Abstract
Successful language learning entails two levels of competence: adequate control of the grammatical system of the target language and ability to effectively communicate in pragmatic contexts. Espoused by the mantra of much inculcated communicative orientation in English language teaching and learning, the divination points to pedagogical trends which essentially jettison grammar instruction in the classroom. However, language is not merely a tool of communication but an instrument of social control, political power, and economic mobility, all of which require not only skills to “get your message across” by whatever means, but more importantly, the accurate use of and facility with language that has been codified and assessed formally by standardized tests. This paper critically examines the role of grammatical accuracy and its relation to communication in terms of social and academic functions of English and advocates a revival of currently penurious grammar instruction. Examples from both native and nonnative speakers of English are used to illustrate the interface between grammar and social and political dimensions of communication through language.
About the author
WU Shinian is Professor of English at Grand Valley State University in the United States and Guest Professor of English at Xi’an International Studies University in China. His areas of expertise are in applied linguistics, second language acquisition, and second language assessment. E-mail: wus@gvsu.edu
References
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A. (1992). Standard Nigerian English: Issues of identification. In B. B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp. 148-161). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Empirical evidence of the need for instruction in pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524797.005Search in Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (Eds.) (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410613776Search in Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1-47.10.1093/applin/1.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. (2013). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, MA: Heinle ELT.Search in Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., & Freeman, L. (2015). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course . Boston, MA: Heinle ELT.Search in Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. Bachman & A. Cohen (Eds.). Interface between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, C.C. (1992). Chinese varieties of English. In B. B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp. 162-177). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cruse, A. 2011. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Curzan, A. (2011). How English works. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J. W. (1993). Expressing gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics, 7, 167-185.10.1093/applin/7.2.167Search in Google Scholar
Fairclogh, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2014). Language and Power. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Finegan, E. (2011). Language: Its structure and use. New York: Thomson Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar
Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory Course. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203137093Search in Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (1999). Objectivity and credibility in L1 and L2 academic writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 90-108). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. London: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hymes, D.H. (1971). On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2014). Global Englishes: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315761596Search in Google Scholar
Kachru, B. (Ed.) 1992. The other tongue: English across cultures: English in the global context. Urbana-Champaign, IL: The University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2003). Pragmatic development in a second Language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Klammer, T., Schulz, M., & Volpe, A. D. (2013). Analyzing English grammar. New York: Pearson Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Kolln, M., & Funk, R. (2011). Understanding English Grammar. New York: Pearson Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Poehner. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203813850Search in Google Scholar
Leung, C. (2005). Convivial communication: Recontextualizing communicative competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 15, No.2, 119-143.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00084.xSearch in Google Scholar
LoCastro, V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Moskowitz, B. (2008). Acquisition of language. In V. Clark, P. Eschholz, A. Rosa, & B. L. Simon (Eds.), Language: Readings in language and culture. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. London: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410600790Search in Google Scholar
Savignon, S.J. (1998). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2nd editionSearch in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1996). Interactional sociolinguistics. In S. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 307-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, J. (1987). Zero anaphora in second language acquisition: A comparison among three varieties of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 339-370.10.1017/S0272263100007488Search in Google Scholar
Wu, S., & VanderBroek, L. (2008). The role of English and indigenous languages in teacher education in the Ghanaian context. In S. Dogancay-Aktuna & J.Hardman (Eds.), Global English language teacher education (pp. 41-57). Washington DC: TESOL.Search in Google Scholar
(Copyedited by Duncan Sidwell & Ding Yanren)
© FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy
