Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Female Disclosure Recipients React to Women Survivors: The Impact of Rape Acknowledgment and Rejection of Rape Myths

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because female rape survivors who are listened to and believed have been found to have fewer difficulties, it is essential that researchers examine factors that influence the social reactions survivors receive. The present experiment included 397 female U.S. college-students who were randomly assigned to read a vignette that either reflected an acknowledged rape survivor (i.e., used the word “rape” to describe the incident) or described an unacknowledged rape survivor (e.g., used the word “miscommunication” to describe the incident). The college women then answered questions about their own levels of rape myth rejection and indicated on measures of positive social reactions, negative social reactions, and victim blame how they would respond to the hypothetical rape survivor. The results demonstrated that the female participants’ answers on positive social reactions and victim blame were a function of both the survivors’ acknowledgment status and the participants’ rape myth rejection. The interaction was not supported for negative social reactions, but this non-finding may have stemmed from a restricted range of variance and overall low scores on that variable. The results are discussed in the context of both individual and systemic interventions that may lead to more positive, helpful, and affirming responses to survivors via the reduction of rape myths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Laura C. Wilson, Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington; Hannah R. Truex, Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington; Madeleine C. Murphy-Neilson, Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington; Kristen P. Kunaniec, Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington; Jordan T. Pamlanye, Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington; Rebecca A. Reed, Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington.

Funding

The authors did not receive funding for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura C. Wilson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest involving this project.

Ethics Approval

IRB approval was obtained at the university of origin.

Consent to Participate

All participants gave informed consent and the consent process was approved by the IRB.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, L.C., Truex, H.R., Murphy-Neilson, M.C. et al. How Female Disclosure Recipients React to Women Survivors: The Impact of Rape Acknowledgment and Rejection of Rape Myths. Sex Roles 84, 337–346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01169-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01169-3

Keywords

Navigation