Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton January 8, 2020

Foregrounding of subordinate clauses by word order: Psycholinguistic evidence of the function of V>Adv (V2) word order in Danish

  • Marie Herget Christensen , Tanya Karoli Christensen and Torben Juel Jensen EMAIL logo
From the journal Linguistics

Abstract

In modern Danish, main clauses have the word order X>Verb>Adverb (i. e., V2) whereas subordinate clauses are generally characterized by the “subordinate clause” word order Subject>Adverb>Verb. Spoken Danish has a high frequency of “main clause” word order in subordinate clauses, however, and in the article we argue that this “Main Clause Phenomena” (cf. Aelbrecht et  al. 2012) functions as a foregrounding device, signaling that the more important information of the clause complex is to be found in the subordinate clause instead of in its matrix clause.

A prediction from the foregrounding hypothesis is that a subordinate clause with Verb>Adverb word order will attract more attention than a clause with Adverb>Verb word order. To test this, we conducted an experiment under the text change paradigm. 59 students each read 24 constructions twice, each containing a subordinate clause with either Verb>Adverb or Adverb>Verb word order. Half of the subordinate clauses were governed by a semifactive predicate (open to both word orders) and the other half by a semantically secondary sentence (in itself strongly favoring Verb>Adverb word order). Attention to the subordinate clause was tested by measuring how disinclined the participants were to notice change of a word in the subordinate clause when re-reading it.

Results showed significantly more attention to Verb>Adverb clauses than to Adverb>Verb clauses (though only under semifactive predicates), and more attention to subordinate clauses under semantically secondary than semifactive predicates. We consider this as strongly supporting the hypothesis that Verb>Adv word order functions as a foregrounding signal in subordinate clauses.

Appendix

Table of all sentences in list 1 (excluding fillers). Note that the word order is opposite in the corresponding sentences in list 2. The word that is changed is underlined. The word that the word is changed into in the second presentation is showed in the rightmost column.

Pred.First presentationChange word
1SFTil mødetforklaredehandemathanvidsteikkenogetomfør ‘before’
At meeting-DEFexplainedhethemthatheknewnotanythingabout
udnævnelsenindenhankiggedeitelefonbogen
nomination-DEFprior.tohelookedintelephone.directory-DEF
‘At the meeting he explained that he did not know anything about the nomination before he looked in the phone directory’
2SSMen detharnogetatgøremedatduikketagerind ‘into’
But thathassomethingtodowiththatyounotbring
sådanentemmeliglillefyrmedikirkennårder
suchaprettysmallguywithinchurch-DEFwhenthere
erbegravelsevel
isfuneralright
‘but that has to do with the fact that you do not take such a small kid with you to church during a funeral’
3SFEfterhåndenharhunaccepteretatjegharikkenogenen ‘a’
EventuallyhassheacceptedthatIhavenotany
forsikringtilmineældredagehvismankansigedetsådan
insuranceformyolderdaysifyoucouldsayitso
‘By now she has accepted that I do not have any insurance for my older days so to speak’
4SStænktejegatdetikkeskulleværedetjoballigevelmit ‘my’
ThenthoughtIthatitnotshouldbethatjobanyway
hvisdetskulleværedenmåde
ifitshouldbeinthatway
‘then I thought that it should not be that job anyway if that was what it was like’
5SFhanoverbevisedemomatviikkeerden ‘this’
Thenmustheconvincethemaboutthatwenotare
sådanalleosfradenneherbebyggelse
like.thatallusfromthisherebuilding
‘Then he will have to convince them that we are not like that all of us from this building’
6SSJegkangodtmærkeatjegsnakkerikkespecieltmegetsærlig
IcanwellfeelthatIspeaknotparticularlymuch‘particular’
mindrejysknuendjeggjordetidligere
lessJutlandishnowthanIdidpreviously
‘I do feel that I do not speak particularly less Jutlandish now than I did before’
7SFOgpludseliggikdetopforhendeatjegikke ‘such’
AndsuddenlywentituptoherthatInot
gikiskoleogsådannogetmenrendterundt
wenttoschoolandsuchsomebutranaround
ogspisteisnedeLangelinie
andateice.creamdownatLangelinie
‘and suddenly she realized that I did not attend school and stuff but ran about eating ice cream at Langelinie’
8SSDetkanværeatdeterikkekommunensellernabos
Itcanbethatitisnotmunicipality-DEF-sor‘neighbor’s’
mingenbosellerhvemvedjegmen
myopposite.neighbor’sorwhoknowIbut
mingrunddeharmedatgøre
mypropertytheyhavewithtodo
‘It is possible that it is not the property of the municipality or of my neighbor opposite or of who knows who but my property which they are dealing with’
9SFHanhargjorthendeklartathankanikkeklareallebegge
Hehasmadeherclearthathecannotmanageall‘both’
børneneoghusetogombygningenogdethele
children-DEFandhouse-DEFandrenovation-DEFanditall
vel
right
‘He has made it clear to her that he cannot manage all of the children and the house and the renovation and everything, right’
10SSAltsådetkorteafdetlangeeratderikkevarsøgtallerede
Sotheshortofthelongisthattherenotwaslooked.for‘already’
kamerafolktilTVogfilmalligevelognusøgtede
cameramenfortvandfilmsanywayandnowlooked.forthey
to
two
‘well in short the thing is that they had not been looking for cameramen for tv and film before and now they were looking for two’
11SFAltsåsidstelønseddelopdagedehanathanvarcirka
Soonlastpaycheckdiscoveredhethathewas‘around’
ikkestegetdederomtrenthalvtredskroneritillæg
notrisenthosethereaboutfiftykronerinbonus
somhanhavdekrav
whichhehaddemandon
‘well on his last paycheck he discovered that he had not received that fifty kroner bonus that he was entitled to’
12SSOgvardetsådannogetmedatviikke kunneafsatsolgt ‘sold’
Andthenwasitsuchsomewiththatwenot couldgetsold
gårdentildenrigtigepris
farm-DEFfortherightprice
‘And then it was something like we could not sell the farm for the right price’
13SFDet-togmangeårforhendeatindseatjegvilleikkekomme
IttookmanyyearsforhertorealizethatIwouldnot‘come’
vendetilbagetilvoresforholdnogensindeigen
returnbacktoourrelationshipeveragain
‘It took her many years before she realized that I would not return to our relationship ever again’
14SSJegkunneforestillemigatpersonenikkevarretmegetældre
Icouldimaginemethatperson-DEFnotwasmuchmore‘older’
yngreenddenaldrendetalerilydprøvetre
youngerthantheolderspeakerinsound.samplethree
fordilydenermegetmoden
becausesound-DEFisverymature
‘I could imagine that the person was not very much younger than the older speaker in sound sample number three because the sound is very mature’
15SFHerdenandendaghørtehanatdekanikkeafskedigederindefra
Heretheotherdayheardhethattheycannotlay.off‘from in
folkogsådannogetderudefragrundafnoglethere’
peopleandsuchsomefrom.out.thereongroundsofsome
bestemteting
specificthings
‘The other day he heard that they cannot lay off people and stuff like that from there because of some specific matters’
16SSOgvedjegatdeikkeerhårdeimodbørnoverfor
AndthenknowIthattheynotaresotoughagainstchildren‘towards’
mendetkommer anhvaddeharstjålet
butitdependsonwhattheyhavestolen
‘And I know that they are not tough against children but it depends on what they have stolen’
17SFOgderkanhunjoforståatviikkeharliggetogsiddet ‘sit’
Andtherecanshewellunderstandthatwenothavelainand
grædtoveratderikkevarnogenfamilietilvores
criedaboutthattherenotwasanyfamilyatour
sølvbryllupvel
silver.weddingright
‘and she must then understand that we have not been crying about the fact that there was not any family present at our silver wedding’
18SSManskaltænkeatdererikkevarmemedhan ‘he’
Youshouldthinkaboutthatthereisnotheatingincluded
idethunbetalerihuslejevel
inthatshepaysinrentright
‘You have to consider that heating is not included in what she pays in rent right’
19SFOgrethurtigtviserdetsigathunikkekantålesin ‘her’
AndprettysoonappearsitREFLthatshenotcantolerate
hendeskatogskaltagepillerogjegvedikkehvad
hercatandmusttakepillsandIknownotwhat
‘And pretty soon it turns out that she is allergic to her cat and needs to take pills and what not’
20SSMenellersviljegmeneatjegsnakkerikkesådansærligvores ‘our’
ButotherwisewillIthinkthatIspeaknotsovery
anderledesendminfasterderogsåerkøbenhavner
differentlythanmyauntwhoalsoisCopenhagener
‘but besides from that I do feel that I do not speak very different from my aunt who is also a Copenhagener’
21SFMenhunharfundetudafathunikkeharheltlige ‘just’
Butshehasfoundoutofthatshenothasjustas
nemtvedatlæseogstavesomTommy
easywithtoreadandspellasTommy
‘But she has found out that reading and spelling does not come to her as easy as for Tommy’
22SSNuharjegdetmedatmindrengerikkefyldtseksnuværende
NowhaveIitwiththatmyboyisnotturnedsix‘this’
åriindeværendeskoleårvelerhanaltsåfor
yearsinthisschol.yearrightthenishereallytoo
lille
small
‘For me it is like my son is not yet six years this school year right, so he is simply too small’
23SFMinsøstervarjokommethjemogaltsåskullemere ‘any
Mysisterwasas.you.knowreturnedhomeandsoshouldlonger’
hanvænnesigtilathanikkevardenældstelængereog
heget.usedREFLtothathenotwastheoldestanymoreand
altdetherfiskke
allthisherecraprighti
‘As you know my sister had returned and then he had to get used to the fact that he was not the oldest kid anymore and all that crap right’
24SSNuviljegsigeatjegharikkenogenintentionermåde ‘way’
NowwillsaythatIhavenotanyintentions
nogenvisomatblandemigidetkunstneriske
inanywayabouttointerfereREFLintheartistic
‘Now I must stress that I have no intentions of interfering with the artistic matters in any ways’

References

Aelbrecht, Lobke, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye. 2012. Main clause phenomena. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190Search in Google Scholar

Andersson, Lars-Gunnar. 1975. Form and function of subordinate clauses. Gothenburg: Department of linguistics, University of Gothenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801686Search in Google Scholar

Bentzen, Kristine. 2010. Exploring embedded main clause phenomena: The irrelevance of factivity and some challenges from V2 languages. Theoretical Linguistics 36. 163–172.10.1515/thli.2010.010Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31. 569–606.10.1075/sl.31.3.03boySearch in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88. 1–44.10.1353/lan.2012.0020Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Marie Herget. 2015. Ændringsblindhed i sætningsprocessering i skriftlig dansk [Change blindness in sentence processing of written Danish]. MUDS 15. 83–96.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen. 2015. Word order variation and foregrounding of complement clauses. In Eivind Thorgersen, Stian Hårstad, Brit Mæhlum & Unn Røyneland (eds.), Language variation – European perspectives V: Selected papers from the Seventh International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 7), Trondheim June 2013, 69–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/silv.17.06karSearch in Google Scholar

Christensen, Tanya Karoli, Torben Juel Jensen & Marie Herget Christensen. 2015. Adverbielle ledsætningers ledstilling i dansk talesprog [Word order of adverbial subclauses in spoken Danish]. MUDS 15. 97–115.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2005. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282005.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær Dansk Grammatik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Fernanda, Karl G. D. Bailey & Vittoria Ferraro. 2002. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11. 11–15.10.1111/1467-8721.00158Search in Google Scholar

Glismann, Otto. 1978. On factives and semi-factives. In John Weinstock (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, Vol. 3, 360–365. Austin: University of Texas.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Georgia M. 1976. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses. Language 52. 382–397.10.2307/412566Search in Google Scholar

Gregersen, Frans. 2009. The data and design of the LANCHART study. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41. 3–29.10.1080/03740460903364003Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Erik & Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. Copenhagfen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Search in Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan B. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 465–497.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Torben Juel & Tanya Karoli Christensen. 2013. Promoting the demoted: The distribution and semantics of “main clause word order” in spoken Danish complement clauses. Lingua 137. 38–58.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2007. Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80. 103–161.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, JW. 2007. PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162. 8–13.10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017Search in Google Scholar

Price, Jessica M. 2008. The use of Focus Cues in Healthy Ageing. Dissertation, University of Glasgow.Search in Google Scholar

Sanford, Alison JS, Anthony J Sanford, Ruth Filik & Jo Molle. 2005. Depth of lexical-semantic processing and sentential load. Journal of Memory and Language 53. 378–396.10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Sanford, Alison J. S., Anthony J. Sanford, Jo Molle & Catherine Emmott. 2006. Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes 42. 109–130.10.1207/s15326950dp4202_2Search in Google Scholar

Simons, Mandy. 2007. Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117. 1034–1056.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.006Search in Google Scholar

Sturt, Patrick, Anthony J Sanford, Andrew Stewart & Eugene Dawydiak. 2004. Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11. 882–888.10.3758/BF03196716Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24. 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Search in Google Scholar

Teleman, Ulf. 1967. Bisatser i talad svenska [Subordinate clauses in spoken Swedish]. In Gösta Holm (ed.), Svenskt talspråk, 160–203. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac. 1991a. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15. 237–251.10.1016/0378-2166(91)90012-MSearch in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac. 1991b. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 313–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119. 1914–1938.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-01-08
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2019-0040/html
Scroll to top button