Abstract
This article gauges the plausibility of Nicolay Yakovlev’s theory of Old English meter. Although he accepts the four-position principle of Eduard Sievers, Yakovlev dissents from the Sieversian tradition by arguing that morphology determines the invariable metrical behavior of every element, that there are no intermediate levels of ictus, and that alliteration is not a structural feature of Old English versification. Yakovlev’s innovations are intended to simplify the Sieversian tradition, but we demonstrate that they actually result in a metrical system that is excessively complex, theoretically incoherent, and empirically inadequate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an extended review of these two monographs, see Pascual (2018).
For a detailed account of Fulk’s refinements to Sievers’s theory, see Pascual (2016b).
Following Yakovlev’s practice, all of the examples used in this essay will be adduced from Beowulf. We consistently cite the poem by line number from the edition of Fulk et al. (2008).
For the standard account, see Campbell (1959: §88).
The hypothetical *frōd cyning þrīo wicg is syntactically patterned on real verses like 653a, Hrōðgār Bēowulf, consisting of Subject and Direct Object. The phrase frōd cyning (nominative singular) occurs in l. 1306b, Þā wæs frōd cyning, and þrīo wicg (accusative plural) occurs in 2174b, þrīo wicg somod. The hypothetical *snotor guma bēah ġeaf is likewise made up of elements that occur in the poem: l. 1384a, Ne sorga, snotor guma, and 1719b, nallas bēagas ġeaf. That verses such as these do not occur is therefore attributable to the reality of ictus subordination within the Old English half-line.
To be sure, the sequence SS, as in gōd ðeġn, occurs verse-finally in late poetry, but never in metrically conservative poems like Beowulf (see Fulk 1992: §291), for which Yakovlev’s theory aims to account. Second compound elements, like -ðeġn in healðeġn, never occur in the verse-internal drop of type B verses, a location generally reserved for unambiguously unstressed syllables.
The vocalism of participial -end indicates lack of phonological stress (see Fulk 1992: §263). That the stress on the deuterotheme of a dithematic name is weaker than that on the second element of a compound word is suggested most clearly by the failure of dithematic names to participate systematically in the line’s alliteration.
For a full list of verses featuring either resolution or its suspension under secondary stress in Beowulf, see Bliss (1967: 27–30).
Old English wine, an i-stem, descends from prehistoric Old English *winĭ, while draca, an n-stem, descends from *drakō. On the length of desinences in prehistoric Old English and Germanic, see Fulk (2018: 79–87).
Lines 563b and 907a are particle verses, that is, verses that consist exclusively of linguistic elements that may be variably ictic or non-ictic depending on their position within the clause. For a detailed study of this type of verse, see Fulk (2016).
The connection between alliteration and meter is further explored in Pascual (2017b).
Cf. Weiskott: “[Yakovlev’s] proposition that the meter was morphological, not accentual, is as original as it is clarifying” (2016: 25).
References
Bliss, A. J. (1967). The metre of Beowulf (rev ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cable, T. (1974). The meter and melody of Beowulf. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Cable, T. (2009). Progress in Middle English alliterative metrics. Yearbook of Langland Studies,23, 243–264.
Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cornelius, I. (2015). The accentual paradigm in early English metrics. Journal of English and Germanic Philology,114, 459–481.
Cornelius, I. (2017). Reconstructing alliterative verse: The pursuit of a medieval meter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duncan, E. (1993). Weak stress and poetic constraints in Old English verse. Journal of English and Germanic Philology,92, 495–508.
Fulk, R. D. (1992). A history of Old English meter. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Fulk, R. D. (1996a). Inductive methods in the textual criticism of Old English verse. Medievalia et Humanistica,23, 1–24.
Fulk, R. D. (1996b). Rhetoric, form, and linguistic structure in early Germanic verse: Towards a synthesis. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis,1, 63–88.
Fulk, R. D. (1997). Textual criticism. In R. E. Bjork & J. D. Niles (Eds.), A Beowulf handbook (pp. 35–53). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Fulk, R. D. (2002). Early Middle English evidence for Old English meter: Resolution in Poema morale. Journal of Germanic Linguistics,14, 331–355.
Fulk, R. D. (2007). The textual criticism of Frederick Klaeber’s Beowulf. In A. Wawn, G. Johnson, & J. Walter (Eds.), Constructing nations, reconstructing myth: Essays in honour of T. A. Shippey (pp. 132–153). Turnhout: Brepols.
Fulk, R. D. (2016). Particle verses in Old English and eddic poetry. In M. J. Toswell & L. Brady (Eds.), Early English poetic culture and meter: The influence of G. R. Russom (pp. 21–37). Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.
Fulk, R. D. (2018). A comparative grammar of the early Germanic languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fulk, R. D., Bjork, R. E., & Niles, J. D. (Eds.). (2008). Klaeber’s Beowulf and the fight at Finnsburg. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Goering, N. (2016). The linguistic elements of Old Germanic metre: Phonology, metrical theory, and the development of alliterative verse. DPhil dissertation, University of Oxford.
Kaluza, M. (1896). Zur Betonungs- und Verslehre des Altenglischen. In Festschrift zum siebzigsten Geburtstage Oskar Schade (pp. 101–134). Königsberg: Hartungsche Verlagsdruckerei.
Krackow, O. (1903). Die Nominalkomposita als Kunstmittel im altenglischen Epos. Weimar: Druck von R. Wagner Sohn.
Kuhn, H. (1933). Zur Wortstellung und -betonung im Altgermanischen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur,57, 1–109.
Neidorf, L. (2016). Metrical criteria for the emendation of Old English poetic texts. In L. Neidorf, R. J. Pascual, & T. Shippey (Eds.), Old English philology: Studies in honour of R. D. Fulk (pp. 52–68). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Neidorf, L. (2017). The transmission of Beowulf: Language, culture, and scribal behavior. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Neidorf, L., & Pascual, R. J. (2014). The language of Beowulf and the conditioning of Kaluza’s law. Neophilologus,98, 657–673.
Pascual, R. J. (2013–2014). Three-position verses and the metrical practice of the Beowulf poet. Selim: Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature, 20, 49–79.
Pascual, R. J. (2014). Ælfric’s rhythmical prose and the study of Old English metre. English Studies,95, 803–823.
Pascual, R. J. (2015). On a crux in Beowulf: The alliteration of finite verbs and the scribal understanding of metre. Studia Neophilologica,87, 171–185.
Pascual, R. J. (2016a). Old English metrical history and the composition of Widsið. Neophilologus,100, 289–302.
Pascual, R. J. (2016b). Sievers, Bliss, Fulk, and Old English metrical theory. In L. Neidorf, R. J. Pascual, & T. Shippey (Eds.), Old English philology: Studies in honour of R. D. Fulk (pp. 17–33). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Pascual, R. J. (2017a). Manuscript evidence and metrical authenticity: A response to Seiichi Suzuki. Journal of Germanic Linguistics,29, 85–99.
Pascual, R. J. (2017b). Oral tradition and the history of English alliterative verse. Studia Neophilologica,89, 250–260.
Pascual, R. J. (2018). Alliterative metre and medieval English literary history. Atlantis,40, 221–230.
Pascual, R. J. (Forthcoming). Bliss’s rule and Old English metrics. ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews.
Sievers, E. (1885). Zur Rhythmik des germanischen Alliterationsverses. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur,10(209–314), 451–545.
Sievers, E. (1893). Altgermanische Metrik. Halle: Niemeyer.
Terasawa, J. (1994). Nominal compounds in Old English: A metrical approach. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger.
Weiskott, E. (2016). English alliterative verse: Poetic tradition and literary history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yakovlev, N. (2008). The development of alliterative metre from Old to Middle English. DPhil dissertation, University of Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neidorf, L., Pascual, R.J. Nicolay Yakovlev’s Theory of Old English Meter: a Reassessment. Neophilologus 104, 245–253 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-019-09624-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-019-09624-7