Abstract
I argue that John Hick’s soul-making theodicy is committed to opposing social progress. By focusing on justifying the current amount and distribution of suffering and evil, Hick’s theodicy ends up having to condemn even positive change as undesirable. First, I give a brief outline of Hick’s theodicy, with a particular emphasis on the role of earned virtue in justifying the existence of evil. Then I consider two understandings of social progress: progress as the elimination of suffering and evil; and progress as the promotion of earned virtue. I further distinguish the earned virtue understanding of social progress into two kinds, in which the relationship between social structures and moral growth either: (1) allows members of a more advanced society to start closer to perfection; or (2) allows members of a more advanced society to progress more quickly (and presumably further). I argue that no matter which approach we take, Hick’s theodicy struggles with the idea of social progress. Hick is either straightforwardly committed to opposing social progress, or he can support it only at the expense of being unable to justify status quo of suffering and evil.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Though this seems unlikely, given that a lot of suffering and evil seems to work against moral growth, rather than for it.
References
Dore, C. (1970). An examination of the ‘soul-making’ theodicy. American Philosophical Quarterly,7(3), 119–130.
Hick, J. (1977). Evil and the God of Love (2nd ed.). London: The Macmillan Press.
Hick, J. (2016). Soul-making theodicy. In M. L. Peterson (Ed.), The problem of evil: Selected readings (2nd ed., pp. 262–273). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Kane, G. S. (1975). Soul-making theodicy and eschatology. Sophia,14(2), 24–31.
Rowe, W. (1991). Paradox and promise: Hick's solution to the problem of evil. In H. Hewitt (Ed.), Problems in the philosophy of religion: Critical studies of the work of John Hick (pp. 111–129). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Scott, M. S. M. (2010). Suffering and soul-making: Rethinking John Hick’s theodicy. The Journal of Religion,90(3), 313–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hemmingsen, M. Soul-making and social progress. Int J Philos Relig 88, 81–96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09726-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09726-x