Skip to main content
Log in

A 2018–2019 Snapshot of Psychological Screening Rejection Rates: Perceived Trends Reported by Police/Public Safety Psychologists

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complaints that there are “fewer applicants” and/or “less qualified candidates” applying for positions as police/public safety officers may reflect a larger or growing problem in this field’s recruitment efforts today. The two surveys and six survey studies conducted here, including a one-year follow-up, were initiated in order to identify the perceptions of working police/public safety psychologists who regularly attend at least one of three national conferences and may provide a representative base of active police/public safety psychology professionals today. Results include the documented perceptions of these psychologists that up to 50% of their police/public safety agencies have lowered their officer selection standards in recent years, with 58% of the 2019 survey-responding psychologists (N = 51) reporting that at least one of their agencies “lowered its selection standards within the last 12 months.” Psychologists also reported a difference between their “current rate of candidate rejection” on pre-employment psychological evaluations (PEPEs) and their “desired rate of candidate rejection,” suggesting that police/public safety organizations may be hiring more “borderline” or potentially “psychologically-unfit” officers in recent years in order to fill officer vacancies. A number of reasons for apparently increasing selection challenges nationwide are documented in these psychologists’ completed surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Inwald.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inwald, R., Thompson, N. A 2018–2019 Snapshot of Psychological Screening Rejection Rates: Perceived Trends Reported by Police/Public Safety Psychologists. J Police Crim Psych 36, 149–158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09375-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09375-1

Keywords

Navigation