Abstract
This article seeks to pluralize current scholarly perceptions of what constitutes Advaita Vedānta in colonial India. It suggests, in particular, that the tendency to concentrate on the so-called “neo-Vedānta” of a handful of cosmopolitan reformers has obscured other kinds of innovative Vedānta-inspired discourses that have significantly shaped the formation of modern Hindu consciousness. These discourses are indebted, in ways that are only beginning to be understood, to religious traditions rooted in particular regions and vernacular languages. The article illustrates this argument with reference to the Kōvilūr Ātīṉam, a Vedānta-affiliated monastic institution in Tamil-speaking South India founded by Mutturāmaliṅka Ñāṉatēcika Cuvāmikaḷ (1791–1847). Examining the significance of this figure’s life story for the wealthy Nāṭṭukkōṭṭai Ceṭṭiyār merchant community that comprises the Ātīṉam’s social base, the article explores how social aspirations, traditions of monastic authority, and vernacular Vedāntic literature contribute toward a colonial project of caste self-fashioning that I refer to as “Ceṭṭiyār Vedānta”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alam, M. (2016). In search of a sacred king: Dārā Shukoh and the Yogavāsiṣṭhas of Mughal India. History of Religions,55(4), 429–459.
Allen, M. S. (2017). Greater Advaita Vedānta: The case of Niścaldās. International Journal of Hindu Studies,21(3), 275–297.
Aruṇācalam, M. [1969] (2005). Tamiḻ ilakkiya varalāṟu (Vols. 1–14). Chennai: The Parkar (Reprint edition).
Ebeling, S. (2010a). Colonizing the realm of words: The transformation of tamil literature in nineteenth-century South India. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ebeling, S. (2010b). Another tomorrow for Nantanar: The continuation and re-invention of a medieval South-Indian untouchable saint. In P. Schalk (Ed.), Geschichte und Geschichten: Historiographie und Hagiographie in der asiatischen Religionsgeschichte (pp. 433–516). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
Fisher, E. (2017). Remaking South Indian Śaivism: Greater Śaiva Advaita and the Legacy of the Śaktiviśiṣṭādvaita Vīraśaiva Tradition. International Journal of Hindu Studies,21(3), 319–344.
Fort, A. O. (1998). Jīvanmukti in transformation: Embodied liberation in Advaita and Neo-Vedanta. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Foye, R. (n.d.). Home alone in the Gutenberg galaxy: A brief account of the life of C. T. Nachiappan (pp. 58–75). Retrieved March 27, 2019, from https://raymondfoye.info/Foye%20Nachiappan%20essay.pdf
Goodding, R. A. (2011). A theologian in a South Indian kingdom: The historical context of the Jīvanmuktiviveka of Vidyāraṇya. In S. E. Lindquist (Ed.), Religion and identity in South Asia and beyond: Essays in honor of Patrick Olivelle (pp. 83–100). New York: Anthem Press.
Hacker, P. (1995). Philology and confrontation: Paul Hacker on traditional and modern Vedānta, Halbfass, W. (Ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Halbfass, W. (1988). India and Europe: An essay in understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hanneder, J. (2006). Studies on the Mokṣopāya. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Hatcher, B. (2007). Bourgeois Vedānta: The colonial roots of middle-class Hinduism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion,75(2), 298–323.
King, R. (1999). Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial theory, India, and ‘the mystic East’. New York: Routledge.
Koppedrayer, K. I. (1990). The sacred presence of the guru: The Velala lineages of Tiruvavatuturai, Dharmapuram, and Tiruppanantal. Ph.D. Diss., McMaster University.
Koviloor Andavar Madalayam. (2008). Koviloor: Koviloor Mutt.
Madaio, J. (2017). Rethinking neo-Vedānta: Swami Vivekananda and the selective historiography of Advaita Vedānta. Religions,8(6), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8060101.
Minkowski, C. (2011). Advaita Vedānta in early modern history. South Asian History and Culture,2(2), 205–231.
Mutturāmaliṅka Ñāṉatēcika Cuvāmikaḷ. (1858). Cuvāṉupavatiruvākku. Kīḻvēḷūr Cuppiramaṇiya Tēcikar (Ed.). Ceṉṉai: Intu Accukkūṭam.
Nicholson, A. J. (2010). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and identity in Indian intellectual history. New York: Columbia University Press.
Paḻaṉiyappa Ayyā, Kāraikkuṭi Mēlamaṭam Cēvu. Paḻa. (1900). Āṇṭavar Carittira-c Curukkam. Ceṉṉai: Matarācu Rippaṉ Acciyantira Cālai.
Prince, P. (1996). Kingship and political practice in colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rudner, D. W. (1994). Caste and capitalism in colonial India: The Nattukottai Chettiars. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sawai, T. (1992). The faith of ascetics and lay Smārtas: A study of the Śaṅkaran tradition of Śṛṅgeri. Vienna: Institut für Indologie, Sammlung De Nobili.
Schwartz, J. (2017). Parabrahman among the yogins. International Journal of Hindu Studies,21(3), 345–389.
Seastrand, A. L. (2013). Praise, politics, and language: South Indian Murals, 1500-1800. Ph.D. Diss. Columbia University.
Sharma, J. (2013). A restatement of religion: Swami Vivekananda and the making of Hindu nationalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Slaje, W. (1994). Vom Mokṣopāya-Śāstra zum Yogavāsiṣṭha-Mahārāmāyaṇa: Philologische Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung- und Überlieferungsgeschichte eines indischen Lehrwerks mit Anspruch auf Heilsrelevanz. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Steinschneider, E. (2017). Arguing the taste of fresh butter: Īcūr Caccitāṉanta Cuvāmikaḷ’s Advaitic interpretation of Tamil Śaiva theology. International Journal of Hindu Studies,21(3), 299–318.
Thurston, E., & Rangachari, K. (1909). Castes and tribes of southern India (Vol. 7). Madras: Government Press.
Venkatesananda, S. (1993). Vasiṣṭha’s yoga. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Vīrai Āḷavantār. (1901). Ñāṉavāciṭṭav amalarāmāyaṉam. Ceṉṉai: “Piriṉs Āv Vēls” Acciyantiracālai.
Waghorne, J. P. (2004). Diaspora of the gods: Modern Hindu temples in an urban middle-class world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinschneider, E. Ceṭṭiyār Vedānta: Fashioning Hindu Selves in Colonial South India. J Indian Philos 48, 101–118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-019-09413-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-019-09413-1