Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological and Political Contributors to Criminal Culpability: Reply to Brink, Howard and Morse

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a reply to David Brink, Jeff Howard and Stephen Morse’s commentaries on my book, The Age of Culpability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Supreme Court has said that olnly the incorrigible children who commit murder should ever receive the sentence of life without parole (LWOP). Many juvenile justice advocates have noted that it is very difficult to say confidently that any given child really is incorrigible and so the LWOP sentence should be vanishingly rare. My remarks in the main text are intended to be compatible with this point.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon Yaffe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaffe, G. Psychological and Political Contributors to Criminal Culpability: Reply to Brink, Howard and Morse. Criminal Law, Philosophy 14, 273–287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-020-09526-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-020-09526-9

Keywords

Navigation