Abstract
Although its economic importance, bauxite mining causes the loss of natural ecosystems. In this sense, the Technosols building from materials made or modified by man, such as mine tailings, is necessary for recovering degraded areas. Additionally, the Technosols management, such as subsoiling and liming, increases chances of plants establishment and growth. In this study, a degraded area by bauxite mining with constructed Technosol in the Eastern Amazon, Brazil, was tested under three different soil management treatments: Technosol-1 (Tech-1), Liming only; Technosol-2 (Tech-2), Subsoiling + 200 g of NPK in the pit; Technosol-3 (Tech-3), Scarification + liming + all Tech-2 procedures. In every treatment and in a reference forest (R-forest), 8 years after the initial seedling planting, three types of indicators were assessed: structural (horizontal vegetation structure, density of natural regeneration, and soil cover), compositional (species diversity, ecological groups, and dispersal syndromes), and functional (chemical properties of Technosols and dry matter and nutrients from the litter stock). The most representative species in all treatments were Croton matourensis and Vismia guianensis, both coming from the natural regeneration and common in early successional stages. Coverage rates in all treatments showed less than 5% of exposed Technosol and the diversity, ecological group, and dispersal syndrome indexes followed a successful trajectory along 8 years. Tech-2 and Tech-3 presented the best chemical attributes and nutrients in the litter stock, but they would probably last several decades to reach the R-forest attributes. Thus, subsoiling alone or with liming provided the best chemical results for soil, litter, and vegetation performance, being recommended to speed up restoration of degrades areas by bauxite mining in the Amazon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABAL (2019) Associação Brasileira do Alumínio. Estatísticas Nacionais—Bauxita, São Paulo
Aerts R, Honnay O (2011) Forest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BMC Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-11-29
Ahirwal J, Maiti SK (2018) Development of Technosol properties and recovery of carbon stock after 16 years of revegetation on coal mine degraded lands, India. CATENA 166:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.026
Ahirwal J, Maiti SK, Reddy MS (2017) Development of carbon, nitrogen and phosphate stocks of reclaimed coal mine soil within 8years after forestation with Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) Dc. CATENA 156:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.03.019
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC et al (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Amaral DD, Viera ICG, Salomão RP et al (2009) Checklist da flora arbórea de remanescentes florestais da região metropolitana de Belém, Pará, Brasil. Bol do Mus Para Emilio Goeldi Ciências Nat 4:231–289
Amaral DD, Jardim MAG, Costa Neto SV, Bastos MNC (2015) Síndromes de dispersão de propágulos e a influência da Floresta Amazônica na composição de espécies lenhosas de uma restinga no litoral norte brasileiro. Biota Amaz 5:28–37. https://doi.org/10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v5n3p28-37
Balestrin D, Martins SV, Schoorl JM et al (2019) Phytosociological study to define restoration measures in a mined area in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Ecol Eng 135:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.04.023
Bandyopadhyay S, Maiti SK (2019) Evaluation of ecological restoration success in mining-degraded lands. Environ Qual Manag 28:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21641
Bertacchi MIF, Amazonas NT, Brancalion PHS et al (2016) Establishment of tree seedlings in the understory of restoration plantations: natural regeneration and enrichment plantings. Restor Ecol 24:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12290
Bizuti DTG, de Soares TM, Duarte MM et al (2020) Recovery of soil phosphorus on former bauxite mines through tropical forest restoration. Restor Ecol 28:776–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12735
Borges SR, Santos RS, Oliveira DMS et al (2019) Practices for rehabilitating bauxite-mined areas and an integrative approach to monitor soil quality. Land Degrad Dev 30:866–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3273
Brancalion PHS, Holl KD (2016) Functional composition trajectory: a resolution to the debate between Suganuma, Durigan, and Reid. Restor Ecol 24:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12312
Buol SW, Sanchez PA, Cate RB, Jr. Granger M. (1975) Soil fertility capability classification. In: Bornemisza E, Alvarado A (eds) Soil management in tropical America. Raleigh, pp 126–140
Byng JW, Chase MW, Christenhusz MJM, et al (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc 1–20
Caldeira MVW, Godinho TDO, Moreira FL et al (2019) Litter as an ecological indicator of forest restoration processes in a dense ombrophylous lowland forest. Florest Ambient 26:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.041118
Cambi M, Certini G, Neri F, Marchi E (2015) The impact of heavy traffic on forest soils: a review. For Ecol Manag 338:124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.022
Carlucci MB, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR et al (2020) Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration. Restor Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13279
Cassol HLG, Shimabukuro YE, de Carreiras JMB, Moraes EC (2018) Improved tree height estimation of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amaz 48:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201700844
Chazdon R (2012) Regeneração de florestas tropicais. Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi Cienc Nat 7:195–218
Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR (2016) Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48:716–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12381
CNCFLORA (2020) Centro Nacional de Conservação da Flora. Hymenaea parvifolia Huber—extinction risk assessment information. http://cncflora.jbrj.gov.br/portal/pt-br/profile/Hymenaeaparvifolia. Accessed 22 Nov 2020
Crouzeilles R, Curran M, Ferreira MS et al (2016) A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nat Commun 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11666
Crouzeilles R, Ferreira MS, Chazdon RL et al (2017) Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests. Sci Adv 3:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701345
Cruz DC, Benayas JMR, Ferreira GC, Ribeiro SS (2020) Tree communities in three-year-old post-mining sites under different forest restoration techniques in the Brazilian Amazon. Forests 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050527
Gupta SD, Kirby W, Pinno BD (2019) Effects of stockpiling and organic matter addition on nutrient bioavailability in reclamation soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.07.0273
Daws MI, Standish RJ, Koch JM et al (2015) Forest ecology and management phosphorus fertilisation and large legume species affect jarrah forest restoration after bauxite mining. For Ecol Manag 354:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.003
Daws MI, Grigg AH, Tibbett M, Standish RJ (2019) Enduring effects of large legumes and phosphorus fertiliser on jarrah forest restoration 15 years after bauxite mining. For Ecol Manag 438:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.029
Desie E, Vancampenhout K, Nyssen B et al (2020a) Litter quality and the law of the most limiting: Opportunities for restoring nutrient cycles in acidified forest soils. Sci Total Environ 699:134383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134383
Desie E, Vancampenhout K, van den Berg L et al (2020b) Litter share and clay content determine soil restoration effects of rich litter tree species in forests on acidified sandy soils. For Ecol Manag 474:118377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118377
Domínguez-Haydar Y, Velásquez E, Carmona J et al (2019) Evaluation of reclamation success in an open-pit coal mine using integrated soil physical, chemical and biological quality indicators. Ecol Indic 103:182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.015
Dudley N, Bhagwat SA, Harris J et al (2018) Measuring progress in status of land under forest landscape restoration using abiotic and biotic indicators. Restor Ecol 26:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12632
Duncan C, Good MK, Sluiter I et al (2020) Soil reconstruction after mining fails to restore soil function in an Australian arid woodland. Restor Ecol 28:A35–A43. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13166
Durigan G, Suganuma MS (2015) Why species composition is not a good indicator to assess restoration success? Counter-response to Reid (2015). Restor Ecol 23:521–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12272
Evju M, Hagen D, Kyrkjeeide MO, Köhler B (2020) Learning from scientific literature: Can indicators for measuring success be standardized in “on the ground” restoration? Restor Ecol 28:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13149
Feng Y, Wang J, Bai Z, Reading L (2019) Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 191:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.015
Fengler FH, Bressane A, Carvalho MM et al (2017) Forest restoration assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: a new clustering-based methodology considering the reference ecosystem. Ecol Eng 108:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.008
Festin ES, Tigabu M, Chileshe MN et al (2019) Progresses in restoration of post-mining landscape in Africa. J For Res 30:381–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0621-x
Flora do Brasil (2020) em construção Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro
Forján R, Rodríguez-Vila A, Covelo EF (2019) Increasing the nutrient content in a mine soil through the application of Technosol and biochar and grown with Brassica juncea L. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0027-6
Gastauer M, Silva JR, Caldeira CF Jr et al (2018) Mine land rehabilitation: modern ecological approaches for more sustainable mining. J Clean Prod 172:1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.223
Gastauer M, Souza Filho PWM, Ramos SJ et al (2019) Mine land rehabilitation in Brazil: goals and techniques in the context of legal requirements. Ambio 48:74–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1053-8
Gastauer M, Caldeira CF, Ramos SJ et al (2020) Active rehabilitation of Amazonian sand mines converges soils, plant communities and environmental status to their predisturbance levels. Land Degrad Dev 31:607–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3475
Gatica-Saavedra P, Echeverría C, Nelson CR (2017) Ecological indicators for assessing ecological success of forest restoration: a world review. Restor Ecol 25:850–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12586
Grau O, Peñuelas J, Ferry B et al (2017) Nutrient-cycling mechanisms other than the direct absorption from soil may control forest structure and dynamics in poor Amazonian soils. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45017
Guedes RS, Ramos SJ, Gastauer M et al (2020) Phosphorus lability increases with the rehabilitation advance of iron mine land in the eastern Amazon. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08365-4
Guerra A, Reis LK, Borges FLG et al (2020) Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: identifying advances and gaps. For Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117802
Horodecki P, Jagodziński AM (2017) Tree species effects on litter decomposition in pure stands on afforested post-mining sites. For Ecol Manag 406:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.059
Horodecki P, Nowiński M, Jagodziński AM (2019) Advantages of mixed tree stands in restoration of upper soil layers on postmining sites: a five-year leaf litter decomposition experiment. L Degrad Dev 30:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3194
IBGE. Intituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2012) Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, 106th edn. Rome
Kauano ÉE, Cardoso FCG, Torezan JMD, Marques MCM (2013) Micro- and meso-scale factors affect the restoration of Atlantic Forest. Nat Conserv 11:145–151. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2013.023
Kneller T, Harris RJ, Bateman A, Muñoz-rojas M (2018) Native-plant amendments and topsoil addition enhance soil function in post-mining arid grasslands. Sci Total Environ 621:744–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.219
Kollmann J, Meyer ST, Bateman R et al (2016) Integrating ecosystem functions into restoration ecology—recent advances and future directions. Restor Ecol 24:722–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12422
Kotschoubey B, Calaf JMC, Lobato a CC, et al (2005) Caracterização e gênese dos depósitos de bauxita da Província Bauxitífera de Paragominas, noroeste da Bacia do Grajú, nordeste do Pará/oeste do Maranhão. In: Marini OJ, Queiroz ET de, Ramos BW (eds) Caracterização de depósitos minerais em distritos mineiros da Amazônia, 1st edn. Brasília, pp 687–782
Laughlin DC, Strahan RT, Moore MM et al (2017) The hierarchy of predictability in ecological restoration: are vegetation structure and functional diversity more predictable than community composition? J Appl Ecol 54:1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12935
Liu X, Liu S (2020) Introduction to the special issue: Biodiversity mechanism in natural succession and ecological restoration. Ecol Eng 143:105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105614
Londe V, Sousa HC, Kozovits AR (2016) Litterfall as an indicator of productivity and recovery of ecological functions in a rehabilitated riparian forest at Das Velhas River, southeast Brazil. Trop Ecol 57:355–360
Lorenzi H (2008) Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. Plantarum, Nova Odessa
Lorenzi H (2009a) Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil, Nova Odessa
Lorenzi H (2009b) Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil, 2nd edn. Nova Odessa
Macdonald SE, Landhäusser SM, Skousen J et al (2015) Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: challenges and solutions. New For 46:703–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9506-4
Machado MR, Sampaio PTB, Ferraz J et al (2016) Nutrient retranslocation in forest species in the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Sci 38:93–101. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i1.26805
Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Oliveira SA (1997) Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas. Piracicaba
Martins WBR, Ferreira GC, Souza FP et al (2018) Deposição de serapilheira e nutrientes em áreas de mineração submetidas a métodos de restauração florestal em Paragominas, Pará. Floresta 48:37–48. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v48
Martins WBR, Vale RL, Ferreira GC et al (2018) Litterfall, litter stock and water holding capacity in post-mining forest restoration ecosystems, Eastern Amazon. Rev Bras Ciencias Agrar 13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v13i3a5546
Martins WBR, Lima MDR, Barros UO Jr et al (2020) Ecological methods and indicators for recovering and monitoring ecosystems after mining: a global literature review. Ecol Eng 145:105707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105707
Martins WBR, dos Barros WS, Dionísio LFS et al (2020) Survival, growth and regeneration of forest species in mining areas in the Eastern Amazonia. Sci Plena 16:1–13. https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2020.060204
Meira MS Jr, Pereira IM, Mendonça EL et al (2015) Potential species for recovery areas Semideciduos Forest in iron exploration in the Serra Espinhaço. Biosci J 31:283–295
Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW (2015) Towards a standardized rapid ecosystem function assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.04.006
Miranda Neto A, Martins SV, Silva KA et al (2015) Litter production and leaf litter decomposition in mined area in restoration process in southeast Brazil. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 9:321–327
Monsels DA, Van Bergen MJ (2019) Bauxite formation on tertiary sediments in the coastal plain of Suriname. J South Am Earth Sci 89:275–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2018.10.010
Nsiah PK, Schaaf W (2019) The potentials of biological geotextiles in erosion and sediment control during gold mine reclamation in Ghana. J Soils Sediments 19:1995–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2217-7
Onésimo CMG, Dias DD, Beirão M et al (2020) Ecological succession in areas degraded by bauxite mining indicates successful use of topsoil. Restor Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13303
Pereira LCSM, Oliveira CCC, Torezan JMD (2013) Woody species regeneration in Atlantic Forest restoration sites depends on surrounding landscape. Nat Conserv 11:138–144. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2013.022
Prach K, Durigan G, Fennessy S et al (2019) A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success. Restor Ecol 27:917–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13011
Quintela-Sabarís C, L’Huillier L, Mouchon LC et al (2018) Chemico-mineralogical changes of ultramafic topsoil during stockpiling: implications for post-mining restoration. Ecol Res 33:767–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-018-1609-x
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rezende GM, Vieira DLM (2019) Forest restoration in southern Amazonia: soil preparation triggers natural regeneration. For Ecol Manag 433:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.049
Ribeiro RA, Giannini TC, Gastauer M, Awade M (2018) Topsoil application during the rehabilitation of a manganese tailing dam increases plant taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity. J Environ Manag 227:386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.060
Rocha-Nicoleite E, Campos ML, Colombo GT et al (2018) Forest restoration after severe degradation by coal mining: lessons from the first years of monitoring. Rev Bras Bot 41:653–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-018-0486-4
Rodrigues TE, Silva RC, Silva JML et al (2003) Caracterização e classificação dos solos do município de Paragominas, estado do Pará. Belém
Ruiz F, Cherubin MR, Ferreira TO (2020) Soil quality assessment of constructed Technosols: towards the validation of a promising strategy for land reclamation, waste management and the recovery of soil functions. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111344
Ruiz-Jaén MC, Aide TM (2005) Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success. For Ecol Manag 218:159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.008
Salomão RP, Brienza S, Nélson J, Rosa A (2014) Dinâmica de reflorestamento em áreas de restauração após mineração em unidade de conservação na Amazônia. Rev Árvore 38:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622014000100001
SER (2004) Science & policy working group. The SER international primer on ecological restoration
Silva WB, Périco E, Dalzochio MS et al (2018) Are litterfall and litter decomposition processes indicators of forest regeneration in the neotropics? Insights from a case study in the Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manag 429:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.020
Souza AL, Soares CPB (2013) Florestas nativas: estrutura, dinâmica e ambiência. Viçosa
Sousa SS, Freitas DAF, Latini AO et al (2020) Iron ore mining areas and their reclamation in Minas Gerais State, Brazil: impacts on soil physical properties. SN Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03457-9
Souza ES, Fernandes AR, Souza Braz AM et al (2018) Physical, chemical, and mineralogical attributes of a representative group of soils from the eastern Amazon region in Brazil. Soil 4:195–212. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-195-2018
Stanturf JA, Palik BJ, Dumroese RK (2014) Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. For Ecol Manag 331:292–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029
Suganuma MS, Durigan G (2015) Indicators of restoration success in riparian tropical forests using multiple reference ecosystems. Restor Ecol 23:238–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12168
Tapia-Coral SC, Luizão F, Pashanasi B et al (2014) Influencia da massa e nutrientes da liteira sobre a composição dos macro-invertebrados em plantíos florestais na Amazônia peruana. Folia Amaz 23:171–186
Teixeira-Santos J, Ribeiro ACC, Wiig Ø et al (2020) Environmental factors influencing the abundance of four species of threatened mammals in degraded habitats in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE 15:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229459
Van der Pijl L (1982) Principles of dispersal in higher plats. Springer, Berlin
Vivanco L, Austin AT (2019) The importance of macro- and micro-nutrients over climate for leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release in Patagonian temperate forests. For Ecol Manag 441:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.019
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38
Wortley L, Hero JM, Howes M (2013) Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restor Ecol 21:537–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12028
Xiao R, Zhang H, Wang Z et al (2019) Foliar litters: Sources of contaminants in phytoremediation sites by returning potentially toxic metals (PTMs) back to soils. Chemosphere 222:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.090
Xiaogai G, Lixiong Z, Wenfa X et al (2013) Effect of litter substrate quality and soil nutrients on forest litter decomposition: a review. Acta Ecol Sin 33:102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.01.006
Zhang H, Yuan W, Dong W, Liu S (2014) Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide. Ecol Complex 20:240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.01.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martins, W.B.R., Schwartz, G., Ribeiro, S.S. et al. Ecosystem restoration after bauxite mining: favorable indicators for Technosols construction and soil management using liming and subsoiling. New Forests 52, 971–994 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09834-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09834-5