Abstract
This article examines the structures, practices, and processes of collection, cataloging, and curation to expose where current cultural authority is placed, valued, and organized within archival workflows. The long arc of collecting is not just rooted in colonial paradigms; it relies on and continually remakes those structures of injustice through the seemingly benign practices and processes of the profession. Our emphasis is on one mode of decolonizing processes that insist on a different temporal framework: the slow archives. Slowing down creates a necessary space for emphasizing how knowledge is produced, circulated, and exchanged through a series of relationships. Slowing down is about focusing differently, listening carefully, and acting ethically. It opens the possibility of seeing the intricate web of relationships formed and forged through attention to collaborative curation processes that do not default to normative structures of attribution, access, or scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler M (2016) The case for taxonomic reparations. Knowl Org 43(8):630–640
Adler M (2017) Cruising the library: perversities in the organization of knowledge. Fordham University Press, New York
Altman J, Hinkson M (2010) Culture crisis: anthropology and politics in aboriginal Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney
American Folk Life Center (AFLC) (2016) Collaborations, collections, and connections symposium. http://www.loc.gov/folklife/. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
Anderson J (2013) Anxieties of authorship in the colonial archive. In: Chris C, Gerstner DA (eds) Media authorship. Routledge, New York, pp 229–246
Anderson J (2018) Negotiating who owns Penobscot culture. Anthr Quart 91(1):267–305
Anderson J, Christen K (2013) Chuck a copyright on it: Dilemmas of digital return and the possibilities for traditional knowledge licenses and labels. Mus Anth Rev 7(1–2):105–126
Anderson J, Christen K (in press) Decolonizing attribution: traditions of exclusion. J Radic Libr
Bastian JA, Alexander B (2009) Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet Publishing, London
Brady E (1999) A spiral way: how the phonograph changed ethnography. University of Mississippi Press, Jackson
Calloway C (2013) Pen and ink witchcraft: treaties and treaty making in American Indian history. Oxford University Press, New York
Caswell M (2014) Seeing yourself in history: community archives and the fight against symbolic annihilation. Pub Hist 36(4):26–37
Caswell M (2016) The archive is not an archives: acknowledging the intellectual contributions of archival studies. Reconstr 16(1) https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk Accessed 5 Feb 2019
Caswell M, Cifor M (2016) From human rights to feminist ethics: radical empathy in archives. Archivia 81:23–43
Caswell M, Migoni AA, Geraci N, Marika C (2017a) To be able to imagine otherwise: community archives and the importance of representation. Arch Rec Assoc 38(1):5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2016.1260445
Caswell M, Punzalan R, Sangwand T (2017b) Critical archive studies: an introduction. J Crit Lib Inf Stud 1(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50
Christen K (2011) Opening archives: respectful repatriation. Am Arch 74:185–210
Christen K (2012) Does information really want to be free? Indigenous knowledge systems and the question of openness. Int J Commun 6:2870–2893
Christen K (2018) Relationships not records: digital heritage and the ethics of sharing indigenous knowledge online. In: Sayers J (ed) Routledge companion to media studies and digital humanities. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 403–412
Christen K, Merrill A, Wynne M (2017) A community of relations: Mukurtu hubs and spokes. D-Lib Mag 23(5–6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may17/christen/05christen.html. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
Cifor M, Lee JA (2017) Towards an archival critique: opening possibilities for addressing neoliberalism in the archival field. J Crit Lib Inf St 1(1):1–22
Cifor M, Caswell M, Migoni A, Geraci N (2018) What we do crosses over to activism: the politics and practice of community archives. Arch Pub Hist 40(2):69–95
Clayton M (1996) Ethnographic wax cylinders at the British library national sound archive: a brief history and description of the collection. Br J Ethnomus 5:67–92
Collaborations, collections, and connections symposium (2016) Transcription of question and answer panel. https://stream-media.loc.gov/webcasts/captions/2016/160913afc0900.txt. Accessed on 23 Aug 2018
Cook T (2011) The archive(s) is a foreign country: historians, archives, and the changing archival landscape. Am Arch 74:600–632
Cushman E (2013) Wampum, Sequoyan, and story: decolonizing the digital archive. Coll Eng 76(2):115–135
Deloria PJ (2018) The new world of the indigenous museum. Daedalus 147(2):106–115. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00494
Deloria PJ, Lomawaima KT, Brayboy BMKJ, Trahant MN, Ghiglione L, Medin D, Blackhawk N (2018) Unfolding futures: indigenous ways of knowing for the twenty-first century. Daedalus 147(2):6–16
Dowd G (1992) A spirited resistance: the North American Indian struggle for unity, 1745–1815. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Drake J (2016) Liberatory archives: towards belonging and believing. Medium. https://medium.com/on-archivy/liberatory-archives-towards-belonging-and-believing-part-2-6f56c754eb17. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
Duarte M (2017) Network sovereignty: building the internet across Indian Country. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Evans J, McKemmish S, Rolan G (2017) Critical archiving and recordkeeping research and practice in the continuum. Crit Arch Stud 1(2):1–38
Falzetti AG (2014) Archival absence: the burden of history. Settl Col Stud 5(2):128–144
Faulkhead S (2009) Connecting through records: narratives of Koorie Victoria. Arch Manuscr 37(2):60–88
Fewkes JW (1890a) Archaeology and ethnology. Am Nat 24(281):495–496
Fewkes JW (1890b) On the use of the phonograph in the study of the languages of American Indians. Science 15(378):267–269
Fewkes JW (1890c) A contribution to Passamaquoddy folk-lore. J of Am Folk 3(11):257–280
Fewkes JW (1890d) A trip to Calais Maine for the purpose of experimenting with phonograph as an instrument to preserve the ancient language of that tribe. Unpublished, Fieldbook
Fewkes JW (1924) Annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1920. Washington Government Printing Office
Gilliland AJ, McKemmish S (2014) The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights, reconciliation and recovery. Atlanti 24:79–88
Gitelman L (1999) Scripts, grooves and writing machines: representing technology in the Edison Era. Stanford University Press, California
Gitelman L (2006) Always already new: media, history and the data of culture. MIT Press, Massachusetts
Goodyear-Ka‘ōpua N, Kuwada BK (2018) Making ‘Aha: independent Hawaiian pasts, presents, and futures. Daedalus 147(2):49–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00489
Gray J (1988) The federal cylinder project: a guide to field cylinder collections in federal agencies. Library of Congress, Washington DC
Greene M, Meissner D (2005) More product, less process: revamping traditional archival processing. Am Arch 68(2):208–263
Hagan W (1978) Archival captive—the American Indian. Am Arch 41(2):135–142
Haraway D (2016) Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke Univ Press, Duke
Hennessy K, Lyons N, Loring S, Arnold C, Joe M, Elias A, Pokiak J (2013) The Inuvialuit living history project: digital return as the forging of relationships between institutions, people, and data. Mus Anth Rev 7(1–2):44–73
Horseman R (1967) Expansion and American Indian policy, 1783–1812. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman
Hudson DJ (2017) On “diversity” as anti-racism in library and information studies: a critique. J Crit Libr Inf Stud 1:1–36
Hughes-Watkins L (2018) Moving toward a reparative archive: a roadmap for a holistic approach to disrupting homogenous histories in academic repositories and creating inclusive spaces for marginalized voices. J Cont Arch Stud 5(1):1–17
Iacovino L (2010) Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Arch Sci 10(4):353–372
Jackson A (1830) Transcript of President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian removal. https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=25&page=transcript. Accessed on 23 Aug 2018
Jules B (2017) Confronting our failure of care around the legacies of marginalized people in the archives. Medium. https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
Kelleher C (2017) Archives without archives: (re)locating and (re)defining the archive through post-custodial praxis. J Crit Lib Inf Stud 1(2):1–30. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.29
Littletree S, Metoyer CA (2015) Knowledge organization from an indigenous perspective: the mashantucket pequot thesaurus of American Indian terminology project. Cat Classif Q 53(5–6):640–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1010113
Local Contexts (2018). http://localcontexts.org/. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
Lonetree A (2012) Decolonizing museums: representing Native American in national and tribal museums. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Iacovino LM, Thorpe K (2010) Australian indigenous knowledge and the archives: embracing multiple ways of knowing and keeping. Arch Manuscr 38(1):27–50
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L (2011) Distrust in the archives: reconciling records. Arch Sci 11(3–4):211–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
Mignolo W (2000) Local histories/global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledge and border thinking. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Mukurtu CMS (2018). http://mukurtu.org/. Accessed 23 Aug 2018
Noble S (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism?. New York University Press, New York
O’Neal JR (2015) The right to know: decolonizing Native American archives. J West Arch 6(1):1–19
O’Neal JR (2014) Respect, recognition, and reciprocity: the protocols for Native American archival materials. In: Daniel D, Levi A (eds) Identity palimpsests: archiving ethnicity in the US and Canada. Litwin, Sacramento, pp 125–142
Owens H (1998) Mapping beyond Dewey’s boundaries: constructing classificatory space for marginalized knowledge domains. Lib Trends 47(2):233–255
Passamaquoddy People (2018). http://passamaquoddypeople.com/. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
Perche D (2017) Ten years on, it’s time we learned the lessons from the failed Northern territory intervention: the conversation. http://theconversation.com/ten-years-on-its-time-we-learned-the-lessons-from-the-failed-northern-territory-intervention-79198. Access 23 Aug 2018
Powell JW (1881) First annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1879–1880. Washington Government Printing Office
Racette SF (2016) Pieces left along the trail: material culture histories and indigenous studies. In: Anderson C, O’Brien JM (eds) Sources and methods in indigenous studies. Routledge, Abingdon
Ramirez MH (2015) Being assumed not to be: a critique of whiteness as an archival imperative. Am Arch 78(2):339–356
Rifkin M (2017) Beyond settler time: temporal sovereignty and indigenous self-determination. Duke University Press, Durham
Riley AR, Carpenter KA (2016) Owning Red: a theory of Indian (cultural) appropriation. Tex Law Rev 94:859–931
Roy L, Bhasin A, Arriaga SK (2011) Tribal libraries, archives, and museums: preserving our language, memory, and lifeways. Scarecrow Press, Lanham
Russell L (2006) Indigenous records and archives: mutual obligations and building trust. Arch Manuscr 34(1):32–43
Sangwand T (2014) Human rights archiving: from postcustodial theory to praxis. Arch Outlook (July/Aug):10–12
Sangwand T (2018) Preservation is political: enacting contributive justice and decolonizing transnational archival collaborations. KULA 2(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.36
Schwartz J, Cook T (2002) Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory. Arch Sci 2:1–19
Simpson A (2014) Mohawk interruptus: political life across the borders of settler states. Duke University Press, Durham
Simpson A (2016) Whither settler colonialism? Settl Colon Stud 4(4):438–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2015.1124427
Soctomah D (2018) Passamaquoddy Peoples’ welcome message. http://passamaquoddypeople.com/about. Accessed 24 Aug 2018
Sutherland T (2017) Archival amnesty: in search of Black American transitional restorative justice. J Crit Lib Inf Stud 1(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42
Te Punga Somerville AA (2017) I do still have a letter: our sea of archives. In: Anderson C, O’Brien JM (eds) Sources and methods in Indigenous studies. Routledge, Abingdon
Thorp J (2019) Thirty-one cylinders. Artist in the archive podcast. Episode 8. https://artistinthearchive.podbean.com/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019
Thorpe K (2014) Indigenous records: connecting, critiquing and diversifying collections. Arch Manuscr 42(2):211–214
Thorpe K (2017) Aboriginal community archives: a case study in ethical community research. In: Gilliland A, McKemmish S, Lau A (eds) Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Melbourne
Trigger B, Washburn W (1996) The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas, Vol 1 North America, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tuck E, Yang K (2012) Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization 1:1–20
Tuck E, Yang W (2014) Unbecoming claims: pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qual Inq 6:811–818
Vizenor G (ed) (2008) Survivance: narratives of native presence. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
Washburn WE (1975) The assault on Indian tribalism: the general allotment law (Dawes Act) of 1887. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge that this work was carried out on the traditional homelands of the Palus Band of Indians, the ceded lands of the Nez Perce Tribe, the traditional territories of the Calusa Indians and on Lenapehoking, the homeland of the Lenape people. We further acknowledge their presence here since time immemorial and recognize continuing connection to the lands, waters, and ancestors. We would like to thank our colleagues and collaborators, James Francis, Donald Soctomah, Dwayne Tomah and Guha Shankar, for their time and dedication to this work. We also want to acknowledge the labor of our graduate student assistants, Jesslyn Starnes and Landon Roper. Their research was invaluable to this work. We would also like to acknowledge the generous support of the Rauschenberg Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christen, K., Anderson, J. Toward slow archives. Arch Sci 19, 87–116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09307-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09307-x