Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:31:41.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Avoiding Capture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Ramsay Burt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay discusses three recent British contemporary dance works that radically rework the spatial relation between audience and performer. These are Nicola Conibere's Assembly (2013), Katye Coe's (To) Constantly Vent (2014), and Alexandrina Hemsley and Jamila Johnson-Small's Voodoo (2017). The essay draws on Henri Lefebvre theorization of the social and political production of space to analyze the kinds of reworkings of space-time that these works enact. It argues that the works evade capture by the apparatuses that maintain normative ideologies, not only those governing the reception of art but also the apparatuses of racial classification.

Keywords

logic of visualizationHenri LefebvreNicola ConibereKatye CoeProject Orhythm patternapparatus of capturecontemporary dance
Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , December 2018 , pp. 99 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Dance Studies Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Acxiom. 2009. Life Stage Clustering System: “PersonicX” An Explanation of the Development of the PersonicX Clustering System. Accessed November 8, 2017. https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/dema.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/Member_Resources/Lifestage_Clustering.pdfGoogle Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 2009. What is an Apparatus? Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (3): 801–31.Google Scholar
Berardi, Franco. 2011. After the Future. Oakland and Baltimore: AK Press.Google Scholar
Berardi, Franco. 2012. The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance. Cambridge, MA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Bernard, Michel. 1993. “Sens et fiction: ou les effets étrange de trois chiasmes sensoriels.” Nouvelles de Danse 17: 6–64.Google Scholar
Bleeker, Maaike. 2008. Visuality in the Theatre: The Locus of Looking. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Briginshaw, Valerie. 2001. Dance Space and Subjectivity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coe, Katye. 2014. Interviewed by Ramsay Burt at the Hayward Gallery, London. November 22.Google Scholar
Conibere, Nicola. 2017. “Some Bodies.” Performance Research 22 (3): 77–84.Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. 1999. Suspension of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cvejić, Bojana. 2015. Choreographing Problems: Expressive Concepts in European Contemporary Dance and Performance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Massumi, Brian. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Dery, Mark. 1994. “Black to the Future.” In Flame Wars: The Discourse of Cyberculture, edited by Dery, Mark, 179–222. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. 1952. Invisible Man. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
Eshun, Kodwo. 1998. More Brilliant than the Sun. London: Quartet Books.Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark. 2009 Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? London: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Fraser, Andrea. 2005. “From the Critique of the Institution to an Institution of Critique.” Artforum 44 (1): 278–83.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gielen, Pascal and Bruyne, Paul De. 2009. Being an Artist in Post-Fordist Times. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 2011. “The Neo-Liberal Revolution.” Cultural Studies 25 (6): 705–728.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 2017. Familiar Stranger: A Life Between Two Islands. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2010. The Enigma of Capital and the Crisis of Capitalism. London: Enigma Books.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Nalo. 2005. “Afrofuturism: Womanist Paradigms for the New Millennium.” (address, College of New Jersey, Department of African American Studies, Thirtieth Anniversary Symposia). Femspec 6 (1): 103–113.Google Scholar
Johnson-Small, Jamila. 2016a. “One Big Fist,” Last Yearz Interesting Negro (blog), January 19. Accessed October 25, 2016. https://jamilajohnsonsmall.wordpress.com/2016/01/19/one-big-fist/Google Scholar
Johnson-Small, Jamila. 2016b. “… All my Education has been Misleading,” Last Yearz Interesting Negro, (blog). March 2. Accessed May 27, 2017. <https://jamilajohnsonsmall.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/all-my-education-has-been-misleading/Google Scholar
Laermans, Rudi. 2015. Moving Together: Theorizing and Making Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2007. “Choreography as Apparatus of Capture.” The Drama Review 51 (2) (T194): 120–23.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2016. Singularities: Dance in the Age of Performance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 2015. Politics of Affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moten, Fred. 2003. In the Break: The Aesthetics of the Black Radical Tradition. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Project O. 2017. Voodoo. Lillian Baylis Studio, Sadler's Wells Theatre, London. Performance program.Google Scholar
Rand, Ayn. 1989. The Voice of Reason. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Jeremy. 2000. The Age of Access: How the Shift from Ownership to Access is Transforming Modern Life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 1993. “Some Notes Towards Thinking About the Spaces of the Future.” In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, edited by John Bird, Barry Curtis, Tim Putman, George Robertson, and Lisa Tickner, 70–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Bloom.Google Scholar
The Invisible Committee. 2009. The Coming Insurrection. N.p.: printed by author.Google Scholar
Turow, Joseph. 2011. The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wookey, Sara, ed. 2015. Who Cares? Dance in the Gallery and Museum. London: Siobhan Davies Dance.Google Scholar