Abstract
Although interactions with Black female scientists can alter beliefs about STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) and encourage Black female students’ interest in these fields, this strategy may overburden the few Black women working in STEM. To address this issue, we explored whether a brief video presentation of a Black female computer scientist would be an effective intervention compared to an identical written transcript. We found that participants from the general U.S. population (Experiments 1, n = 201, and 2, n = 745) and Black women U.S. students (Experiment 3, n = 217) perceived the computer scientist as warmer and felt more virtual connection (i.e., sense of friendship, identification) with the scientist in video compared to written format. The video also was more effective for promoting feelings of friendship with the scientist relative to audio alone or a written transcript with pictures (Experiment 2). Most importantly, Black female students who watched the video of the computer scientist reported greater interest in computer science compared to those who read about the computer scientist and those in a no narrative control condition (Experiment 3). The current findings not only demonstrate that videos are useful tools for diversity practitioners but also highlight the importance of representation in popular movies and TV shows.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambady, N. (2010). The perils of pondering: Intuition and thin slice judgments. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.524882.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256.
Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Cote, N. G. (2010). When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes? Social Psychology, 41, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000028.
Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1.
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645.
Cable, D. M., & Yu, K. Y. T. (2006). Managing job seekers’ organizational image beliefs: The role of media richness and media credibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.828.
Calvert, S. L., Kondla, T. A., Ertel, K. A., & Meisel, D. S. (2001). Young adults’ perceptions and memories of a televised woman hero. Sex Roles, 45, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101300830.
Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645.
Casad, B. J., Petzel, Z. W., & Ingalls, E. A. (2019). A model of threatening academic environments predicts women STEM majors’ self-esteem and engagement in STEM. Sex Roles, 80(7–8), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0942-4.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.241.
Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405218.
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x.
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/Fbul0000052.
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01.
Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041374.
Cohen, J. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2018). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion?. Media Psychology, 21, 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
Columb, C., & Plant, E. A. (2011). Revisiting the Obama effect: Exposure to Obama reduces implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.012.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). The intersection of race and gender. In K. W. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 357–383). New York: New Press.
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.
Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313.
Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003.
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–814 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800.
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114.
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342.
Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025199.
Durante, F., Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12208.
Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w.
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 209–241. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u.
Esses, V. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). The role of emotions in determining willingness to engage in intergroup contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1202–1214. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812006.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Fiedler, K., Harris, C., & Schott, M. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests–an analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008.
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519.
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022327.
Galinsky, A. D., Hall, E. V., & Cuddy, A. J. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457783.
Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media. (2018). Portray her: Representations of women STEM characters in media. Retrieved from https://seejane.org/research-informs-empowers/portray-her/
Gibson, D. E. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00051-4.
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04.
Gill, M. J., & Mendes, D. M. (2016). When the minority thinks “essentially” like the majority: Blacks distinguish bio-somatic from bio-behavioral essentialism in their conceptions of Whites, and only the latter predicts prejudice. PLoS One, 11, e0160086.
Gillig, T. K., Rosenthal, E. L., Murphy, S. T., & Folb, K. L. (2018). More than a media moment: The influence of televised storylines on viewers’ attitudes toward transgender people and policies. Sex Roles, 78, 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0816-1.
Gregg, P. B. (2018). Parasocial breakup and Twitter: The firing of Barb Abney. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1402900.
Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58, 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2.
Guynn, J., (2017). Google teams with ‘Hidden Figures’ to bust stereotypes. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/01/06/google-hidden-figures-diversity/96224964/.
Hall, J. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2007). Sources of accuracy in the empathic accuracy paradigm. Emotion, 7, 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.438.
Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A., Murphy, N. A., Mast, M. S., & Feinstein, B. A. (2008). Accuracy of judging others’ traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1476–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.013.
Harley, D. A. (2008). Maids of academe: African American women faculty at predominately white institutions. Journal of African American Studies, 12, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-007-9030-5.
Hatch, J., (2017). ‘Hidden Figures’ is already inspiring more girls to go into STEM. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/13/hidden-figures-inspiring-stem-heroes-for-girls/.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Johnson, D. R., Jasper, D. M., Griffin, S., & Huffman, B. L. (2013). Reading narrative fiction reduces Arab-Muslim prejudice and offers a safe haven from intergroup anxiety. Social Cognition, 31, 578–598. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.578.
Johnson, I. R., Pietri, E. S., Fullilove, F., & Mowrer, S. (2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926.
Kanazawa, S. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00098-8.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
Knoll, J., Schramm, H., Schallhorn, C., & Wynistorf, S. (2015). Good guy vs. bad guy: The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising, 34, 720–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1009350.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.284.
Legault, L., Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22, 1472–1477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427918.
Lewis, N. A., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Meadows, L. A. (2019). Modeling gender counter-stereotypic group behavior: A brief video intervention reduces participation gender gaps on STEM teams. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09489-3.
Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
Litman, L., Williams, M. T., Rosen, Z., Weinberger-Litman, S. L., & Robinson, J. (2018). Racial disparities in cleanliness attitudes mediate purchasing attitudes toward cleaning products: A serial mediation model. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 5, 838–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0429-y.
Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23, 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611428079.
Martinez, L., Falvello, V. B., Aviezer, H., & Todorov, A. (2016). Contributions of facial expressions and body language to the rapid perception of dynamic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 939–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1035229.
Mellström, U. (2009). The intersection of gender, race and cultural boundaries, or why is computer science in Malaysia dominated by women? Social Studies of Science, 39, 885–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709334636.
Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 3–26 https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573.
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1678–1712. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000022.
Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., & Peters, K. (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals. Review of General Psychology, 19, 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000059.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., van der Toorn, J., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2016). A “scientific diversity” intervention to reduce gender bias in a sample of life scientists. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, ar29. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-09-0187.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Pietri, E. S., Hennes, E. P., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Roussos, G., … Handelsman, J. (2018a). Reducing STEM gender bias with VIDS (video interventions for diversity in STEM). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24, 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000144.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C., Caluori, N., & Rabasco, H. (2018b). Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles, 79, 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z.
Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x.
Murphy, M. C., & Taylor, V. J. (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schamder (Eds.), Stereotype threat (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17–310. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
Naumann, L. P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309.
Paice, E., Heard, S., & Moss, F. (2002). How important are role models in making good doctors? BMJ: British Medical Journal, 325, 707–710. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.707.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Pietri, E. S., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Guha, D., Roussos, G., Brescoll, V. L., … Handelsman, J. (2017). Using video to increase gender bias literacy toward women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316674721.
Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., & Ozgumus, E. (2018a). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021.
Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., Ozgumus, E., & Young, A. I. (2018b). Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643.
Plant, E. A., Devine, P. G., Cox, W. T., Columb, C., Miller, S. L., Goplen, J., … Peruche, B. M. (2009). The Obama effect: Decreasing implicit prejudice and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 961–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.018.
Quimby, J. L., & De Santis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women’s career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 54, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00195.x.
Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6.
Remedios, J. D., & Snyder, S. H. (2015). How women of color detect and respond to multiple forms of prejudice. Sex Roles, 73, 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0453-5.
Richards, J. (2017). How “Hidden Figures” awakened my love for STEM. Retrieved from https://thegrio.com/2017/02/24/how-hidden-figures-awakened-my-love-for-stem/.
Rubin, R. B., & Rubin, A. M. (2001). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. In V. Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationships (pp. 320–337). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x.
Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279009.
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544.
Schiappa, E., Allen, M., & Gregg, P. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In R. Preiss, B. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 301–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schroeder, J., & Epley, N. (2015). The sound of intellect: Speech reveals a thoughtful mind, increasing a job candidate’s appeal. Psychological Science, 26, 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572906.
Schweppe, J., & Rummer, R. (2016). Integrating written text and graphics as a desirable difficulty in long-term multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.035.
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5.
Smith, S.L., Choueiti, M., Pieper, K., & Prescott (2012). Gender roles & occupations: A look at character attributes and job-related aspirations in film and television. Report prepared for the Geena Davis Institute on gender in media. Retrieved from http://seejane.org/research-informsempowers/.
Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., & Pieper, K. (2014). Gender bias without borders. Report prepared for the Geena Davis Institute on gender in media. Retrieved from http://seejane.org/research-informsempowers/.
Smith, S.L., Pieper, K., & Choueiti, M. (2017). Hidden Figures should be a diversity wake-up call for film. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2017/01/hidden-figures-diversity-wake-call-film/.
Steinke, J. (2017). Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEM professionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716.
Steinke, J., Lapinski, M., Long, M., Van Der Maas, C., Ryan, L., & Applegate, B. (2009). Seeing oneself as a scientist: Media influences and adolescent girls’ science career possible-selves. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i4.10.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719.
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385.
Stout, J. G., Grunberg, V. A., & Ito, T. A. (2016). Gender roles and stereotypes about science careers help explain women and men’s science pursuits. Sex Roles, 75, 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0647-5.
Tate, E. D., & Linn, M. C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-0223-1.
Tsay, C. J. (2013). Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14580–14585. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221454110.
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002.
Turner, C. S. V., González, J. C., & Wong, K. (2011). Faculty women of color: The critical nexus of race and gender. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024630.
Weitekamp, M. (2017). The big bang theory. Physics Today, 70, 40–48.https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3427.
Welson-Rossman, T. (2017). Hidden Figures: Inspiring STEM heroes for girls. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/13/hidden-figures-inspiring-stem-heroes-for-girls/.
Williams, J., Phillips, K. W., & Hall, E. V. (2014). Double jeopardy?: Gender bias against Women of Color in Science. Retrieved from http://www.uchastings.edu/news/articles/2015/01/double-jeopardy-report.pdf.
Wong, N. C., Lookadoo, K. L., & Nisbett, G. S. (2017). “I’m Demi and I have bipolar disorder”: Effect of parasocial contact on reducing stigma toward people with bipolar disorder. Communication Studies, 68, 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1331928.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This research was conducted in compliance with APA standards regarding the treatment of human participants. All participants received an online informed consent form prior to taking part in the experiments, and were provided with a thorough debriefing.
This research was supported in part by the DRIVE grant from IUPUI Office of Vice Chancellor for Research awarded to the first author and by a Small Grant from the Spencer Foundation, awarded to the first and second author.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Charles Chu and Sana Majid were at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis when this research was conducted
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 32 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pietri, E.S., Johnson, I.R., Majid, S. et al. Seeing What’s Possible: Videos are more Effective than Written Portrayals for Enhancing the Relatability of Scientists and Promoting Black Female Students’ Interest in STEM. Sex Roles 84, 14–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01153-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01153-x