Abstract
Stanley Kubrick’s anti-war film Full Metal Jacket (1987) dramatically represents US Marine Corps basic training during the Vietnam War as both gruelling and brutalising. The brutal, linguistically aggressive and physically intimidating scenes purport to detail the dehumanising process that Marine Corps recruits were put through in preparation for combat during that period. In the film, the recruits are trained by Gunnery Sergeant Hartman, played by the actor R. Lee Ermey, who is himself an ex-Marine Corps drill instructor (1965–1967) and who also served in Vietnam in 1968. As a result of his experience as an instructor, Ermey was given free rein by Kubrick to write his own dialogue for the abusive barrack room and field training scenes in order to lend the drama an air of authenticity (see Ermey 2017). Within the fictional world of the film, the intense training and disciplinary regime ultimately causes one recruit, Private Leonard Lawrence, to crack psychologically. Private Lawrence is nicknamed ‘Gomer Pyle’ by Hartman upon their first meeting, this name being a direct allusion to the hapless character of the same name who was a US Marine recruit in the sitcom Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C., which ran from 1964–1969 – contemporaneously with the time period in which Full Metal Jacket is set. This insulting allusion is merely the start of a long line of linguistically impolite/aggressive and ultimately physically aggressive interactions which Lawrence/Pyle suffers at the hands of Hartman, both directly and, later in the film as a result of Hartman’s orchestrations, from the other recruits. Under this unrelenting barrage of impoliteness, aggression, and abuse, Lawrence/Pyle eventually shoots Hartman dead before turning his rifle on himself and committing suicide. Thus, the film argues that the dehumanising effect of the basic training, which was ostensibly carried out to toughen up and mentally prepare conscripted recruits for combat in Vietnam, had a profound, brutalising and (potentially) utterly destructive effect on those subjected to it. In this article, we explore the creative linguistic aggression displayed by the character of Hartman. We focus particularly on the reasons underlying the creativity of Hartman’s impoliteness and aggression, and argue that these are essentially to foreground the seriousness of the training regime which the recruits must follow.
References
Angouri, J. & T. Tseliga. 2010. You have no idea what you are talking about!’ From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora’. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 57–82.10.1515/jplr.2010.004Search in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2006. “Never a truer word said in jest’: A pragmastylistic analysis of impoliteness masked as banter in Henry IV, Part I. In M. Lambrou & P. Stockwell (eds.), Contemporary Stylistics, 209–220. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2007. Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics 39(12). 2185–2216.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005Search in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167Search in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2010. Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In M. Locher & S. Lambert Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics 6, 101–134. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338.1.101Search in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2013. Face in conflict. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1). 37–57.10.1075/jlac.1.1.03bouSearch in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2014. Stylistics, speech acts and im/politeness theory. In M. Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, 118–136. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. & D. McIntyre. 2011. Emotion and empathy in Martin Scorsese’s Goodfellas: A case study of the ‘funny guy’ scene. In R. Piazza, M. Bednarek, & F. Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 105–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211.08bouSearch in Google Scholar
Brown, L. 2013. “Mind your own esteemed business’: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas’. Journal of Politeness Research 9(2). 159–186.10.1515/pr-2013-0008Search in Google Scholar
Carter, R. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 349–367.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: ‘The Weakest Link’. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1). 35–72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., D. Bousfield & A. Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10/11). 1545–1579.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2Search in Google Scholar
Dynel, M. 2012. Setting our House in order: The workings of impoliteness in multi-party film discourse. Journal of Politeness Research 8. 161–194.10.1515/pr-2012-0010Search in Google Scholar
Dynel, M. 2013. Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk. In M. Dynel (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, 105–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.07dynSearch in Google Scholar
Ermey, RL. 2017. http://www.rleeermey.com/about.php accessed 24th November 2017: 11:54 amSearch in Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2009. Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: The culture wars. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 5(2). 273–303.Search in Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2012. Politics, ‘lies’ and YouTube: A genre approach to assessments of im/politeness on Obama’s 9/9/2009 presidential address. In L. Fernandez-Amaya, O. Hernandez Lopez, M. De La, Gomez Moron, R. Padilla Cruz, M. Mejias Borrero & M. Relinque Barranca (eds.), New Perspectives on (Im)politeness and Interpersonal Communication, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity, and im/politeness. Looking backwards, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1). 1–33.10.1515/pr-2013-0001Search in Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., N. Lorenzo-Dus & P. Bou-Franch. 2013. Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1). 97–121.10.1515/pr-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967. [1955] Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behaviour. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3, Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar
Haugh, M. 2010. When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 7–31.10.1515/jplr.2010.002Search in Google Scholar
Haugh, M. & F. Bargiela-Chiappini. 2010. Face in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2073–2077.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.013Search in Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1962. Cogito, ergo sum: Inference or performance? The Philosophical Review 71(1). 3–32.10.2307/2183678Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, J.E. 2013. Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 9(1). 35–54.10.1515/pr-2013-0002Search in Google Scholar
Labov, W. & J. Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral version of personal experience. In J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lambert-Graham, S. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742–759.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017Search in Google Scholar
Lambert-Graham, S. 2008. A Manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay With Power in Practice, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. Activity types and language. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Locher, M. 2008. Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In G. Antos & E. Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Issue 2: Interpersonal Communication, 509–540. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211399.4.509Search in Google Scholar
Locher, M. & A. Langlotz. 2008. Relational work: At the intersection of cognition, interaction and emotion. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 88. 165–191.Search in Google Scholar
Locher, M. & R. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9Search in Google Scholar
Locher, M. & R. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344Search in Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. 2015. Dialogue: Credibility versus realism in fictional speech. In V. Sotirova (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, 430–443. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. & D. Bousfield. 2017. Impoliteness in fictional texts. In Michael Haugh Jonathan Culpeper & Daniel Z Kadar (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 759–783. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_29Search in Google Scholar
Methias, N. W. 2011. Impoliteness or underpoliteness: An analysis of a Christmas dinner scene from Dickens’s Great Expectations. Journal of King Saud University: Languages and Translation 23(1). 11–18.10.1016/j.jksult.2009.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2005. Gender and impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2). 263–280.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.263Search in Google Scholar
Mills, S. & D. Kádár (eds.). 2011. Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977886Search in Google Scholar
Paternoster, A. 2012. Inappropriate inspectors: Impoliteness and overpoliteness in Ian Rankin’s and Andrea Camilleri’s crime series. Language and Literature 21(3). 311–324.10.1177/0963947012444221Search in Google Scholar
Planchenault, G. 2010. Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites’ website. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 83–103.10.1515/jplr.2010.005Search in Google Scholar
Quaglio, P. 2009. Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.36Search in Google Scholar
Rudanko, J. 2006. Aggravated impoliteness and two types of speaker intention in an episode in Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens. Journal of Pragmatics 38(6). 829–841.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.006Search in Google Scholar
Schnurr, S., M. Marra & J. Holmes. 2007. Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Maori and Pakeha leaders. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4). 712–729.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.016Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, P. & D. Bousfield. 2017. Humour and stylistics. In S. Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humour, 118–136. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315731162-12Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Search in Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. 2007. Toward a universal notion of face for a universal notion of co-operation. In I. Kecskes & L. Horn (eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 1, 313–344. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Upadhyay, S. R. 2010. Identity and impoliteness in computer mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 105–127.10.1515/jplr.2010.006Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
