Abstract
Purpose
Recent life-course scholarship has argued that desistance from (rather than persistence in) crime is a marker of adulthood. In this article, I argue that a commitment to desistance is only one of many elements of the participants’ sense of adult masculinity, which is best understood by drawing on theoretical literature on “hybrid masculinities.” By linking life-course criminological literature with recent theoretical advancements in the sociology of gender, I connect two important, but as yet independent, strands of research.
Methods
Using the grounded theory approach to qualitative research, I performed inductive analyses of 24 in-depth interviews with adult men incarcerated at a state-run facility in the Northeastern USA.
Results
I argue that the participants construct hybrid masculinities that combine conventionally masculine traits (such as being a provider and protector) with conventionally feminine traits (such as loyalty, humility, and emotional expressiveness). These hybrid masculinities manifest through the participants’ reliance on intangible markers of adulthood, and they emerge gradually over the men’s life course. I further argue that the disruptions that incarceration poses to the men’s life course impede their ability to realize their hybrid masculinities fully.
Conclusion
The current research contributes to the burgeoning literature that attempts to correct the oversimplified portrayal of incarcerated men as singularly hypermasculine, and it also highlights how incarceration disrupts men’s life course, making it difficult for them to be the “hybrid” men that they wish to be.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Because this article is part of a broader project exploring how men’s constructions of masculinity shape their pathways into and out of homelessness and/or prison, I also asked men about their experiences with homelessness.
I also relied on handwritten transcription/fieldnotes for two interviews because of a voice recorder malfunction.
Several men in this study were actively involved in the hypermasculine prison culture at the time of the interviews, and I therefore don’t aim to minimize the extent to which hypermasculinity is an important element of the participants’ prison lives. In fact, the men construct hybrid masculinities in response to prison hypermasculinity, a finding that I discuss elsewhere.
References
Aday, R. H. (2006). Aging prisoners’ concerns toward dying in prison. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 52(3), 199–216.
Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity. New York: Routledge Press.
Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people’s conception of the transition to adulthood. Youth & Society, 29(1), 3–23.
Arxer, S. (2011). Hybrid masculine power: Rethinking the relationship between homosociality and hegemonic masculinity. Humanity and Society, 35(4), 390–422.
Barber, K. (2016). Styling masculinity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Blumstein, A., & Beck, A. J. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980–1996. Crime and Justice, 26, 17–61.
Bridges, T. (2010). “Men just weren’t made to do this”: The performances of drag at “walk a mile in her shoes” marches. Gender & Society, 24(1), 5–30.
Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociological Compass, 8(3), 246–258.
Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2018). On the elasticity of gender hegemony: Why hybrid masculinities fail to undermine gender and sexual inequality. In J. Messerschmidt, P. Y. Martin, M. Messner, & R. Connell (Eds.), Gender Reckonings. New York: NYU Press.
Butler-Kisber, L., & Poldma, T. (2010). The power of visual approaches in qualitative inquiry: The use of collage making and concept mapping in experiential research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), 18.
Carlsson, C. (2013). Masculinities, persistence, and desistance. Criminology, 51(3), 661–693.
Chung, H. L., Little, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). The transition to adulthood for adolescents in the juvenile justice system: A developmental perspective. In D. W. Osgood, E. M. Foster, C. Flanagan, & G. R. Ruth (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations.
Connell, R. W. (2002). On hegemonic masculinity and violence: Response to Jefferson and Hall. Theoretical Criminology, 6(1), 89–99.
Crewe, B. (2014). Not looking hard enough: Masculinity, emotion, and prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4), 392–403.
Crewe, B., Warr, J., & Bennett, P. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56–74.
Diefendorf, S. (2015). After the wedding night: Sexual abstinence and masculinities over the life course. Gender & Society, 29(5), 647–669.
Elder Jr., G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and the life course: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.
Ezzell, M. B. (2012). “I’m in control”: Compensatory manhood in a therapeutic community. Gender & Society, 26(2), 190–215.
Fader, J. J. (2013). Falling back: Incarceration and transitions to adulthood among urban youth. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Fefferman, A. M., & Upadhyay, U. (2018). Hybrid masculinity and young men’s circumscribed engagement in contraceptive management. Gender & Society, 32(3), 371–394.
Foster, E. M., Flanagan, C., Osgood, D. W., & Ruth, G. R. (2005). The transition to adulthood for vulnerable youth and families: Common themes and future directions. In D. W. Osgood, E. M. Foster, C. Flanagan, & G. R. Ruth (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Furstenberg Jr., F. F. (2010). On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. The Future of Children, 20(1), 67–87.
Furstenberg, F. F., Kennedy, S., McCloyd, V. G., Rumbaut, R. G., & Settersten, R. A. (2004). Becoming an adult: The changing nature of early adulthood. Contexts, 3(3), 33–41.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Gorga, A. (2017). “Kinda like a man and a woman thing”: The construction and reification of gender hegemony in a women’s prison. Social Currents, 4(5), 413–428.
Haney, C. (2011). The perversions of prison: On the origins of hypermasculinity and sexual violence in confinement. American Criminal Law Review, 48(1), 121–142.
Hearn, J. (1995). Imaging the aging of men. In M. Featherstone & A. Wernick (Eds.), Images of Aging: Cultural Respresentations of Late Life. London: Routledge.
Man, C. D., & Cronan, J. P. (2001). Forecasting sexual abuse in prison: The prison subculture of masculinity as a backdrop for deliberate indifference. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 92(1), 127–186.
Massoglia, M., & Uggen, C. (2010). Settling down and aging out: Toward an interactionist theory of desistance and the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 543–582.
Maycock, M. (2018). Introduction. In M. Maycock & K. Hunt (Eds.), New perspectives on prison masculinity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pfaffendorf, J. (2017). Sensitive cowboys: Privileged young men and the mobilization of hybrid masculinities in a therapeutic boarding school. Gender & Society, 31(2), 197–222.
Randles, J. (2018). “Manning up” to be a good father: Hybrid fatherhood, masculinity, and U.S. responsible fatherhood policy. Gender & Society, 32(4), 516–539.
Randolph, A., Swan, H., & Rowe, K. D. (2018). “That $ hit ain’t gangsta”: Symbolic boundary making in an online urban gossip community. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(5), 609–639.
Ricciardelli, R., Maier, K., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2015). Strategic masculinities: Vulnerabilities, risk, and the production of prison masculinities. Theoretical Criminology, 19(4), 1–23.
Sabo, D., Kupers, T. A., & London, W. (2001). Prison masculinities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
Schlosser, J. A. (2008). Issues in interviewing inmates: Navigating the methodological landmines of prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(8), 1500–1525.
Settersten, R. A. (2003). Age structuring and the rhythm of the life course. In J. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course. Boston, MA: Springer.
Spector-Mersel, G. (2006). Never-aging stories: Western hegemonic masculinity scripts. Journal of Gender Studies, 15(1), 67–82.
Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives: A study of maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.
Ward, J. (2015). Not gay: Sex between straight white men. New York: New York University Press.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Alex Sinha as well as the editors and three anonymous reviewers at the Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology for their valuable feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Umamaheswar, J. “When the Hell Are You Going to Grow Up?”: a Life-Course Account of Hybrid Masculinities Among Incarcerated Men. J Dev Life Course Criminology 6, 127–151 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-020-00137-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-020-00137-5