Skip to main content
Log in

Affirmative Action and Women in Uganda’s Public University Education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines how Affirmative Action was used to govern access to higher education for the disadvantaged. In 1991, a gender-based Affirmative Action policy was incorporated into college admission in Uganda. Using existing empirical data at district and college levels, the article accounts for the categories of women for whom the Uganda’s Affirmative Action policy is most effective. The study found that Affirmative Action had a substantial effect. Sixty-six per cent of the sampled population would not have been admitted, had it not been for Affirmative Action. But the policy did not work for the historically disadvantaged; it worked for specific categories of women from specific regions, districts and high schools; on grounds that it was implemented for competitive reasons. The study provides relevant lessons for policy making in countries grappling with the challenges of high socio-economic inequality and higher returns to higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alon, S. (2011) ‘The diversity dividends of a need-blind and color-blind Affirmative Action policy’, Social Science Research, 40(6): 1494–1505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono, P. and Lovenheim, M. (2016) ‘Affirmative Action and the Quality-Fit Tradeoff’, Journal of Economic Literature 54(1): 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M. (2003) Panel Data Econometrics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I. and Brooks, R. (2005) ‘Does Affirmative Action reduce the number of black lawyers?’, Stanford Law Review 57(6): 1807–1814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagde, S., Epple, D, and Taylor, L. (2016) ‘Does Affirmative action work? Caste, gender, college quality and academic success in India’, The American Economic Review 106(6):1495–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Basant, R. and Sen., G. (2019) ‘Quota-Based Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Impact on Other Backward Classes in India’. The Journal of Development Studies. Published online 20 February. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1573987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betrand, M,. Hanna, R,. and Mullainathan, S. (2010) ‘Affirmative action in education: Evidence from engineering college admission in India', Journal of Public Economics 94(1): 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski, S. (2012) ‘Affirmative Action and reverse discrimination: Walking the fine line’, Insight into Diversity 79(3): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, C. and DiPrete, T.A. (2006) ‘The Growing Female Advantage in College Completion: the Role of Family Background and Academic Achievement’, American Sociological Review 71: 515–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butto, J., Moore, K. N. and Rienzo, B. A. (2006) ‘Supporting diversity works: African American male and female employment in six Florida cities’, Western Journal of Black Studies 30(3): 144–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. M. J. (2002) ‘Mental Models and Counterfactual thoughts about what might have been’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(10): 426–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. l., Clydesdale, T., Kidder, W. C. and Lempert, R. O. (2005) ‘The real impact of eliminating Affirmative Action in American law schools: An empirical critique of Richard Sander’s study’, Stanford Law Review 57(6): 1855–1890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S., and Zacharias, U. (eds.) (2013) Beyond inclusion. The practice of equal access in India higher education, New Delhi: Routledge

  • Dryler, H. (1998) ‘Parental Role Models, Gender and Educational Choice’, British Journal of Sociology 49(3): 375–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L.N. and M.P. Pasquale (2003) ‘Women’s Higher Education in Japan: Family Background, Economic Factors and the Equal Employment Opportunity Law’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 17(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • EOC (2007) Equal Opportunities Commission Act 2007, Kampala: EOC. https://ulii.org/ug/legislation/act/2015/2-1. Retrieved 10 December 2018.

  • Estevan, F., Gall, T. and Morin, L.-P. (2018) ‘Redistribution without Distortion: Evidence from an Affirmative Action Programme at a Large Brazilian University’ The Economic Journal, Published online 19 May.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D. (1991) ‘Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science’, World Politics 43(2): 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M., Pollak, L., Bell, D. and Kristol, I. (eds.) (1970) ‘The black quota at Yale Law School’, The Public Interest 19(1): 44–52.

  • François, A.B. (2014) ‘The brand of inferiority. The civil rights act of 1875, white supremacy, and Affirmative Action’, Howard Law Journal 57(2): 573–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., L. Katz and I. Kuziemko (2006) The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4): 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. (2004) ‘The Long Road to the Fast Track: Career and Family’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596(1): 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. and Katz, L.F. (2002) ‘The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions’, Journal of Political Economy 110(4): 730–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.R. and C.T. Kenney (2001) ‘Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for US Women’, American Sociological Review 66: 506–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1947) ‘The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals’, The Journal of Philosophy 44(5): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S., Robins, J. M. and Pearl, J. (1999) ‘Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference’, Statistical Science 14(1): 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grob, U. and S. Wolter (2007) ‘Demographic Change and Public Education Spending: A Conflict between Young and Old?’, Education Economics 15(3): 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, P. (2012) ‘The effects of Affirmative Action bans on college enrollment, educational attainment, and the demographic composition of universities’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 94(3): 712–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, C. (2006) ‘The impact of Affirmative action in India. More political than socioeconomic’, India Review 5(2): 173–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayal, N.G. (2015) ‘Affirmative action in India: Before and after the neoliberal turn’, Cultural Dynamics 27(1): 117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, A. and Bland, E. (1998) ‘Statistics notes: The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomization’, British Medical Journal 316: 1455–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlowski, D. J. (1998) ‘Richard Nixon and the origins of Affirmative Action’, The Historian 60(3): 523–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwesiga, J.C. (2002) Women’s access to higher education in Africa: Uganda’s experience, Kampala: Fountain Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R. N. (2000) ‘What’s so Different about a Counterfactual?’, World Politics 52(4): 550–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. S. (1990) ‘The impact of Affirmative Action regulation and equal employment law on black employment’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(4): 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lihamba, A., Mwaipop, R. and Shule, L. (2006) ‘The challenges of Affirmative Action in Tanzania higher education institutions: A case study of the University of Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania’, Women Studies International Forum 29: 581–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R. and Ramseyer, J. M., and Standen, J. (2011) ‘Peer effects in Affirmative Action: Evidence from law student performance’, International Review of Law and Economics 31(1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, F. R. (1989) Invisible victims: White males and the crisis of Affirmative Action, New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloy, R. and Byrne, R. M. J. (2000) ‘Counterfactual Thinking about Controllable Events’, Memory and Cognition 28(6):1071–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2016) ‘High participation systems of higher education’, Journal of Higher Education 87(2): 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2014) ‘Higher education and public good: A global study’, in G. Goastellec and F. Picard (eds.) Higher education in societies: A multi scale perspective, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. 2005. ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’, Signs: Journal of women in culture and society 30(3): 1771–1800.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoES (2017) Education and Sports Strategic plan 2017/18–2019/2020, Kampala: Ministry of Education and Sports. https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/planipolis/files/ressources/uganda_education_sector_strategic_plan_2017-2018_2019_2020.pdf. Retrieved 17 December 2019.

  • Morley, L. (2006) ‘Hidden transcripts. The micropolitics of gender in common wealth universities', Women Studies International Forum 29: 543–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasco, S. A. and Marsh, K. L. (1999) ‘Gaining Control through Counterfactual Thinking’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(5): 556–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, P. G. (1971) ‘Affirmative Action under Executive Order 11246 (1971) 46’, New York University Law Review 46(2): 225–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, S. X. & Wan, G. (2018) ‘The Effectiveness and Efficiency of China’s Special Admission Policies: The Case of X University’, Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(1): 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odaga, G. (2020). ‘Gender in Uganda’s Tertiary Educational Distribution’, Social Sciences & Humanities, 2(1): 1000023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H. (2004) ‘Are Sons and Daughters Substitutable? Allocation of Family Resources in Contemporary Japan’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 18: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onsongo, J. (2009) ‘Affirmative action, gender equity and university admission-Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania’, London Review of Education 7(1): 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Onsongo, J. (2007) ‘The growth of private universities in Kenya: Implications for gender equality in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education in Africa 5(2–3): 111–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, W. T. (1957) ‘Re-examination of the Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals’, The Journal of Philosophy 54(4): 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman, L. P. (1998) ‘The case against Affirmative Action’,International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12(1): 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenfeld, J. (1997) ‘Affirmative Action and Legislative Purpose’, The Yale Law Journal 107(8): 2679–2684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1974) ‘Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies’, Journal Educational Psychology 66(5): 688–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, D. (2011) ‘The Rise of Direct Affirmative Action: Converging Strategies for promoting ‘Diversity’ in selective Institutions of Higher Education in the United States and France’, World Politics 63(3): 470–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, R. H. (2004) ‘A systemic analysis of Affirmative Action in American law schools’, Stanford Law Review 57(2): 367–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, E., and Meyer, J. W. (2005) ‘The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century’, American Sociological Review 70(6): 898–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S. J. and McConnell, A. R. (2014) ‘Dysfunctional Implications of Counterfactual Thinking: When Alternatives to reality Fail Us’, in N.J. Roese and J.M. Olson (eds.) What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpitser, I. and Pearl, J. (2008) ‘Complete identification methods for the causal hierarchy’, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 9: 1941–1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (2004) ‘Affirmative action in the United States’, in Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 115–65.

  • Sylvan, D. and Majeski, S. (1998) ‘A Methodology for the Study of Historical Counterfactuals’, International Studies Quarterly 42(1): 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A. and Byrne, R. M. J. (2002) ‘Reasoning Counterfactually: Making Inferences about Things That Didn't Happen’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(6): 1154–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S,. Naik, A, K,. and Tagade, N. (2016) ‘Prejudice against reservation policies: How and Why?’, Economic and Political Weekly 51(8): 61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopt, T.E. (2004) ‘Impact of reservation on admission to higher education in India’, Economic and Political Weekly 39(39): 4339–4349

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was part of a larger study, partly funded by a bursary from the University of South Africa for which I am most grateful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Odaga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Odaga, G. Affirmative Action and Women in Uganda’s Public University Education. High Educ Policy 35, 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00189-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00189-8

Keywords

Navigation