Abstract
This article is a response to Viviane Frings-Hessami’s ‘The flexibility of the records continuum model: a response to Michael Karabinos’ “in the shadow of the continuum”’ and continues the debate on my original paper. It is meant to further expand upon the shadows of the continuum, while also responding to Frings-Hessami with other records continuum model literature that refutes some of her critiques. By going through Frings-Hessami’s main arguments against my idea of shadows of the continuum, I point out the flaws in each, while also reiterating the original goal of the concept.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson D (2011) Mau Mau in the High Court and the “lost” British Empire archives: Colonial conspiracy or bureaucratic bungle? J Imp Commonw Hist 39:699–716
Banton M (2012) Destroy? ‘Migrate’? Conceal? British strategies for the disposal of sensitive records of colonial administrations at independence. J Imp Commonw Hist 40:321–335
Frings-Hessami V (2019) The flexibility of the records continuum model: a response to Michael Karabinos’ “in the shadow of the continuum”. Arch Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09316-w
Karabinos M (2015) The shadow continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Djogdja Documenten and the Migrated Archives. PhD Thesis, Leiden University
Karabinos M (2018) In the shadows of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’. Arch Sci 18(3):207–224
Piggott M (2012) Archives and societal provenance: Australian essays. Chandos Publishing, Oxford
Reed B (2005a) Beyond perceived boundaries: imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping. Arch Manuscr 33:176–198
Reed B (2005b) Reading the records continuum: interpretations and explorations. Arch Manuscr 33:18–43
Upward F, McKemmish S, Reed B (2011) Archivists and changing social and information spaces: a continuum approach to recordkeeping and archiving in online cultures. Archivaria 72:197–237
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karabinos, M. Acknowledging the shadows. Arch Sci 20, 187–196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09329-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09329-5