Abstract
Contemporary young adults (18–29 years old) have experienced technology as a normative feature throughout their lives. The current case study was designed to understand how technology is used in young adult marital relationships and how these couples perceive that technology influences their relationships. Ten heterosexual young adult married couples (n = 20 individuals) completed daily diary surveys about their own and their partners technology use over seven consecutive days and each participant completed an individual in-depth interview. Results indicated no significant differences between spouses in time spent with technology (i.e., cell phones, computer/tablet, entertainment media, social networking sites). Couples indicated that technology facilitated both connection and distraction in their relationships. Further, all couples reported that they had rules for regulating technology use within their marriages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi, I. S., & Alghamdi, N. G. (2017). When flirting turns into infidelity: The Facebook dilemma. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 45, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1277804.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). New York: Elsevier.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
Carcary, M. (2009). The research audit trial—Enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7, 11–24.
Chesley, N. (2006). Families in a high-tech age. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05285187.
Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. (2011). “I luv u :)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x.
Cravens, J. D., Leckie, K. R., & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Facebook infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9231-5.
Dew, J., & Tulane, S. (2015). The association between time spent using entertainment media and marital quality in a contemporary dyadic national sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9427-y.
Dworkin, J., Rudi, J. H., & Hessel, H. (2018). The state of family research and social media. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12295.
Ferdous, H. S., Ploderer, B., Davis, H., Vetere, F., & O'Hara, K. (2015, December). Pairing technology and meals: A contextual enquiry in the family household. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the australian special interest group for computer human interaction (pp. 370–379). New York: ACM.
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051.
Helsper, E. J., & Whitty, M. T. (2010). Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.006.
Hertlein, K. (2012). Digital dwelling: technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61, 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x.
Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86.
Lee, Y. G., & Bhargava, V. (2004). Leisure time: Do married and single individuals spend it differently? Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 32, 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X03261631.
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065.
McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031.
McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., Cravens, J. D., & Drouin, M. (2018). “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019.
Morgan, P., Hubler, D. S., Payne, P. B., Pomeroy, C., Gregg, D., & Homer, M. (2017). My partner’s media use: A qualitative study exploring perceptions of problems with a partner’s media use. Marriage & Family Review, 53(7), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2016.1263589.
Nielson (2018). Time flies: U.S. adults now spend nearly half a day interacting with media. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/time-flies-us-adults-now-spend-nearly-half-a-day-interacting-with-media.html.
Northrup, J., & Smith, J. (2016). Effects of Facebook maintenance behaviors on partners’ experience of love. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9379-5.
Norton, A. M., Baptist, J., & Hogan, B. (2018). Computer-mediated communication in intimate relationships: Associations of boundary crossing, intrusion, relationship satisfaction, and partner responsiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12246.
Pantic, I. (2014). Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0070.
Perrin, A., & Jiang, J. (2018). About a quarter of U.S. adults say they are ‘almost constantly’ online. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/14/about-a-quarter-of-americans-report-going-online-almost-constantly/.
Perry, S. L., & Schleifer, C. (2018). Till porn do us part? A longitudinal examination of pornography use and divorce. The Journal of Sex Research, 55, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1317709.
Pew Research Center. (2017). About 6 in 10 young adults in U.S. primarily use online streaming to watch TV. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/13/about-6-in-10-young-adults-in-u-s-primarily-use-online-streaming-to-watch-tv/.
Pew Research Center. (2018a). Internet/broadband factsheet. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/.
Pew Research Center. (2018b). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2012). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
Ruppel, E. K. (2014). Use of communication technologies in romantic relationships: Self-disclosure and the role of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514541075.
Rus, H. M., & Tiemensma, J. (2017). “It's complicated”. A systematic review of associations between social network site use and romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.004.
Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005.
Schumm, W. R., Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., et al. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/352405.
Seidman, G., Langlais, M., & Havens, A. (2017). Romantic relationship-oriented Facebook activities and the satisfaction of belonging needs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000165.
Siebert, C. F., & Siebert, D. C. (2018). Data analysis with small samples and non-normal data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.
Spencer, T. A., Lambertsen, A., Hubler, D. S., & Burr, B. K. (2017). Assessing the mediating effect of relationship dynamics between perceptions of problematic media use and relationship satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9407-0.
Stake, R. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
Tremblay, M. S., Colley, R. C., Saunders, T. J., Healy, G. N., & Owen, N. (2010). Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 35, 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1139/H10-079.
United States Census Bureau. (2018a). People are waiting to get married. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2018/comm/married.html.
United States Census Bureau. (2018b). Percent married among 18-to 34-year-olds: 1978 and 2018. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2018/comm/percent-married.html.
Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2014). Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce: Survey and state-level evidence from the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.034.
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7.
Vaterlaus, J. M. (2017). Yik Yak: An exploratory study of college student uses and gratifications. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 37, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617738902.
Vaterlaus, J. M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., & Young, J. A. (2016). “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029.
Vaterlaus, J. M., Cottle, N. M., Patten, E. V., & Gibbons, R. (2018). Understanding customers: The jobs to be done theory applied in the context of a rural food pantry. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 118, 1895–1902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.011.
Vaterlaus, J. M., Jones, R. M., Patten, E. V., & Cook, J. L. (2015). An exploratory study of time spent with interactive technology and body mass among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.035.
Vaterlaus, J. M., & Tulane, S. (2015). Digital generation gaps in parent–adolescent relationships. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family Communication in the Digital Age (pp. 426–446). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Vaterlaus, J. M., & Tulane, S. (2019). The perceived influence of interactive technology on marital relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09494-w.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Montana State University's Undergraduate Scholars Program (Grant No. 2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interests.
Informed Consent
A University Institutional Review Board approved the informed consent procedures and an informed consent form was signed by each participant.
Research Involving Human and Animal Rights
Human participants were recruited for this study. No animals were involved in this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaterlaus, J.M., Stinson, R. & McEwen, M. Technology Use in Young Adult Marital Relationships: A Case Study Approach. Contemp Fam Ther 42, 394–407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-020-09538-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-020-09538-6