Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors in a professional learning program to support a teacher’s growth in mathematical reasoning and its pedagogy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improved pedagogical practice does not happen in a silo; it requires impetus. External influences and pressures and internal motivations are drivers for pedagogical change. Professional learning (PL) programs, in their multitude of forms, are key tools for affecting teacher change. In response to an increased focus on fostering students’ reasoning in curriculum documents, our team developed the Mathematical Reasoning Professional Learning Research Program (MRPLRP) to support teacher change. This two-phased project aimed to build teachers’ knowledge of the critical aspects of reasoning pedagogical approaches that foster students’ development of reasoning. Phase One involved researchers’ planning and demonstrating a lesson with a focus on reasoning. In Phase Two, a peer learning team (PLT) is formed to plan a lesson to elicit reasoning and to observe each other teach the lesson. This article reports on Phases One and Two of the MRPLRP from the perspective of one teacher who participated in both phases. The findings provide insights into the aspects of PL that were critical in shifting this teacher’s understanding of reasoning and approaches to teaching reasoning. Whilst the results of a single case cannot be extrapolated to a larger population, we present and discuss the factors of this PL program in raising the awareness of critical aspects of reasoning, and thus this paper has the potential to impact future PL design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2019). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/mathematics/key-ideas/ Accessed 20 October, 2019

  • Australian Academy of Science and Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers [AAMT]. (2017). reSolve: Mathematics by inquiry. Assessing Reasoning Special Topic 5. http://www.resolve.edu.au/ Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Accessed 14 July 2019

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2013). Problem Solving versus Reasoning. Accessed https://topdrawer.aamt.edu.au Accessed 25 August 2019

  • Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers' beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians' mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beswick, K., & Jones, T. (2011). Taking professional learning to isolated schools: Perceptions of providers and principals, and lessons for effective professional learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, S. (2004). Why do students learn what they learn? In C. Baillie & I. Moore (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching in engineering (pp. 3737–3724). Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development: Processes and content. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548–556). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. (Eds.). (2005). Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Marton, F. (2004). The university of learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, L. A., Herbert, S., Loong, E.Y-K., Vale, C., & Widjaja, W. (2016). Primary teachers notice the impact of language on children’s mathematical reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 28(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0178-y

  • Brodie, K. (Ed.). (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. (1997). Spaghetti and meatballs for all! New York: Scholastic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., Brown, H., & Challen, D. (2010). Peer development as an alternative to peer observation: A tool to enhance professional development. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, O. (1996). Reconstructing teachers' thinking in teaching problem solving. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 193–201). Valencia: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Croxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 37–48). Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M., Clarke, D. J., & Sullivan, P. (2012). Reasoning in the Australian curriculum: Understanding its meaning and using the relevant language. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(3), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Roche, A., Wilkie, K., Wright, V., Brown, J., Downton, A., Horne, M., Knight, R., McDonoughna, A., Sexton, M., & Worrall, C. (2013). Demonstration lessons in mathematics education: Teachers’ observation foci and intended changes in practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, C. (2000). Educationally critical aspects of the experience of learning about the concept of an information system. Unpublished PhD, La Trobe University, Victoria. Retrieved from http://ironbark.bendigo.latrobe.edu.au/staff/cope/cope-thesis.pdf Accessed 10 March, 2010

  • Dahlgren, L. O., & Marton, F. (1978). Students' conceptions of subject matter: An aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 3(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin, B. (2007). Enriching the theoretical horizons of phenomenography, variation theory and learning studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. (2017). Exploring ways to improve teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching with effective team planning practices. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: We are still learning! Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia (pp. 205–212). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2004). Professional practice and performance for improved learning: Performance and development. Melbourne: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, L. M. (2017). How do teachers make sense of peer observation professional development in an urban school. International Education Studies, 10(1), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., Nardi, E., & Leikin, R. (2012). Forms of proof and proving in the classroom. In G. Hanna & M. deVilliers (Eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, New ICMI Study Series (Vol. 15, pp. 191–213). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington: National Education Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students’ reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 194–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eri, R. (2014). Peer observation of teaching: Reflections of an early career academic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(9), 625–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2007). Designing professional development to support teachers' learning in complex environments. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 8(2), 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Generic Centre: Learning and Teaching Support Network, 8(10), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L. A., Loong, E., Widjaja, W. (2015). A framework for primary teachers' perceptions of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 26–37.

  • Hill, H., Ball, D., & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualising and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D., & Cornish, R. (2016). Developing a professional learning culture. Independence, 41(2), 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In T. Romberg & E. Fennema (Eds.), Mathematics classroom that promotes understanding (pp. 133–155). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiorgi, Y. (2012). Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions and experiences of teachers in a primary school in Cyprus. Teacher Development, 16(4), 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, J. K., Ellis, A. B., & Elliott, R. (2011). Developing essential understanding of mathematical reasoning for teaching mathematics in prekindergarten—Grade 8. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lesseig, K. (2016). Fostering teacher learning of conjecturing, generalising and justifying through mathematics studio. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18(1), 100–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lick, D. W. (2006). A new perspective on organizational learning: Creating learning teams. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(1), 88–96.

  • Lo, M. P. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Pakey, C. P. M. (2005). For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Students’ mathematical noticing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 809–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, C. T., De Temple, D., & Millman, R. (2012). Mathematical reasoning for elementary teachers (6th ed.). Boston: Mass.: Pearson Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loong, E. Y. K., Vale, C., Herbert, S., Bragg, L. A., & Widjaja, W. (2017). Tracking Change in Primary Teachers' Understanding of Mathematical Reasoning through Demonstration Lessons. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 5–19.

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–42). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, E., & Knuth, E. (2017). Changing classroom culture, curricula, and instruction for proof and proving: How amenable to scaling up, practicable for curricular integration, and capable of producing long-lasting effects are current interventions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, S. D., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teachers’ professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietilla, A. (2003). Fulfilling the criteria for good mathematics teacher - the case of one student. Proceedings of European research in mathematics education III. Retrieved http://www.dm.unipi.it/clusterpages/didattica/CERME3/proceedings/Groups/TG2/TG2_pietila_cerme3.pdf Accessed 26 July, 2019

  • QSR international. (2017). NVivo. http://www.qsrinternational.com/

  • Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 388–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Researching Numeracy Project Team. (2004). Researching numeracy teaching approaches in primary schools. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 9(4), 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, A., Clarke, D. M., Clarke, D. J., & Sullivan, P. (2014). Primary teachers’ written unit plans in mathematics and their perceptions of essential elements of these. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 853–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal for Educational Research, 50(4), 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., & Buchanan, J. (2008). Enhancing teacher education practice through professional learning conversations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. (2011). One, Two. Infinity. Retrieved 30 July, 2013 from http://www.onetwoinfinity.ca/

  • Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 157–223). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematics teaching and learning to reach beyond the basics. In, Make it count: What research tells us about effective mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 21–26). Camberwell: Australian Council of Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (2013). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 27–62). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiff, L. V., & Curcio, F. R. (1999). Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12: 1999 yearbook of the National Council of teachers of mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, G. J. (2010). Engaging secondary students in reasoning and proving. Mathematics Teaching, 219, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., Gould, P., Leigh-Lancaster, D., & Lewis, G. (2012). Insights into ways that teachers plan their mathematics teaching. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons: Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia. MERGA: Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Superfine, A. C. (2008). Planning for mathematics instruction: A model of experienced teachers’ planning processes in the context of a reform mathematics curriculum. The Mathematics Educator, 18(2), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. (1993). The use of arguments. Cambridge: University press (French translation De Brabanter P. (1958). Les usages de l’argumentation, Presse Universitaire de France).

  • University of Cambridge. (2019). Magic Letters. Accessed https://nrich.maths.org/7821

  • Wilson, A. (2013). Embedding peer observation. Independence, 38(2), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (1999). Creating a context for argument in mathematics class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts and Education, School of Education, Deakin University (Warrnambool Campus), PO Box 423, Warrnambool, Victoria, 3280, Australia

    Sandra Herbert

  2. Faculty of Arts and Education, School of Education, Deakin University (Melbourne Campus), 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia

    Leicha A. Bragg

Authors
  1. Sandra Herbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leicha A. Bragg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Herbert.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herbert, S., Bragg, L.A. Factors in a professional learning program to support a teacher’s growth in mathematical reasoning and its pedagogy. Math Ed Res J 33, 409–433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00310-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00310-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation