Abstract
Creative works are always multifaceted and complex; therefore, I argue that literature specialists need to recognize how creativity develops within the literary domain and what criteria we can set as standards for the appreciation of literary creativity. In this paper, I attempt to provide a cognitive theoretical account of the factors or dynamics that underlie the creative literary production. This study has two major purposes. First, the paper explains specific, basic processes of literary creativity and reveals how they function in the composition and comprehension of creative literary works, demonstrating their applicability to both acclaimed canons and works of contemporary writers. Second, it draws on cognitive theories in order to emphasize the cognitive and developmental benefit of the conscious awareness, practice and application of the cognitive processes underlying literary creativity. The selected creative processes are fundamental to the composition of literary works; therefore, they are the most commonly used and recurrent in acknowledged literary works. They include retrieval of knowledge, conceptual integration, compression, ambiguity, association between categories, effectiveness, and problem solving. The paper also argues that these cognitive processes of literary creativity are interdependent and overlapping as the construction of one process entails the functioning of another.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albee, E. (2008). The collected plays of Edward Albee. New York: Overlook Duckworth.
Artaud, A. (1958). The theatre and its double (M. Richards, Trans.). New York: Grove Press.
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M., Kam, J., Franklin, M., & Schooler, J. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024.
Beach, C. (2003). The Cambridge introduction to twentieth-century American Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beckett, S. (1986). The complete dramatic works of Samuel Beckett. Boston: Faber and Faber.
Beghetto, R., & Corazza, G. (Eds.). (2019). Dynamic perspectives on creativity. Basel: Springer.
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018). Spontaneous and controlled processes in creative cognition. In K. Christoff & K. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought (pp. 285–296). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, H. (Ed.). (2009). Joseph Conrad’s heart of darkness. New York: Infobase Publishing.
Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Boden, M. (2005). What is creativity? In S. Mithen (Ed.), Creativity in human evolution and prehistory (pp. 15–43). Abingdon: Routledge.
Boden, M. (2011). Creativity and art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bradley, A. C. (1974). Shakespearean tragedy. Great Britain: Macmillan.
Bristol, A., & Viskontas, I. (2006). Dynamic processes within associative memory stores. In J. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 60–80). London: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, T. (2003). Shannon, Claude. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 4). New York: Wiley.
Churchill, C. (2013 [1982]). Top girls. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.
Conrad, J. (2005). Heart of darkness. San Diego: ICON Group International Inc.
Cook, A. (2010). Shakespearean neuroplay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cummings, L. B. (2016). Empathy as dialogue in theatre and performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Mey, M. (2006). Mastering Ambiguity. In M. Turner (Ed.), The artful mind (pp. 271–304). New York: Oxford University Press.
Driver, T. (1999). Tom Driver ‘Columbia University Forum’. In L. Graver & R. Federman (Eds.), Samuel Beckett: The critical heritage (pp. 241–247). London: Routledge.
Dumas, D., & Runco, M. (2018). Objectively scoring divergent thinking tests for originality: A re-analysis and extension. Creativity Research Journal, 30(4), 466–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1544601.
Empson. W. (1949 [1930]). Seven types of ambiguity. London: Chatto and Windus.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–66). London: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, K. C. R., & Beaty, R. E. (2019). Mind-wandering as creative thinking: Neural, psychological, and theoretical considerations. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.10.009.
Freeman, M. (2011). Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hemingway, E. (1958). Interview by George Plimpton. The Art of Fiction No. 21. The Paris Review 18. Retrieved November 30, 2019, from www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4825/ernest-hemingway-the-art-of-fiction-no-21-ernest-hemingway.
Hemingway, E. (1964). A moveable feast. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Hocking, D. (2018). Communicating creativity: The discursive facilitation of creative activity in arts. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hogan, P. (2003). Cognitive science, literature, and the arts. New York: Routledge.
Hogan, P. (2011). What literature teaches us about emotions. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, P. (2017). Simulation and the structure of emotional memory. In M. Burke & E. Troscianko (Eds.), Cognitive literary science (pp. 113–133). USA: Oxford University Press.
Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Mental models in problem solving. In J. R. Anderson & K. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory (pp. 193–218). New York: Freeman.
Ionesco, E. (1958). Plays: Amédée; or, How to get rid of it. The new tenant. Victims of duty. (D. Watson, Trans.). London: J. Calder.
Irving, Z. (2016). Mind-wandering is unguided attention: Accounting for the “purposeful” wanderer. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 173(2), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0506-1.
Ishiguro, K. (1988). The remains of the day. New York: Vintage Books.
Karam, K. (2018). A critical appraisal of Shakespeare’s creative conceptual blending of the supernatural and the human in the dramatic composition of Macbeth. Shakespeare Review, 54(3), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.17009/shakes.2018.54.3.008.
Karam, K. (2020). Reciprocal self-consciousness as an antidote to the fixity of categorical borders in Mohsin Hamid’s Exit West. Neophilologus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-020-09639-5.
Kaufman, A., Kornilov, S., Bristol, A., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. (2010). The neurobiological foundation of creative cognition. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 216–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kowall, T. (2010). Creativity and interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 296–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lau, J. (2011). An introduction to critical thinking and creativity. New Jersey: Wiley.
Leech, G. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman.
Lubart, T. (2018). Introduction. The creative process. London: Palgrave.
Macedo, L., & Cardoso, A. (2002). Assessing creativity: The importance of unexpected novelty. In C. Bento, A. Cardoso & G. Wiggins (Eds.), Proceedings of the ECAI 2002 workshop on creative systems: Approaches to creativity in artificial intelligence and cognitive science (pp. 31–38). Lyon: University Claude Bernard.
Miller, A. (1949). Death of a salesman. Great Britain: Clays Ltd.
Morley, D. (2007). The Cambridge introduction to creative writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 3–39). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company.
Nelson, M. (2015). The Argonauts. Minnesota: Graywolf Press.
Neto, M., Barbosa, J., Filho, H., Delage, P., & Borges, R. (2016). Behavior analysis, creativity and insight. In J. Todorov (Ed.), Creativity and insight (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 49–80). Brasília: Technopolitik.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ossa-Richardson, A. (2019). A history of ambiguity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Oswald, A. (2016). Falling awake. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Piirto, J. (2018). The creative process in writers. In T. Lubart (Ed.), The creative process (pp. 89–121). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pope, A. (1995). The works of Alexander Pope. London: Wordsworth Editions Ltd.
Pound, E. (1968). Then spirit of romance. New York: New Directions Books.
Rhys, J. (1998). Wide Sargasso sea. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Rogers, P. (2006). Alexander Pope: The major works. USA: Oxford University Press.
Ruhl, S. (2005). Eurydice. London: Methuen Drama.
Runco, M. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: research, development and practice (2nd ed.). USA: Academic Press.
Runco, M. (2019). Creativity as a dynamic, personal, parsimonious process. In R. Beghetto & G. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity (pp. 181–188). Basel: Springer.
Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
Salomon, D., & Motta, G. (2010). Handbook of data compression. New York: Springer.
Shakespeare, W. (1967). As you like it (Ed., J. W. Lever). London: Longman.
Shakespeare, W. (1977). Macbeth (Ed., R. Gill). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shakespeare, W. (1985). Hamlet (Ed., P. Edwards). London: Cambridge University Press.
Shakespeare, W. (2005). Julius Caesar. USA: ICON Group International Inc.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). Introduction: Cognitive processes in creative contexts. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 1–6). Cambridge: Bradford.
Spolsky, E. (2010). Making ‘Quite Anew’: Brain modularity and creativity. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), Introduction to cognitive cultural studies (pp. 84–102). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanton, P. (2018). Conscious creativity. London: Leaping Hare Press.
Starko, A. (2014). Creativity in the classroom (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Szalai, J. (2015, May). Maggie Nelson’s ‘The Argonauts’. The New York Time. Retrieved March 21, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/10/books/review/maggie-nelsons-the-argonauts.html.
Turkman, B., & Runco, M. (2019). Discovering the creativity of written works: The keywords study. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1–2), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1690955.
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, M. (2006). The art of compression. In M. Turner (Ed.), The artful mind (pp. 93–115). New York: Oxford University Press.
Turner, M. (2014). The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity and the human spark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, M. (2017). Foreword. In M. Booth, Shakespeare and conceptual blending: Cognition, creativity and criticism (pp. vii–x). Basel: Palgrave Macmillan.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today, 20(3), 397–418.
Walsh, E. (2015). Plays: One. New York: Nick Hern Books.
Ward, T., & Kolomyts, Y. (2010). Cognition and creativity. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 39–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, S. (2016). Shakespeare on Stage and Page. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zedelius, C., & Schooler, J. (2018). Unraveling what’s on our minds. In K. Christoff & K. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought (pp. 233–247). New York: Oxford University Press.
Zeki, S. (2006). The neurology of ambiguity. In M. Turner (Ed.), The artful mind (pp. 243–270). New York: Oxford University Press.
Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01080.
Funding
This study has received no funding support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I (the author) acknowledge that I have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study does not involve human participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karam, K.M. Conscious application of creativity dynamics as an approach to the formation and appreciation of literary creativity. Neohelicon 48, 313–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-020-00546-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-020-00546-x