Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct and Simultaneous Regional Head Election in Indonesia with Government Efforts to Build a Balance of Political and Managerial Approaches

  • Published:
East Asia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to implement government efforts in direct and simultaneous regional head elections by building a balance between politics and managerial in Indonesia. The case studies in this study used direct and simultaneous elections in 2015, 2017, and 2018. Direct and simultaneous regional elections in 2015, 2017, and 2018 were the population in this study, while samples were obtained from primary data and secondary data. There were six observations which included grant funds, voter data, voter participation, SCA neutrality, security and order, and acting for regional head preparation. The policies regarding the regional government law and the election law as well as building the political and managerial balance of the government are expected to be able to anticipate and overcome problems that arise in direct and simultaneous regional head elections. Originality in this study is a new approach in building balance with a managerial approach to governance and the decentralization approach. Besides, it can provide alternative suggestions and input that encourage the development of a balance of political and managerial dimensions of government in direct and simultaneous local elections in Indonesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Irham , Muhammad Aqil (2015) Demokrasi " Muka Dua " Pada Negara Dan Masyarakat( Studi Pemilukada di Lampung. Disertasi Departmen Ilmu Sosiologi FISIP UI.

  2. Rosenbloom, David H. 2013. Teori Administrasi Publik dan Pemisahan Kekuasaan . Ulasan Amerika tentang Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Sagepub.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frederickson , H. George. 1980. New public administration. The University of Albama Press. Tuscaloosa.

  4. Smith, Brian C. (2012). Desentralisasi: Dimensi Wilayah Negara .

  5. Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71 (1), 44-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pewarna, Thomas R. (1987). Memahami Kebijakan Publik . Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frederickson, H. George. Smith, Kevin B., Larimer, Christopher., Dan Licari, Michael J. 2011. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Rutekan. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494369

  8. Smith, BC (1985). Desentralisasi: dimensi teritorial negara . Taylor & Francis.

  9. Mindarti , LI (2016). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik : Menuju Tata Kelola yang Baik . Universitas Brawijaya Press.

  10. Pamudji, P. (1987). TRILOGI KECIL SEDIKIT: KRITIK PRINCIPAL WATCHMAN NEE PIKIRAN PADA KRISTUS, MANUSIA, DAN GEREJA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenbloom David H, Tinjauan Administrasi Publik . Vol. 43, No. 3 (Mei - Juni, 1983), hlm. 219-227. Diterbitkan oleh: Wiley atas nama Masyarakat Amerika untuk Administrasi Publik DOI: 10.2307 / 976330.https: // www.jstor.org/ stable / 976330

  12. Wilson, W. (1887). Studi administrasi. Ilmu Politik Quarterly , 2 (2), 197-222.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Easton, David. ( 1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John, Peter (1998). Analyzing public policy. London: Routledge .

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharkansky, I., & Hofferbert, RI (1969). Dimensi politik negara, ekonomi, dan kebijakan publik. Ulasan ilmu politik Amerika , 63 (3), 867-879.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mereka, Geurts . (2010). Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Abad 21. Belanda: Diinformasikan.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hill, Michael (2005). The public policy process. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crook, RC, & Manor, J. (1998). Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, accountability and performance. Cambridge University Press.

  19. Rosenbloom, D., & Kravchuk, RS (2005). Praktik dan disiplin administrasi publik - Persaingan Persaingan. Administrasi Publik: Memahami Manajemen, Politik, dan Hukum di Sektor Publik , 2-41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenbloom, DH, Kravchuk, RS, & Clerkin , RM (2009). Administrasi publik dan konstitusionalisme demokratis. Administrasi publik: Memahami manajemen, politik, dan hukum di sektor publik , 466-506.

  21. Ribot, JC (2004). Waiting for democracy. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC .

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. World Bank.

  23. Agrawal, A., & Ribot, JC (2000). Analyzing decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African environmental cases. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hill, MJ, & Hupe, PL (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice (No. 04; H97, H5.). London: Sage.

  25. Hill, Michael ., Dan Peter Hupe ., 2002. Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kaimowitz , D., & Angelsen , A. (1998). Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. Cifor .

  27. Grindle, Merilee S. 2007. Going local: decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Surbakti, RA (1992). Keterkaitan antara kekuatan agama dan politik di bawah Orde Baru Indonesia.

  29. Moertopo, A. (1974). Politik Dan Bahan Baku: Tantangan Dunia Saat Ini Dan Konsekuensinya Terhadap Kebijakan Dalam Negeri. Ekonomi dan Keuangan di Indonesia , 22 , 285-292.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Creswell, John W. 2012. Penelitian Desain: Pendekatan Kualitatif , Kuantitatif Dan Mixed. Yogyakarta. Pustakan Pelajar .

  31. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). Tipologi umum desain penelitian yang menampilkan metode campuran. Penelitian di Sekolah , 13 (1), 12-28.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, B. C. (1998). Pemerintah daerah dan transisi menuju demokrasi: artikel ulasan. Administrasi Publik dan Pengembangan , 18 , 85-92. 10.1002/ (SICI) 1099-162 X ( 199802) 18: 1 <85 :: AID- PAD979> 3.3.CO; 2-Z

Download references

Funding

This study was self-funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akmal Malik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, A., Supriyono, B., Hermawan et al. Direct and Simultaneous Regional Head Election in Indonesia with Government Efforts to Build a Balance of Political and Managerial Approaches. East Asia 37, 261–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09341-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09341-y

Keywords

Navigation