Abstract
The paper poses the question of how the use of external artifacts contributes to the stabilization of meaning and thought. On the basis of the private language argument and the problem of objective meaning, I argue that Wittgenstein’s considerations regarding meaning-making should be sensitive to how materiality bears on the interactions with semiotic artifacts produced in speech and writing. The distributed language perspective and the concept of languaging (Cowley 2011, 2007; Steffensen 2011) is then linked to a metacognitive theory of writing (Goody 1977; Olson 1994, 2016) to clarify how social and material settings contribute to the lived experience and metalinguistic awareness that is essential to meaning-making. It is argued that, if material characteristics of symbolizations change metalinguistic awareness, the interpretation of the private language argument partly depends on the types of external artifacts the private linguist is allowed to exploit. The frameworks of distributed language and the theory of writing thus shed new light on the private language argument by making it even more radical than has previously been assumed.
About the author
Marcin Trybulec (b. 1980) is an Assistant Professor at Maria Curie-Skłodowska University. His research interests include epistemology of cognitive artefacts, literacy theory, and philosophy of language and communication. His publications include “How the ‘Extended Mind’ thesis helps to solve a fundamental dilemma of literacy theory” (2013), “Bridging the gap between writing and cognition” (2013), “External representations reconsidered: Against reification of cognitive extensions” (2017), “Rationality in the material world” (2018).
Note
The research is supported by National Science Center, Poland, under the grant Understanding Cognitive Artifacts: Towards the Epistemology of Cognitive Extensions, no. 2017/26/D/HS1/00677.
Acknowledgement
In writing this paper I have benefited considerably from inspiration and support from Stephen J. Cowley. I thank also Zuzanna Rucinska for her insightful criticism on an earlier draft of the paper.
References
Austin, John L. 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Harvard University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Candlish, Stewart & George Wrisley. 2014. Private language. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2019 edition). At https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/private-language/ (accessed: 05 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. 1990. The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1985. Linguistic difference produced by differences between speaking and writing. In David Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing, 105–124. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Cowley, Stephen J. 2007. The cognitive dynamics of distributed language. Language Sciences 29(5). 575–583.10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Cowley, Stephen J. 2009. Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(3). 495–508.10.1075/pc.17.3.01cowSearch in Google Scholar
Cowley, Stephen J. 2011. Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology 23(3). 185–209.10.1080/10407413.2011.591272Search in Google Scholar
Cowley, Stephen J. 2019. The return of languaging Toward a new ecolinguistics. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15(4). 483–512.10.1515/css-2019-0027Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1998. The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Devlin, Keith. 1997. Goodbye, Descartes: The end of logic and the search for a new cosmology of the mind. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. 1996. A Wittgenstein dictionary. Oxford, UK ; Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631185376.1996.xSearch in Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1977. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Homer, Bruce D. 2009. Literacy and metalinguistic development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 487–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609664.027Search in Google Scholar
Homer, Bruce D. & David R. Olson. 1999. Literacy and children’s conception of words. Written Language & Literacy 2(1). 113–140.10.1075/wll.2.1.07homSearch in Google Scholar
Jarvilehto, Timo, Veli-Matti Nurkkala & Kyösti Koskela. 2009. The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(3). 509–526.10.1075/pc.17.3.02jarSearch in Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 2005. Wittgenstein. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470776643Search in Google Scholar
Kravchenko, Alexander V. 2009. The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(3). 527–548.10.1075/pc.17.3.03kraSearch in Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2004. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203342763Search in Google Scholar
Love, Nigel. 2007. Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences 29(5). 690–709.10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Charles K. Ogden & Ivor A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, 296–336. London: K. Paul, Trend, Trubner.Search in Google Scholar
Molière. 2001. The Middle Class Gentleman. Project Gutenberg. www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2992#download (accessed: 01 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Morais, Jose, Paul Bertelson, Luz Cary & Jesus Alegria. 1986. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition 24(1). 45–64.10.1016/0010-0277(86)90004-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Olson, David R. 1994. The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of reading and writing. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Olson, David R. 1996. Towards a psychology of literacy: on the relations between speech and writing. Cognition 60(1). 83–104.10.1016/0010-0277(96)00705-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Olson, David R. 2013. Writing, the discovery of language, and the discovery of mind. Dialogue and Universalism 23(1). 9–14.10.5840/du201323115Search in Google Scholar
Olson, David R. 2016. The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316678466Search in Google Scholar
Prechtl, Peter. 1999. Sprachphilosophie: Lehrbuch Philosophie. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-05029-8Search in Google Scholar
Prechtl, Peter. (ed.). 2004. Grundbegriffe der analytischen Philosophie. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-05070-0Search in Google Scholar
Read, Charles, Yun-Fei Zhang, Hong-Yin Nie & Bao-Qing Ding. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24(1). 31–44.10.1016/0010-0277(86)90003-XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1996. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Steffensen, Sune. V. 2011. Beyond mind: an extended ecology of languaging. In Stephen J. Cowley, Distributed language, 185–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/bct.34.10steSearch in Google Scholar
Trybulec, Marcin. 2013. Bridging the gap between writing and cognition: Materiality of written vehicles reconsidered. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(3). 469–483.10.1075/pc.21.3.03trySearch in Google Scholar
Trybulec, Marcin. 2017. External representations reconsidered: Against reification of cognitive extensions. Avant : Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard 7(1). 229–244.10.26913/80102017.0101.0014Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. (G. E. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
