Abstract
Essentialism, or the belief that certain categories have fundamental, intrinsic, and stable essences, pervasively influences social judgments. Among the many groupings that describe people, gender is the most essentialized category yet relatively little is known about individual differences in gender essentialism. To explore this construct in Study 1 with 2996 U.S. participants, we developed a new measure, named the Gender Essentialism Measure (GEM), that offers two advantages over prior measures: (a) we used Item Response Theory to optimize the measure’s psychometrics and (b) we adopted a multidimensional conceptualization, incorporating four core facets of gender essentialism (Biological Determinism, Social Determinism, Immutability, and Inductive Potential). Study 2 used a large U.S. sample (n = 2803) to characterize individual differences in essentialistic thinking about gender. Gender essentialism was associated with endorsement of sexism, system-justifying ideologies, relatively inflexible and dispositional thinking about others, and lesser empathic concern and perspective-taking. Studies 3 and 4, using samples of 133 and 118 U.S. participants, respectively, demonstrated that gender essentialism predicts greater acceptance of existing gender disparities. Our research indicates that understanding and addressing the societal and personal impact of gender stereotyping would benefit from going beyond sexism to also considering the role of essentialistic thinking about gender. The GEM offers researchers, practitioners, and policymakers a psychometrically optimized, multi-faceted tool to assess the extent and prevalence of gender-essentialistic beliefs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674053052.
Altemeyer, B. (2002). Dogmatic behavior among students: Testing a new measure of dogmatism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603931.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003.
Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., & Koval, P. (2011). Essentialist beliefs predict automatic motor responses to social categories. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210385258.
Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008.
Brescoll, V. L., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychological Science, 15, 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00712.x.
Brescoll, V. L., Uhlmann, E. L., & Newman, G. E. (2013). The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034701.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13.
Carothers, B. J., & Reis, H. T. (2013). Men and women are from earth: Examining the latent structure of gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030437.
Coleman, J. M., & Hong, Y. Y. (2008). Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping. Self and Identity, 7, 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600980185.
Crowson, H. M. (2009). Does the DOG scale measure dogmatism? Another look at construct validity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 265–283. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.3.365-383.
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women's math performance. Science, 314, 435. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131100.
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021860.
Dar-Nimrod, I., Heine, S. J., Cheung, B. Y., & Schaller, M. (2011). Do scientific theories affect men's evaluations of sex crimes? Aggressive Behavior, 37, 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20401.
Davis, M. A. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85 https://www.uv.es/~friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.
Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: W. W. Norton and Company https://wwnorton.com/books/Delusions-of-Gender.
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.
Gelman, S. A., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (1999). How biological is essentialism? In D. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folk biology (pp. 403–446). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gelman, S. A., & Taylor, M. G. (2000). Gender essentialism in cognitive development In P. H. Miller & E. K. Scholnick (Eds.), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 169-190). New York: Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AKptqkv1XYoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA169&ots=9U87PZsmZL&sig=ged9DLnNyxpB4nzOEbsBxw4yQus–v=onepage&q&f=false
Gelman, S. A., Collman, P., & Maccoby, E. E. (1986). Inferring properties from categories versus inferring categories from properties: The case of gender. Child Development, 57, 396–404. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130595.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
Gorman, J. (2014, January 4). The brain, in exquisite detail. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/07/science/the-brain-in-exquisite-detail.html .
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage https://us.sagepub.com/enus/nam/fundamentals-of-item-response-theory/book3067.
Haslam, N., & Ernst, D. (2002). Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.21.6.628.22793.
Haslam, N., & Levy, S. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276516.
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164363.
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602165072.
Haslam, N., Bastian, B., & Bissett, M. (2004). Essentialist beliefs about personality and their implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1661–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271182.
Horvath, M., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Antecedents and potential moderators of the relationship between attitudes and hiring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 48, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022499121222.
Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172.
Jayaratne, T. E., Ybarra, O., Sheldon, J. P., Brown, T. N., Feldbaum, M., Pfeffer, C. A., … Petty, E. M. (2006). White Americans' genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059863.
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893.
Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686.
Klonis, S. C., Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2005). Internal and external motivation to respond without sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275304.
Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647.
Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2013). Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032895.
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing—Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686.
MacDonald, A. P. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1970.26.3.791.
Mahalingam, R., & Rodriguez, J. (2003). Essentialism, power and cultural psychology of gender. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703322148525.
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008.
Martin, C. L., & Parker, S. (1995). Folk theories about sex and race differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211006.
Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosinadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.009.
Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012966.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplususer guide Ver_7_r3_web.pdf
Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113.
No, S., Hong, Y., Liao, H., Lee, K., Wood, D., & Chao, M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans' responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012978.
Penn Medicine News (2013, December 2). Brain connectivity study reveals striking differences between men and women. Retrieved from https://www.pennmedicine.org/news/news-releases/2013/december/brain-connectivity-study-revea.
Poon, C. S., & Koehler, D. J. (2006). Lay personality knowledge and dispositionist thinking: A knowledge-activation framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.001.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01675.x.
Rad, M. S., & Ginges, J. (2018). Folk theories of nationality and anti-immigrant attitudes. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(5), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0334-3.
Rangel, U., & Keller, J. (2011). Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1056–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022401.
Reis, H. T., & Clark, M. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0018.
Reis, H. T., & Wright, S. (1982). Knowledge of sex-role stereotypes in children aged 3 to 5. Sex Roles, 8, 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290999.
Richardson, S. S. (2013). Sex itself: The search for male and female in the human genome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo16835663.html.
Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004.
Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). London: Sage https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marjorie_Taylor/publication/232599266_Category_labels_and_social_reality_Do_we_view_social_categories_as_natural_kinds/links/59cc157eaca272bb050c65c1/and-social-reality-Do-we-view-social-categories-as.
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004.
Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-18187-012.
Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). New York: Pearson Taylor, M. G. (1996). The development of children's beliefs about social and biological aspects of gender differences. Child Development, 67, 1555–1571. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131718.
Taylor, M. G. (1996). The development of children's beliefs about social and biological aspects of gender differences. Child Development, 67, 1555–1571. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131718.
Thissen, D., Chen, W. H., & Bock, D. (2002). Multilog user's guide: Multiple, categorical item and test scoring using item response theory (version 7.0) [computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Thompson, M., Naccarato, M., Parker, K., & Moskowitz, G. (1993). The development and validation of the personal need for structure (PNS) measure. Unpublished manuscript.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049.
Williams, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). Cambridge: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7.
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805.
Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Oxford, England: Blackwell. https://perso.uclouvain.be/vincent.yzerbyt/Yzerbytetal.1997.pdf.
Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Standards Statement
All procedures performed in these studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Research Subjects Review Board #00057154) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 313 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, K.Y., Reis, H.T. & Rogge, R.D. Seeing the World in Pink and Blue: Developing and Exploring a New Measure of Essentialistic Thinking about Gender. Sex Roles 83, 685–705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01141-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01141-1