Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Young Children’s Conceptions of Sustainability in Croatia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research focuses on young children’s understandings about economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Participants were 43 children, aged from 3 to 7 years of age, recruited from two kindergartens in Croatia. Children’s ideas were discussed through semi-structured interviews that focused on saving, spending, recycling, justice, inequality, diversity, gender stereotypes, interdependence, helping others, environmental pollution, and care of the environment. The interviews included closed and open-ended questions and photographs were used to illustrate the sustainability concepts discussed. The analyses of children’s ideas about sustainability concepts and practices considered the complexity of children’s ideas, using the SOLO learning outcomes framework. Older children were familiar with almost all key topics (e.g., use of money, recycling, diversity) but less familiar with the term justice, although they did have some understandings of its meaning. The youngest children had fewer ideas about sustainability. The findings indicate that kindergartens and preschools can provide foundations for lifelong learning about sustainability and important implications are that teachers can promote children’s understandings through enriching pedagogical activities.

Résumé

Cette recherche se concentre sur la compréhension qu’ont les jeunes enfants de la durabilité économique, sociale et environnementale. Les participants étaient 43 enfants, âgés de 3 à 7 ans, recrutés dans deux jardins d’enfants en Croatie. Les idées des enfants étaient discutées dans le cadre d’entretiens semi-structurés portant sur l’épargne, les dépenses, le recyclage, la justice, l’inégalité, la diversité, les stéréotypes sexuels, l’interdépendance, l’aide aux autres, la pollution et la protection de l’environnement. Les entretiens comprenaient des questions fermées et ouvertes et des photos étaient utilisées pour illustrer les concepts de durabilité discutés. Les analyses des idées des enfants sur les concepts et les pratiques de durabilité prenaient en compte la complexité des idées des enfants, en utilisant le cadre des résultats d’apprentissage SOLO. Les enfants plus âgés étaient familiers avec presque tous les sujets clés (par exemple, l’utilisation de l’argent, le recyclage, la diversité) mais moins avec le terme de justice, même s’ils avaient une certaine compréhension de sa signification. Les plus jeunes enfants avaient moins d’idées sur la durabilité. Les résultats indiquent que les jardins d’enfants et les écoles maternelles peuvent fournir les bases d’un apprentissage tout au long de la vie sur la durabilité et que les enseignants peuvent promouvoir la compréhension des enfants par des activités pédagogiques enrichissantes.

Resumen

Esta investigación se centra en la comprensión que poseen las niñas y niños pequeños sobre la sostenibilidad económica, social y ambiental. Los participantes fueron 43 niños, de edades comprendidas entre 3 y 7 años, reclutados de dos jardines de infancia en Croacia. Las ideas infantiles se discutieron a través de entrevistas semiestructuradas que se centraron en el ahorro, el gasto, el reciclaje, la justicia, la desigualdad, la diversidad, los estereotipos de género, la interdependencia, la ayuda a los demás, la contaminación ambiental y el cuidado del medio ambiente. Las entrevistas incluyeron preguntas cerradas y abiertas. Así mismo, se utilizaron fotografías para ilustrar los conceptos de sostenibilidad discutidos. Los análisis de las ideas infantiles sobre conceptos y prácticas de sostenibilidad mostraron su complejidad, utilizando para ello la taxonomía SOLO. Los niños y niñas mayores estaban familiarizados con casi todos los temas clave (p. Ej., uso del dinero, reciclaje, diversidad), sin embargo, no se daba esta situación con el término justicia, aunque tenían algunos conocimientos sobre su significado. Los más pequeños tenían menos ideas sobre la sostenibilidad. Los resultados indican que los jardines infantiles y preescolares pueden proporcionar las bases para el aprendizaje permanente sobre la sostenibilidad y las implicaciones importantes. Los maestros y maestras pueden promover la comprensión de los niños y niñas a través de actividades pedagógicas enriquecedoras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bautista, A., Moreno-Núñez, A., Ng, S., & Bull, R. (2018). Preschool teachers’ interactions with children about sustainable development: planned and incidental conversations. International Journal of Early Childhood, 50(1), 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the observed learning outcome). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, F. (2017). Caring for people and the planet. Preschool children’s knowledge and practices of sustainability. Umeå: Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappello, M. (2005). Photo interviews: eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods, 17, 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2016). From best practices to breakthrough impacts: A science-based approach to building a more promising future for young children and families. Retrieved from http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu.

  • Daries, J., Engdahl, I., Otieno, L., Pramling Samuelson, I., Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Vallabh, P. (2009). Early childhood education for sustainability: recommendations for development. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, I., & Rabušicová, M. (2010). Children’s voices about the state of the Earth and sustainable development. A report for the OMEP World Assembly and World Congress on the OMEP World project on education for sustainable development 2009–2010. Retrieved from http://www.omep.org.se/uploads/files/congress_report_child_interviews_-_final.pdf.

  • Furnham, A., & Thomas, P. (1984). Adults’ perceptions of the economic socialization of children. Journal of Adolescence, 7, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, F., Fossi, C., Weber, R., Santillo, D., Sousa, J., Ingram, I., et al. (2018). Marine litter plastics and microplastics and their toxic chemicals components: the need for urgent preventive measures. Environmental Sciences Europe, 30(13), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzieska-Jurczak, M., Stepska, A., Nieszporek, K., & Bryda, G. (2006). Perception of environmental problems among pre-school children in Poland. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 62–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, P., Wall, S., & Manger, R. (2015). An action research project with SOLO taxonomy. Book 1. How to introduce and use SOLO as a model of learning across a school. Invercargill, New Zealand: Essential Resources Educational Publishers.

  • Huston, A. C. (1983.). Sex typing. In: E.M. Hetherington (Ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology: Socialization, Personality, and Social Development (pp. 387-467). New York: Wiley.

  • Kato-Shimizu, M., Onishi, K., Kanazawa, T., & Hinobayashi, T. (2013). Preschool children’s behavioral tendency toward social indirect reciprocity. PLOS ONE: Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070915.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, K. (2007). The development of social identity and intergroup attitudes in young children. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on social learning in early childhood education (pp. 51–84). Charlotte: Information Age Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., & Downs, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children. Child Development, 51(4), 1237–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G., & Smith, K. (2008). Children’s rights in early childhood. In M. J. Kehily (Ed.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. 161–176). New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Science, Education and Sport. (2014). Nacionalni kurikulum ranog i predškolskog odgoja i obrazovanja [National Curriculum for Early Childhood Education]. Zagreb: Ministry of Science, Education and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norddahl, K. (2008). What might early childhood education for sustainability look like? In: I. Pramling Samuelsson & Y. Kaga (Eds.) Early childhood education for a sustainable society (pp. 25-30). Paris: UNESCO.

  • OMEP (2013). Skala za procjenu okruženja za održivi razvoj u ranom djetinjstvu (ERS-SDEC). Retrieved from http://eceresourcebank.org/index.php?hCode=SCALE_03_01.

  • Ooka Pang, V. (2004). Multicultural education: A caring-centered, reflective approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2009). Editorial: education for sustainable development in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J., Smith, K.C., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2010). Education for Sustainable Development in the Early Years. Retrieved from http://www.omep.org.uk/education-for-sustainable-development.

  • Sonuga-Barke, E. J., & Webley, P. (1993). Children’s saving: A study in the development of economic behaviour. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatković, N., Diković, M., & Štifanić, M. (2015). Odgoj i obrazovanje za razvoj danas i sutra. Ekološke i društvene paradigme [Education for development today and tomorrow: Ecological and social paradigms]. Pula: Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli.

  • Thomson, P. (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED. (1992). Agenda 21—Programme for action for sustainable development: Rio declaration on environment and development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf.

  • UNESCO. (2012). The education for sustainable development sourcebook. Education for sustainable development in action. Learning and training tools, No. 4. Paris: UNESCO.

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx.

  • United Nations. (2000). Millennium Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf.

  • United Nations. (2019). Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future is Now—Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf.

  • Winton, A. (2016). Using photography as a creative, collaborative research tool. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 428–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, L., & Fengfeng, L. (2008). Building a harmonious society and ECE for sustainable development. In: I. Pramling Samuelsson & Y. Kaga (Eds.) The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society (pp. 43–52). Paris: UNESCO.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrijana Višnjić Jevtić.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahtić, K., Višnjić Jevtić, A. Young Children’s Conceptions of Sustainability in Croatia. IJEC 52, 195–211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00266-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00266-4

Keywords

Navigation