Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does effective cost transparency increase price fairness? An analysis of apparel brand strategies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Built on reference dependence, this study investigated how the framing of cost information affects perceived gains and losses, and tested the mediating roles of gain and loss perceptions in the relationship between cost information and price fairness, which in turn, increase buying intentions toward the apparel brand. A between-subjects study was designed to test the hypotheses and our sample consisted of a total of 804 U.S. participants who responded to our online survey. The results showed that disclosing the true cost and markup of a product along with its retail price was a more effective way to increase the perceived gain of buying and also the loss of not buying the product than when only the retail price was presented. Differently framed cost information triggered price fairness and buying intentions only through gain perceptions, but not through loss perceptions. The results of this research demonstrate the power of cost transparency using reference points for effective apparel brand strategies. Theoretical and practical implications were also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J.S., and T.S. Overton. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14(3): 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J., A. Parasuraman, D. Grewal, and G.B. Voss. 2002. The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing 66(2): 120–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A., and E.A. Blair. 1991. Contextual effects of reference prices in retail advertisements. Journal of Marketing 55(3): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackston, M. 1992. A brand with an attitude: A suitable case for the treatment. Journal of the Market Research Society 34(3): 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R.N., and K.N. Lemon. 1999. A dynamic model of customers’ usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 36(2): 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, L.E., L. Warlop, and J.W. Alba. 2003. Consumer perceptions of price (un) fairness. Journal of Consumer Research 29(4): 474–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briesch, R.A., L. Krishnamurthi, T. Mazumdar, and S.P. Raj. 1997. A comparative analysis of reference price models. Journal of Consumer Research 24(2): 202–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byun, S.E., and B. Sternquist. 2012. Here today, gone tomorrow: Consumer reactions to perceived limited availability. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20(2): 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M.C. 1999. Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research 36(2): 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M.C. 2007. Says who?! How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (un)fairness. Journal of Marketing Research 44(2): 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekaran, R. 2012. Consumers’ utilization of reference prices: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management 21(1): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T.Z., and A.R. Wildt. 1994. Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22(1): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., and A.J. Dubinsky. 2003. A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing 20(4): 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, A.D., T. Meyvis, and A. Schwartz. 2001. Avoiding future regret in purchase-timing decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 27(4): 447–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosno, J.L., and A.P. Cui. 2018. Something old, something new: The role of partitioned pricing in consumers’ preference for new versus used products. Journal of Consumer Marketing 35(4): 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desarbo, W.S., K. Jedidi, and I. Sinha. 2001. Customer value analysis in a heterogeneous market. Strategic Management Journal 22(9): 845–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U.M., and I. Simonson. 2005. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Science 24(2): 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J.L., and P.S. Ellen. 2013. Transparency in pricing and its effect on perceived price fairness. Journal of Product & Brand Management 22(5/6): 404–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J., G. Bick, and R. Abratt. 2016. The perceptions of supplier–buyer relations and its affect on the corporate brand. Journal of Brand Management 23(1): 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesove, D., and C. Mayer. 2001. Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4): 1233–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., K.B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan. 1998. The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing 62(2): 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., and H.W. Kim. 2010. Value-driven Internet shopping: The mental accounting theory Perspective. Psychology & Marketing 27(1): 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., S. Gupta, and D.R. Lehmann. 2001. Consumer price sensitivity and price thresholds. Journal of Retailing 77(4): 435–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, D.M., and T.A. Suter. 2005. E-tail and retail reference price effects. Journal of Product & Brand Management 14(2): 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, B.G., E.J. Johnson, and P.S. Fader. 1993. Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science 12(4): 378–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K.L., and W.O. Bearden. 2006. Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research 33(3): 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F., and K.J. Preacher. 2014. Statistical mediating analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 67(3): 451–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. 1964. Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmbeck, G.N. 1997. Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65(4): 599–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.H., C.T. Chang, and C.Y.H. Chen. 2005. Perceived fairness of pricing on the internet. Journal of Economic Psychology 26(3): 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., H.J. Chang, D.R. Matthews, and M. Gupta. 2012. Fast fashion business model: What, why and how?”. In Fashion supply chain management: Industry and business analysis, ed. T.-M. Choi, 193–211. Hershey, PA: IGL Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1986. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review 76(4): 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 363–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaram, G., and J.D. Little. 1994. An empirical analysis of latitude of price acceptance in consumer package goods. Journal of Consumer Research 21(3): 408–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaram, G., and R.S. Winer. 1995. Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Science 14(3): G161–G169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., and G. Hustvedt. 2014. Building trust between consumers and corporations: The role of consumer perceptions of transparency and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 125(2): 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenning, P., H. Evanschitzky, V. Vogel, and D. Ahlert. 2007. Consumer price knowledge in the market for apparel. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 35(2): 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, L., T. Mazumdar, and S.P. Raj. 1992. Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 19(3): 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuah, A.T.H., and V. Weerakkody. 2015. Is cost transparency necessarily good for consumers? European Journal of Marketing 49(11/12): 1980–1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, G.I., E. Karpova, and M.B. Garner. 2016. Going global: The textile and apparel industry. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D.R., S. Burton, and E.J. Karson. 1991. The effect of semantic cues on consumer perceptions of reference price ads. Journal of Consumer Research 18(3): 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D.R., N.M. Ridgway, and R.G. Netemeyer. 1993. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research 30(2): 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B. 2015. “Should consumers request cost transparency?” cost transparency in consumer markets. European Journal of Marketing 49(11–12): 1992–1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luk, S.T., and L.S. Yip. 2008. The moderator effect of monetary sales promotion on the relationship between brand trust and purchase behaviour. Journal of Brand Management 15(6): 452–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y.J., H.H. Lee, and K. Goerlitz. 2016. Transparency of global apparel supply chains: Quantitative analysis of corporate disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 23(5): 308–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W.C., N. Ponder, and J.E. Lueg. 2009. Price fairness perceptions and customer loyalty in a retail context. Journal of Business Research 62(6): 588–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. 2002. Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase. Journal of Economic Psychology 23(2): 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, T., and P. Papatla. 2000. An investigation of reference price segments. Journal of Marketing Research 37(2): 246–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B., R.W. Buell, and L.L. John. 2015. Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Harvard Business Review. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2498174. Accessed 22 May 2017.

  • Novemsky, N., and D. Kahneman. 2005. The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research 42(2): 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, B. 2017. Transparent pricing: Shedding light on the real value of a shirt, and brand. Forbes. Retrieved April 3, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanpearson/2017/07/25/transparent-pricing-shedding-light-on-the-real-value-of-a-shirt-and-brand/#701d32866acc.

  • Piron, R., and L. Fernandez. 1995. Are fairness constraints on profit-seeking important? Journal of Economic Psychology 16(1): 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp, B., and H. Woratschek. 2017. Consumer-brand identification revisited: An integrative framework of brand identification, customer satisfaction, and price image and their role for brand loyalty and word of mouth. Journal of Brand Management 24(3): 250–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K., D. Rucker, and A. Hayes. 2007. Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 42(1): 185–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putler, D.S. 1992. Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Science 11(3): 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, I. 2004. Anthropology and the brand. Journal of Brand Management 11(5): 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şen, A. 2008. The US fashion industry: A supply chain review. International Journal of Production Economics 114(2): 571–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simintiras, A.C., Y.K. Dwivedi, G. Kaushik, and N.P. Rana. 2015. Should consumers request cost transparency? European Journal of Marketing 49(11/12): 1961–1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. 2015. What’s behind the price tag: Understanding cost transparency? European Journal of Marketing 49(11/12): 1987–1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, I. 2000. Cost transparency: The net’s real threat to prices and brands. Harvard Business Review 78(2): 43–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J.C., G.N. Soutar, and L.W. Johnson. 1999. The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing 75(1): 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science 4(3): 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481): 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan, R., and P. Aggarwal. 2003. Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research 56(6): 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K., R. MacDonnell, and D.W. Dahl. 2011. It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research 48(3): 472–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, D.C.H., L.W. Johnson, and L. White. 2015. The line extension dilemma: Greater difference or similarity to existing products? Journal of Brand Management 22(6): 534–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, R. 1988. Behavioral perspectives on pricing: Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price revisited. In Issues in pricing: Theory and research, ed. T.M. Divinney, 35–57. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, L., K.B. Monroe, and J.L. Cox. 2004. The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing 68(4): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., and H.A. Chen. 2017. A tale of two brands: The joint effect of manufacturer and retailer brands on consumers’ product evaluation. Journal of Brand Management 24(3): 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Kyung Hee University in 2018 (KHU-20180936).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea

    Sojin Jung & Byoungho Ellie Jin

  2. Department of Marketing, Harrison College of Business and Computing, Southeast Missouri State University, One University Plaza, Mail Stop 5875, Cape Girardeau, MO, 63701, USA

    Hyeon Jeong Cho

  3. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA

    Byoungho Ellie Jin

Authors
  1. Sojin Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyeon Jeong Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Byoungho Ellie Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeon Jeong Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Stimuli examples ($120 of the product).

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, S., Cho, H.J. & Jin, B.E. Does effective cost transparency increase price fairness? An analysis of apparel brand strategies. J Brand Manag 27, 495–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00191-w

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00191-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation