grammar: For reference and revision. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315029559Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J., Prince, Alan. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of morphology 1993, 79-153. Dordrecht: Springer. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=linguist_faculty_pubs10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J., Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Dickey, and S. Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory 18, 249-384. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=linguist_faculty_pubsSearch in Google Scholar

Michelson, Karin. 1988. A comparative study of Lake-Iroquoian accent. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-009-2709-4Search in Google Scholar

Mobaraki, Mahmoud. 2013. Fortition in Persian Phonological System. Journal of Education and Practice.Search in Google Scholar

Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil. 1992. Describing the phonology of non-native varieties of a language. World Englishes 11(2-3). 111-128. https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/5242310.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00056.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pawelec, Przemysław. 2012. The Sonority Sequencing Generalization and the Structure of Consonant Clusters with Trapped Sonorants in Polish. Anglica Wratislaviensia 50. 183-195.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Alan, Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Boulder: MS, Rutgers University and University of Colorado.Search in Google Scholar

Rahbar, Elham Rohany.2009. On contrasts in the Persian vowel system. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 31. https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6092/3093Search in Google Scholar

Rahbar, Elham Rohany. 2012. Aspects of Persian phonology and morpho-phonology. Toronto: University of Toronto Ph.D. thesis.Ridouane, Rachid. 2008. Syllables without vowels: phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology 25(2). 321-359. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00382862/file/Ridouane-Phonology25.pdf10.1017/S0952675708001498Search in Google Scholar

Roach, Peter. 2002. A little encyclopaedia of phonetics. http://www.freeinfosociety.com/media/pdf/4599.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Rossi, Adriano. 2015. Diglossia in Persian. Acta et studia 13. 211-219.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In M. Aronoff & R. Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure, 107-136. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shademan, Shabnam. 2002. Epenthesis Vowel Harmony in Farsi. California: University of California MA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Treiman, Rebecca, Berch, Denise, Tincoff, Ruth, Weatherston, Sarah. 1993. Phonology and spelling: The case of syllabic consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 56(3). 267-290.10.1006/jecp.1993.1035Search in Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin: Mounton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110849608Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 1996. Lexicon optimization in languages without alternations. In Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, vol. 1, ed. by Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks, 757–788. Manchester, U.K.: University of Salford, European Studies Research Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Zahedi, Muhamad Sediq, Alinezhad, Batool, Rezai, Vali. 2012. The Sonority Sequencing Principle in Sanandaji/Erdelani Kurdish: An Optimality Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of English Linguistics 2(5).72-84.10.5539/ijel.v2n5p72Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-10-11
Accepted: 2019-10-15
Published Online: 2019-12-05

© 2019 Mufleh Salem M. Alqahtani, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2019-0024/html
Scroll to top button