Abstract
The antinomy of teleological judgment has increasingly been understood as a conflict between regulative principles. But it is not clear why regulative principles can be in conflict at all, since Kant otherwise takes the realization that two conflicting principles are regulative to be sufficient to resolve an antinomy. I argue that in Kant’s view regulative principles do not conflict with one another only if they are reducible to reason’s interest in systematicity. Given that the principles of this antinomy do conflict, they must not be reducible to reason’s interest in systematicity. I argue that teleology is thus not reducible to reason’s interest because it is fundamentally unlawful. I then use this irreducibility to account for Kant’s appeal to the supersensible in this context.
Bibliography
Allison, Henry E. “Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy XXX, Supplement, 1991, 25-42.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647033.003.0015Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. Physics. In: The Complete Works of Aristotle. Ed. Jonathon Barnes. Princeton, NJ, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela: “Teleology in Biology: A Kantian Perspective.” In: Kant Yearbook: Teleology. Edited by Dietmar H. Heidemann. Berlin/New York 2009, 31-56.10.1515/9783110196672.31Search in Google Scholar
—. “Two Views on Nature: A Solution of Kant’s Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology.” In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16/2, 2008, 351-369.10.1080/09608780801969167Search in Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart: “Von der Eigentümlichkeit unseres Verstands in Ansehung der Urteilskraft.” In: Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Urteilskraft. Edited by O. Höffe and I. Goy. Berlin 2008, 259-274.10.1524/9783050050157.259Search in Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah: “Kant’s Biological Teleology and its Philosophical Significance.” In: The Blackwell Companion to Kant. Edited by Graham Bird. Oxford 2006, 455-469.10.1002/9780470996287.ch30Search in Google Scholar
—. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. First edition. Oxford 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547975.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
—. “Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle.” In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 42/1, 2004, 33-65.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547975.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273461.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
—. “Kant’s Ambitions in the Third Critique.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Paul Guyer. Cambridge 2006, 533-587.10.1017/CCOL052182303X.017Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel: Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge 2000.10.1017/CBO9780511804656Search in Google Scholar
—. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Allen Wood and Paul Guyer. New York, NY, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter: Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. [Vol. 16. Studies in the History of Philosophy.] Lewiston/New York 1990.Search in Google Scholar
—. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge 2001.10.1017/CBO9780511498510Search in Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel: “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment: What it is and how it is Solved.” In: Kant’s Theory of Biology. Edited by Ina Goy and Eric Watkins. Berlin/Boston 2014, 167-183.10.1515/9783110225792.167Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, Thomas: “What is the Problem of Teleology in Kant’s Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment?” In: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 12, 2011, 198-236.10.1515/sats.2011.014Search in Google Scholar
—. “Wholes that Cause their Parts: Organic Self-Reproduction and the Reality of Biological Teleology.” In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42, 2011, 252-260.10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric: “Nature in General as a System of Ends.” In: Kant’s Theory of Biology. Edited by Ina Goy and Eric Watkins. Berlin/Boston 2014, 117-130.10.1515/9783110225792.117Search in Google Scholar
—. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” In: Kant Yearbook 1, 2009, 197-221.10.1017/9781316683026.009Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Allen: “The Antinomies of Pure Reason.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Paul Guyer. New York 2010, 245-265.10.1017/CCOL9780521883863.011Search in Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel: Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the ‘Critique of Judgment.’ Cambridge 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511487323Search in Google Scholar
Zumbach, Clark: The Transcendent Science: Kant’s Conception of Biological Methodology. Boston 1984.10.1007/978-94-009-6104-3Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
