Abstract
This article examines Cohen’s “transcendental method”, Windelband’s “critical method”, the neo-Kantian distinctions between natural science and the humanities (i. e., human or cultural sciences), and Weber’s account of ideal-typical explanations. The Marburg and the Southwest Schools of neo-Kantianism have in common that their respective philosophies of science focused on method, but they substantially differ in their approaches. Cohen advanced the “transcendental method”, which was taken up and transformed by Natorp and Cassirer; later, it became influential in neo-Kantian approaches to 20th century physics. Windelband distinguished between facts and values, linking the former to the “genetic” method of history and the latter to the “critical” method of philosophy; and between the “nomothetic” and “idiographic” methods of the empirical sciences, a distinction further elaborated by Rickert. The distinction does not give rise to a sharp discrimination but is rather what Weber would later call an ideal type. All these approaches contribute in different ways to understanding the structure of scientific knowledge, focusing on different aspects of the general path of the empirical sciences between rationalism and empiricism.
Acknowledgements
Dietmar Heidemann invited me to contribute this article to the Kant Yearbook and I am very grateful to him for giving me this opportunity. In addition I would like to thank Kieran Salt for language corrections.
Bibliography
Albert, Hans and Ernst Topitsch (eds.) (1971): Werturteilsstreit. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre (1685): La logique ou l’art de penser. Quoted after: Logic or the Art of Thinking. Transl. and ed. by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Aronovitch, Hilliard (2012): Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types. in: Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42, 356 – 369.10.1177/0048393111408779Search in Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael: Analysis. in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/analysis/>.Search in Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2014): The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism (1796 – 1880). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722205.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1910): Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Reprint: Gesammelte Werke, ed. by Birgit Recki. Vol. 6. Hamburg: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1921): Zur Relativitätstheorie Albert Einsteins. Reprint: Gesammelte Werke, ed. by Birgit Recki. Vol. 10. Hamburg: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1923 – 27): Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, vol. I-III. Reprint: Gesammelte Werke, ed. by Birgit Recki. Vol. 11 – 13. Hamburg: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1937): Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik. Reprint: Gesammelte Werke, ed. by Birgit Recki. Vol.19. Hamburg: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1871, 18852): Kant’s Theorie der Erfahrung. Berlin: Dümmler. Repr. of the 3rd ed. (1918) in: Werke, Bd. 1.1. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1877): Kants Begründung der Ethik. Berlin: Dümmler. Reprint of the 2nd ed. (1910) in: Werke, Bd. 2 Hildesheim: Olms, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1883) Das Prinzip der Infinitesimalmethode und seine Geschichte. Ein Kapitel zur Grundlegung der Erkenntniskritik. Berlin: Dümmler. Reprint of the 4th ed. in: Werke, Bd. 5.I. Hildesheim: Olms 1977. Quoted after: “Introduction” to The Principle of the Infinitesimal Method and its History. Engl. transl. by David Hyder and Lydia Patton of Part I, pp. 1 – 11, in: Luft (2015b), pp. 101 – 106.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1896) Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag zu Fr. Alb. Lange's Geschichte des Materialismus in fünfter Auflage. Leipzig: Brandstetter.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1914) Das Verhältnis der Logik zur Physik. In: Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag zur 9. Auflage der Geschichte des Materialismus von Friedrich Albert Lange in dritter, erweiterter Auflage. Leipzig: Brandstetter, 58 – 94. Reprint in: Werke, Band 5.II. Hildesheim: Olms 1977. Quoted after: The Relation of Logic to Physics from the Introduction, with Critical Remarks, to the Ninth Edition of Lange’s “History of Materialism”. Engl. transl. by Lydia Patton, in: Luft (2015b), pp. 117 – 136.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1902, ²1914): System der Philosophie. Erster Teil: Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin: Cassirer. Nachdruck d. 2., verb. Aufl. (1914) in: Werke, Band 6. Hildesheim: Olms, 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1904, ²1907) System der Philosophie. Zweiter Teil: Ethik des reinen Willens. Berlin: Cassirer. Nachdruck d. 2. Aufl. (1907) in: Werke, Band 7. Hildesheim: Olms, 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1912): System der Philosophie. Dritter Teil: Ästhetik des reinen Gefühls. Berlin: Cassirer. Nachdruck in: Werke, Band 8 – 9. Hildesheim: Olms, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Damböck, Christian (2018): Philosophie und Wissenschaft bei Hermann Cohen / Philosophy and Science in Hermann Cohen. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-58023-4Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1973): On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47, pp. 5 – 20.10.2307/3129898Search in Google Scholar
DiSalle, Robert (2013): The transcendental method from Newton to Kant. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, 448 – 456.10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Edel, Geert (1987): Einleitung, in: Helmut Holzhey (Hrsg.): Hermann Cohen, Werke, Bd. 1, Teil 1, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. 8*-59*.Search in Google Scholar
Edel, Geert (2010): Von der Vernunftkritik zur Erkenntnislogik. Die Entwicklung der theoretischen Philosophie Hermann Cohens. Alber 1988. Quoted after the 2nd, completely revised ed.: Waldkirch, Edition Gorz 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert (1949): Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Co-operative Volume. In: Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein. Philosopher – Scientist, Evanston, Ill.: Libr. of Living Philosophers, 1949, pp. 663 – 688.Search in Google Scholar
Engelhard, Kristina (forthcoming): Kant’s non-aprioristic practice of metaphysics in his Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. In manuscript.Search in Google Scholar
Engelhard, Kristina, Gebharter, Alexander, Feldbacher-Escamilla,Cristian and Seide, Ansgar (eds.) (2020):Traditional and Inductive Metaphysics. Special Issue of Grazer Philosophische Studien (to appear).10.1163/18756735-00000129Search in Google Scholar
Falkenburg, Brigitte (2018): Kant and the Scope of the Analytic Method. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 71 (2018), pp. 13 – 23.Search in Google Scholar
Falkenburg, Brigitte (2020a): Kant’s Cosmology. From the Pre-Critical System to the Antinomy of Pure Reason. Cham: Springer Nature (to appear).10.1007/978-3-030-52290-2Search in Google Scholar
Falkenburg, Brigitte (2020b): Hermann Cohens Bedeutung für die Philosophie. In: Görge K. Hasselhoff (ed.), “Diese Einheit von Erzeugen und Erzeugniss fordert der Begriff des reinen Denkens.” – Vorträge zu Erkenntnistheorie und Religion im Denken Hermann Cohens (Schriften aus dem Nachlass von Dieter Adelmann, 4), Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam (to appear).Search in Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1978): Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett. Dt.: Weisen der Welterzeugung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1807): Die Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bamberg/Würzburg: Goebhardt.Search in Google Scholar
Heidemann, Dietmar H. (2002): Hegel, Sellars und der Mythos des Gegebenen. in: Hegel-Jahrbuch 2002/1, pp. 362 – 368.10.1524/hgjb.2002.4.jg.362Search in Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1959): Physik und Philosophie. Stuttgart: Hirzel. Engl.: Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1959.Search in Google Scholar
Hertz, Heinrich (1894): Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhange dargestellt. Leipzig: Barth. Quoted after the Engl. Transl. by T. E. Jones and J. T. Walley: The Principles of Mechanics in a New Form. London/New York: MacMillan & Co., 1899.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2008): Critique of Pure Reason, ed. by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian (2015a) The Space of Culture: Towards a Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Culture. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian (ed.) (2015b): The Neo-Kantian Reader. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (2016): “Wilhelm Dilthey”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/dilthey/>.Search in Google Scholar
Mittelstaedt, Peter (1964): Philosophische Probleme der modernen Physik. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut 1964; 4th ed.: 1972; 7th ed.: 1989. Engl. Translation of the 4th ed.: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Mittelstaedt, Peter (1998): The Constitution of Objects in Kant’s Philosophy and in Modern Physics. In: Elena Castellani (ed.), Interpreting Bodies. Princeton University Press 1998, pp. 168 – 180.Search in Google Scholar
Mittelstaedt, Peter (2009): The Constitution of Objects in Classical Physics and in Quantum Physics. In: Michel Bitbol, Pierre Kerszberg and Jean Petitot (eds.), Constituting Objectivity. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 169 – 181.10.1007/978-1-4020-9510-8_10Search in Google Scholar
Mittelstaedt, Peter (2013): Rational Reconstructions of Modern Physics. 2nd ed., Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5593-2Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., and Margaret Morrison (1999): Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511660108Search in Google Scholar
Mormann, Thomas (2018): Zur Mathematischen Wissenschaftsphilosophie des Marburger Neukantianismus. In: Damböck (2018), pp. 101 – 133.Search in Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul (1910, ²1921): Logische Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac ([1713]: The Principia. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. A new translation by I. Bernhard Cohen and Anne Whitman. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1799.Search in Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1730): Opticks. Based on the Fourth Edition London, 1730. Ed. by I. Bernhard Cohen, New York: Dover 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Oakes, Guy (1990): Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. German ed.: Die Grenzen kulturwissenschaftlicher Begriffsbildung : Heidelberger Max-Weber-Vorlesungen 1982. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (1990).Search in Google Scholar
Pappus of Alexandria (1589), Pappi Alexandrini Mathematicae Collectiones. Venedig. Engl. Transl.: Book 7 of the Collection. Part 1. Edited with Translation and Commentary by Alexander Jones. New York 1986, 82.Search in Google Scholar
Patton, Lydia (2004): Hermann Cohen's history and philosophy of science. Dissertation, McGill University (2004). https://philpapers.org/archive/PATHCH.pdf (access: April 11, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2010): The “Transcendental Method”. On the Reception of the Critique of Pure. Reason in Neo-Kantianism. in: Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge University Press, 346 – 379.Search in Google Scholar
Pringe, Hernán (2017): Cohen and Natorp on Transcendental and Concrete Subjectivity. In: CR: The New Centennial Review, Vol. 17, pp. 115 – 134.10.14321/crnewcentrevi.17.2.0115Search in Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1920). Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori. Berlin: Springer. Transl. by Maria Reichenbach: The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula (2018): Zwischen erkenntnistheoretischem Rationalismus und wissenschaftsphilosophischem Empirismus. Zu Cohens Philosophiebegriff. In: Damböck (2018), pp. 1 – 12.Search in Google Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich (1926): Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. 6th and 7th expanded editions, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Engl. transl.: Science and history: A critique of positivist epistemology, Princeton: Van Nostrand 1962.Search in Google Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich (1929): Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften, 6th improved edition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Abridged Engl. transl.: The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1903): The Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin, 19372.Search in Google Scholar
Scheibe, Erhard (1997): Missverstandene Naturwissenschaft. In: R. Enskat (Hrsg.), Wissenschaft und Aufklärung. Leske und Budrich: Opladen, pp.9 – 29.10.1007/978-3-322-95866-2_1Search in Google Scholar
Scheibe, Erhard (2001): Between Rationalism and Empiricism. Selected Papers in the Philosophy of Physics. Ed. by Brigitte Falkenburg. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4613-0183-7Search in Google Scholar
Scheibe, Erhard (2007): Die Philosophie der Physiker. München: C.H.Beck (revised paperback edition).10.17104/9783406692543Search in Google Scholar
Seide, Ansgar (2020): Die Notwendigkeit empirischer Naturgesetze bei Kant. Reihe: Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie, 144. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110697209Search in Google Scholar
Seide, Ansgar (forthcoming): The Relation between Empirical and A priori Elements in Kant’s Special Metaphysics of Nature. In manuscript.Search in Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfried (1997): Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press. Dt.: Der Empirismus und die Philosophie des Geistes. Paderborn: Mentis, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Staiti, Andrea (2018): “Heinrich Rickert”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/heinrich-rickert/>.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, Robert A. (2019): “Transcendental Arguments”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/transcendental-arguments/>.Search in Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard (2017): How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. In: Journal of Classical Sociology 18, pp. 181 – 196.Search in Google Scholar
Von Weizsäcker, Carl Friedrich (1985): Aufbau der Physik. München: Hanser. Engl. transl.: The Structure of Physics. Edited, revised and enlarged by Thomas Görnitz and Holger Lyre. Dordrecht: Springer 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Gerhard, and Claudius Höpfner (2015): Neo-Kantianism and the social sciences: from Rickert to Weber. In: Nicolas de Warren and Andrea Staiti (eds.), New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139506717.009Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. (1952): Ideal Types and Historical Explanation. In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3, pp. 22 – 43.10.1093/bjps/III.9.22Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1904): Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In: Johannes Winckelmann (ed.), Max Weber: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. 3rd, extended ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1968, pp.146 – 214. Quoted after the Engl. transl.: “Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy. in: E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch (eds.), Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press, 1949, pp. 50 – 112.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1904 – 05): Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus. In: Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 20 (1904), pp. 1 – 54, and 21 (1905), pp. 1 – 110. Engl. Transl. by T. Parsons: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge, 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1882): Was ist Philosophie? (Über Begriff und Geschichte der Philosophie) In: Windelband (1915a), pp. 1 – 54.Search in Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1883): Kritische oder genetische Methode? In: Windelband (1915b), 99 – 135. Quoted after: Critical or Genetic Method? Engl. Transl. by Alan Duncan, in: Luft (2015b, 271 – 286).Search in Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1894): Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. (Straßburger Rektoratsrede) in: Windelband (1915b), pp.136 – 160. Quotations: my translation. Engl. transl. by Guy Oakes: “History and Natural Science” (Presidential Address Strasbourg), in: Luft (2015b, 287 – 298).Search in Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1915a): Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte. Fünfte, erweiterte Auflage. Erster Band. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1915b): Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte. Fünfte, erweiterte Auflage. Zweiter Band. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
