Abstract
Neutrality is intended to guarantee national security, promote peace, and maximize national interest. The Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission (NNSC) was established in 1953 after the Korean War and was intended to maintain armistice and promote peace on the Korean Peninsula. The NNSC contributed to making the Peninsula more stable. The neutral powers of Switzerland and Sweden, two members designated by one side of the two opposing sides, however, became much weaker over time due to the one-sided structure and its lack of independence from the United Nations Command (UNC). In particular, five preconditions to make neutrality credibly work rarely existed. This examination generates crucial conclusions in terms of the inherent purposes of neutrality, its sustainability, and policy options taken for future consideration. This finding can also be applicable to other neutral states or neutrality-seeking candidates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For all contents of the law of neutrality made by the 1907 Hague Conventions, see [40].
Joseon Korea refers to the 1392–1897 Korean dynasty and 1897–1910 the Korean Empire.
Indian Prime Minister said that “Indian neutrality is not passive but dynamic.” (see [15]).
UNSCR 84 recommends the establishment of a unified command under the USA. Then, the USA has named this unit the UNC. For an original document of UNSCR 84, see [35].
The Korean Armistice Agreement was aimed at “establishing an armistice which will ensure a complete cessation of hostilities and of all acts of armed force in Korea until a final peaceful settlement is achieved.” (see [33]).
References
Altfeld, Michael F. (1984). The Decision to Ally: A Theory and Test. The Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 523-544.
Andrey, Marjorie. (2010). Security Implications of Neutrality: Switzerland in the Partnership for Peace Framework. Connections, 9(4), 83-96.
Bennett, Scott D. (1997). Testing Alternative Models of Alliance Duration, 1816-1984. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 846-878.
Binter, Josef. (1989). Neutrality, European Community and World Peace: The Case of Austria. Journal of Peace Research, 26(4), 413-418.
dvids. (2019). Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission Change of Responsibility. 30 May, 2019. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/5413992/neutral-nations-supervisory-commission-change-responsibility. Accessed 20 December 2019.
Fischer, Thomas, Juhana Aunesluoma, and Aryo Makko. (2016). Neutrality and Nonalignment in World Politics during the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 4-11.
Forde, Steven. (1995). International Realism and the Science of Politics: Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Neorealism. International Studies Quarterly, 39(2), 141-160.
Greig, Michael J., and Patrick M. Ragan. (2008). When do they say yes? An analysis of the willingness to offer and accept mediation in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly, 2(4), 759-781.
Hagglof, M. Gunnar. (1960). A Test of Neutrality: Sweden in the Second World War. International Affairs, 36(2), 153-167.
Hakovirta, Harto. (1983). The Soviet Union and the Varieties of Neutrality in Western Europe. World Politics, 35(4), 563-585.
Hancock, M. Donald. (1972). Sweden, Scandinavia and the EEC. International Affairs, 48(3), 424-437.
Jervis, Robert. (1988). War and Misperception. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 675-700.
Keesing’s Record of World Events. (1955). South Korean Demands for Withdrawal of Neutral Nations’ Supervisory Commission. Vol. 10. August. http://web.stanford.edu/group/tomzgroup/pmwiki/uploads/2244-1955-Keesings-a-LIZ.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2020.
Kim, Yong-bin. (2018). Mujangjungnipkuk sŭwisŭŭi che2ch’a segyedaejŏnsi kukkabisangdaebi sayewa kyohun [A Study on the Switzerland National Emergency Preparedness in the Second World War]. Chŏlyagyŏn’gu, 25(1), 181-204.
Kripalani, Acharya J. B. (1959). A New Appraisal of Indian Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, October. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/1959-10-01/principled-neutrality. Accessed 5 January 2020.
Levy, Jack. S. (1983). Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems. World Politics, 36(1), 76-99.
Mueller, Wolfgang. (2016). The USSR and Permanent Neutrality in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 148-179.
New Republic. (1977). When Isolationism Died. 177(24), 2-3.
Noh, Ji-won. (2020). UN Command says both Koreas violated Armistice Agreement in gunfire across DMZ. Hankyoreh, 27 May, 2020. http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_northkorea/946745.html Accessed 7 June 2020.
Ock, Hyun-ju. (2018). [2018 Inter-Korean summit] Behind-the-scenes stories unveiled. The Korea Herald, 30 April, 2018. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20180430000644 Accessed 7 June 2020.
Oh, Seok-min. (2019). UNC vows commitment to supporting full implementation of inter-Korean military pact. YonhapNews, 19 September, 2019. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20190919006700325. Accessed 26 December 2019.
Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/neutrality?q=neutrality. Accessed 3 January 2020.
Pacific Air Forces. (2015). Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission visits 607th AOC. 26 August 2015. https://www.pacaf.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/614957/neutral-nations-supervisory-commission-visits-607th-aoc/. Accessed 14 December 2019.
Park, Tae-gyun. (2019). Migugŭi taehanjŏngch’aegŭl t’ongae pon hanbando chungnipkukhwa pangan [The Possibility of Korea’s Neutralization from the US Policy]. Han’gukkwa kukchejŏngch’i, 35(3), 67-96.
Partem, Michael Greenfield. (1983). The Buffer System in International Relations. The Journal of Conflict, 27(1), 3-26.
Quensel, Remi. (2013). Swiss mark 60 years of military presence in Korea. SWI, 26 July 2013. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/border-watch_swiss-mark-60-years-of-military-presence-in-korea/36541100. Accessed 6 January 2020.
Rabiroff, Jon. (2010). Uncollected paperwork a sign of DMZ battle of wills. Stars and Stripes. 3 February 2010. https://www.stripes.com/news/uncollected-paperwork-a-sign-of-dmz-battle-of-wills-1.98578. Accessed 28 December 2019.
Regeringskansliet. (2019). 2019 Joint Statement by Neural Nations Supervisory Commission Member States. 27 March 2019. https://www.regeringen.se/uttalanden/2019/03/2019-joint-statement-by-neutral-nations-supervisory-commission-member-states/. Accessed 15 January 2020.
Shin, Sang-bum. (2019). The Korean Peninsula, Armistice to Peace. Seoul: Hannurimijiŏ.
Sutter, Peter. (1997). Chungnipkuk kamdogwiwŏnhoe (NNSC) kaibŭl wihan sŏnjejogŏni toenŭn sŭwisŭŭi chungnipchuŭi [Neutrality as Prerequisite for Switzerland’s Participation in the NNSC]. Kukchejiyŏgyŏn’gu, 1(3), 116-120.
Svensson, Isak. (2009). Who Brings Which Peace? Neutral versus Biased Mediation and Institutional Peace Arrangements in Civil Wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 446-469.
Swissint. (2016). Operation of the Swiss Armed Forces in the NNSC. 4 June 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160701234658/http://www.vtg.admin.ch/internet/vtg/en/home/themen/einsaetze/peace/korea.parsysrelated1.68745.downloadList.85423.DownloadFile.tmp/nnsc2016e.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2020.
The Korean Armistice Agreement. (1953). https://web.archive.org/web/20140305164517/http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/korea/kwarmagr072753.html. Accessed 15 February 2020.
Tomlinson, B.R. (2003). What was the Third World? Journal of Contemporary History, 38(2), 307-321.
UN. 84. (1950). Resolution of 7 July 1950 [S/1588]. http://unscr.com/files/1950/00084.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2020.
UN Security Council. (2008). Permanent Representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to the United Nations. August 12.
United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. (1970). The Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission in Korea (A Peacekeeping Operation). http://oldsite.nautilus.org/DPRKBriefingBook/armistice/NeutralNationsSpervisoryCommission1970.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2020.
Wachtmeister, Wilhelm. (1990). Neutrality and International Order. Naval War College Review, 43(2), 105-114.
Washington. (1957). National Security Report NSC 5702/2. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955-1957, Korea, 23(2). https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v23p2/d240. Accessed 29 December 2019.
Yale Law School Homepage, Laws of War: Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land (Hague V); October 18, 1907. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague05.asp. Accessed 30 December 2019.
Yang, Jun-seok. (2019). 6.25chŏnjaeng ihu han’gugŭi tongyurŏp insik: chungnipkukkamsiwiwŏndanŭl chungsimŭro [The Republic of Korea’s Perception of Eastern Europe after the Korean War: Focusing on the Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission in Korea] Tongyurŏppalk’anyŏn’gu, 43(2), 221-253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ban, K.J. Making Neutrality Credibly Work: The NNSC on the Korean Peninsula. East Asia 37, 349–368 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09342-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09342-x