Skip to main content
Log in

Digital Archaeology and the Living Cherokee Landscape

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cherokee Landscapes is a digital conservation project to protect and preserve heritage in ways determined by Ani-Kitu Hwagi (Cherokee) stakeholders. This digital repatriation project requires new ways of visualizing archaeological information and geographically integrating Ani-Kitu Hwagi materials that are dispersed among many national and international institutions. The platform for Cherokee Landscapes is mbira, an open-source program developed by Michigan State University’s MATRIX: The Center for Digital Humanities and Social Sciences. Mbira, an interactive map interface, and other open-source programs offer novel ways of visualizing spatial data that benefit archaeological professionals and the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, H. M. and Belt, T. N. (2009). Tohi: the Cherokee concept of well-being. In Lefler, L. J. (ed.), Under the Rattlesnake: Cherokee Health and Resiliency. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, C. (2016). Critical indigenous studies: intellectual predilections and institutional realities. In Moreton-Robinson, A. (ed.), Critical Indigenous Studies: Engagements in First World Locations. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, S. (2012). Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Jr., W. (2017). Oral history. In Andersen, C. and O'Brien, J. M. (eds.), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies. Routledge, New York, pp. 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, J. A. (2016). Still waiting for the “post” to arrive: Elizabeth Cook-Lynn and the imponderables of American Indian postcoloniality. Wicazo Sa Review 31(1): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2003). The ethos of return: erasure and reinstatement of aboriginal visibility in the Australian historical landscape. Historical Archaeology 37(1): 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, S., Clarke, A., Harrison, R., and Torrence, R. (eds.) (2011). Unpacking the Collection: Networks of Material and Social Agency in the Museum. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, Q. E. and Matthews, C. N. (eds.) (2008). Ethnographic Archaeologies: Reflections on Stakeholders and Archaeological Practices. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, G. (2014). From wards of the state to subjects of recognition? Marx, Indigenous peoples, and the politics of dispossession in Denedeh. In Simpson, A. and Andrea Smith, A. (eds.), Theorizing Native Studies. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 56–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell Racette, S., Corbiere, S. A., and Migwans, C. (2017). Pieces left along the trail: material culture histories and Indigenous Studies. In Andersen, C. and O’Brien, J. M. (eds.), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies. Routledge, New York, pp. 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Wolfe, P. 2006. Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native. Journal of Genocide Research 8(4): 387–409.

  • Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (2004). How did colonialism dispossess? comments from an edge of empire. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(1): 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. and Wasilewski, J. (2004). Indigeneity, an alternative worldview: four R's (relationship, responsibility, reciprocity, redistribution) vs. two P's (power and profit), sharing the journey towards conscious evolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 21(5): 489–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2006). An artefact of colonial desire? Current Anthropology 47(1): 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C. P. and TallBear, K. (2006). This Stretch of the River: Lakota, Dakota, and Nakota Responses to the Lewis and Clark Expedition and Bicentennial. Oak Lake Writers’ Society, South Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. and Gillespie, S. (2015). Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Anthropological Practice. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiddey, R. (2014). Punks and drunks: counter mapping homelessness in Bristol and York. In Schofield, J. (ed.), Who Needs Experts? Counter Mapping Cultural Heritage. Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. (1992). National geographic: the rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology 7(1): 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, G. and Markey, N. (2015). Traditional knowledge, archaeological evidence, and other ways of knowing. In Chapman, R. and Wylie, A. (eds.), Material Evidence: Learning from Archaeological Practice. Routledge, New York, pp. 287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J., Kitchin, T., and Millar, A. (1755). A Map of the British and French Dominions in North America, with the Roads, Distances, Limits, and Extent of the Settlements, Humbly Inscribed to the Right Honourable the Earl of Halifax, and the Other Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners for Trade & Plantations. Millar, London.

  • Mooney, J. (1902). Myths of the Cherokee. Bureau of American Ethnology. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2017). Relationality: a key presupposition of an Indigenous social research paradigm. In Andersen, C. and O’Brien, J. M. (eds.), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies. Routledge, New York, pp. 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M. (2018). Curatorial Activism: Towards an Ethics of Curating. Thames and Hudson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodning, C. B. (2015). Center Places and Cherokee Towns: Archaeological Perspectives on Native American Architecture and Landscape in the Southern Appalachians. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampeck, K. and Griffin, J. D. (2018). Cherokee archaeological landscapes as community action. História: Questoes e Debates 66(2): 87–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampeck, K., Thayn, J. B., and Earnest, Jr., H. H. (2015). GIS modeling of De Soto’s route from Joara to Chiaha: archaeology and anthropology of southeastern road networks in the sixteenth century. American Antiquity 80(1): 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. (ed.) (2014). Who Needs Experts? Counter Mapping Cultural Heritage. Ashgate, Farnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steere, B. A. (2015). Revisiting platform mounds and townhouses in the Cherokee heartland: a collaborative approach. Southeastern Archaeology 34(3): 196–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Te Punga Somerville, A. (2017). “I do still have a letter”: our sea of archives. In Andersen, C. and O’Brien, J. M. (eds.), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies. Routledge, New York, pp. 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrall, E. (2018). Public heritage at scale: building tools for authoring mobile digital heritage and archaeology experiences. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 5(2): 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Several seasons of archaeological research in eastern Tennessee and North Carolina were made possible by institutional support from Illinois State University, numerous grants and logistical support from the Tribal Historic Preservation Office of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, and a grant from the Cherokee Preservation Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Sampeck.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Townsend, R., Sampeck, K., Watrall, E. et al. Digital Archaeology and the Living Cherokee Landscape. Int J Histor Archaeol 24, 969–988 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-019-00534-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-019-00534-7

Keywords

Navigation