Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing First-Generation Students to Continuing-Generation Students and the Impact of a First-Generation Learning Community

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined how factors associated with student development and persistence differ between first-generation and continuing-generation students and how participation in a learning community influences development and persistence. The findings show that first-generation students were less involved in academics and had lower gains in intellectual development and engagement with diverse perspectives than did continuing-generation students. There was no significant difference between the two groups on first-to-second year persistence rates. First-generation students who participated in the learning community outperformed continuing-generation students in gains in intellectual development, interpersonal development, and engagement with diverse perspectives. There was no significant difference in persistence between first-generation students who were in the learning community and those who were not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 518–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, M. C. (2014). Academic preparedness of first-generation college students: Different perspectives. Journal of College Student Development, 55, 824–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. A., Swanbrow, L. S., Romano, K., & Spinelli, C. (2017). Promoting first-generation college students’ mental well-being: Student perceptions of an academic enrichment program. Journal of College Student Development, 58, 1166–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, K., & MacDonald, S. (2005). Defining college readiness from the inside out: First-generation college students’ perspectives. Community College Review, 33, 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cataldi, E. F., Bennett, C. T., & Chen, X. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and postbachelor’s outcomes. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy, S. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, C., Campbell, S. E., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 60–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, L., Franke, R., Hurtado, S., Pryor, J. H., & Tran, S. (2011). Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four year institutions. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, C., Meece, J., Eaker-Rich, D., & Powell, C. (2017). The activities, roles, and relationships of successful first-generation students. Journal of College Student Development, 58(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engberg, M. E., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Developing pluralist skills and dispositions in college: Examining racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 82, 416–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, J., Bermeo, A., & O’Brien, L. (2006). Straight from the source: What works for first-generation college students. Washington, DC: Pell Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, J., & Tinto, V. (2008). Moving beyond access. Washington, DC: Pell Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filkins, J.W., & Doyle, S.K. (2002, June). First-generation and low income students: Using NSSE data to study effective educational practices and student gains. Paper presented at the Annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • Fink, J. E., & Hummel, M. L. (2015). With educational benefits for all: Campus inclusion through learning communities designed for underserved student populations. New Directions for Student Services, 149, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, L., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 24, 803–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W., & Woodward, L. S. (2013). Examining the impact learning communities have on college of education students on an urban campus. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 643–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2003). Diversity experiences and college student learning and personal development. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta, J. C., & Bray, J. J. (2013). How do learning communities affect first-year Latino students? Learning Communities: Research & Practice, 1, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, K. K., Daver, Z. E., Vogt, K. E., & Leonard, J. B. (2007). Living-learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college. Research in Higher Education, 48, 403–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, K. K., & Weisman, J. L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 335–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishitani, T. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first- generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44, 433–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, U. M. (2008). Can higher education meet the needs of an increasingly diverse and global society? Campus diversity and cross-cultural workforce competencies. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 615–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehangir, R. (2009). Stories as knowledge: Bringing the lived experience of first-generation college students into the academy. Urban Education, 45, 533–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohfink, M. M., & Paulsen, M. B. (2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first- generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2017). First-generation and continuing-generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018009.pdf

  • Pascarella, E. (2001). Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., & Terenzini, P. T. (1996). Influences on students’ openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college. The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 174–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, A. M. (2002). Academic literacy perceptions and performance: Comparing first- generation and continuing-generation college students. Research in the Teaching of English, 36, 437–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, J. S., & Haas, K. (2003). The process of coping among ethnic minority first-generation college freshmen: A narrative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 707–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 276–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocconi, L. M. (2011). The impact of learning communities on first year students’ growth and development in college. Research in Higher Education, 52, 178–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, N. (2002). Anticipatory socialization, adjustment to university life, and perceived stress. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 365–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L., MacGregor, J., Matthews, K., & Gabelnick, F. (2004). Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soria, K. M., & Stebleton, M. J. (2012). First-generation students’ academic engagement and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 673–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R. (2015). Predicting first-year student success in learning communities: The power of pre-college variables. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 3, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, N. M., Hamedani, M., & Destin, M. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, A., Parra, P., & Lalonde, T. (2014). First-generation college student achievement and the first-year seminar: A quasi-experimental design. Journal of the First-year Experience & Students in Transition, 26, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L., Siegel, M., & Davenport, Z. (2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment to graduation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, K., Krylow, R., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 591–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, E. J., Edison, M., Pascarella, E. T., Nora, A., & Terenzini, P. T. (1999). Interactions with peers and objective and self-reported cognitive outcomes across 3 years of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail Markle.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markle, G., Stelzriede, D.D. Comparing First-Generation Students to Continuing-Generation Students and the Impact of a First-Generation Learning Community. Innov High Educ 45, 285–298 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09502-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09502-0

Keywords

Navigation