Abstract
Given Plutarch’s fragmentary piece on Aristophanes and Menander (Mor. 853A–854D), a piece of Table Talk on almost the same topic (Mor. 711A–713F) and various attacks on comic poets scattered through the Lives, one might believe that Plutarch is a staid, conservative and humourless author. But several other instances in his writings reveal a playful, facetious, witty and humorous Plutarch. This paper will focus on the Quaestiones Convivales, which bear ample witness to this aspect of Plutarch’s personality and authorial technique. It will examine the ways in which he introduces and describes the various interlocutors, discuss certain comments (or arguments) with which he tries to ridicule his philosophical opponents, notably the Stoics and the Epicureans, try to distinguish the various manifestations of Plutarch’s humour (spontaneous reaction, literary device, pleasantry, witticism, irony) and finally suggest that Plutarch’s stance and attitude towards playfulness, comic situations and laughter may ultimately be affected, at least in part, by his allegiance to Plato.
Bibliography
Epicurea, ed. H. Usener (Studia philologica 3), Roma 1963 (= Leipzig 1887). 10.1017/CBO9780511711077Search in Google Scholar
Galen, Opera omnia, tom. I, ed. C. G. Kühn, Hildesheim 1964 (= Leipzig 1821).Search in Google Scholar
Philodemi Περὶ κακιῶν liber decimus, ed. C. Jensen, Leipzig 1911.Search in Google Scholar
Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. VI, English translation by W. C. Helmbold; vol. VIII by P. A. Clement/H. B. Hoffleit; vol. IX by E. L. Minar/F. H. Sandbach/W. C. Helmbold (LCL), London/Cambridge, MA 1939/1969/1961.Search in Google Scholar
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta (SVF), tom. I, ed. H. von Arnim, Stuttgart 1978 (= Leipzig 1905).10.1515/9783110955026Search in Google Scholar
Z. Abramowiczówna, “Humor u Plutarcha”, Eos 54, 1964, 89–98.10.1524/zaes.1964.89.jg.54aSearch in Google Scholar
F. Amory, “eirôn and eirôneia”, C&M 33, 1982, 49–80.10.1088/0031-9112/33/3/004Search in Google Scholar
E. Arndt, De ridiculi doctrina rhetorica, Bonn 1904.Search in Google Scholar
D. Babut, “A propos des enfants et d’un ami de Plutarque: essai de solution pour deux énigmes”, REG 94, 1981, 47–62.10.3406/reg.1981.1261Search in Google Scholar
R. H. Barrow, Plutarch and His Times, London 1967.Search in Google Scholar
W. Boder, Die sokratische Ironie in den platonischen Frühdialogen, Amsterdam 1973.Search in Google Scholar
W. Büchner, “Über den Begriff der Eironeia”, Hermes 76, 1941, 339–358. Search in Google Scholar
W. Christ/W. Schmid/O. Stählin, Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, vol. II.1, München 1920.Search in Google Scholar
J. Diggle, Theophrastus: Characters, Cambridge 2004. 10.4159/DLCL.theophrastus-characters.2003Search in Google Scholar
J. A. Fernández Delgado, “El sentido del humor de Plutarco”, in: J. A. Fernández Delgado/F. Pordomingo Pardo (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: Aspectos formales, Madrid 1996, 381–403.Search in Google Scholar
W. Fortenbaugh et al., Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought & Influence, Leiden/New York/Köln 1992.10.1163/9789004326064Search in Google Scholar
F. Frazier/J. Sirinelli, Plutarque: Œuvres Morales, vol. IX.3 (CUF), Paris 1996. Search in Google Scholar
F. Frazier, “Théorie et pratique de la παιδιὰ symposiaque dans les Propos de table de Plutarque”, in: M. Trédé/P. Hoffmann (eds.), Le rire des Anciens (Actes du colloque international, Université de Rouen), Paris 1998, 281–292.Search in Google Scholar
F. Frazier, “Rires et rieurs dans l’œuvre de Plutarque”, in: M. L. Desclos (ed.), Le rire des Grecs: Anthropologie du rire en Grèce ancienne, Grenoble 2000, 469–494.Search in Google Scholar
P. Friedländer, Plato. An Introduction, transl. by P. Meyerhoff, Princeton, NJ 21969.10.1515/9781400868780Search in Google Scholar
F. Fuhrmann, Plutarque: Œuvres Morales, vol. IX.1 (CUF), Paris 1972.Search in Google Scholar
H. Görgemanns et al., Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, Tübingen 2006.Search in Google Scholar
A. M. Grant, The Ancient Rhetorical Theories of the Laughable, Madison, WI 1924.Search in Google Scholar
P. Gray, “Humor and Religion in Plutarch’s Writings”, in: A. Pérez Jiménez/F. Titchener (eds.), Valori letterari delle opera di Plutarco: Studi offerti al Professore Italo Gallo dall’International Plutarch Society, Málaga/Logan 2005, 197–206.Search in Google Scholar
C. L. Griswold Jr., “Irony in the Platonic Dialogues”, Ph&Lit 26, 2002, 84–106.10.1353/phl.2002.0012Search in Google Scholar
W. K. C. Guthrie, Socrates, Cambridge/London/New York 1971.10.1017/CBO9780511518454Search in Google Scholar
S. Halliwell, Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity, Cambridge 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511483004Search in Google Scholar
W. C. Helmbold, Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. IX (LCL), London/Cambridge, MA 1961.Search in Google Scholar
B. P. Hillyard, Plutarch: De audiendo, New York 1981.Search in Google Scholar
N. Holland, Laughing: A Psychology of Humor, Ithaca, NY 1982.Search in Google Scholar
C. P. Jones, Plutarch and Rome, Oxford 1971.Search in Google Scholar
G. Kennedy, A New History of Classical Rhetoric, Princeton, NJ 1994.10.1515/9781400821471Search in Google Scholar
M. Lane, “The Evolution of eirôneia in Classical Greek Texts: Why Socratic eirôneia is not Socratic Irony”, in: D. Sedley (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 31, Oxford 2006, 49–83.Search in Google Scholar
H. Lausberg, Handbook of Literary Rhetoric, transl. by M. T. Bliss/A. Jansen/D. E. Orton, Leiden/Boston/Köln 1998. Search in Google Scholar
J. L. Moles, Plutarch: The Life of Cicero, Warminster 1988.Search in Google Scholar
A. G. Nikolaidis, “Plutarch on the Fifth Century Sophists”, in: G. Pace/P. Volpe Cacciatore (eds.), Plutarch’s Writings: Transmission, Translation, Reception, Commentary, Napoli 2013, 309–325.Search in Google Scholar
J. Opsomer, “εἰρωνεία in the Corpus Plutarcheum”, in: L. Van der Stockt (ed.), Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch, Louvain-Namur 2000, 309–329.Search in Google Scholar
A. Plebe, La teoria del comico da Aristotele a Plutarco, Torino 1952.Search in Google Scholar
B. Puech, “Soclaros de Tithorée, ami de Plutarque, et ses descendants”, REG 94, 1981, 186–192.10.3406/reg.1981.1272Search in Google Scholar
B. Puech, “Prosopographie des amis de Plutarque”, ANRW 33.6, 1992, 4831–4893.10.1515/9783110854725-024Search in Google Scholar
V. Ramón Palerm, “Recursos humorísticos en la obra de Plutarco”, in: A. G. Nikolaidis (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch’s Work, Berlin/New York 2008, 601–610.10.1515/9783110211665.8.601Search in Google Scholar
A. Rapp, The Origins of Wit and Humor, New York 1951. Search in Google Scholar
T. Reekmans, “Verbal Humour in Plutarch and Suetonius’ Lives”, AncSoc 23, 1992, 189–232.10.2143/AS.23.0.2005880Search in Google Scholar
T. Reekmans, “Non-Verbal Jesting in Plutarch’s Lives”, in: L. Van der Stockt (ed.), Plutarchea Lovaniensia: A Miscellany of Essays on Plutarch, Leuven 1996, 228–241. Search in Google Scholar
O. Ribbeck, “Über den Begriff des εἴρων”, RhM 31, 1876, 381–400.Search in Google Scholar
K. M. Sayre, Plato’s Literary Garden, Notre Dame, Ind. 1995.10.2307/j.ctvpj7fk4Search in Google Scholar
G. R. Stanton, “Sophists and Philosophers: Problems of classification”, AJPh 94, 1973, 350–364.10.2307/293614Search in Google Scholar
R. Stark, “Sokratisches in den ‘Vögeln’ des Aristophanes”, RhM 96, 1953, 77–89.Search in Google Scholar
E. Stein, “Soklaros”, RE 3.A, 1927, 801–802. Search in Google Scholar
S.-T. Teodorsson, A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, 3 vols., Göteborg 1989/1990/1996.Search in Google Scholar
R. G. Ussher, The Characters of Theophrastus, London 1960.Search in Google Scholar
G. Vlastos, “Socratic Irony”, CQ 37, 1987, 79–96.10.1017/CBO9780511518508.003Search in Google Scholar
K. Ziegler, Plutarchos von Chaironeia, Stuttgart 1949 (= ‘Plutarchos’ in RE 21.1, 1951, 636–962).Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
