Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective primary school teachers’ competence for analysing the difficulties in solving proportionality problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the design, implementation and results of a formative intervention, meant to develop prospective primary school teachers’ competence in the analysis of the difficulties emerging in the resolution of proportionality tasks. Solving problems by different methods, identifying the knowledge put at stake in each problem and taking this information into account to recognize the difficulties that pupils may encounter in solving the problems using each strategy are essential aspects of the epistemic and cognitive facets of didactic-mathematical knowledge. The experience has been carried out with a sample of 88 prospective primary school teachers during the third year of their studies, by applying a didactic model that includes work in teams, institutionalization, and assessment of the individual learning achieved. To analyse the participants’ responses, we used some theoretical and methodological tools of the onto-semiotic approach in mathematics education. The identification of pupils’ potential difficulties in addressing problem-solving, based on the objects involved in the mathematical activity, was a challenging task for prospective teachers. The difficulties most frequently identified by the prospective teachers were those concerned with understanding the statement requirements, or the problem-situations context, and the mathematical procedures involved in the resolution of the task. They did not discriminate the difficulties according to the resolution strategies. Time constraints conditioned the degree of learning achieved. We conclude that it is necessary that teacher education programs consider this type of didactical analysis and should be articulated with situations focused on developing other complementary knowledge and competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aké, L., Godino, J. D., Gonzato, M., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2013). Proto-algebraic levels of mathematical thinking. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 1–8). Kiel: PME.

  • Artigue, M. (1989). Ingénierie didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 9(3), 281–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizont: Knowing mathematics for teaching to learnes’ mathematical futures. Paper presented at the 43Rd Jahrestagung Für Didaktik Der Mathematik Held in Oldenburg, Germany.

  • Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T. & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: the unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. En V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B. (2012). Ratio and proportion: research and teaching in mathematics teachers’ education. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, D., Taber, S. B., Gorowara, C. C., & Petzl, C. (2009). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boston, M. D. (2013). Connecting changes in secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge to their experiences in a professional development workshop. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, K. (2014). Learning about learner errors in professional learning communities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9507-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buforn, A., & Fernández, C. (2014). Conocimiento de matemáticas especializado de los estudiantes para maestro de primaria en relación al razonamiento proporcional. BOLEMA, 28(48), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buforn, A., Llinares, S., & Fernández, C. (2018). Características del conocimiento de los estudiantes para maestro españoles en relación con la fracción, razón y proporción. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23, 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos, M., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., Giacomone, B., & Godino, J. D. (2018). Prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge and competence analyzing proportionality tasks. Educação e Pesquisa, 44, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman. O. (2014). Overall commentary: understanding and changing mathematics teachers. In J.J. Lo, K. R. Leatham y L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 295–309). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.

  • Clarke, B., Grevholm, B., & Millman, R. (Eds.). (2009). Tasks in primary mathematics teacher education. Purpose, use and exemplars. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., Clarke, D., & Roche, A. (2013). Teachers’ decisions about mathematics tasks when planning lessons. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 626–633). Melbourne: MERGA.

  • Clarke, D., Roche, A., Cheeseman, J., & van der Schans, S. (2014). Teaching strategies for building student persistence on challenging tasks: insights emerging from two approaches to teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., & Post, T. (1993). Connecting research to teaching proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teacher, 86(5), 404–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., Janssens, D. y Verschaff, L (2007). The illussion of the linearity. From analysis to improvement, Londres: Springer.

  • Dole, S., Clarke, D., Wright, T., & Hilton, G. (2012). Students’ proportional reasoning in mathematics and science. In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. v. 2, pp. 195–202). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2008) Setting an agenda for international research in mathematics education. In Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 2nd Edition (pp. 3-19). New York & London: Taylor and Francis (Routledge).

  • Font, V., Godino, J. D., & Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomone, G., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., & Godino, J. D. (2019). Cognitive analysis on prospective mathematics teachers’ reasoning using area and tree diagrams. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(2), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135.

  • Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., Contreras, A., Estepa, A. Lacasta, E. & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2013). Didactic engineering as design-based research in mathematics education. Proceedings CERME8, Turkey. Available from: http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG16/WG16_Godino.pdf.

  • Godino, J. D., Aké, L., Gonzato, M., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2014). Niveles de algebrización de la actividad matemática escolar. Implicaciones para la formación de maestros. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(1), 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., Burgos, M. & Giacomone, B. (2017). Significados pragmáticos y configuraciones ontosemióticas en el estudio de la proporcionalidad. In J. M. Contreras, P. Arteaga, G. R. Cañadas, M. M. Gea, B. Giacomone y M. M. López-Martín (Eds.), Actas del Segundo Congreso International Virtual sobre el Enfoque Ontosemiótico del Conocimiento y la Instrucción Matemáticos (pp. 1–13). http://enfoqueontosemiotico.ugr.es/civeos.html.

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2018). Primary school teachers implementing structured mathematics interventions to promote their mathematics knowledge for teaching proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. Published online: 28 March 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9405-7.

  • Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2016). Promoting middle school students’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9694-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., Pulos, S. y., & Stage, E.K. (1983). Early adolescents proportional reasoning on "rate" problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 219–233.

  • Lamon, S. (2007). Rational number and proportional reasoning: toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Charlotte, NC: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Zazkis, R. (2007). A view on the teachers’ opportunities to learn mathematics through teaching. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 122–127). Seoul, Korea: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.

  • Livy, S., & Vale, C. (2011). First year pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge: methods of solution for a ratio question. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 22–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livy, S., Herbert, S., & Vale, C. (2019). Developing primary pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge: opportunities and influences. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0252-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misailidou, C., & Williams, J. (2002). "Ratio": Raising teachers' awareness of children's thinking. Paper presented at the 2nd ICMI. Retrieved 16 February 2010, from http://www.math.uoc.gr/~ictm2/Proceedings/pap143.pdf.

  • Misailidou, C., & Williams, J. (2003). Diagnostic assessment of children’s proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 22(3), 335–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2010). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(1), 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). An investigation of teachers’ beliefs of students’ algebra development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osana, H., Lacroix, G., Tucker, B., & Desrosieres, C. (2006). The role of content knowledge and problem features on preservice teachers’ appraisal of elementary mathematics tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 347–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostermann, A. (2018). Factors influencing the accuracy of diagnostic judgments. In T. Leuders, K. Philipp & J. Leuders (Eds), Diagnostic Competence of Mathematics Teachers (pp. 95–108). Springer.

  • Ostermann, A., Leuders, T., & Nückles, M. (2018). Improving the judgment of task difficulties: Prospective teachers’ diagnostic competence in the area of functions and graphs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21, 579–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–58). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss y A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Pino-Fan, L. R., Assis, A., & Castro, W. F. (2015). Towards a methodology for the characterization of teachers’ didactic-mathematical knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1429–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2011). The structure of prospective kindergarten teachers’ proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2016). Prospective mathematics teachers’ learning and knowledge for teaching. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 275–296). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, K. J. (2010). Teachers’ understanding of proportional reasoning. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 6 (pp. 1055–1061). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, T., Montes, M. A., Godino, J. D., Carrillo, J., & Pino-Fan, L. (2019). What makes mathematics teacher knowledge specialized? Offering alternative views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Towards a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. L. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 321–354). Rotterdam: Ed. Sense Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R., Carpenter, T., Fennell, F., Geary, D., Lewis, J., Okamoto, Y., Thompson, L., & Wray, J. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: a practice guide (NCEE #2010–4039). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education Retrieved from whatworks.ed.gov/publications/practice guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, J. W. (2013). How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student errors: ratio and proportion in similar rectangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). From addition to multiplication ... and back: the development of students' additive and multiplicative reasoning skills. Cognition and Instruction, 28(3), 360–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, T., Orrill, C. H., Nagar, G. G., Brown, R. E., & Burke, J. (2020). Framing a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: The MacMillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalavsky, O., & Sullivan, P. (Eds.). (2011). Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research carried out as part of the research project, PID2019-105601GB-I00, with support from the FQM-126 Research Group (Junta de Andalucía, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Didactic of Mathematics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    María Burgos & Juan D. Godino

Authors
  1. María Burgos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan D. Godino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Burgos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burgos, M., Godino, J.D. Prospective primary school teachers’ competence for analysing the difficulties in solving proportionality problem. Math Ed Res J 34, 269–291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00344-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00344-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation