Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward an Understanding of the Role of Human Resources in Cultivating a Climate for Innovation in Nonprofit and Public Organizations

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human resources are vital to an organization’s success and are a driving force behind innovation processes. This study examines the influence of various employee characteristics and their effect on the innovation culture with public and nonprofit organizations (innovation climate). Using data collected from 1220 public and nonprofit employees, we evaluate the role of various elements such as work motivation, job flexibility, and financial motivation, and how they affect an innovation culture within organizations. Findings from a series of OLS regressions suggest that job flexibility, the quality and reputation of the organization, and importance placed on work are positively related to both public and nonprofit innovation climates. Personnel inflexibility negatively affects the innovation climate in both the public and nonprofit sectors, and the effects of other variables, including advancement motivation, vary by sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Unfortunately, the survey did not include “Nonprofit Sector” as an option for respondents to choose in terms of innovativeness.

References

  • Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European journal of innovation management, 1(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akingbola, K. (2012). Contingency, fit and flexibility of HRM in nonprofit organizations. Employee Relations, 35(5), 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S., Winston, B. E., Tatone, G. R., & Crowson, H. M. (2018). Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler, A., & Zegans, M. (1990). Innovation and creativity: Comparisons between public management and private enterprise. Cities, 7, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado, E. I. (1996). The validity of supplementary pay systems in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(3), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The Creative Environment Scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 231–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballart, X., & Rico, G. (2018). Public or nonprofit? Career preferences and dimensions of public service motivation. Public administration, 96(2), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baluch, A. M. (2017). Employee perceptions of HRM and well-being in nonprofit organizations: Unpacking the unintended. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(14), 1912–1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management (1986-1998), 37(1), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65–122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglio, R. P., Jr. (2010). Public service reform and motivation: Evidence from an employment at-will environment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30, 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxx, W. R., Odom, R. Y., & Dunn, M. G. (1991). Organizational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion: An empirical examination within the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 20, 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimhall, K. C. (2019a). Inclusion is important…But how do i include? Examining the effects of leader engagement on inclusion, innovation, job satisfaction, and perceived quality of care in a diverse nonprofit health care organization. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48, 716–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimhall, K. C. (2019b). Inclusion and commitment as key pathways between leadership and nonprofit performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, E. (2003). Are nonprofit organizations. In The study of nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches, p. 239.

  • Buelens, M., & Van den Broeck, H. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public administration review, 67(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., & Gefen, D. (2010). The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. A. (2014). Nonprofit managers’ motivational styles: A view beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(4), 737–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demircioglu, M. A., & Berman, E. (2018). Effects of the innovation climate on turnover intention in the Australian Public Service. The American Review of Public Administration, 49, 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure, and innovativeness of organizations. Stockholm: F. A. Institute, Report I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, M. K. (2006). National Administrative Studies Project III: A survey of managers in public and non-profit organizations in Georgia and Illinois: Summary report. University of Georgia.

  • Feeney, M. K., & Rainey, H. G. (2010). Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: Distinctions due to institutional and political accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 801–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. L., Dwyer, D. J., & Ganster, D. C. (1993). Effects of stressful job demands and control on physiological and attitudinal outcomes in a hospital setting. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 289–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behavior. Research Policy, 32, 715–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady, D. O. (1992). Promoting innovations in the public sector. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M. (2010). Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 28–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Singhal, A. (1993). Managing human resources for innovation and creativity. Research-Technology Management, 36(3), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. B. (1995). The correlates of innovation: Lessons from best practice. Public Productivity & Management Review, 19, 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, P. W. (1993). Of pigs in pokes and policy diffusion: Another look at pay-for-performance. Public Administration Review, 53, 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskyte, K., Byerly, C., Bryant, A., & Koksarova, J. (2010). Transforming a nonprofit work environment for creativity: An application of concept mapping. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellough, J. E., & Lu, H. (1993). The paradox of merit pay in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13, 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellough, J. E., & Nigro, L. C. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia state government: Employee perspectives on Georgia Gain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22, 146–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. (2016). Comparison of job satisfaction between nonprofit and public employees. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(2), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J., & Wilkins, V. M. (2011). More similarities or more differences? Comparing public and nonprofit managers’ job motivations. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoux, K., & Feeney, M. K. (2013). Factors attracting individuals to nonprofit management over public and private sector management. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(3), 465–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonti, Z., & Verma, A. (2003). The determinants of flexibility and innovation in the government workplace: Recent evidence from Canada. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 283–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. E. (2007). An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations: The role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 256–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis Johnson, J., & Ng, E. S. (2016). Money talks or millenials walk: The effect of compensation on nonprofit millenial workers sector-switching intentions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray, A. J., Islam, M., Sarros, J. C., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2013). Workplace innovation in a nonprofit organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(3), 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G. T., & Wigdor, A. K. (1991). Pay for performance: Evaluating performance appraisal and merit pay. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, R. Y., Boxx, W. R., & Dunn, M. G. (1990). Organizational cultures, commitment, satisfaction, and cohesion. Public Productivity & Management Review, 14, 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piatak, J. S. (2017). Sector switching in good times and in bad: Are public sector employees less likely to change sectors? Public Personnel Management, 46(4), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A. E. (1989). The nonprofit worker in a for-profit world. Journal of Labor Economics, 7(4), 438–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pynes, J. E. (2008). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations: A strategic approach (Vol. 30). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder, H. G., & McCandless, A. (2010). Influences on the architecture of human resource management in nonprofit organizations: An analytical framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronquillo, J. C., Miller, A., & Drury, I. (2017). Trends in nonprofit employment. In J. K. A. Word & J. E. Sowa (Eds.), The nonprofit human resource management handbook: From theory to practice (pp. 29–43). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. L., & Perrin, C. (2018). Managing conflicts in the nonprofit sector through organizational culture change. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2016-0254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidel, J. R. (1991). Resource interdependence: The relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 51, 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (2012). The state of nonprofit America. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauermann, H., & Cohen, W. M. (2010). What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Science, 56(12), 2134–2153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stater, K. J., & Stater, M. (2019). Is it “just work”? The impact of work rewards on job satisfaction and turnover intent in the nonprofit, for-profit, and public sectors. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, J. (2018). Human capital inflow in nonprofits: Entry-level employees’ sector shift. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 28(4), 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & Zatzick, C. D. (2019). Human capital acquisition and organizational innovation: A temporal perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51, 355–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA

    John C. Ronquillo

  2. Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

    Andrea Popa

  3. Department of Management, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Vienna, Austria

    Jurgen Willems

Authors
  1. John C. Ronquillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Popa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jurgen Willems
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. Ronquillo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ronquillo, J.C., Popa, A. & Willems, J. Toward an Understanding of the Role of Human Resources in Cultivating a Climate for Innovation in Nonprofit and Public Organizations. Voluntas 32, 1126–1138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00325-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00325-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation