Skip to main content
Log in

Amphibolic space of Central Europe in the writings of Aleksandar Tišma and Danilo Kiš

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article deals with the ideas of Central Europe in the writings of two Yugoslav and Serbian writers Danilo Kiš (1935–1989) and Aleksandar Tišma (1924–2003). Central Europe is, in metaphorical terms, a transitional, central region, an area of passage that is filled with opposites. It is demonstrated that in Kiš’s Hourglass and Tišma’s The Book of Blam (both novels were published in 1972), the region forms a complex literary image of the world of dispersal and disintegration, both in terms of form and content. On the one hand, views of these two writers can be summarized in a well-known and tragic fact that in Central Europe, the heart of Europe, there is also the heart of European darkness symbolized in the Central-European village of Auschwitz. On the other hand, Kiš’s and Tišma’s poetics undoubtedly belong to the geographical and cultural space of a literary Central Europe (marked by Kafka, Musil, Broch). This paper will try to explain how this ambivalent position works as a complex and rich foundation of their fictional work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an elaborated critical attitude towards Naumann’s conception in particular and the conception of “Central Europe” that stems from Germany in general, see Zoran Konstantinović’s article “Sistem srpske književnosti u sistemu srednjoevropske literature” (“Serbian Literature System as a part of the Central European Literary System”) (Konstantinović 2000, pp. 322–335).

  2. On the basis of the interwar experience, J. P. Stern notes that the Central Europe includes all those European states created at the end of the World War I, which at the crucial moment proved incapable of defending their independence (Stern 1992, p. 2).

  3. If it is not indicated otherwise, all translations from Serbian are mine.

  4. See Todorova (2009, pp. 140–160) (chapter 6 “Between Classification and Politics: The Balkans and the Myth of Central Europe”), as well as Gvozden (2002, pp. 83–87).

  5. “Small nations. This concept is not quantitative; it signifies the situation; destiny; small nations do not know the happy feeling that they are there forever; they have all passed, at this or that particular moment of their history, through the gate of death; […] because their existence is a question” (Kundera 1995, p. 222).

  6. This term was proposed a few years ago by a Dutch comparatist and art historian Ernst van Alphen: “When I call something a Holocaust effect, I mean to say that we are not confronted with a represetation of the Holocaust, but that we, as viewers or readers, experience directly a certain aspect of the Holocaust or of Nacism […]. The Holocaust is not made present by means of a constative speech act—that is, as a mediated account, as the truthful or untrutful content of the speech act; rather, it is made present as performative act. The performative acts ‘do’ the Holocaust, or rather, they ‘do’ a specific acpect of it” (van Alphen 1997, p. 10).

  7. Kiš himself uses the following terms for his activity of writing: reconstruction, research, creation of the world, compression.

References

  • Barthes, R. (1989). The rustle of language (Trans., R. Howard). New York: Hill and Wang.

  • Bibó, I. (1986 [1946]). A kelet-európai kisállamok nyomorúsága [The misery of East-European small states]. In Válogatott tanulmányok [Selected essays] (Vol. 2, pp. 185–265). Budapest: Magvető.

  • Culler, J. (2000). The literary in theory. In J. Butler, J. Guillory, & K. Thomas (Eds.), What’s left of theory: New work on the politics of literary theory (pp. 273–292). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvozden, V. (1998). Savršena pukotina: Peščanik Danila Kiša [A perfect flaw: Danilo Kiš’s Hourglass]. In J. Zivlak (Ed.), Roman kao peščanik [Novel as an hourglass] (pp. 73–78). Novi Sad: Svetovi.

  • Gvozden, V. (2002). Danilo Kiš jako pisarz środkowoeuropejski: przyczinek do pisania i czytania tożsamości [Danilo Kiš as a Central European writer: Reasons to write and read identity]. In B. Zieliński (Ed.), Narodowy i ponadnarodowy model kultury: Europa Środkowa i Połwysep Bałkański [National and supranational models of culture: Central Europe and the Balkan Peninsula] (pp. 83–94). Poznań: Wydawnictvo naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.

  • Gvozden, V. (2005). Tišmina književnost rascepa [Tišma’s literature of the split]. In J. Delić, I. Negrišorac, & S. Koljević (Eds.), Povratak miru Aleksandra Tišme [Aleksandar Tišma: The return to peace] (pp. 74–92). Novi Sad: Matica Srpska.

  • Gvozden, V. (2011). Mukotrpno oživljavanje istine [The painstaking revival of truth: Preface]. In A. Tišma, Knjiga o Blamu [The book of Blam] (pp. 5–19). Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.

  • Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall (Ed.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. (1996). Central Europe: Enemies, neighbors, friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiš, D. (1989). Grobnica za Borisa Davidoviča [A tomb for Boris Davidovich]. Beograd: BIGZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiš, D. (1995). Život, literatura [Life, literature]. Beograd: BIGZ.

  • Kiš, D. (1990). Gorki talog iskustva [A bitter sediment of experience]. Beograd: BIGZ, SKZ, Narodna knjiga.

  • Kiš, D. (1991). Peščanik [Hourglass]. Beograd: Prosveta.

  • Kiš, D. (2000). Eseji: autopoetike [Autopoietic essays]. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

  • Konstantinović, Z. (2000). Sistem srpske knjizevnosti u sistemu srednjoevropske literature [The system of Serbian literature in the system of Central European literature]. In Z. Žiletić, S. Grubačić, & S. Bogoslavljević (Eds.), Polazišta: izbor iz radova Zorana Konstantinovića povodom osamdesetog rođendana [Starting points: A selection from the works of Zoran Konstantinović on the occasion of his eightieth birthday] (pp. 322–335). Novi Sad: Prometej.

  • Kundera, M. (1995). Iznevereni testamenti: esej [Failed testaments: Essays] (Trans., N. Bojić). Beograd: Prosveta.

  • Mičeta, L. (2004). Aleksandar Tišma (interview). http://www.alexandria-press.com/arhiva/No_1/aleksandar_tisma.htm, https://archive.is/wSJqx. Retrieved 1.6.2019.01.2004.

  • Naumann, F. (1917). Central Europe (Trans., C.M. Meredith). New York: A. A. Knopf.

  • Pach, Z. P. (1981). East Central Europe and world trade at the dawn of modern times. Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 27(3/4), 281–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pach, Z. P. (1990). Hungary’s place in Europe (On the lessons of economic history). Aula, 12(2), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palsky, G. (2002). Emmanuel de Martonne and the ethnographical cartography of Central Europe (1917–1920). Imago Mundi, 54(1), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pászka, I. (2000). Srednja Evropa: dimenzije značenja [Central Europe: Dimensions of meaning]. Habitus, 2, 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radović, M. (1998). Podmuklo dejstvo Peščanika [An insidious effect of the Hourglass]. In J. Zivlak (Ed.), Roman kao peščanik [Novel as an hourglass] (pp. 9–15). Novi Sad: Svetovi.

  • Stern, J. P. (1992). The heart of europe: Essays on literature and ideology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tišma, A. (1969). Drugde: putopisi [Elsewhere: Travelogues]. Beograd: Nolit.

  • Tišma, A. (1988). Knjiga o Blamu [The book of Blam]. Novi Sad: Književna zajednica Novog Sada.

  • Tišma, A. (1989). Pre mita [Before the myth]. Banjaluka: Glas.

  • Tišma, A. (2000). Dnevnik 1942–2001 [Diary 1942–2001]. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

  • Todorova, M. (2009). Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen, E. (1997). Caught by history: Holocaust effects in contemporary art, literature and theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebrook, M. (2001). Identity, narrative and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M. (1982). A road not taken—Friedrich Naumann’s attempt at a modern German nationalism. Journal of Contemporary History, 17(4), 689–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Gvozden.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gvozden, V. Amphibolic space of Central Europe in the writings of Aleksandar Tišma and Danilo Kiš. Neohelicon 47, 603–614 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-020-00553-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-020-00553-y

Keywords

Navigation