Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rethinking Critique: Becoming Clinician

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 November 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Today, capitalism functions as a very complex tool of colonisation capturing our desires, dreams, and putting life itself at risk. Its effects lead us all to times of extreme anxiety increasing the number of people with mental health problems. This paper is concerned with the question of ‘critique’ within this context. How can critical legal scholarship engage with a theoretical mode that allows us to confront the politics of law with today’s capitalism? This analysis shows that contemporary capitalism, which operates as an immanent desiring-machine, is investing in our unconscious. In this sense, we aim to rethink the idea of ‘critique’ as an opportunity to make it creative and effective. As such, this paper argues that the Deleuzian concept Critical and Clinical is particularly useful, as it opens new roots for the critical movement. Taking the literary strategy of Masochism and the experience of the Institutional Psychotherapy movement in France, the clinical–critical practice contributes to push and expand critical scholarship into new terrains of thought and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 05 November 2019

    The article Rethinking Critique: Becoming Clinician, written by Leticia Da Costa Paes, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 24 September 2019 with open access.

Notes

  1. According to Rolnik, a characteristic of the finance capitalism that established itself across the planet from the mid-1970s onward.

  2. ‘Philosophy does not serve the State or the Church (…) It serves no established power. The use of philosophy is to sadden. A philosophy that saddens no one, that annoys no one, is not a philosophy’ (Deleuze 2006, p. 106).

  3. Contrary to psychoanalytical interpretation, the unconscious in Guattari and Deleuze functions not through representation, but rather as a factory. See Lazzarato (2014, p. 31).

  4. Understood as the practice of not imposing on us a form established a priori.

  5. I have been greatly inspired in this undertaking by the work of Tosel (2016, pp. 195–204).

  6. This makes sense if one understands the Guatarri–Deleuzean claim that Oedipus is not a truth of the unconscious, but a mystification of the unconscious that has triumphed from elements of the previous social formations (Deleuze and Guattari 1986).

  7. In his work with Guattari in What is Philosophy, Deleuze argues that creating concepts is the main task of philosophy, and indeed their work is marked by an extraordinary inventiveness.

  8. This is a direct reference to the clinical practice of the psychiatrist; however, the idea of critique as clinic can be understood in the same sense if the psychiatrist/psychoanalytical/medical clinic becomes a practice of resistance and de-territorialisation.

  9. For more on Fanon’s work at Saint-Alban, see: Mbembe and Fanon-Mendès-France (2012).

  10. La Borde in the Loire Valley of France was created by Jean Oury in the 1950s, which Guattari later joined.

  11. This argument is repeated throughout What is Philosophy? (1994) written with Gilles Deleuze.

  12. Reference to Deleuze’s 'The Exhausted' in Essays Critical and Clinical (1998).

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio, and Carole Walter. 2014. Bartleby ou la création. Belval (Vosges): Circé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, Etienne. 2016. Critique in the 21st century. Political economy still, and religion again. Radical Philosophy 200: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bifo, Franco. 2015. Heroes: Mass murder and suicide. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, Georges. 1991. The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1967. The method of dramatization. Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie LXII: 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1978. Lectures on Spinoza. http://deleuzelectures.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/on-spinoza.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. The logic of sense. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1995a. Negotiations 19721990 (trans: Joughin, M.). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1995b. Postscript on control societies. In Negotiations (trans: Joughin, M.). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1998. Essays critical and clinical (trans: Smith, D.W., Greco, M.A.). London: Verso.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2001. Difference and repetition (trans: Patton, P.). London: Continuum.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2004. Capitalism and schizofrenia. In Desert islands and other texts (19531974) (trans: Taormina, M.), ed. David Lapoujade. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2006. Nietzsche and philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2007. Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 19751995 (trans: Hodges, A., Taormina, M.), ed. David Lapoujade. New York: Semiotext(e).

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2016. Foucault. London: Bloombury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1986. Kafka: Toward a minor literature, 9th ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1994. What is philosophy? (trans: Burchell, G., Tomlinson, H.). London: Verso Books.

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 2014. A thousand plateaus (trans: Massumi, B.). London: Bloomsbury.

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Leopold Sacher-Masoch. 2013. Masochism: WITH coldness and cruelty AND Venus in furs. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosse, F. 2010. Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari: Biografia cruzada. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sutter, Laurent. 2009. Deleuze: La pratique du droit. Editions Michalon. Collection Le bien commun. Parution.

  • Fanon, Frantz. 1961. The wretched of the earth (trans. Farrigton, C.). Penguin Books: London.

  • Fanon, Frantz. 1969. Toward the African revolution: political essays. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, Frantz. 2001. The wretched of the earth. trans. Constance Farrington. London: Penguin Books.

  • Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?. Winchester: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1998. Polemics, politics and problematizations. Interview by Paul Rabinow, May 1984. In Essential works of Foucault, vol. 1, ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1990. Qu’est-ce que la critique? Bulletin de la société française de philosophie 84 (2): 25–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, Félix. 1995. Chaosmosis (trans: Bains, P., Pefanis, J.). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

  • Guattari, Félix. 2007. La Borde: A clinic unlike any other. In Chaosophy: Texts and Interview 1972–1977. Edited by Sylvere Lotringer. trans. David L. Sweet, Jarred Becker, and Taylor Adkins. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e): 176–194.

  • Guattari, Félix, and Suely Rolnik. 2008. Molecular revolution in Brazil. Los Ángeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapoujade, David. 2005. The normal and the pathological in Bergson. MLN, Comparative Literature Issue 120 (5): 1146–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2014. Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, Roland, and Maurice Lipsedge. 2006. Aliens and alienists: Ethnic minorities and psychiatry. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, Achille, and Mireille Fanon-Mendès-France. 2012. Frantz Fanon par les textes de l’époque. Paris: Les Petits Matins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Nathan. 2004. So you love me. Law and Critique 15: 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Nathan. 2013. Image and affect: Between Neo-Baroque sadism and masochism. New York Law School Law Review 57 (1): 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Nathan, and Anne Bottomley. 2012. Law, diagram, film: Critique exhausted. Law and Critique 23 (2): 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oury, Jean. 1970. La psychothérapie institutionnelle de Saint-Alban a La Borde. Poitiers Conférence 1970. Archives IMEC.

  • Pessoa, Fernando. 1998. I don’t know how many souls I have. In Fernando Pessoa & Co.Selected Poems (trans: Zenith, R.). New York: Grove Press.

  • Pignarre, Philippe, and Isabelle Stengers. 2005. Capitalist sorcery: Breaking the spell (trans: Goffey, A.), ed. Goffey, A. Paris: La Decouverte.

  • Querrien, Anne. 2016. Anne Querrien Interviewed by Constantin V. Boundas: La Borde, Guattari and Left Movements in France, 1965–1981. Deleuze Studies 10 (3): 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolnik, Suely. 2001. Archive Mania. DOCUMENTA (13), 9/6/2012–16/9/2012. 100 Notes—100 Thought, No 22.

  • Rolnik, Suely. 2015. A conversation with Suely Rolnik. Re-Visiones #5. http://re-visiones.net/anteriores/spip.php%3Farticle145.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Rolnik, Suely. 2017. The spheres of insurrection: Suggestions for combating the pimping of life. E-flux Journal 86(Nov). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/86/163107/the-spheres-of-insurrection-suggestions-for-combating-the-pimping-of-life/. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

  • Richards, Serene. 2018. May ‘68—A past that never was and a future that has already been missed. In Crisis and critique. 50 Years after May ‘68, eds. Agon Hamza and Frank Ruda, Vol. 5(2), pp. 301–317. https://crisiscritique.org/past.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Robcis, Camille. 2016. Francois Tosquelles and the psychiatric revolution in postwar France. Constellations 23 (2): 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robcis, Camille. 2017. Insitutional psychotherapy in France: An interview with Camille Robcis, by Sarah Marks. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/hiddenpersuaders/blog/robcis-interview/. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Sibertin-Blanc, Guillaume. 2014. Décolonisation du Sujet et Résitance du Symptôme: Clinique et Politique dans Les Damnés de la terre. Cahiers Philosophiques, n. 138/3e trimestre: 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibertin-Blanc, Guillaume, and Stéphane Legrand. 2008. Capitalisme et psychanalyse: l’agencement de subjectivation familialiste. In Ateliers sur L’Anti-Œdipe, ed. Jean-Christophe Goddard and Nicolas Cornibert. Milan: Mimesis Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Daniel. 1998. Introduction. In Essays critical and clinical, ed. Gilles Deleuze. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Daniel W. 2007. Deleuze and the question of desire: Toward an immanent theory of ethics. Parrhesia 2: 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachey, J. (1958). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XII (1911–1913): The Case of Schreber, Papers on Technique and Other Works, ii–vii. The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, London.

  • Tosel, Natascia. 2016. Letteratura, critica e clinica: La perversione deleuziana. Journal of Philosophy II (4): 195–204. (Gilles Deleuze and the Resistance of the Arts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosquelles. 1986. Le vécu de la fin du monde dans la folie. Toulouse: Ed. De L’Areppi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Janell. 2009. Guattari’s diagrammatic thought: Writing between Lacan and Deleuze. London: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Robert. 2010. Anatomy of an epidemic: Magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of mental illness in America. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2001. The world health report 2001. Mental health. New understanding. New hope. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

  • Zourabichvili, François. 1996. Six notes on the percept (on the relation between the critical and the clinical). In Deleuze: A critical reader, ed. Paul Patton. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zourabichvili, François. 2003. Le vocabulaire de Deleuze. Paris: Ellipses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zourabichvili, François. 2012. Deleuze: A philosophy of the event (trans: Kieran Aarons), eds. Gregg Lambert and Daniel W. Smith. Edinburgh: University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

With thanks to Serene Richards and Nathan Moore. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leticia Da Costa Paes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised due to retrospective Open Access cancellation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Da Costa Paes, L. Rethinking Critique: Becoming Clinician. Law Critique 30, 265–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-019-09249-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-019-09249-4

Keywords

Navigation