Abstract
Governments have created development banks in hopes of accelerating growth. Theoretical growth models that assess the pertinence of these banks are scarce and, none of them analyzes the implication of these banks under weak institutions and underdeveloped financial markets, which are two common problems in poor countries. This article studies the implications of subsidies to producers, a monopoly bank, or to a development bank, for the technology adoption and welfare in a Schumpeterian growth model in which creditors cannot completely eradicate moral hazard. I find that under these circumstances, the innovator will under-invest in research and, although subsidies contribute to a higher level of technology in the economy, they may harm the welfare of the working class. Subsidies to a development bank can be the most effective measure in terms of catching up with advanced economies, but this policy can be the most negative for the economic environment by diverting a large amount of resources from investment in research. Finally, this policy harms workers’ welfare when they finance the subsidy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Among the theoretical works, Roubini and Sala-i Martin (1995) shows that these policies can be inflationary and also harm investment and growth because they reduce investments for a given level of savings. Espinosa and Yip (1996) finds that aggressive binding reserve requirements refrains economic growth. On the contrary, Courakis (1984) demonstrates that ceiling in deposit rates can boost total deposits and loans under certain circumstances.
There are private development banks, but this article will focus only on the public ones. Also, there are public banks without an explicit mandate of promoting growth.
Most of the Schumpeterian models only considers the creation aspect of the process of technological progress. However, Acemoglu et al. (2006) and Vandenbussche et al. (2006) also consider the dimension of adoption. Development banks also engage in this last one by facilitating the importation and adaptation of modern technology.
Laeven et al. (2015) considers that possibility, but the analysis focus on the relevance of financial innovations for growth.
Published in the Global Development Finance of the World Bank.
The data sources are: World Development Indicators of the World Bank for the banking credit and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, Economic Freedom of the World of the Fraser Institute for the legal system, and the World Intellectual Property Organization for the granted patents.
The idea that higher financial development propitiates higher growth has been challenged by several empirical studies. I just want to refer to Cecchetti and Kharroubi (2015), which finds that the growth of the financial sector harms research and development firms that are financially dependent.
A notable example is BNDES, the main development bank of Brazil. One of its sources of funds is the Workers’ Assistance Fund (FAT) which is financed with workers’ contributions to an unemployment insurance program (and other purposes). The workers receive an interest rate far lower than the existing in the market, and because of that, the savings of the workers are “taxed” by this strategy. Although this bank has programs for small and medium enterprises (whose owners would be relatively poor citizens), the bulk of its loans are for larger companies. In addition to a theoretical model and quantitative analysis, a discussion on BNDES can be found in A. Antunes, T. Cavalcanti and A. Villamil, “The Effects of Credit Market Subsidies on Development.” Economic Theory, 1–30, 2015.
References
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Zilibotti, F.: Distantce to frontier, selection and economic growth. J Eur Econ Assoc 4(1), 37–74 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2006.4.1.37
Aghion, P., Howitt, P.: A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2), 323–351 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
Aghion, P., Howitt, P., Mayer-Foulkes, D.: The effect of financial development on convergence: theory and evidence. Q J Econ 120(1), 173–222 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2005.120.1.173
Altunbas, Y., Evans, L., Molyneux, P.: Bank ownership and efficiency. J Money Credit Bank 33(4), 926–954 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2673929
Antunes, A., Cavalcanti, T., Villamil, A.: The effects of credit subsidies on development. Econ Theory (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-014-0808-0
Bencivenga, V.R., Smith, B.D.: Deficits, inflation, and the banking system in developing countries: the optimal degree of financial repression. Oxf Econ Pap 44(4), 767–790 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042074
Blackburn, K., Hung, V.T.Y.: A theory of growth, financial development and trade. Economica 65(257), 107–124 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00116
Cecchetti, S., Kharroubi, E.: Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth? BIS Work Pap 490, 1–31 (2015)
Courakis, A.S.: Constraints on bank choices and financial repression in less developed countries. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 46(4), 341–370 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00116
De Aghion, B.: Development banking. J Dev Econ 58(1), 83–100 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00104-7
Dewatripont, M., Maskin, E.: Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economies. Rev Econ Stud 62(4), 541–555 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/2298076
Espinosa, M., Yip, C.: An endogenous growth model of money, banking, and financial repression. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working paper 96-4(June) (1996)
Gerschenkron, A.: Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1962)
Greenwood, J., Jovanovic, B.: Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. J Polit Econ 98(5), 1076–1107 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1086/261720
Greenwood, J., Sanchez, J.M., Wang, C.: Financing development: the role of information costs. Am Econ Rev 100(4), 1875–1891 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1875
Hasan, I., Wachtel, P., Zhou, M.: Institutional development, financial deepening and economic growth: evidence from China. J Bank Finance 33(1), 157–170 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.016
Holmstrom, B., Tirole, J.: Financial lntermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector. Q J Econ 112(3), 663–691 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401297
Jones, C.: R&D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103(4), 759–784 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1086/262002
Jones, C.: Introduction to Economic Growth, 1st edn. W. W. Norton, New York (1998)
Kane, J.A.: Development Banking: An Economic Appraisal. Lexington Books, Lexington (1975)
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: Government ownership of banks. J Finance 57(1), 265–301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00422. arXiv:1011.1669v3
Laeven, L., Levine, R., Michalopoulos, S.: Financial innovation and endogenous growth. J Financ Intermed 24, 1–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2014.04.001
Lewis, A.: The Principles of Economic Planning, 4th edn. Dennis Dobson and George Allen & Unwin, London (1949)
Lucas, R.E.: On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22(February), 3–42 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
McKinnon, R.: Money and Capital in Economic Development. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (1973)
Morales, M.F.: Financial intermediation in a model of growth through creative destruction. Macroecon Dyn 7(3), 363–393 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100502020138
OECD: OECD Economic Surveys: Brazil 2013. Technical report (2013)
Robinson, J.: The generalization of general theory. The Rate of Interest, and Other Essays, pp. 67–142. Macmillan, London (1952)
Roubini, N., Sala-i Martin, X.: A growth model of inflation, tax evasion, and financial repression. J Monetary Econ 35(2), 275–301 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(95)01192-Q
Sunaga, M.: A Schumpeterian growth model with financial intermediaries. Macroecon Dyn 23(4), 1–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100517000426
Vandenbussche, J., Aghion, P., Meghir, C.: Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital. J Econ Growth 11(2), 97–127 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0887-006-9002-y
Vivarelli, M.: The middle income trap: a way out based on technological and structural change. Econ Change Restruct 49(2–3), 159–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-015-9166-6
World Bank: 2017 Survey of National Development Banks Global Report: Finance. Technical report, Competitiveness and Innovation Global Practice (2018)
Acknowledgements
I am extremely grateful of professors Ph.D. Noritsugu Nakanishi and Ph.D. Yunfang Hu and the rest of participants in the PHD seminar at Kobe University for very valuable comments. The research was conducted during the Ph.D studies of the author. I am also thankful of the MEXT scholarship of the Japanese Government which fully financed my Ph.D. studies. I want to thank Professor Nicole Moskowitz for proofreading this article.
Funding
The research was not directly financed. However, it was part of the Ph.D studies of the author. The Ph.D. program was fully financed by the MEXT scholarship of the Japanese Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This article has only one author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Availability of data and material.
Not applicable.
Code availability.
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Senra Hodelin, R. Development banking under weak institutions and imperfect credit markets. Ann Finance 16, 353–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-020-00372-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-020-00372-2