MOF@POP core–shell architecture as synergetic catalyst for high-efficient CO2 fixation without cocatalyst under mild conditions
Graphical abstract
A porous MOF@POP core-shell catalyst (NH2-UiO-66(Hf)@CoTPy-CAP) was successfully designed and constructed. The presence of Lewis acidic sites (Hf clusters in NH2-UiO-66(Hf) and porphyrin Co(II) sites in CoTPy-CAP) as electrophilic center and a sterically hindered nucleophilic center (bromine ions in CoTPy-CAP) gives NH2-UiO-66(Hf)@CoTPy-CAP the potential to act as bifunctional synergetic catalyst for the cycloaddition of CO2 and epoxides under cocatalyst-free and mild conditions. The results showed that NH2-UiO-66(Hf)@CoTPy-CAP can synergetically catalyze the cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides.
Introduction
Carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the main causes of climate damage and global warming, is also an inexpensive, non-toxic and abundant C1 feed stock [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Using CO2 as raw material to prepare variety of value-based fine chemicals is an effective way to realize carbon reduction and reutilization [5,6]. Cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides to prepare cyclic carbonates (CCs), not only on account of its 100 % atom efficiency but also great industrial applications of CCs, such as electrolyte components in lithium batteries [7], intermediates for the production of plastics [8], pharmaceuticals [9], polar aprotic solvents [10] and other fine chemicals [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. However, the low reactivity of catalysts and the kinetic inertias of CO2 limit the extensive industrial production of CCs. Therefore, to develop and find a high quality production technology and highly active catalyst is of important practical significance. Up to now, some homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts have been received wide coverage for the preparation of CCs [[17], [18], [19]]. Heterogeneous catalysts, like functional polymers [20], metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [21], zeolites [22], metal oxides [23] and graphite oxide [24], etc., have several advantages over homogenous catalysts due to their simple method of separation, sample treatment, and reusability. Among them, MOFs, due to excellent properties including large BET surface area, tunable pore architectures and diverse functionalities, make them extensively developed as ideal heterogeneous catalysts for CO2 fixation [[25], [26], [27]]. MOFs possessing coordinatively unsaturated metal center as Lewis acidic sites have excellent activation ability for epoxides to result in the ring-opening of epoxides much easier [[28], [29], [30], [31]]. Further, MOFs with functional groups can activate the CO2 molecules easily by a nucleophilic attack, such as amino-group [32,33]. Thus, MOFs are an appropriate candidate for catalyzing the cycloaddition of CO2. Han group synthesized CCs for the first time using a MOF-5/n-Bu4NBr catalytic system in 2009 [34]. Since then, Zhou group reported a Zr-porphyrin MOFs (PCN-224) and revealed superior catalytic activity for the cycloaddition of CO2 [35]. However, cocatalysts, for example tetraalkyl ammonium halides, are needed in most MOFs catalytic system, which complicate the separation and purification process because of their homogeneous nature. To solve this problem, it is a rational method that nucleophilic functional groups and MOFs are combined to create the bifunctional materials for cycloaddition of CO2, such as ionic liquid (IL) functionalized MOFs via post-synthesis modification [[36], [37], [38]].
Recent years, bifunctional materials, are composed with two active sites, have become research hotspots in catalysis [[39], [40], [41], [42], [43]]. The advisable combination of two different active functional sites can produce bifunctional catalysts that synergistically boost a lot of organic reactions that cannot be readily or efficiently catalyzed by catalysts with only a single functional site [[44], [45], [46]]. As a member of the bifunctional materials family, core-shell MOFs materials have attracted extensive research interest due to fascinating topologies and remarkable chemical performances. The core-shell MOFs materials can maintain the excellent properties of core and shell components through the synergistic effect, and effectively overcome the defects of single components, which can expand their application in diverse fields [[47], [48], [49], [50], [51]]. Compared with other reported bifunctional materials [[52], [53], [54]], the core-shell MOFs materials have better performances, such as the following: (1) Improve the stability of the frameworks. Using a material with strong stability as the shell to protect the poorly stable MOFs core can improve its stability to a certain extent [55]. (2) Promote selective gas separation and adsorption. The pore size of single MOFs materials is too large to effectively separate gas molecules of different sizes. If the shell components with appropriate pore size are synthesized on its surface, it can not only separate the small gas molecules from the shell, but also store the large gas molecules in the core, so as to achieve the dual purpose of separation and adsorption [56]. (3) Optimize the performance of nonporous materials. The core-shell structure composed of MOFs and nonporous materials, especially when MOFs materials are used as shell components, can generate uniform, ordered and porous core-shell structure by controlling the conditions, which can enhance the performance of the nonporous materials [57]. Importantly, as a single catalytic system, the core-shell MOFs materials are simple in preparation, increase the active sites and maintain their respective advantages [58]. A core-shell MOFs@COFs (NH2-MIL-101(Fe)@NTU) material synthesized by Li group observably improved conversion and selectivity of the styrene oxidation reaction [59]. In our group’s previous research, a novel core-shell MOF@POP(UiO-66@SNW-1) with acid-base sites was constructed as bifunctional catalyst for tandem deacetalization-Knoevenagel reaction [58]. Every coin has a flip side, core-shell MOFs materials are immature in industrial application, and there are still several deficiencies. On the one hand, the synthesis of core-shell MOFs materials is usually complex and the reaction conditions are harsh, which put forward to strict demand for the stability of MOFs, on the other hand, the special construction characteristics make them difficult for large-size substrates to diffuse during the catalysis. Therefore, the value of scientific research on core-shell MOFs materials is worth investigating, and it will be a meaningful research to explore their application in the field of catalysis.
In the light of these observations and our previous works, we reported a porous MOF@POP core-shell architecture (NH2-UiO-66(Hf)@CoTPy-CAP), which was prepared by introducing NH2-UiO-66(Hf) in the synthesis of CoTPy-CAP (Fig. 1). So far, to be best of our knowledge, the ionic porphyrin-based POP and MOF are incorporated in a catalyst system to form core-shell architecture as the bifunctional catalyst for cycloaddition of CO2 has not been reported. Coating on NH2-UiO-66(Hf) with CoTPy-CAP shell to form core-shell MOF@POP architecture not only increases the exposure degree of active sites in CoTPy-CAP but also Hf clusters presented in
NH2-UiO-66(Hf) can also increase Lewis acidic sites of the whole catalyst. Meanwhile, pyridyl quaternary ammonium bromides were introduced into the metal-porphyrin, thus leading to a bifunctional synergetic catalyst in one system. Under mild conditions, the resulting MOF@POP architecture revealed high catalytic activity, indicating that porphyrin Co(II), Hf clusters and quaternary ammonium bromides could synergistically act on the ring-opening of epoxides and succeeding CO2 insertion.
Section snippets
Chemicals and reagents
4-pyridinecarboxaldehyde, pyrrole, cobalt(II) acetate tetrachloride (Co(OAc)2·4H2O, 99 %), 2,4,6-tris(bromomethyl)mesitylene (TBMBr), hafnium(IV) chloride (HfCl4, 99 %), 2-aminoterephthalic acid (H2BDC-NH2), formic acid, tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBABr), propylene oxide (PO), 1,2-epoxybutane, allyl glycidyl ether, 1-butoxy-2,3-epoxypropane and styrene oxide were all purchased from Aladdin and used directly. THF, DMF, CHCl3, methanol, propionic acid, CH2Cl2, hexane, ethanol were analytical
Characterizations of catalysts
The core-shell MOF@POP catalyst was prepared through adding NH2-UiO-66(Hf) nanocrystal into the synthesis of CoTPy-CAP. As you can see from Fig. 2a, the diffraction peak of the core-shell NH2-UiO-66(Hf)@CoTPy-CAP catalyst is in great accordance with the simulated and experimental PXRD patterns of NH2-UiO-66(Hf) owing to the weak intensity of CoTPy-CAP, which provides solid evidence on the successful preparation of the MOF@POP catalyst. CoTPy-CAP is similar with previous reported cationic
Conclusions
In conclusion, ionic porphyrin-based POP shell and NH2-UiO-66(Hf) core were assembled to constructe a core@shell catalyst (NH2-UiO-66(Hf)@CoTPy-CAP) and firstly was applied in the cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides. The core-shell architecture with porphyrin Co(II) of CoTPy-CAP and Hf clusters of NH2-UiO-66(Hf) as Lewis acidic sites, and bromine ions as nucleophilic centers can high efficiently catalyze the CO2 cycloaddition reaction under cocatalyst-free and mild conditions. The results
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yue Zhang: Writing - original draft, Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization. Lin Liu: Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Wei-Guo Xu: Writing - review & editing. Zheng-Bo Han: Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no competing financial interest.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21671090 and 21701076), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1802125), and Liaoning Province Doctor Startup Fund (20180540056) for financial support of this work.
References (78)
- et al.
Coord. Chem. Rev.
(2011) - et al.
Appl. Catal. B-Environ.
(2017) - et al.
Carbon
(2015) - et al.
Coord. Chem. Rev.
(2019) - et al.
J. CO₂ Util.
(2020) - et al.
Coord. Chem. Rev.
(2019) Mat. Sci. Eng. C
(2019)- et al.
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
(2018) - et al.
Renew. Energ.
(2019) - et al.
Appl. Catal. A-Gen.
(2017)
Fuel. Process. Technol.
Chem. Eng. J.
Chem. Eng. J.
Chem. Eng. J.
J. Clean. Prod.
J. Mol. Liq.
Chem. Eng. Sci.
Polyhedron
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con.
J. Solid State Chem.
Catal. Today
Chem. Rev.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Science
Chem. Sci.
Energ. Environ. Sci.
Nat. Commun.
Chem. Rev.
J. Med. Chem.
Green Chem.
Nat. Commun.
Chem. Commun.
Chem. Rec.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
ACS Catal.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Nat. Commun.
Cited by (19)
Design of composite based on UiO-66 and ionic liquid for the CO<inf>2</inf> conversion into cyclocarbonate
2024, Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsFacile prepared 2D Ni-based metal-organic framework nanosheets for boosting one-pot catalytic synthesis of cyclic carbonates
2023, Chemical Engineering ScienceCarbon dioxide conversion into propylene carbonate using meso-substituted free-base and Co(II)metalloporphyrins
2023, CO2-Philic Polymers, Nanocomposites and Solvents: Capture, Conversion and Industrial ProductsConstruction of core-shell MOFs@ionic liquid materials and their performance for CO<inf>2</inf> cycloaddition reaction under atmospheric pressure
2023, Ranliao Huaxue Xuebao/Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology