Abstract
Children are innately mathematical and explore mathematical concepts through play. However, educator beliefs about mathematics can impact the inclusion of mathematics in early childhood education (ECE). Recent research has suggested that spatial reasoning is a key concept which forms the foundations of mathematics learning. The theoretical argument underpinning this research is that young children benefit from intentional teaching specifically focused on supporting the development of children’s spatial reasoning skills during play. This mixed-methods research project investigated the effects of the implementation of a suite of play-based, spatial reasoning activities on educators’ teaching practices—including observations, assessment and evidence-based planning—and educator beliefs about mathematics in ECE. Twenty-seven participants were educators from 15 early childhood centres for children age 3–5 years, based within culturally and socio-economically diverse populations. Participant qualifications included diplomas, graduate and postgraduate degrees in early childhood and primary education, with teaching experience ranging from 6 months to 35 years. The investigations found reciprocal influences between the three key areas of the research project which included: the implementation of the activities by educators, educator beliefs about mathematics, spatial reasoning and mathematics teaching practice. The findings have implications for further research and curriculum design and practice. These include the need for research methodologies which contribute to sustained professional learning outcomes and the uptake of research findings in practice, play-based spatial reasoning assessment strategies and the contribution of a focus on spatial reasoning to early childhood curricula.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
EYPC: evidence of child capabilities gathered by observations, assessment that derives from analysis of observations and links to evidence-based planning, mandated by the Australian National Quality Framework (ACECQA n.d.).
In Victoria, Australia, kindergartens typically educate children aged 3 to 5 years, offering part-time or full-time programs between 8.45 am and 3.30 pm.
Long day care is available to infants, toddlers and young children. Centres may be open from 6.30 am to 6 pm, 5 days per week. Some centres offer a kindergarten program within a long day care program. Child attendance varies from 1 day per week, to 5 days per week.
References
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). The shape of the Australian curriculum. (4th ed.) [ebook]. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/The_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_v4.pdf
Anders, Y., & Rossbach, H.-G. (2015). Preschool teachers’ sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play: the influence of math-related school experiences, emotional attitudes, and pedagogical beliefs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(3), 305–322.
Anthony, G., McLachlan, C., & Lim, R. (2015). Narrative assessment: making mathematics learning visible in early childhood settings. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(3), 385–400.
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196.
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(2), 224–237.
Ashiabi, G. (2007). Play in the preschool classroom: Its socioemotional significance and the teacher’s role in play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 199–207.
Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (n.d.) Australian Curriculum, assessment and reporting authority. Retrieved from https://www.acecqa.gov.au
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). Foundation year mathematics curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Curriculum/F-10.
Bailey, D. H., Nguyen, T., Jenkins, J. M., Domina, T., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. S. (2016). Fadeout in an early mathematics intervention: constraining content or pre-existing differences? Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1457–1469.
Barblett, L. (2010). Why play-based learning? Every Child, 16(3), 4–5.
Beilock, S. L. (2010). Choke: what the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16(2), 101–105.
Beilock, S. L., & Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety: a factor in math achievement not to be ignored. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601438.
Bellock, S., Gunderson, E., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 107(5), 1860–1863.
Boaler, J., Chen, L., Williams, C., & Cordero, M. (2016). Seeing as understanding: the importance of visual mathematics for our brain and learning. Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 5, 325.
Bobis, J., Papic, M., & Mulligan, J. (2009). The mathematical knowledge of preschool practitioners: evidence from the field. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 16(2), 87–97.
Bobis, J., Higgins, J., Cavanagh, M., & Roche, A. (2012). Professional knowledge of practising teachers of mathematics. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia (pp. 313–341). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (2007). Tools of the mind: the Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle Rive: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Bordingnon, C. M., & Lam, C. M. (2004). The early assessment conundrum: lessons from the past, implications for the future. Psychology in Schools, 41(7).
Bradford, H. (2012). Planning and observation of children under three. In Abingdon, England. New York: Routledge.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bromley, H. (2009). Observation, assessment and planning in the EYFS. Nursery World (Haymarket Business Publications Ltd), 109(4179), 16.
Brown, E. T. (2005). The influence of teachers’ efficacy and beliefs regarding mathematics instruction in the early childhood classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26(3), 239–257.
Brown, A., & Inglis, S. (2013). So what happens after the event? Exploring the realisation of professional development with early childhood educators. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 11–15.
Bruns, J., Eichen, L., & Gasteiger, H. (2017). Mathematics-related competence of early childhood teachers visiting a continuous professional development course: an intervention study. Mathematics Teacher Education And Development, 19(3), 76–93.
Carnoy, M., Chisholm, L., Addy, N., Arends, F., Baloyi, H., Irving, M., & Sorto, A. (2011). The process of learning in South Africa: The quality of mathematics teaching in North West Province (pp. 1–150). Pretoria: HSRC Press.
Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2011). Understanding children’s mathematical graphics: beginnings in play. In Berkshire, England. New York: Open University Press.
Cheng, Y.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186.
Chiatovich, T., & Stipek, D. (2016). Instructional approaches in kindergarten: what works for whom? Elementary School Journal, 117(1), 1–29.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2014). Mathematics learning, assessment and curriculum. In R. Pianta (Ed.), Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 217–239). New York: The Guilford Press.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2017). Learning math, science and technology is good for preschoolers. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317348741_Learning_math_science_and_technology_is_good_for_preschoolers
Clements, D., Copple, C., & Hyson, M. (2002). NCTM position statement: Early childhood mathematics: promoting good beginnings. A joint position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 24.
Cohen, L., Manion, & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Cohrssen, C., & Page, J. (2016). Articulating a rights-based argument for mathematics teaching and learning in early childhood education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(3), 104–108.
Cohrssen, C., & Pearn, C. (2019). Assessing preschool children’s maps against the first four levels of the primary curriculum: lessons to learn. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00298-7.
Cohrssen, C., Church, A., Ishimine, K., & Tayler, C. (2013). Playing with maths: facilitating the learning in play-based learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 95–99.
Cohrssen, C., Tayler, C., & Cloney, D. (2015). Playing with maths: implications for early childhood mathematics teaching from an implementation study in Melbourne, Australia. Education 3–13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43, 641–652.
Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2016). Play-based mathematics activities as a resource for changing educator attitudes and practice. SAGE Open, 6(2), 215824401664901.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Washington, DC: Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Washington, DC: SAGE.
Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Edwards, S., & Fleer, M. (2009). Investigating the environmental scientific concepts in children’s play: how do children and teachers interpret play-based learning? Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 16(1), 49–61.
da Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2008). Preservice mathematics teachers’ knowledge and development. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 223.
Davis, B., & the Spatial Reasoning Study Group. (2015). Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions, and speculations. [electronic resource]. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Deans, J., & Cohrssen, C. (2015). Children dancing mathematical thinking. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 61–67.
DeLoache, J. (1988). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of young children. Science New York, N.Y., 238, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2446392.
DeLoache, J. S., Miller, K. F., & Rosengren, K. S. (1997). The credible shrinking room: very young children’s performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8(4), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00443.x.
Department of Education and Training (DET). (2016). Victorian early years learning and development framework. Melbourne: Early Childhood Strategy Division.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: the early years learning framework for Australia (EYLF). Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2015). The early years planning cycle. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/nqs/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Worksheet_planning_cycle.pdf
DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353–386.
Duncan, G. J., Claessens, A., Huston, A., Pagani, L., Engel, M., Sexton, H., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
Durlak, J. (2010). The importance of doing well in whatever you do: a commentary on the special section, “implementation research in early childhood education”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 348–357.
Elkind, D. (1981). The hurried child. Newton: Addison-Wesley.
Elkind, D. (1998). Educating young children in math, science, and technology. In Paper presented at the forum on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC.
Farmer, G., Verdine, B., Lucca, K., Davies, T., Dempsey, R., Newcombe, N., et al. (2013). Putting the pieces together: spatial skills at age 3 predict to spatial and math performance at age 5. Paper presented at the Society for Research in child development. Seattle.
Fleer, M. (2011). “Conceptual play”: foregrounding imagination and cognition during concept formation in early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(3), 224–240.
Ford, L., Kozey, M., & Negreiros, J. (2012). Cognitive assessment in early childhood: theoretical and practice perspectives. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theory, research and practice (3rd ed., pp. 585–622). New York: Guilford Press.
Frick, A., Hansen, M. A., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Development of mental rotation in 3-to 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 28(4), 386–399.
Geist, E. (2010). The anti-anxiety curriculum: combating math anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(1), 24–31.
Ginsburg, H. P., & Golbeck, S. (2004). Thoughts on the future of mathematics and science learning and education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.013.
Ginsburg, H. P., Hyson, M., & Woods, T. A. (2014). Preparing early childhood educators to teach math: professional development that works. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Göbel, S., Walsh, V., & Rushworth, M. (2002). The mental number line and the human angular gyrus. NeuroImage, 14(6), 1278–1289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0927.
Goss, P., Hunter, J., Romanes, D., & Parsonage, H. (2015). Targeted teaching: how better use of data can improve student learning. Victoria: Grattan Institute.
Grieshaber, S., & McArdle, F. (2010). The trouble with play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 87–99.
Griffin, P. (Ed.). (2014). Assessment for teaching. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Grissmer, D. W., Mashburn, A. J., Cottone, E., Chen, W. B., Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., & Cameron, C. E. (2013). Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development. Seattle, WA. Play-based after-school curriculum improves measures of executive function, visuospatial and math skills and classroom behavior for high risk K-1 children.
Gronlund, G., & James, M. (2005). Focused observations: how to observe children for assessment and curriculum planning. St Paul: Redleaf Press.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge. The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1241.
Hachey, A. C. (2009). I hate math: what we want young children not to learn. Texas Child Care Quarterly, 2, 7. Retrieved from http://www.childcarequarterly.com/fall09_story1.html
Hachey, A. C. (2013). The early childhood mathematics education revolution. Early Education & Development, 24(4), 419–430.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. A global perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Halpenny, A. M., & Pettersen, J. (2013). Introducing Piaget [electronic resource]: a guide for practitioners and students in early years education (p. 2013). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Han, J., Yin, H., & Boylan, M. (2016). Teacher motivation: definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1).
Harris, D., & Lowrie, T. (2018). In J. Hunter, P. Perger, & L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 376–383). Auckland: MERGA.
Hawes, Z., Tepylo, D., & Moss, J. (2015). Developing spatial thinking: implications for early mathematics education. In B. Davis & Spatial Reasoning Study Group (Eds.), Spatial reasoning in the early years: principles, assertions and speculations (pp. 29–45). New York: Routledge.
Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L. E., & Singer, D. G. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in school: presenting the evidence. New York; Oxford University Press.
Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2012). Interconnections of knowledge and beliefs in teaching mathematics. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12, 7–21.
Hubbard, E., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 6(6), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1684.
Hyde, D. C., Winkler-Rhoades, N., Lee, S., Izard, V., Shapiro, K. A., & Spelke, E. S. (2011). Spatial and numerical abilities without a complete natural language. Neuropsychologia, 49, 924–936.
Kennedy, A., & Stonehouse, A. (2012). Victorian early years learning and development framework practice principle guide 6. In Integrated teaching and learning approaches. Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
Ketelaar, E., Koopman, M., Brok, P., Beijaard, D., & Boshuizen, H. (2014). Teachers’ learning experiences in relation to their ownership, sense-making and agency. Teachers and Teaching, 20(3), 314–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.848523.
Kilderry, A. (2015). Intentional pedagogies: insights from the past. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 20–28.
Klibanoff, R. S., Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Hedges, L. V. (2006). Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: the effect of teacher “math talk”. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 59–69.
Lake, V., & Kelly, L. (2014). Female preservice teachers and mathematics: anxiety, beliefs, and stereotypes. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2014.936071.
Lee, J., & Ginsburg, H. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 37–45.
Lehrl, S., Kluczniok, K., & Rossbach, H. G. (2016). Longer-term associations of preschool education: The predictive role of preschool quality for the development of mathematical skills through elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.013.
Lester, S., & Russell, S. (2008). Play for a change. Play policy and practice: a review of contemporary perspectives. Play England. Retrieved from http://www.playengland.org.uk/media/120519/play-for-a-change-summary.pdf
Levine, S. C., Ratliff, K., Huttenlocher, J., & Cannon, J. E. (2012). Early puzzle play: a predictor of preschoolers’ spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 530–542.
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2016). Spatial reasoning influences students’ performance on mathematics tasks. In B. White, M. Chinnappan, & S. Trenholm (Eds.), Opening up mathematics education research (proceedings of the 39thannual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 407–414). Adelaide: MERGA.
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., Harris, D., & Hegarty, M. (2018). The impact of an intervention program on students’ spatial reasoning: student engagement through mathematics-enhanced learning activities. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0147-y.
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Hegarty, M. (2019). The influence of spatial visualization training on students’ spatial reasoning and mathematics performance. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(5), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1653298.
Lyons, I., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). When math hurts: math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS One, 7(10), e48076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048076.
MacNaughton, G., & Williams, G. (2009). Techniques for teaching young children. Sydney: Pearson Education.
Maloney, E. A., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Math anxiety: Who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 404–406, ISSN 1364–6613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.008.
McGrew, K. S. (2014). Evolution and revolution in CHC theory and the WJIV. Communique (0164775X), 43(3), 40–40.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, B., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Washington, DC: SAGE.
Miller, M. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., Loehr, A. M., & Fyfe, E. R. (2016). The influence of relational knowledge and executive function on preschoolers’ repeating pattern. Knowledge Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(1).
Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. In J. B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in child development behavior (Vol. 42). New York: Elsevier.
Moss, J., Hawes, Z., Naqvi, S., & Caswell, B. (2015). Adapting Japanese lesson study to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: a case study. ZDM, 47(3), 377–390.
Moss, J., Bruce, C., Caswell, B., Flynn, T., & Hawes, Z. (2016). Taking shape: activities to develop geometric and spatial thinking grades k–2. Toronto: Pearson.
Mulligan, J. T., & Vergnaud, G. (2006). Research on children’s early mathematical development: Towards integrated perspectives. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present and future (pp. 261–276). London: SensePublishers.
Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: why, what and how. Mind, Brain and Education, 4(3), 102–111.
Nuttall, J. (2005). Educators and children learning together: reflections on the early childhood assessment exemplars. Early Education, 38, 63–71.
O’Neill, S., & Stephenson, J. (2012). Exploring Australian pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy, its sources, and some possible influences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 535–545.
Oppermann, E., Anders, Y., & Hachfeld, A. (2016). The influence of preschool teachers’ content knowledge and mathematical ability beliefs on their sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 174–184.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. Paris: Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.
Page, J., & Tayler, C. (2016). Learning and teaching in the early years. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Piasta, S. B., Pelatti, C. Y., & Miller, H. L. (2014). Mathematics and science learning opportunities in preschool classrooms. Early Education and Development, 25, 445–468.
Piasta, S. B., Logan, J. A., Pelatti, C. Y., Capps, J. L., & Petrill, S. A. (2015). Professional development for early childhood educators: efforts to improve math and science learning opportunities in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 407–422.
Platas, L. M. (2014). The mathematical development beliefs survey: Validity and reliability of a measure of preschool teachers’ beliefs about the learning and teaching of early mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(3), 295–310 USA: Sage Publishing.
Pollitt, R., Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Wright, S. (2015). Thirty-one is a lot! Assessing four-year-old children’s number knowledge during an open-ended activity. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 13–22.
Pollitt, R., Seah, W. T., & Cohrssen, C. (2017). Spatial reasoning and mathematics in early childhood education. Every Child, 23(3), 18–19.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307.
Pruden, S. M., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter? Developmental Science, 14, 1417–1430.
Ramani, G. B., Zippert, E., Schweitzer, S., & Pan, S. (2014). Preschool children’s joint block building during a guided play activity. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 326–336.
Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.664593.
Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Busse, J. (1996). The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: gender similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.88.2.341.
Rogers, S. (2011). Play and pedagogy: a conflict of interests? In S. Rogers (Ed.), Rethinking play and pedagogy in early childhood education: concepts, contexts and cultures (pp. 5–18). London: Routledge.
Rosenfeld, D. (2010). Increasing perceived efficacy for teaching mathematics: an exploratory study. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 1, 25–35.
Ryan, S., Whitebook, M., & Cassidy, D. (2014). Strengthening the math-related teaching practices of the early care and education workforce: insights from experts. Berkeley: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California, Berkeley.
Saffigna, M., Franklin, D., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2011). Victorian early years learning and development framework, evidence paper practical principle 4: equity and diversity. Retrieved from https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/childhood/.../evidpaperequity.docx.
Sarama, J. (2002). Listening to teachers: planning for professional development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 36–39.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 457–469.
Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues (pp. 292–331). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Seah, W. T., Andersson, A., Bishop, A., & Clarkson, P. (2016). What would the mathematics curriculum look like if values were the focus? For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(1), 14–20.
Sharma, A., Cockerill, H., Okawa, N., & Sheridan, M. D. (2014). Mary Sheridan’s from birth to five years. In London, England. New York: Routledge.
Shulman, L. (2013). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Journal of Education, 193, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300302.
Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: district policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 141–179.
Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.
Stipek, D. (2013). Mathematics in early childhood education: revolution or evolution? Early Education and Development, 24(4), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2013.777285.
Stonehouse, A. (2015). Documentation: what’s the point? [blog post]. The Spoke: Early Childhood Australia’s Blog. Retrieved from http://thespoke.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/documentation-whats-the-point/
Sumsion, J., Grieshaber, S., McArdle, F., & Shield, P. (2014). The ‘state of play’ in Australia: early childhood educators and play-based learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(3), 4–13.
Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational theory (pp. 39–61). New York: Nova.
Tayler, C., Cloney, D., Adams, R., Ishmine, K., Thorpe, K., & Nguyen, T. K. C. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of Australian early childhood education and care experiences: study protocol. BMC Public Health, 16(352), 352. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2985-1.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
Umiltà, C., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2008). The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale, 192, 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1623-2.
Uttal, D. H., & Sheehan, K. J. (2014). The development of children’s understanding of maps and models: a prospective cognition perspective. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13(2), 188–200.
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446.
van Oers, B. (2010). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 23–37.
Vartuli, S. (1999). How early childhood teacher beliefs vary across grade level. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14(4), 489–514.
Vendlinski, T. P., Hemberg, B., Mundy, C., & Phelan, J. (2009). Designing professional development around key principles and formative assessments to improve teachers’ knowledge to teach mathematics. Los Angeles: Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.
Verdine, B. N., Lucca, K. R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2016). The shape of things: the origin of young children’s knowledge of the names and properties of geometric forms. Journal of Cognition and Development: Official Journal of the Cognitive Development Society, 17(1), 142–161.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (n.d.). Victorian curriculum foundation–10 mathematics. Retrieved from http://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/mathematics/introduction/rationale-and-aims
Vig, S., & Sanders, M. (2007). Cognitive assessment. In M. Brassard & A. Boehm (Eds.), Preschool assessment: Principles and practices (pp. 382–419). New York: Guildford Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher mental process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weckbacher, L. M., & Okamoto, Y. (2015). Discovering “space” in the elementary classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 35–40.
Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood: meaning-making and children’s drawing. London: SAGE.
Young, R., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 64(3), 373–388.
Young, C., Levine, S., & Mix, K. (2018). The connection between spatial and mathematical ability across development. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00755.
Yu, A. B., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17(4), 304–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2017.1322596.
Zhang, Q., & Wong, N. Y. (2015). Beliefs, knowledge and teaching: a series of studies about Chinese mathematics teachers. In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics: perspectives from insiders (pp. 457–492). London: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814415828_001.
Zvoch, K. (2009). Treatment fidelity in multisite evaluation: a multilevel longitudinal examination of provider adherence status and change. American Journal of Evaluation, 3(1), 44–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollitt, R., Cohrssen, C. & Seah, W.T. Assessing spatial reasoning during play: educator observations, assessment and curriculum planning. Math Ed Res J 32, 331–363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00337-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00337-8