Abstract
The problems of making and evaluating counterfactual claims about fictional characters cannot be adequately handled without taking into account the practices of literary criticism, interpretation, and re-creation. The direct-reference theory of names explains only a subset of the phenomena of fiction and explains away the rest as irrelevant or pseudo-problems, whereas some criticisms of that theory bring in metaphysical concepts that may obscure the issue. This paper suggests that the indeterminacy of fictions and the conventions of the aforementioned practices are sufficient basis for explaining and assessing such counterfactual claims. In this view, fiction ceases to be understood as a phenomenon sui generis; it is instead an institutionalized use of the stipulative or computational aspects of language that are at work in other areas as well. Thus, these results can be brought into line with recent ideas in the fields of the philosophy of mathematics, relevance theory, and cognitive studies.
References
Alvin, Plantinga. 1974. The nature of necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 2007 [1966]. Criticism and truth. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon. 1989. The situation in logic. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Brock, Stuart. 2004. The ubiquitous problem of empty names. The Journal of Philosophy 101(6). 277–298.10.5840/jphil2004101618Search in Google Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1979. Fiction and reality: their fundamental connections. Poetics 8. 31–62.10.1016/0304-422X(79)90014-7Search in Google Scholar
Cervantes, Miguel de. 2008 [1605/1615]. Don Quixote de la Mancha. Trans. C. Jarvis. ed. E.C. Riley. Oxford: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar
Chihaia, Matei & Katharina Rennhak (eds.), Forthcoming. Relevance and narrative (research). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. 1967. Identity through possible worlds: some questions. Noûs 1(1). 1–8.10.2307/2214708Search in Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda & John Tooby. 2000. Consider the source: the evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentation. In Dan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective, 53–115. Oxford & New York: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511897498Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The logic of decision and action, 81–120. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1993. Locating literary language. In Reed Way Dasenbrock (ed.), Literary theory after davidson, 295–308. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, David. 2015. Fictive utterance and the fictionality of narratives and works. British Journal of Aesthetics 55(1). 39–55.10.1093/aesthj/ayu061Search in Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomír. 1998. Heterocosmica: fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.Search in Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith S. 1974. Speaking of nothing. The Philosophical Review 83(1). 3–31.10.2307/2183871Search in Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2012. The event of literature. New Haven: Yale UP.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2004. On some functions of literature. Yale Review 92(4). 1–13.10.1111/j.0044-0124.2004.00848.xSearch in Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1982. The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Everett, Anthony. 2013. The nonexistent. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674794.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1984. Critical review of Parsons’ nonexistent objects. Philosophical Studies 45. 95–142.10.1007/BF00372993Search in Google Scholar
Friend, Stacie. 2000. Real people in unreal contexts. In A. Everett & T. Hofweber (eds.), Empty names, fiction and the puzzles of non-existence, 183–203. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Friend, Stacie. 2012. Fiction as a genre. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112(2). 179–209.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00331.xSearch in Google Scholar
Friend, Stacie. 2014. Notions of nothing. In M. García-Carpintero & G. Martí (eds.), Empty representations: reference and non-existence, 307–332. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647057.003.0014Search in Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of criticism. Princeton: Princeton UP.10.1515/9781400866908Search in Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov M. & John Woods. 2003. Agenda relevance: a study in formal pragmatics. Amsterdam: North-Holland (Elsevier).10.1016/S1874-5075(03)80008-6Search in Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2013. Norms of fiction-making. British Journal of Aesthetics 53(3). 339–357.10.1093/aesthj/ayt021Search in Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1991. Fiction et diction. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Glüer-Pagin, Kathrin & Peter Pagin. 2014. Vulcan might have existed and neptune not. On the semantics of empty names. In M. García-Carpintero & G. Martí (eds.), Empty representations: reference and non-existence, 117–141. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647057.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, E. T. A. 1994 [1813]. Don Juan. Fantasiestücke in callots manier, 81–95. Berlin: Aufbau.Search in Google Scholar
Howell, Robert. 1979. Fictional objects: how they are and how they aren’t. Poetics 8. 129–177.10.1016/0304-422X(79)90018-4Search in Google Scholar
Howell, Robert. 2010. Fictional realism and its discontents. In Franck Lihoreau (ed.), Truth in fiction, 153–202. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110326796.153Search in Google Scholar
Howell, Robert. 2015. Objects of fiction and objects of thought. In Stuart Brock & A. Everett (eds.), Fictional objects, 41–70. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Ihwe, Jens F. & Hannes Rieser. 1979. Normative and descriptive theory of fiction. Poetics 8. 63–84.10.1016/0304-422X(79)90015-9Search in Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. 1968. Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar
Kripke Saul, A. 2013. Reference and existence. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. 1963. Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica 16. 83–94.10.1007/978-3-0346-0145-0_16Search in Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. 1981. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. 2011. Vacuous names and fictional entities. In Philosophical troubles: collected papers, vol. 1, 52–74. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter & Stein Haugom Olsen. 1994. Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Leslie, Alan M. 1987. Pretense and representation: the origins of ‘Theory of Mind’. Psychological Review 94(4). 412–426.10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1978. Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 15(1). 37–46.10.1093/0195032047.003.0015Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 1977. The structure of the artistic text. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Art as a social system. Stanford: Stanford UP.10.1515/9781503618763Search in Google Scholar
Lycan, William G. 1994. Modality and meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-0936-9Search in Google Scholar
Lycan, William G. 2015. A reconsidered defence of haeccetism regarding fictional individuals. In Stuart Brock & A. Everett (eds.), Fictional objects, 24–40. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Mandel, Oskar (ed.), 1963. The theatre of don juan: a collection of plays and views, 1630-1963. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar
Margolin, Uri. 2012. Mathematics and narrative: a narratological perspective. In Apostolos Doxiadis & Barry Mazur (eds.), Circles disturbed: the interplay of mathematics and narrative, 481–507. Princeton: Princeton UP.10.1515/9781400842681.481Search in Google Scholar
Nabokov, Vladimir. 1983. Lectures on Don Quixote. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Search in Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1980. Nonexistent objects. New Haven: Yale UP.Search in Google Scholar
Pattison, Walter T. 1980. La Fontana de Oro: Its early history. Anales galdosianos 15. 5–8.Search in Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G. 1986. Fictional Worlds. Cambridge (MA). Harvard UP.Search in Google Scholar
Pérez Galdós, Benito. 1871. La Fontana de Oro: novela histórica. Madrid: Imprenta de José Noguera y Castellano.Search in Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1977. Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington & London: Indiana UP.Search in Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 2005. Towards non-being: the logic and metaphysics of intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199262543.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 1946a [1920-1921]. A la Recherche du temps perdu, VI: Le côté de Guermantes (première partie). Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 1946b [1920-1921]. A la Recherche du temps perdu, VI: Le côté de Guermantes (troisième partie). Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1976. Literature, science, and reflection. New Literary History 7(3). 483–491.10.2307/468557Search in Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Is there a problem about fictional discourse? In Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays: 1972-1980), 110–138. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Routley, Richard. 1980. Exploring meinong’s jungle and beyond. Camberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Search in Google Scholar
Salanskis, Jean-Michel. 2013. La littérature entre axiomatique et formalisme. Les Temps modernes 676. 178–197.10.3917/ltm.676.0178Search in Google Scholar
Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Modal paradox: parts and counterparts, points and counterpoints. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11. 75–120.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00489.xSearch in Google Scholar
Salmon, Nathan. 1998. Nonexistence. Noûs 32(3). 277–319.10.1111/0029-4624.00101Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Siegfried J. 1980. Fictionality in literary and non-literary discourse. Poetics 9. 525–546.10.1016/0304-422X(80)90005-4Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Siegfried J. 1989. Die Selbstorganisation des Sozialsystems Literatur im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1975. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6(2). 319–332.10.2307/468422Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: communication and cognition. 2nd. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Stock, Kathleen. 2011. Fictive utterance and imagining. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 85. 145–161.10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00200.xSearch in Google Scholar
Thomas, Robert. 2000. Mathematics and fiction I: identification. Logique and Analyse 171/172. 301–340.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Robert. 2002. Mathematics and fiction II: analogy. Logique and Analyse 177/178. 185–228.Search in Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 1999. Fiction and metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511527463Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.10.4159/9780674726369Search in Google Scholar
Tooby, John & Leda Cosmides. 2001. Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance 30(1/2). 6–27.Search in Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1977. Creatures of fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 14. 299–308.Search in Google Scholar
Voltolini, Alberto. 2006. How ficta follow fiction. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-5147-6Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, Richard. 2007. The rhetoric of fictionality. Columbus: Ohio State UP.Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall. 1990. Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, Edwin. 1984. The half-way house of fiction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470696675Search in Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980. Works and worlds of art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Woods, John. 1974. The logic of fiction. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Woods, John & Peter Alward. 2004. The logic of fiction. D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, 2nd, vol. 11, 241–316. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-0466-3_4Search in Google Scholar
Zalta, Edward N. 2000. The road between pretense theory and abstract object theory. In T. Hofweber & A. Everett (eds.), Empty names, fiction, and the puzzles of non-existence, 117–147. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
