Abstract
Triffin gained enormous influence by reviving the interwar story that gold scarcity threatened deflation. In particular, he held that central banks needed to accumulate claims on the United States to back money growth. But the claims could eventually surpass the US gold stock, and then, central banks would stage a run on it. He feared that the United States might reduce the supply of dollars and cause global deflation. However, not US prudence and global deflation, but US profligacy and global inflation ensued. Moreover, we show that the US gold position after WWII was no worse than the UK position in 1900. Yet it took WWI to break sterling’s gold link. Could, contrary to Triffin’s framework, better and feasible US policies have kept Bretton Woods going? This history serves as a backdrop to our critical review of two later extensions of Triffin. One holds that the dollar’s reserve role required US current account deficits. This current account Triffin is popular, but not demonstrated. Nevertheless, it pops up in debates over the euro’s and the renminbi’s reserve roles. A fiscal Triffin holds that global demand for safe assets will either remain dangerously unsatisfied or force excessive US fiscal debt. This story overstates demand for safe assets and the inflexibility of their supply. Thus, these stories do not convince in their own terms. Moreover, each lacks Triffin’s clear crossover point from stability to instability. Triffin’s seeming predictive success leads economists to wrap his brand around dissimilar stories. Yet Triffin’s dilemma in its most general form correctly points to the conflicts and difficulties that arise when a national currency serves as an international public good.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Eichengreen (1992, pp. 20, 203–204) suggests that it should be called the Młynarski Dilemma.
“Notably Dr. Otmar Emminger. See, for instance, his (1973), p. 35) Per Jacobsson lecture” [Triffin footnote]. Triffin was surprised by “the reluctance to accept the appreciation of its exchange rate that would flow from a country's refusal to accumulate dollars” (p. 5), which he ascribed to a coordination problem arising from multiple European currencies.
But not the IMF, or at least not Altman (1961), who contests Triffin’s diagnosis and especially his prescription.
Strange (1976) quipped that the GAB should have been labelled the Selective Agreement to Lend.
Gilbert (1968) of the BIS, Rueff (1972) in French official circles and others (Meltzer 1991) argued that the problem could have been solved by the United States, unilaterally or in concert with others, doubling the nominal price of gold from $35 to $70 per ounce. US officials opposed this move because pariah nations South Africa and the USSR would have gained. It would also have been a time inconsistent policy and would have induced moral hazard (Bordo 1993).
Farhi and Maggiori introduce something like a self-fulfilling run on the liabilities of the reserve currency issuer. They offer their model as a bridge between Triffin and Despres et al. However, their reserve currency issuer uses its capacity to produce (possibly) safe liabilities to extract real resources from the rest of the world to consume or to invest at home. On this reading, these authors bridge the current account and safe assets versions of Triffin, discussed below.
“As far as the ‘international banker’ is concerned, it is obvious that he cannot count on a one-sided, permanent, and ever-increasing flow of short-term funds from abroad. The flow of short-term capital can reverse itself suddenly for a number of reasons, making the deficit which the minority view considers entirely normal rather problematic. The world banker can suddenly be faced with a liquidity problem or even a liquidity crisis. Then he will have to be able to fall back on very large international reserves” (Halm 1968, p. 7).
Kindleberger (1978) saw the outline of an international lender of last resort in the swap network that the Fed developed during the Bretton Woods period but that outlasted it. In the end, despite the swaps’ short-term success, Bretton Woods collapsed between 1971 and 1973 amid US inflation (Bordo et al 2015a, b, chapter 4).
With the principal exception of the United States. Britain and France suspended de facto but not de jure. And notably bank panics were avoided.
Still, the inadequacy of the Bank of England’s gold reserve received much public attention discussion for 30 years before 1914: “It was a commonplace of economists, financial journalists, politicians (notably just about every Chancellor of the Exchequer) Tory or Liberal, bankers themselves…Everybody wrote articles on the subject: the journals of the period are filled with papers on the inadequacy of our reserves” (Goodhart 1972, p. 101).
However, before 1965 the Fed did pay attention to international considerations in setting its policy rates (Bordo and Eichengreen 2013).
This shift is not altogether surprising given what Borio (2016) calls “the centrality of the current account in international economics”.
The fact that dollar reserves could grow in the 1960s in the absence of US current account deficits underscores an important distinction between nets and grosses in international finance (Borio 2016). Countries like Brazil, India and Indonesia accumulate foreign exchange reserves, notwithstanding current account deficits.
See also Caballero et al. (2017b, p. 38).
Caballero et al. (2017a) recognize that the narrow spread between corporate bond yields and US Treasury yields seems inconsistent with their story. Recent observations of negative government bond yields may make the safety trap less likely.
Obstfeld et al (2010) find M2/GDP a powerful determinant of foreign exchange reserves as a proportion of GDP and interpret the relationship as insurance against financial instability arising from a domestic run (“drain”) from M2 into foreign exchange.
However, the Federal Reserve absorbed much Treasury debt in this period. Federal Reserve selling of its Treasuries leaves a larger supply of Treasury debt available to reserve managers.
A significant share of China’s reserve drawdown reflects the reversal of various forms of carry trades after the renminbi peaked against the dollar in early 2014. McCauley and Shu (2016) highlighted both the repayment of foreign currency debt by the Chinese corporate sector and the liquidation of renminbi deposits held outside the mainland in Hong Kong SAR, Macao SAR, Chinese Taipei, Korea and Singapore.
According to the BIS locational international banking statistics, cross-border liabilities denominated in the dollar to central banks peaked before the Great Financial Crisis at about $800 billion, then declined to about $400 billion and have since recovered to about $600 billion. See http://stats.bis.org/statx/srs/tseries/LBS_D_PUB/Q.S.L.A.USD.A.5J.A.5A.M.5J.N?t=a8&c=&m=F&p=20172&i=3.6.
Jeanne (2012) notes that these have grown as rapidly as the rest of the world GDP.
If dollar reserves grow at 3.5% of US GDP per year (the maximum in Table 1 based on the larger, IMF COFER-derived measure in column (3) for 2002–2010), this implies, neglecting equity investment, 2.4% of US GDP new demand for US Treasuries. Even if the US Treasury debt/GDP ratio were miraculously to stabilise at the current 78% of US GDP, US nominal growth of 3.5% implies growth of 2.7% of US GDP in the annual supply of Treasuries. On this combination of extreme assumptions, the foreign official share of US Treasuries would still approach just 88%.
See the BIS global liquidity indicators: https://www.bis.org/statistics/gli.htm?m=6%7C333; and Borio et al. (2017). Foulis (2015) suggests that both technical and political factors constrain the Fed’s backstop of eurodollars. “Could the Fed save the day again? It would be a lot harder than last time. The offshore archipelago is almost twice as large as it was in 2007 and is growing fast, so any rescue would have to be on a much larger scale. The mix of countries involved is tilting away from America’s allies. The banks in question are less likely to have subsidiaries in New York that can borrow directly from the Fed or are viewed as palatable by the American legal system”.
References
Aizenman, J., and J. Lee. 2007. International Reserves: Precautionary Versus Mercantilist Views, Theory and Evidence. Open Economies Review 18 (2): 191–214.
Andolfatto, D., and S. Williamson. 2015. Scarcity of Safe Assets, Inflation, and the Policy Trap. Journal of Monetary Economics 73: 70–92.
Alogoskoufis, G., and R. Portes. 1997. The Euro, the Dollar and the International Monetary System. In EMU and the International Monetary System, ed. P. Masson, T. Krueger, and B. Turtelboom, 58–89. Washington, DC: IMF.
Altman, O. 1961. Professor Triffin on International Liquidity and the Role of the Fund. IMF Staff Papers 8 (2): 151–191.
Barro, R. 1979. Money and the Price Level Under the Gold Standard. Economic Journal 89 (353): 13–33.
Bergsten, F. 1997. The Impact of the Euro on Exchange Rates and International Policy Cooperation. In EMU and the International Monetary System, ed. P. Masson, T. Krueger, and B. Turtelboom, 17–48. Washington, DC: IMF.
Bergsten, F., and J. Gagnon. 2017. Currency Conflict and Trade Policy. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Bertaut, C., S. Kamin, and C. Thomas. 2008. “How Long Can the Unsustainable U.S. Current Account Deficit be Sustained?” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. In International Finance Discussion Papers No 935, July.
Bini-Smaghi, L. 2011. The Triffin dilemma revisited. In In Search of a New World Monetary Order, Proceedings of a Conference to Celebrate the 100th Anniversary of Robert Triffin (1911–1993). No 5 in the Relations Financières Internationals, ed. J.-C. Koeune and A. Lamfalussy, 101–111. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang for the Fondation Internationale Triffin.
Bordo, M.D. 1993. The Bretton Woods international monetary system: a historical overview. In A Retrospective on the Bretton Woods System: Lessons for International Monetary Reform, ed. M.D. Bordo and B. Eichengreen, 3–108. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
Bordo, M.D., and B. Eichengreen. 2013. Bretton Woods and the great inflation. In The Great Inflation: The Rebirth of Modern Central Banking, ed. M. Bordo and A. Orphanides, 449–489. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bordo, M.D., O. Humpage, and A.J. Schwartz. 2015a. The Evolution of the Federal Reserve Swap Lines Since 1962. IMF Economic Review 63 (2): 353–372.
Bordo, M.D., O. Humpage, and A.J. Schwartz. 2015b. Strained Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
Bordo, M. D., E. Monnet, and A. Naef. forthcoming. The Gold Pool, 1961–1968 and the Fall of the Bretton Woods system. Journal of Economic History.
Bordo, M.D., and A. Schwartz. 1999. Under What Circumstances, Past and Present, Have International Rescues of Countries in Financial Distress been Successful? Journal of International Money and Finance 18 (4): 683–708.
Bordo, M.D., D. Simard, and E. White. 1995. France and the Bretton Woods International Monetary System 1960 to 1968. In International Monetary Systems in Historical Perspective, ed. J. Reis, 153–180. London: Macmillan.
Borio, C. 2016. On the Centrality of the Current Account in International Economics. Journal of International Money and Finance 68: 266–274.
Borio C, R. McCauley, and P. McGuire. 2017. “FX Swaps and Forwards: Missing Global Debt?” BIS Quarterly Review, September, pp 37–54.
Caballero, R. and E. Farhi. 2013. A Model of the Safe Asset Mechanism (SAM): Safety Traps and Economic Policy. NBER Working Paper no 18737, August.
Caballero, R., E. Farhi, and P.-O. Gourinchas. 2016. Safe Asset Scarcity and Aggregate Demand. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 106 (5): 513–518.
Caballero, R., E. Farhi, and P.-O. Gourinchas. 2017a. Rents, Technical Change, and Risk Premia Accounting for Secular Trends in Interest Rates, Returns on Capital, Earning Yields, and Factor Shares. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 107 (5): 614–620.
Caballero, R., E. Farhi, and P.-O. Gourinchas. 2017b. The Safe Assets Shortage Conundrum. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (3): 29–46.
Camdessus, M., and A. Icard. 2011. Toward an Orderly Supply of Reserve Currencies. In Reform of the International Monetary System: The Palais Royal Initiative, ed. J. Boorman and A. Icard, 75–81. New Delhi: Sage Press.
Carlson, M., B. Duygan-Bump, F. Natalucci, W. Nelson, M. Ochoa, J. Stein, and S. van den Heuvle. 2016. The Demand for Short-term, Safe Assets and Financial Stability. International Journal of Central Banking 12 (4): 307–333.
Chinn, M., B. Eichengreen, and H. Ito. 2014. A Forensic Analysis of Global Imbalances. Oxford Economic Papers 66 (2): 465–490.
Coombs, C. 1976. The Arena of International Finance. New York: Wiley.
Cooper, R. 2009. The Future of the Dollar, Policy Brief 09-21. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Croke, H., S. Kamin, and S. Leduc. 2006. An Assessment of the Disorderly Adjustment Hypothesis for Industrial Economies. International Finance 9 (1): 37–61.
Despres, E., C. Kiindleberger, and W. Salant. 1966. The Dollar and World Liquidity: A Minority View. The Economist, 218(6389, 5 February): 526–529.
Diamond, D., and P. Dybvig. 1983. Bank Runs, Liquidity, and Deposit Insurance. Journal of Political Economy 91: 401–449.
Eichengreen, B. 1985. Editor’s Introduction. In The Gold Standard in Theory and History, ed. B. Eichengreen, 1–35. New York: Methuen.
Eichengreen, B. 1992. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eichengreen, B. 2011. Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International Monetary System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eichengreen, B. 2016. Global Monetary Order. In Paper Prepared for the ECB’s Annual Research Conference on “The International Financial Architecture”. Sintra, 28–29 June.
Emminger, O. 1967. Practical Aspects of the Problem of Balance of Payments Adjustment. Journal of Political Economy 75 (4): 512–522.
Emminger, O. 1973. Inflation and the International Monetary System. Basle: Per Jacobsson Lecture.
European Commission. 2018. Towards a Stronger International Role for the Euro. COM(2018) 796 final, 5 December.
Farhi, E., P.-O. Gourinchas, and H. Rey. 2011. Reforming the International Monetary System. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Farhi, E., and M. Maggiori. 2018. A Model of the International Monetary System. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (1): 295–355.
Feldstein, M. 2013. An Interview with Paul Volcker. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (4): 105–120.
Flandreau, M. 1997. Central Bank Cooperation in Historical Perspective: A Sceptical View. The Economic History Review 50 (4): 735–763.
Foulis, P. 2015. The Sticky Superpower: Special Report, the World Economy. Economist, 417(8958, 3 October): 1–14.
Frankel, J. 2019. Systematic Managed Floating. Open Economies Review 30: 255–295.
Fratianni, M. 2012. The Future International Monetary System: Dominant Currencies or Supranational Money? An introduction. Open Economy Review 23: 1–12.
Gagnon, J. 2017. Do Governments Drive Global Trade Imbalances? Peterson Institute for International Economics, Working Paper 17–15, Addendum, September.
Garber, P. 1993. The Collapse of the Bretton Woods Fixed Exchange Rate System. In A Retrospective on the Bretton Woods System: Lessons for International Monetary Reform, ed. M.D. Bordo and B. Eichengreen, 461–494. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
Genberg, H., and A. Swoboda. 1981. Gold and the Dollar: Asymmetries in World Money Stock Determination, 1959–1971. In The International Monetary System Under Flexible Exchange Rates: Global Regional and National, Essays in Hour of Robert Triffin, ed. R. Cooper, P. Kenen, J. de Macedo, and J. van Ypersele, 235–257. Cambridge: Ballinger.
Ghosh, A., J. Ostry, and C. Tsangarides. 2010. Exchange Rate Regimes and the Stability of the International Monetary System. IMF Occasional Paper No 270.
Gilbert, M. 1966. Problems of the International Monetary System, Princeton Essays in International Finance 53. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Gilbert, M. 1968. The Gold-Dollar System: Conditions of Equilibrium and the Price of Gold, Princeton Essays in International Finance 70. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Goodhart, C. 1972. The Business of Banking, 1891–1914. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
Gorton, G. 2017. The History and Economics of Safe Assets. Annual Review of Economics 9: 547–586.
Gorton, G., S. Lewellen, and A. Metrick. 2012. The Safe Asset Share. American Economic Review 102: 101–106.
Gourinchas, P.-O., and H. Rey. 2007. From World Banker to World Venture Capitalist: US External Adjustment and the Exorbitant Privilege. In G-7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment, ed. R. Clarida, 11–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gourinchas, P.-O. and H. Rey. 2014. External Adjustment, Global Imbalances, Valuation Effects. In Handbook of International Economics, ed. by G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff, Vol. 4, 585–646. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Gruber, J., and S. Kamin. 2007. Explaining the Global Pattern of Current Account Imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance 26 (4): 500–522.
Guvenen F., R. Mataloni, Jr., D. Rassier, and K. Ruhl. 2018. Offshore Profit Shifting and Domestic Productivity Measurement. NBER Working Paper 23324, June.
Halm, G. 1968. International Financial Intermediation: Deficits Benign and Malignant, Princeton Essays in International Finance, 68. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
He, D. 2012. The Triffin Dilemma and Currency Internationalisation. Caijing Magazine, 339 (3 December): 58–59.
He, Z., A. Krishnamurthy, and K. Milbradt. 2016. What Makes US Government Bonds Safe Assets? American Economic Review 106 (5): 519–523.
He, Z., A. Krishnamurthy, and K. Milbradt. 2019. A Model of Safe Asset Determination. American Economic Review 109 (4): 1230–1262.
Heath, A. 2007. What Explains the US Net Income Balance? BIS Working Papers No 223, January.
International Monetary Fund. 2010. Reserve Accumulation and International Monetary Stability. IMF Policy Papers, See https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2010/041310.pdf. 13 April.
International Monetary Fund. 2012. Safe Assets: Financial System Cornerstone? Global Financial Stability Report, April: 81–122.
Jeanne, O. 2012. The Dollar and its Discontents. Journal of International Money and Finance 31: 1976–1989.
Kindleberger, C.P. 1965. Balance of Payments Deficits and the International Market for Liquidity, Essays in International Finance, no 46. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Kindleberger, C.P. 1978. Manias, Panics and Crashes. New York: Basic Books.
Kindleberger, C.P. 1985. The Dollar Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 155: 295–308.
Kindleberger, C.P. 1986. International Public Goods Without International Government. American Economic Review 76 (1): 1–13.
Krugman, P. 1979. A Model of Balance-of-payments Crises. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 11: 311–325.
Leeper, E. and T. Walker. 2011. Perceptions and Misperceptions of Fiscal Inflation. BIS Working Papers, No 364, November.
Lindert, P. 1969. Key Currencies and Gold, 1900—1913, Princeton Essays in International Finance 24. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Marion, N. 1999. Some Parallels Between Currency and Banking Crises. In International Finance and Financial Crises, ed. P. Isard, A. Razin, and A. Rose, 1–18. Boston, Washington, DC: Kluwer Academic Publishers and IMF.
Mateos y Lago, I., R. Duttagupta, and R. Goyal. 2009. The Debate on the International Monetary System. IMF Staff Position Note, No SPN/09/26, 11 November.
McCauley, R. 1997. The Euro and the Dollar, Princeton Essays in International Finance, 205, November. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
McCauley, R. 2015. Does the Dollar Confer an Exorbitant Privilege on the US Economy? Journal of International Money and Finance 57: 1–14.
McCauley, R. 2019. Safe Assets: Made, Not Just Born. BIS Working Papers No 769, February.
McCauley, R. and P. McGuire. 2009. Dollar Appreciation in 2008: Safe Haven, Carry Trades, Dollar Shortage and Overhedging. BIS Quarterly Review, December: 85–93.
McCauley, R. and J.-F. Rigaudy. 2011. Managing Foreign Exchange Reserves in the Crisis and After. In Portfolio and risk management for central banks and sovereign wealth funds, BIS Papers No 58, October: 19–47. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
McCauley, R., and C. Schenk. 2015. Reforming the International Monetary System in the 1970s and 2000s: Would a Special Drawing Right Substitution Account Have Worked? International Finance 18 (2): 187–206.
McCauley, R. and C. Shu. 2016. Dollars and Renminbi Flowed Out of China. BIS Quarterly Review, March: 26–27.
McKinnon, R. 1969. Private and Official International Money: The Case for the Dollar, Princeton Essays in International Finance 74. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Meltzer, A. 1991. U.S. Policy in the Bretton Woods Era, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Review 73 (3): 53–83.
Młynarski, Feliks. 1929. Gold and Central Banks. New York: Macmillan.
Mundell, R. A. 1996. Jacques Rueff and the International Monetary System. In Acualité de la pensée de Jacques Rueff, Proceedings of a colloquium held on the centenary of the birth of Jacques Rueff, Assemblée nationale, Paris, 7 November. Paris: Commissariat général du plan.
Obstfeld, M. 2011. International Liquidity: The Fiscal Dimension. NBER Working Paper No. 17379.
Obstfeld, M. 2013. The International Monetary System: Living with Asymmetry. In Globalization in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, ed. R. Feenstra and A. Taylor, 301–336. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Obstfeld, M., J. Shambaugh, and A. Taylor. 2010. Financial Stability, the Trilemma, and International Reserves. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (2): 57–94.
Padoa-Schioppa, T. 2011. The Ghost of Bancor: The Economic Crisis and Global Monetary Disorder. In Reform of the International Monetary System: The Palais Royal Initiative, ed. J. Boorman and A. Icard, 51–73. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Philips, C. 1920. Bank Credit. New York: Macmillan.
Portes, R. 2012. A Reassessment of the Triffin Dilemma. In In Search of a New World Monetary Order, op cit, edited by J.-C. Koeune and A. Lamfalussy, 195–199.
Prasad, E. 2013. The Dollar Trap: How the US Dollar Tightened its Grip on Global Finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rueff, J. 1972. The Monetary Sin of the West. NY: Macmillan.
Salant, S., and D. Henderson. 1978. Market Anticipation of Government Policy and the Price of Gold. Journal of Political Economy 86: 627–648.
Sayers, R.L. 1976. The Bank of England, 1891–1944, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, A. 2014. Current Account Balance and Dollar Standard: Exploring the Linkages. Journal of International Money and Finance 41: 65–94.
Strange, S. 1976. International Monetary Relations. In International Economic Relations in the Western World 1959–1971, vol. 2, ed. A. Shonfield. London: Oxford University Press.
Swoboda, A. 2012. International Monetary Reform and Global Imbalances. In In Search of a New World Monetary Order, edited by J.-C. Koeune and A. Lamfalussy, 201–209. op cit.
Tille, C. 2003. The Impact of Exchange Rate Movements on US Foreign Debt, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Current Issues in Economics and Finance 9(1), January. See https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/current_issues/ci9-1.pdf.
Toniolo, G. 2005. Central Bank Cooperation at the Bank for International Settlements, 1930–1973. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Triffin, R. 1960. Gold and the Dollar Crisis: The Future of Convertibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Triffin, R. 1964. The Evolution of the International Monetary System: Historical Reappraisal and Future Perspectives, Princeton Studies in International Finance 12, June. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Triffin, R. 1978. Gold and the Dollar Crisis: Yesterday and Tomorrow. In Princeton Essays in International Finance No 132, December. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2017. Table 3.1. U.S. International Investment Position for Liabilities to Foreign Official Agencies at the End of the Period.
US Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2018. Foreign Portfolio Holdings of U.S. Securities as of June 30, 2017, April.
Zhou, Xiaochuan. 2009. Reform of the International Monetary System. BIS Review 41/2009, 23 March 2009, https://www.bis.org/review/r090402c.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors thank Robert Aliber, Claudio Borio, Piet Clement, Emmanuel Fahri, Joseph Gagnon, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, Dong He, Boris Hofmann, Krista Hughes, Hiroyuki Ito, Steven Kamin, Perry Mehrling, Eric Monnet, Maurice Obstfeld, Hyun Song Shin and Chris Sims for discussion, two anonymous reviewers for their close readings, Hiroyuki Ito and Joseph Gruber for their US residuals, and Bilyana Bogdanova, Julieta Contreras, Burcu Erik, Tania Romero and José Maria Vidal Pastor for research assistance. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Bank for International Settlements.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.