Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sidewalk design in multi-cultural settings: a study of street furniture layout and design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public space, and all the complexities surrounding its creation and management, continues to be the domain of urban designers. In multi-cultural societies, the users of public space come from a diverse range of social and ethnic backgrounds, each with some unique needs and interests. Because of this, it can be assumed that social, cultural, and economic characteristics of people living in an area should be evident in the design and use of the public spaces. The research reported in this paper identifies the sidewalk design characteristics and furniture arrangements that can foster social activities amongst people from diverse cultural backgrounds. The research followed a mixed, multi-staged methodology. Stage one used structured field observations and surveys of street users. Three suburban centre streets in two New Zealand cities were studied in this way to understand the patterns of usage along their length. Stage two sought people’s preferences for different street design configurations through an on-line survey. The main conclusion from this research is that the seating preferences of different ethnicities are in many ways similar. However, people make specific decisions on where to sit based on the location, orientation and arrangement of seating and how it relates to different land-use activities. The findings confirm that a complex set of factors influence social activity along streets and that, in light of this, designers should become familiar with the diverse needs and expectations of those who make use of the sidewalks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton, J. 1975. The Experience of Landscape. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. 1981. Livable Streets. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann, P. 2008. Urban Transformation: Understanding City Design and Form. Washington, DC: IslandPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. 2019. Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to do Better. Urban Design International 24: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., C. De Magalhaes, and L. Hammond. 2008. Public Space: The Management Dimension. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., S. Tiesdell, T. Heath, and T. Oc. 2010. Public Places, Urban Spaces, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S., M. Francis, L. Rivlin, and A. Stone. 1992. Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D.A., T.L. McKenzie, A. Sehgal, S. Williamson, D. Golinelli, and N. Lurie. 2007. Contribution of Public Parks to Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health 97 (3): 509–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, N.A. 2006. Open-Ended Space: Urban Streets in Different Cultural Contexts. In Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life, ed. K.A. Franck and Q. Stevens, 54–72. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. 1987. The Making of Democratic Streets. In Public Streets for Public Use, ed. A. Vernez-Moudon, 23–39. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. 1987. Life Between Buildings Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde, M. 2011. Visual Evaluation of Urban Streetscapes: How do Public Preferences Reconcile with Those Held by Experts? Urban Design International 16: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass-Klau, C., G. Crampton, C. Dowland, and I. Nold. 1999. Streets as Living Space: Helping Public Places Play Their Proper Role. London: Landor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J. 2013. Your Place and/or My Place. In Transcultural Cities: Border-Crossing and Placemaking, ed. J. Hou, 1–16. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, R. 1987. Ethnicity and Urban Recreation: Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics in Chicago’s Public Parks. Journal of Leisure Research 19: 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. 1993. Great Streets. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joardar, S.D., and J.W. Neill. 1978. The Subtle Differences in Configuration of Small Public Spaces. Landscape Architecture 68: 487–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, S.M., and M.A. Murray. 1982. Evaluations of an Architectural Space as a Function of Variations in Furniture Arrangement, Furniture Density, and Windows. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 24: 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. 2004. Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. 1987. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesan, M., and M. Gjerde. 2015. Management of Business Activities Along Streets; an Often Neglected Aspect of Urban Design. Paper Presented at the Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment: The 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, The University of Melbourne.

  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 1995. Urban Form and Social Context: Cultural Differentiation in the Uses of Urban Parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (89): 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. 2004. Marginal Public Spaces in European Cities. Journal of Urban Design 9 (3): 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, B., and G.G. Hannah. 2010. Site Furnishings: A Complete Guide to the Planning, Selection and Use of Landscape Furniture and Amenities. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, V. 2006. Lively Streets: Exploring the Relationship Between Built Environment and Social Behavior. (Doctor of Philosophy). University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

  • Mehta, V. 2013. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space.

  • Mulgan, G., G. Potts, J. Audsley, M. Carmona, C. De Magalhaes, L. Sieh, and C. Sharpe. 2006. Mapping Value in the Built Urban Environment: A Report to the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). London: The Young Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostmond, H. 1957. Function as the Basis of Psychiatric Ward Design. Mental Hospitals 8: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham, S. 1992. Conviviality by Design: Gastronomic Strategies for Australian Cities. Urban Futures: Ideas for Australian Cities 2 (2): 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham, S. 2012. Market Place: Food Quarters, Design and Urban Renewal in London. New Castle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. 2012. Ethnic Inequalities - Occupation and Education [Online]. Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/ethnic-inequalities/. Accessed 17 Sept 2014.

  • Porta, S., and R. Luciano. 2005. Linking Urban Design to Sustainability: Formal Indicators of Social Urban Sustainability Field Research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International 10: 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PPS. 2008a. Have a Seat: Movable Chairs or Benches? [Online]. Project of Public Space. http://www.pps.org/reference/movable-seating/. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.

  • PPS. 2008b. A Primer on Seating [Online]. http://www.pps.org/reference/generalseating/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.

  • Pugalis, L. 2009. The Culture and Economics of Urban Public Space Design: Public and Professional Perceptions. Urban Design International 14: 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 1982. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 2005. Culture, Architecture, and Design. Chicago: Locke Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 2008. Some Further Thoughts on Culture and Environment. Archnet-IJAR 2 (1): 16–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftoe, H. 2009. Convivial Urban Spaces: Creating Effective Public Places. London: Sterling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.R. 1991. The Demise of Public Space. In Town Planning Responses to City Change, ed. V. Nadin and J. Doak, 209–224. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.M. 2003. Digestible Cultural Difference: The Use of Food to Claim Space in the Public Realm. Paper presented at the National Planning Congress: Leading Diversity, 31 March–2 April, Adelaide, South Australia.

  • Varna, G., and S. Tiesdell. 2010. Assessing the Publicness of Public Space: The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 575–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velden, B., D. Reeves. 2010. Intercultural Public Spaces. Paper Presented at the International Planning Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.

  • Whyte, W.H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H., and P. Underhill. 1988. City: Rediscovering the Center. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambonelli, V. 2013. Brazilian Restaurants and the Transcultural Making of Place in Tokyo, Japan. In Transcultural Cities: Border Crossing and Placemaking, ed. J. Hou. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Noshirvani University of Technology, Shariati Av., Babol, Mazandaran, 47148 - 71167, Iran

    Maryam Lesan

  2. Faculty of Architecture and Design, Victoria University of Wellington, 139 Vivian St., Te Aro, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand

    Morten Gjerde

Authors
  1. Maryam Lesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morten Gjerde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Lesan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lesan, M., Gjerde, M. Sidewalk design in multi-cultural settings: a study of street furniture layout and design. Urban Des Int 26, 21–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00121-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00121-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation