Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring Uncharted Communities of Crowdsourced Plagiarism

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of crowd-sourcing ‘study aid’ web platforms. Students are sharing completed academic coursework through a growing network of ‘study aid’ web platforms like CourseHero.com. These websites facilitate the crowd-sourced exchange of coursework, and effectively support plagiarism. However, virtually no data exists concerning the scope or extent of coursework being shared through these platforms. This paper reports on two experiments to monitor the frequency of coursework from a sample university uploaded onto CourseHero.com. Ultimately, both experiments failed to produce a clear or meaningful measurement of coursework upload frequency. The apparently widespread use of these crowd-sourcing ‘study aid’ websites and the failure of these experiments demonstrates the need for further investigation into how much coursework is being shared through such platforms, how frequently it is shared, and what kind of coursework is being shared. Addressing these issues is an important step into measuring the impact of these wellsprings of academically dishonest behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (2008). Foreword. In T. Jiyoshi & M. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Course Hero. (2018). Why you need unlocks. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/blog/course-hero-unlocks-free/

  • Course Hero. (2019a). About us. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/about-us/.

  • Course Hero. (2019b). Copyright infringement notification. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/copyright-infringement/

  • Course Hero. (2019c). Payment. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/payment/.

  • Course Hero. (2019d). Terms of use. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/terms-of-use/.

  • Course Hero. (2019e). Upload. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/upload/.

  • Davidson, C. N., & Goldberg, D. T. (2009). The future of learning institutions in a digital age. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors, and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google. (2019). Alerts. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/alerts

  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1992). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Qriting, 11(2), 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (2007). Understanding “internet plagiarism”. Computers and Composition, 24(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, D. C. (2014). Does the online environment promote plagiarism? A comparative study of dissertations from brick-and-mortar versus online institutions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, D. C. (2015). The influence of the internet on plagiarism among doctoral dissertations: An empirical study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, D. C. (2012). Plagiarism among dissertations: Prevalence at online institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2016). Contract cheating: The outsourcing of assessed student work. In Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, E., Huotari, E., & Kupila, P. (2017). Conceptions of plagiarism and problems in academic writing in a changing landscape of external regulation. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, J. (2005). Cut and paste: Remixing composition pedagogy for online workspaces. In Internet-Based Workplace Communications: Industry and Academic Applications. IGI Global.

  • Louw, H. (2017). Defining plagiarism: Student and staff perceptions of a grey concept. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(5), 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, S., & Naha, L. M. (2011). Playful affinity: A case study of the digital writing and research lab as a collaborative graduate student research network. In L. McGrath (Ed.), Collaborative approaches to the digital in English studies. Logan: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, L. (Ed.). (2011). Collaborative approaches to the digital in English studies. Logan: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). CAI research. Retrieved from https://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp.

  • Reyman, J. (2008). Rethinking plagiarism for technical communication. Technical Communication, 55(1), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, A. M., & Basanta, G. (2016). Peer-to-peer file sharing and academic integrity in the internet age. In Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing…’: A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: How technology makes consumers into collaborators. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M. (2008). University student online plagiarism. International Journal on E-learning, 7(4), 743–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: A&C Black.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, S. (2007). First-year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary Dixon.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, Z., George, K. Monitoring Uncharted Communities of Crowdsourced Plagiarism. J Acad Ethics 19, 291–301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09381-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09381-2

Keywords

Navigation